Clinical Research in Cardiology

, Volume 107, Issue 4, pp 271–280 | Cite as

Cardio-oncology: conflicting priorities of anticancer treatment and cardiovascular outcome

Open Access
Review

Abstract

Background

This article about the emerging field of cardio-oncology highlights typical side effects of oncological therapies in the cardiovascular system, cardiovascular complications of malignancies itself, and potential preventive or therapeutic modalities.

Methods

We performed a selective literature search in PubMed until September 2016.

Results

Cardiovascular events in cancer patients can be frequently attributed to oncological therapies or to the underlying malignancy itself. Furthermore, many patients with cancer have pre-existing cardiovascular diseases that can be aggravated by the malignancy or its therapy. Cardiovascular abnormalities in oncological patients comprise a broad spectrum from alterations in electrophysiological, laboratory or imaging tests to the occurrence of thromboembolic, ischemic or rhythmological events and the impairment of left ventricular function or manifest heart failure.

Discussion

A close interdisciplinary collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists/angiologists as well as an increased awareness of potential cardiovascular complications could improve clinical care of cancer patients and provides a basis for an improved understanding of underlying mechanisms of cardiovascular morbidity.

Keywords

Cardiotoxicity Side effects Cardio-oncology Onco-cardiology 

Introduction

Scientific advances have led to a steady increase in survival rates of many oncologic entities within in the last decades. With more patients surviving their cancer, long-term side effects of oncologic therapies warrant consideration. In particular, cardiotoxic side effects following cancer therapy account for a relevant decrease in quality of life and mortality. On the other hand, a hasty withdrawal or de-escalation of oncologic therapy with the first appearance of cardiovascular side effects might worsen long-term prognosis. Combined chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy can have synergistic or additive effects on the risk for cardiac complications and increase the cardiotoxic potential [1]. Cardiotoxicity of a certain therapy is difficult to predict for the individual patient as multiple factors contribute to an unknown extent (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Multifactorial cardiovascular risk model for the occurrence of cardiotoxic effects in oncologic patients

Patients with increased cardiovascular risk profiles are more prone to chemotherapy-associated cardiac dysfunction and deterioration of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases [2, 3]. However, even when adjusting for cardiovascular risk, there is still a high variability regarding the individual susceptibility to cardiotoxic effects. Subsequently, genetics and genotyping have gained more attention within the last decade [4, 5]. Aside from iatrogenic cardiotoxicity, there is also some evidence for the cancer itself affecting cardiac function and exercise performance, measured by peak oxygen consumption [6]. Accordingly, different preclinical models have described cancer-related myocardial atrophy, cardiac remodeling and cellular dysfunction, which are summarized as cardiac cachexia [7].

Distinguishing tumor associated or iatrogenic cardiotoxicity from inherent cardiac diseases is one of the tasks of the still young field of cardio-oncology. Further tasks include the interdisciplinary management of patients with cardiac tumors or metastases, myocardial, endocardial or pericardial complications, therapy-induced ischemia or arrhythmias, vascular complications, and venous thromboembolism. This review gives an overview of major cardiovascular implications of oncologic diseases and therapies.

Myocardial dysfunction

Myocardial dysfunction is a frequent complication of various oncologic therapies. Although there is no generally accepted definition of therapy-induced cardiotoxicity, echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is still the most commonly used parameter to diagnose toxic cardiomyopathy [8, 9]. A symptomatic or asymptomatic decrease in LVEF of more than 10% to less than 50% is considered clinically relevant [10, 11]. In patients with symptoms or signs of heart failure but with preserved ejection fraction, echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function should be performed and natriuretic peptide should be measured [11]. Recent data do also suggest that strain and strain rate analysis might be important alone or in combination with biomarkers, to assess the individual course of cardiotoxicity in oncological patients [12].

In recent years, two distinct forms of cardiotoxicity have been described—a dose-dependent, cumulative, mostly irreversible form and a reversible, dose-independent type; see Table 1. The dose-independent type of cardiotoxicity is usually not associated with structural damage of cardiomyocytes, thus, chemotherapy can often be resumed after a short pause or in mild forms be continued [13, 14].

Table 1

Characteristics of type-1 and type-2-cardiotoxicity.

Modified from [15]

Drugs

Histopathology

Reversibility

Dose-dependency

Prognostic value

Doxorubicin

Daunorubicin Epirubicin

Idarubicin

Mitoxantrone

Cyclophosphamide

Apoptosis, necrosis-damaged sarcomeres

No (partially responsive to heart failure therapy)

Yes

Associated with increased mortality

Trastuzumab

Sunitinib

Lapatinib

Imatinib

Myocyte dysfunction

Yes (in most cases)

No

Not associated with increased mortality

This classification might facilitate therapeutic decisions, but has limitations when it comes to the individual patient’s prognosis regarding cardiac function. In addition, chemotherapeutic drugs are often applied as combination therapies or are administered sequentially. Thus, the interaction of diverse toxic effects makes it difficult to distinguish between different pathomechanisms.

