Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Daily SOAP

  • LEITTHEMA
  • Published:
Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Staudinger T, Stoiser B, Müllner M, Locker GJ, Laczika K, Knapp S et al (2000) Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28:1322–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams HA, Baumann G, Cascorbi I, Ebener C, Emmel M, Geiger S et al (2005) Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Schockformen der IAG Schock der DIVI. Teil 2: Hypovolämischer Schock. Intensivmed 42:96–109

    Google Scholar 

  3. Janssens U, Graf J (2004) Was ist „Schock“? Internist 45(3):258–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Graf J, Janssens U (2005) The early bird catches the worm. Crit Care Med 33:2412–2414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leone M, Vallet B, Teboul JL