The best-known example of cardiotoxicity is anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Similar effects, however, have also been shown for other chemotherapeutic agents like cyclophosphamide [16]. Anthracyclines may infrequently cause acute, dose-independent, and reversible cardiac dysfunction directly following infusion, which is to be distinguished from dose-dependent chronic cardiomyopathy. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress seem to play an important role in its pathomechanism leading to a decrease in myocardial mass, cardiac remodeling and ultimately cardiac dysfunction [17, 18]. Approximately 5% of patients treated with a cumulative dose of 400–450 mg/m2 doxorubicin develop heart failure; the proportion increases to 10% in elderly patients [19, 20]. Once a cumulative dose of more than 300 mg/m2 doxorubicin has been administered, the addition of dexrazoxane can be considered to decrease toxicity [17, 21]. However, a general recommendation for dexrazoxane cannot be given as it might decrease the efficacy of anthracycline therapy. Other cardioprotective measures include the usage of liposomal formulas and prolonged infusions (more than 30 min). However, a potential decrease in efficacy is also assumed for these measures.

Heart failure therapy in oncologic patients follows the same principles as in other patients and has shown some reversibility even in chronic anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy when initiated early [22]. In contrast, preventive heart failure therapy accompanying chemotherapy or radiation in the absence of heart failure is discussed controversially [23, 24, 25]. There might be, however, beneficial effects in high-risk populations, namely, patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with anthracyclines [26, 27]. Accordingly, current recommendations consider a preventive cardioprotective therapy for patients at high-risk cardiac complications [10].

In order to monitor patients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction as well as to identify patients with an increased cardiac risk, echocardiography, ECG, and measurement of biomarkers such as natriuretic peptide (BNP or nt-proBNP) or (high-sensitive) troponin are recommended (Fig. 2). The value of routine measurements of cardiac biomarkers to monitor asymptomatic patients without any pre-existing cardiac conditions is still uncertain as the clinical significance of minor changes is yet to be elucidated. With this in mind, cardiac biomarkers can still be useful to track minor subclinical changes in cardiac function, which might influence decisions on oncologic treatment strategies or preventive measures [10].

Fig. 2

Cardiac monitoring of patients during potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapy. *Reassessment with discontinuation of cardiotoxic therapy vs. dose reduction vs. change of chemotherapeutic drug vs. unmodified continuation of oncologic treatment. **Optional. BP blood pressure measurement, ECG electrocardiogram, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, ACEI angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ARB angiotensin receptor blockers, ASA acetylsalicylic acid

Venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in cancer patients. The risk for VTE is 4–7 times increased in cancer patients compared to persons without malignancy [28]. The risk for VTE depends on the type of malignancy, the stage of disease, the oncologic treatment, and patient-specific factors (Table 2). Suspected VTE in cancer patients is usually clarified by diagnostic imaging, i.e., compression ultrasound for deep vein thrombosis, and CT-angiography for pulmonary embolism, respectively [29]. d-dimers are often unspecifically increased and should not be used to rule out VTE in cancer patients [29]. Low molecular heparins (LMH) are first-line therapy during the first 3–6 months after diagnosis and are usually followed by long-term anticoagulation as long as the cancer is active [29]. This also applies to catheter-associated intravenous thrombosis as long as the catheter is functional, in use, and shows no signs of bacterial infection.

Table 2

Thromboembolic risk factors in oncologic patients

Risk

Description

Individual risk

Age [30]

Positive anamnesis or family history for VTE [31]

Hereditary thrombophilia (e.g., factor-V-Leiden mutation) [32]

Life style (obesity, lack of physical exercise, smoking) [30, 33]

Oral contraceptive therapy

Ethnicity (increased risk in Afro-Americans) [34]

Risk of tumor entity and stage

Tumor entity (high risk with pancreatic, gastric, renal, lung or ovarian cancer as well as lymphoma and malign brain tumors) [30, 32, 33, 34]

Metastasized disease stage [30, 32, 34]

First 3–6 months following diagnosis [32, 34]

Thrombocytosis before initiation of chemotherapy [33]

Increased inflammatory markers

Increased d-dimers

Oncologic therapy

Surgery [35]

Radiation

Chemotherapy [28, 31]

Hormone therapy [36]

Immune therapy

Antiangiogenic therapy [37, 38]

Other risk factors

Blood transfusions

Drugs stimulating erythropoiesis (e.g., erythropoietin) [33]

Central venous catheter (e.g., port systems) [39]

Immobilization, hospitalization [30, 31]

Dehydration due to vomiting or diarrhea

An increased incidence of VTE has been described for cisplatin, bevacizumab (angiogenesis inhibitor), tamoxifen (selective estrogen receptor blocker), and sunitinib and sorafenib (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) [36, 37, 38, 40]. Routine prophylactic anticoagulation, however, is not recommended in cancer patients, even when the above-mentioned drugs are administered [29, 41]. Aside from the lack of clinical data, the increased risk for major bleedings and the comparatively low incidence of VTEs in an outpatient setting support this recommendation [42]. In contrast, the benefit of a prolonged thrombosis prophylaxis following major abdominal or pelvic tumor surgery is well-described [35]. Furthermore, patients suffering from multiple myeloma and who are treated with lenalidomide or thalidomide should routinely receive anticoagulation therapy [41, 43, 44]. Prophylactic therapy is also recommended for hospitalized cancer patients with active disease [41]. Other situations (e.g., bed-ridden patients) need individual decisions.

Endocardial complications/endocarditis

Thrombotic endocarditis

Thrombotic endocarditis (TE) is a form of non-bacterial endocarditis affecting mainly patients with advanced cancer stages [45]. Often patients remain asymptomatic as long as no arterial embolization occurs. Distinguishing TE form infectious endocarditis (IE) can be challenging. A disseminated embolic distribution pattern and low inflammatory markers are indicative of TE [46]. TE is also likely if echocardiographic criteria of endocarditis are met but blood cultures remain negative or if there is no clinical response to antibiotic therapy. Other causes of blood culture-negative endocarditis should be ruled out. Vegetations are most commonly located to left ventricular valves, specifically at the ventricular side of the aortic valve and atrial side of the mitral valve [47]. Surgical therapy is rarely needed. Besides treating the underlying disease, systemic anticoagulation therapy is indicated to prevent thromboembolic complications [48, 49].

Infectious endocarditis

Intravascular foreign bodies (e.g., catheter-systems) as well as an altered immune response enable the development of IE in cancer patients. Due to a lack of data regarding the incidence of IE in cancer patients, IE prophylaxis, diagnosis, and therapy follows the same guidelines as in other patients with IE [50]. Every diagnosed catheter-associated infection in combination with at least one positive peripheral blood culture should be considered for further evaluation by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) if indicated. Lack of adequate clinical response (e.g., persistent fever or persistent positive blood cultures) or the presence of additional risk factors (e.g., artificial heart valves, pace-maker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator) warrant echocardiographic evaluation.

As cancer patients are prone to IE, IE might also be the first complication of undiagnosed cancer. IE is associated with an increased risk for cancer, in particular hematologic or intraabdominal malignancies [51]. For example, due to a strong association with colorectal cancer, guidelines recommend to perform a colonoscopy if S. bovis or S. gallolyticus has been detected in blood cultures [50].

Hedinger’s syndrome

Paraneoplastic processes might also favor valvulopathy. Patients suffering from certain types of neuroendocrine tumors, carcinoids, gradually develop right ventricular endocardial fibrosis. This paraneoplastic process eventually leads to Hedinger’s syndrome which is characterized by a degeneration and restriction of the tricuspid and pulmonary valve. Therapy focuses primarily on the treatment of the underlying disease [52]. The valvulopathy and subsequent right ventricular failure is treated primarily with diuretics and in some cases with surgical valve replacement [53].

Pericardial complications

A newly diagnosed pericardial effusion might represent the first sign of an underlying malignancy. Cytological analysis of the pericardial effusion and peri-/epicardial biopsies should be pursued [54, 55, 56]. Almost 2/3 of pericardial effusions in cancer patients, however, are not caused by direct tumor infiltration, but are due to paraneoplastic processes, former radiation, or due to an opportunistic infection [56]. If cardiac tamponade is imminent, pericardiocentesis should be performed promptly. Pericardial effusions often re-occur in these patients and are difficult to manage. Radiotherapy might likely lead to a reduction of the associated pericardial effusion in the presence of radiation sensitive tumors. However, radiotherapy itself is also associated with pericardial effusion although the use of modern protocols has reduced its occurrence [57]. Pericardial fenestration might provide symptomatic control with frequently recurring pericardial effusions [54, 58]. In some cases, intrapericardial application of cytostatic or sclerosing agents might represent the only feasible therapy [54, 56, 59, 60]. As pericardial involvement often implies a palliative stage, control of symptoms and improving quality of life should be the primary focus of any therapy.

Arterial hypertension

Arterial hypertension has been associated with various chemotherapeutic agents [61]. Drugs modifying the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway frequently increase systemic blood pressure [62]. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also associated with an increase in systemic blood pressure, which occurs often as early as a few hours after initiation of treatment [62]. A disturbance in endothelial function and alterations on the capillary level are likely pathomechanisms linked to this effect [63]. Patients receiving chemotherapeutic agents associated with arterial hypertension should be screened on a weekly basis for arterial hypertension during the first cycle [61]. The interval can be prolonged to 2 or 3 weeks in time [61]. Discontinuation of the chemotherapeutic drug should be considered in patients with a hypertensive crisis or a persistent systolic blood pressure over 180 mmHg despite adequate antihypertensive therapy [61]. In general, blood pressure therapy in cancer patients follows the same principles as in other patients with the exception that diuretics should be used with particular caution because of potential electrolyte impairments in cancer patients. In addition, drug interactions require particular care in choosing the most appropriate antihypertensive therapy as some chemotherapeutic and antihypertensive drugs share the same metabolic pathways.

Arteriosclerosis and complications

Atherosclerotic processes usually evolve over several years before symptoms occur. This latency might contribute to the fact that the effect of chemotherapeutic agents on blood vessels is still not well understood. Furthermore, cancer and atherosclerosis share the most potent risk factor: smoking [64]. The co-prevalence of different cancers and clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis complicates the distinction between toxic side effects of chemotherapy and pre-existing cardiovascular risk. However, for some chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin, bleomycin, and etoposide, an increased long-term risk for cardiovascular and atherosclerotic complications has been confirmed [65, 66]. These long-term effects have to be distinguished from acute vascular events caused by arterial thrombosis, which might lead to thrombotic occlusion of coronary vessels in the absence of coronary artery disease [67]. Substances such as 5-FU and capecitabine, or paclitaxel, gemcitabine, rituximab, and sorafenib have been linked to vascular spasm and Raynaud phenomenon, angina pectoris, and even myocardial infarction [68, 69, 70].

While more clinical research is needed to understand long-term arterial complications of chemotherapy, long-term effects of radiotherapy on blood vessels is comparatively well studied. Inflammatory processes lead to atherosclerotic lesions in irradiated vessels [71]. Patients with pre-existing coronary artery disease or a high cardiovascular risk profile are particularly prone to cardiovascular events following radiation [71]. Accordingly, adults that underwent radiotherapy of the chest during childhood have a significantly elevated risk for myocardial infarction, even in the absence of other cardiovascular risk factors [72, 73]. Radiation of the head and neck increases the cerebrovascular event rate and radiation of the pelvis might trigger the development of peripheral artery disease [74]. Apart from a few exceptions, there are no differences with regard to therapy and secondary prophylaxis when compared to non-irradiated patients [75]. As an example, carotid artery stenting might be preferred over carotid endarterectomy in patients with prior radical neck dissection and radiation therapy who require treatment for carotid stenosis, because of an increased rate of wound complications and kidney failure in patients undergoing surgery [76].

Pulmonary hypertension

The exact prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in cancer patients is unknown. Initial, mostly exercise-induced symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, dizziness, and infrequently angina are unspecific. In addition to chronic thrombembolia, PH is frequently caused by drug-induced chemotoxicity. Especially alkylating agents (e.g., cyclophosphamide) have been associated with PH. Furthermore, radiotherapy of the chest has been associated with veno-occlusive PH. Most often, however, the development of PH in cancer patients has a multifactorial etiology. Post-capillary PH due to left ventricular dysfunction should be distinguished from pulmonary tissue disease or chronic thromboembolic PH as treatment and prognosis vary. Diagnostic workup should take into account the patient’s individual prognosis [77]. Echocardiography often provides the first clues for the presence of PH. To diagnose PH and distinguish post-capillary from other forms of PH, right heart catheterization should be performed. In the presence of right heart failure and volume overload, diuretics provide symptomatic relieve. PH therapy depends on the underlying processes and should follow current guidelines [77]. However, adaptations might be necessary due to altered life expectancy and drug interactions.

Arrhythmias

As more attention is paid to cardiotoxic side effects, more and more oncologic treatment regimens are being linked to a wide variety of electrophysiological changes and arrhythmias [78]. Although associated with an increased overall long-term mortality, arrhythmias related to chemotherapy are mostly transient and not life-threatening [79]. The diagnostic workup should include a 12 lead ECG, Holter monitoring, echocardiography and a laboratory workup with serum electrolytes and renal function tests.

Chemotherapy-induced arrhythmia has been documented for anthracyclines, taxanes, and cyclophosphamide. A short infusion duration of anthracyclines increases the likelihood for transient supraventricular arrhythmia and ventricular premature beats (VPB) following administration [80]. Taxane therapy might lead to sinus bradycardia and first-degree atrioventricular block in some patients, which usually do not require any further therapy [81]. Up to 10% of all patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide develop supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmia within the first 3 days after administration [78, 82]. Patients with perimyocarditis or other chemotoxic side effects are at increased risk [78, 82].

In addition, many chemotherapeutic drugs can lead to QT-prolongation. Chemotoxic side effects like diarrhea or vomiting as well as antiemetic drugs and psychotropic medication can enhance QT-prolongation [82]. Susceptibility to torsades de pointes tachycardia with potential conversion to ventricular fibrillation depends on the chemotherapeutic drug used [83, 84, 85]. Therefore, there is no general recommendation concerning a QTc-interval, at which chemotherapy should be suspended [85].

While the above-mentioned transient arrhythmias are mostly direct side effects and resolve when chemotherapy is suspended, chronic or recurrent arrhythmias are often due to structural myocardial damage caused by chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., anthracyclines) [80]. Myocardial scarring of the cardiac conduction system caused by chest radiotherapy leads to atrioventricular blocks [86, 87]. Rarely, myocardial tumor infiltration or pericardial metastasis might be the cause of arrhythmia, which are usually associated with a poor prognosis and should be treated symptomatically.

Beside arrhythmias, recent data indicate that resting heart rate alone could serve as a predictive marker for patients with colorectal, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer [88].

Conclusion

The challenge of cardio-oncology is getting the right diagnosis from merely unspecific symptoms in order to balance the urgent and often life-saving oncologic therapy against cardiotoxic side effects limiting quality of life and long-term survival. Thus, a close collaboration between oncologists/hematologists and cardiologists is crucial. Cancer patients should, therefore, be seen by a cardiologist before, during and after a potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of cancer-related cardiovascular risks and to develop parameters for a better cardiovascular risk stratification of cancer patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Schlitt A, Jordan K, Vordermark D, Schwamborn J, Langer T, Thomssen C (2014) Cardiotoxicity and oncological treatments. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111(10):161–168.  https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0161 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kravchenko J, Berry M, Arbeev K, Kim Lyerly H, Yashin A, Akushevich I (2015) Cardiovascular comorbidities and survival of lung cancer patients: medicare data based analysis. Lung Cancer 88(1):85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.01.006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hershman DL, McBride RB, Eisenberger A, Tsai WY, Grann VR, Jacobson JS (2008) Doxorubicin, cardiac risk factors, and cardiac toxicity in elderly patients with diffuse B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 26(19):3159–3165.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1242 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deng S, Wojnowski L (2007) Genotyping the risk of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Cardiovasc Toxicol 7(2):129–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12012-007-0024-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhatia S (2011) Role of genetic susceptibility in development of treatment-related adverse outcomes in cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20(10):2048–2067.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cramer L, Hildebrandt B, Kung T, Wichmann K, Springer J, Doehner W, Sandek A, Valentova M, Stojakovic T, Scharnagl H, Riess H, Anker SD, von Haehling S (2014) Cardiovascular function and predictors of exercise capacity in patients with colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(13):1310–1319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.948 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murphy KT (2016) The pathogenesis and treatment of cardiac atrophy in cancer cachexia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 310(4):H466–H477.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00720.2015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aleman BM, Moser EC, Nuver J, Suter TM, Maraldo MV, Specht L, Vrieling C, Darby SC (2014) Cardiovascular disease after cancer therapy. EJC Suppl 12(1):18–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin M, Esteva FJ, Alba E, Khandheria B, Perez-Isla L, Garcia-Saenz JA, Marquez A, Sengupta P, Zamorano J (2009) Minimizing cardiotoxicity while optimizing treatment efficacy with trastuzumab: review and expert recommendations. Oncologist 14(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0137 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Munoz D, Aboyans V, Asteggiano R, Galderisi M, Habib G, Lenihan DJ, Lip GY, Lyon AR, Lopez Fernandez T, Mohty D, Piepoli MF, Tamargo J, Torbicki A, Suter TM, Authors/Task Force M, Guidelines ESCCfP (2016) 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: the task force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw211 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GM, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P (2016) 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 69(12):1167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2016.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim KD, Plana JC, Woo A, Marwick TH (2014) Use of myocardial strain imaging by echocardiography for the early detection of cardiotoxicity in patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(25 Pt A):2751–2768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.073 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ewer MS, Lippman SM (2005) Type II chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction: time to recognize a new entity. J Clin Oncol 23(13):2900–2902.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.827 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keefe DL (2002) Trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity. Cancer 95(7):1592–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10854 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ewer MS, Ewer SM (2010) Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: What the cardiologist needs to know. Nat Rev Cardiol 7(10):564–575.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.121 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dhesi S, Chu MP, Blevins G, Paterson I, Larratt L, Oudit GY, Kim DH (2013) Cyclophosphamide-induced cardiomyopathy: a case report, review, and recommendations for management. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 1(1):2324709613480346.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2324709613480346 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wouters KA, Kremer LC, Miller TL, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE (2005) Protecting against anthracycline-induced myocardial damage: a review of the most promising strategies. Br J Haematol 131(5):561–578.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05759.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Minotti G, Cairo G, Monti E (1999) Role of iron in anthracycline cardiotoxicity: new tunes for an old song? FASEB J 13(2):199–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wojnowski L, Kulle B, Schirmer M, Schluter G, Schmidt A, Rosenberger A, Vonhof S, Bickeboller H, Toliat MR, Suk EK, Tzvetkov M, Kruger A, Seifert S, Kloess M, Hahn H, Loeffler M, Nurnberg P, Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Brockmoller J, Hasenfuss G (2005) NAD(P)H oxidase and multidrug resistance protein genetic polymorphisms are associated with doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Circulation 112(24):3754–3762.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.576850 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swain SM, Whaley FS, Ewer MS (2003) Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin—a retrospective analysis of three trials. Cancer 97(11):2869–2879.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11407 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hensley ML, Hagerty KL, Kewalramani T, Green DM, Meropol NJ, Wasserman TH, Cohen GI, Emami B, Gradishar WJ, Mitchell RB, Thigpen JT, Trotti A, 3rd, von Hoff D, Schuchter LM (2009) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 clinical practice guideline update: use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy protectants. J Clin Oncol 27 (1):127–145.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2627 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cardinale D, Colombo A, Bacchiani G, Tedeschi I, Meroni CA, Veglia F, Civelli M, Lamantia G, Colombo N, Curigliano G, Fiorentini C, Cipolla CM (2015) Early detection of anthracycline cardiotoxicity and improvement with heart failure therapy. Circulation 131(22):1981–1988.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013777 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Georgakopoulos P, Roussou P, Matsakas E, Karavidas A, Anagnostopoulos N, Marinakis T, Galanopoulos A, Georgiakodis F, Zimeras S, Kyriakidis M, Ahimastos A (2010) Cardioprotective effect of metoprolol and enalapril in doxorubicin-treated lymphoma patients: a prospective, parallel-group, randomized, controlled study with 36-month follow-up. Am J Hematol 85(11):894–896.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.21840 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bosch X, Rovira M, Sitges M, Domenech A, Ortiz-Perez JT, de Caralt TM, Morales-Ruiz M, Perea RJ, Monzo M, Esteve J (2013) Enalapril and carvedilol for preventing chemotherapy-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with malignant hemopathies: the OVERCOME trial (preventiOn of left Ventricular dysfunction with Enalapril and caRvedilol in patients submitted to intensive ChemOtherapy for the treatment of Malignant hEmopathies). J Am Coll Cardiol 61(23):2355–2362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dessi M, Madeddu C, Piras A, Cadeddu C, Antoni G, Mercuro G, Mantovani G (2013) Long-term, up to 18 months, protective effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker telmisartan on Epirubin-induced inflammation and oxidative stress assessed by serial strain rate. Springerplus 2(1):198.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-198 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yun S, Vincelette ND, Abraham I (2015) Cardioprotective role of beta-blockers and angiotensin antagonists in early-onset anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J 91(1081):627–633.  https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133535 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gulati G, Heck SL, Ree AH, Hoffmann P, Schulz-Menger J, Fagerland MW, Gravdehaug B, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Bratland A, Storas TH, Hagve TA, Rosjo H, Steine K, Geisler J, Omland T (2016) Prevention of cardiac dysfunction during adjuvant breast cancer therapy (PRADA): a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of candesartan and metoprolol. Eur Heart J.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw022 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (2000) Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 160 (6):809–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S2-Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie der Venenthrombose und der Lungenembolie (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Fisher RI, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH (2006) Thromboembolism in hospitalized neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24(3):484–490.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.8877 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kroger K, Weiland D, Ose C, Neumann N, Weiss S, Hirsch C, Urbanski K, Seeber S, Scheulen ME (2006) Risk factors for venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients. Ann Oncol 17(2):297–303.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdj068 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR (2005) Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 293(6):715–722.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.6.715 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Lyman GH (2005) Risk factors for chemotherapy-associated venous thromboembolism in a prospective observational study. Cancer 104(12):2822–2829.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21496 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chew HK, Wun T, Harvey D, Zhou H, White RH (2006) Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers. Arch Intern Med 166(4):458–464.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.4.458 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bergqvist D, Agnelli G, Cohen AT, Eldor A, Nilsson PE, Le Moigne-Amrani A, Dietrich-Neto F, Investigators EI (2002) Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med 346(13):975–980.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012385 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Petrelli F, Cabiddu M, Borgonovo K, Barni S (2012) Risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events associated with anti-EGFR agents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ann Oncol 23(7):1672–1679.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr592 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Choueiri TK, Schutz FA, Je Y, Rosenberg JE, Bellmunt J (2010) Risk of arterial thromboembolic events with sunitinib and sorafenib: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 28(13):2280–2285.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2757 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nalluri SR, Chu D, Keresztes R, Zhu X, Wu S (2008) Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300(19):2277–2285.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.656 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cortelezzi A, Moia M, Falanga A, Pogliani EM, Agnelli G, Bonizzoni E, Gussoni G, Barbui T, Mannucci PM, Group CS (2005) Incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with haematological malignancies with central venous catheters: a prospective multicentre study. Br J Haematol 129(6):811–817.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05529.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moore RA, Adel N, Riedel E, Bhutani M, Feldman DR, Tabbara NE, Soff G, Parameswaran R, Hassoun H (2011) High incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a large retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3466–3473.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5669 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A, Clarke-Pearson D, Flowers C, Jahanzeb M, Kakkar A, Kuderer NM, Levine MN, Liebman H, Mendelson D, Raskob G, Somerfield MR, Thodiyil P, Trent D, Francis CW, American Society of Clinical O (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline: recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 25 (34):5490–5505.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1283 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Haas SK, Freund M, Heigener D, Heilmann L, Kemkes-Matthes B, von Tempelhoff GF, Melzer N, Kakkar AK, Investigators T (2012) Low-molecular-weight heparin versus placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in metastatic breast cancer or stage III/IV lung cancer. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 18(2):159–165.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029611433769 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bennett CL, Angelotta C, Yarnold PR, Evens AM, Zonder JA, Raisch DW, Richardson P (2006) Thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thromboembolism among patients with cancer. JAMA 296(21):2558–2560.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.21.2558-c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zangari M, Anaissie E, Barlogie B, Badros A, Desikan R, Gopal AV, Morris C, Toor A, Siegel E, Fink L, Tricot G (2001) Increased risk of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma receiving thalidomide and chemotherapy. Blood 98(5):1614–1615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    el-Shami K, Griffiths E, Streiff M (2007) Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis in cancer patients: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Oncologist 12(5):518–523.  https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.12-5-518 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Singhal AB, Topcuoglu MA, Buonanno FS (2002) Acute ischemic stroke patterns in infective and nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 33(5):1267–1273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reagan TJ, Okazaki H (1974) The thrombotic syndrome associated with carcinoma. A clinical and neuropathologic study. Arch Neurol 31(6):390–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rogers LR, Cho ES, Kempin S, Posner JB (1987) Cerebral infarction from non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis. Clinical and pathological study including the effects of anticoagulation. Am J Med 83(4):746–756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lopez JA, Ross RS, Fishbein MC, Siegel RJ (1987) Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis: a review. Am Heart J 113(3):773–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, Dulgheru R, El Khoury G, Erba PA, Iung B, Miro JM, Mulder BJ, Plonska-Gosciniak E, Price S, Roos-Hesselink J, Snygg-Martin U, Thuny F, Tornos Mas P, Vilacosta I, Zamorano JL, Document R, Erol C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Aboyans V, Agewall S, Athanassopoulos G, Aytekin S, Benzer W, Bueno H, Broekhuizen L, Carerj S, Cosyns B, De Backer J, De Bonis M, Dimopoulos K, Donal E, Drexel H, Flachskampf FA, Hall R, Halvorsen S, Hoen B, Kirchhof P, Lainscak M, Leite-Moreira AF, Lip GY, Mestres CA, Piepoli MF, Punjabi PP, Rapezzi C, Rosenhek R, Siebens K, Tamargo J, Walker DM (2015) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS), the European association of nuclear medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 36(44):3075–3128.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thomsen RW, Farkas DK, Friis S, Svaerke C, Ording AG, Norgaard M, Sorensen HT (2013) Endocarditis and risk of cancer: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Am J Med 126(1):58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.07.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shen C, Shih YC, Xu Y, Yao JC (2014) Octreotide long-acting repeatable use among elderly patients with carcinoid syndrome and survival outcomes: a population-based analysis. Cancer 120(13):2039–2049.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28653 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Connolly HM, Schaff HV, Abel MD, Rubin J, Askew JW, Li Z, Inda JJ, Luis SA, Nishimura RA, Pellikka PA (2015) Early and late outcomes of surgical treatment in carcinoid heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(20):2189–2196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Adler Y, Charron P (2015) The 2015 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J 36(42):2873–2874.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv479 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Maisch B, Ristic A, Pankuweit S (2010) Evaluation and management of pericardial effusion in patients with neoplastic disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 53(2):157–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2010.06.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vaitkus PT, Herrmann HC, LeWinter MM (1994) Treatment of malignant pericardial effusion. JAMA 272(1):59–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Stewart JR, Fajardo LF, Gillette SM, Constine LS (1995) Radiation injury to the heart. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1205–1211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00656-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Baron-Esquivias G, Bogaert J, Brucato A, Gueret P, Klingel K, Lionis C, Maisch B, Mayosi B, Pavie A, Ristic AD, Sabate Tenas M, Seferovic P, Swedberg K, Tomkowski W, Achenbach S, Agewall S, Al-Attar N, Angel Ferrer J, Arad M, Asteggiano R, Bueno H, Caforio AL, Carerj S, Ceconi C, Evangelista A, Flachskampf F, Giannakoulas G, Gielen S, Habib G, Kolh P, Lambrinou E, Lancellotti P, Lazaros G, Linhart A, Meurin P, Nieman K, Piepoli MF, Price S, Roos-Hesselink J, Roubille F, Ruschitzka F, Sagrista Sauleda J, Sousa-Uva M, Uwe Voigt J, Luis Zamorano J, European Society of C (2015) 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 36 (42):2921–2964.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv318 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bishiniotis TS, Antoniadou S, Katseas G, Mouratidou D, Litos AG, Balamoutsos N (2000) Malignant cardiac tamponade in women with breast cancer treated by pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial administration of triethylenethiophosphoramide (thiotepa). Am J Cardiol 86(3):362–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kunitoh H, Tamura T, Shibata T, Imai M, Nishiwaki Y, Nishio M, Yokoyama A, Watanabe K, Noda K, Saijo N, Jcog Lung Cancer Study Group TJ (2009) A randomised trial of intrapericardial bleomycin for malignant pericardial effusion with lung cancer (JCOG9811). Br J Cancer 100(3):464–469.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604866 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Herrmann J, Yang EH, Iliescu CA, Cilingiroglu M, Charitakis K, Hakeem A, Toutouzas K, Leesar MA, Grines CL, Marmagkiolis K (2016) Vascular toxicities of cancer therapies: the old and the new—an evolving avenue. Circulation 133(13):1272–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018347 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Izzedine H, Ederhy S, Goldwasser F, Soria JC, Milano G, Cohen A, Khayat D, Spano JP (2009) Management of hypertension in angiogenesis inhibitor-treated patients. Ann Oncol 20(5):807–815.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn713 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Small HY, Montezano AC, Rios FJ, Savoia C, Touyz RM (2014) Hypertension due to antiangiogenic cancer therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: understanding and managing a new syndrome. Can J Cardiol 30(5):534–543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.02.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hansen ES (1990) International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC Working Paper 7/1/2. Shared risk factors for cancer and atherosclerosis—a review of the epidemiological evidence. Mutat Res 239(3):163–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Haugnes HS, Wethal T, Aass N, Dahl O, Klepp O, Langberg CW, Wilsgaard T, Bremnes RM, Fossa SD (2010) Cardiovascular risk factors and morbidity in long-term survivors of testicular cancer: a 20-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 28(30):4649–4657.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.9362 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Meinardi MT, Gietema JA, van der Graaf WT, van Veldhuisen DJ, Runne MA, Sluiter WJ, de Vries EG, Willemse PB, Mulder NH, van den Berg MP, Koops HS, Sleijfer DT (2000) Cardiovascular morbidity in long-term survivors of metastatic testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1725–1732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Samuels BL, Vogelzang NJ, Kennedy BJ (1987) Severe vascular toxicity associated with vinblastine, bleomycin, and cisplatin chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 19(3):253–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Arima Y, Oshima S, Noda K, Fukushima H, Taniguchi I, Nakamura S, Shono M, Ogawa H (2009) Sorafenib-induced acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery spasm. J Cardiol 54(3):512–515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Gemici G, Cincin A, Degertekin M, Oktay A (2009) Paclitaxel-induced ST-segment elevations. Clin Cardiol 32(6):E94–E96.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20291 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Shah K, Gupta S, Ghosh J, Bajpai J, Maheshwari A (2012) Acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction following paclitaxel administration for ovarian carcinoma: a case report and review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther 8(3):442–444.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.103530 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Darby SC, Ewertz M, Hall P (2013) Ischemic heart disease after breast cancer radiotherapy. N Engl J Med 368(26):2527.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1304601 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Castellino SM, Geiger AM, Mertens AC, Leisenring WM, Tooze JA, Goodman P, Stovall M, Robison LL, Hudson MM (2011) Morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Blood 117(6):1806–1816.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-04-278796 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, Cunningham D, Hancock BW, Horwich A, Hoskin PJ, Lister A, Radford JA, Rohatiner AZ, Linch DC (2007) Myocardial infarction mortality risk after treatment for Hodgkin disease: a collaborative British cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(3):206–214.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djk029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cheng SW, Ting AC, Ho P, Wu LL (2004) Accelerated progression of carotid stenosis in patients with previous external neck irradiation. J Vasc Surg 39(2):409–415.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.08.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    AWMF (Stand: 08.08.2012) S3-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge der extracraniellen CarotisstenoseGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Tallarita T, Oderich GS, Lanzino G, Cloft H, Kallmes D, Bower TC, Duncan AA, Gloviczki P (2011) Outcomes of carotid artery stenting versus historical surgical controls for radiation-induced carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 53(3):629–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.056 (e621–625) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Galie N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, Simonneau G, Peacock A, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Beghetti M, Ghofrani A, Gomez Sanchez MA, Hansmann G, Klepetko W, Lancellotti P, Matucci M, McDonagh T, Pierard LA, Trindade PT, Zompatori M, Hoeper M, Aboyans V, Vaz Carneiro A, Achenbach S, Agewall S, Allanore Y, Asteggiano R, Paolo Badano L, Albert Barbera J, Bouvaist H, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Carerj S, Castro G, Erol C, Falk V, Funck-Brentano C, Gorenflo M, Granton J, Iung B, Kiely DG, Kirchhof P, Kjellstrom B, Landmesser U, Lekakis J, Lionis C, Lip GY, Orfanos SE, Park MH, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Revel MP, Rigau D, Rosenkranz S, Voller H, Luis Zamorano J (2016) 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 37(1):67–119.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Tamargo J, Caballero R, Delpon E (2015) Cancer chemotherapy and cardiac arrhythmias: a review. Drug Saf 38(2):129–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0258-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jurczak W, Szmit S, Sobocinski M, Machaczka M, Drozd-Sokolowska J, Joks M, Dzietczenia J, Wrobel T, Kumiega B, Zaucha JM, Knopinska-Posluszny W, Spychalowicz W, Prochwicz A, Drohomirecka A, Skotnicki AB (2013) Premature cardiovascular mortality in lymphoma patients treated with (R)-CHOP regimen—a national multicenter study. Int J Cardiol 168(6):5212–5217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kilickap S, Barista I, Akgul E, Aytemir K, Aksoy S, Tekuzman G (2007) Early and late arrhythmogenic effects of doxorubicin. South Med J 100(3):262–265.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.smj.0000257382.89910.fe CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Arbuck SG, Strauss H, Rowinsky E, Christian M, Suffness M, Adams J, Oakes M, McGuire W, Reed E, Gibbs H et al. (1993) A reassessment of cardiac toxicity associated with Taxol. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (15):117–130Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ando M, Yokozawa T, Sawada J, Takaue Y, Togitani K, Kawahigashi N, Narabayashi M, Takeyama K, Tanosaki R, Mineishi S, Kobayashi Y, Watanabe T, Adachi I, Tobinai K (2000) Cardiac conduction abnormalities in patients with breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 25(2):185–189.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702106 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Barbey JT, Pezzullo JC, Soignet SL (2003) Effect of arsenic trioxide on QT interval in patients with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol 21(19):3609–3615.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.10.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Westervelt P, Brown RA, Adkins DR, Khoury H, Curtin P, Hurd D, Luger SM, Ma MK, Ley TJ, DiPersio JF (2001) Sudden death among patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with arsenic trioxide. Blood 98(2):266–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kantarjian H, Giles F, Wunderle L, Bhalla K, O’Brien S, Wassmann B, Tanaka C, Manley P, Rae P, Mietlowski W, Bochinski K, Hochhaus A, Griffin JD, Hoelzer D, Albitar M, Dugan M, Cortes J, Alland L, Ottmann OG (2006) Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant CML and Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. N Engl J Med 354(24):2542–2551.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa055104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Larsen RL, Jakacki RI, Vetter VL, Meadows AT, Silber JH, Barber G (1992) Electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias after cancer therapy in children and young adults. Am J Cardiol 70(1):73–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jaworski C, Mariani JA, Wheeler G, Kaye DM (2013) Cardiac complications of thoracic irradiation. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(23):2319–2328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.090 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Anker MS, Ebner N, Hildebrandt B, Springer J, Sinn M, Riess H, Anker SD, Landmesser U, Haverkamp W, von Haehling S (2016) Resting heart rate is an independent predictor of death in patients with colorectal, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer: results of a prospective cardiovascular long-term study. Eur J Heart Fail 18(12):1524–1534.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.670 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa M. Tilemann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Markus B. Heckmann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hugo A. Katus
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lorenz H. Lehmann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Oliver J. Müller
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und AngiologieUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-ForschungMannheimGermany
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine IIIUniversity of KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations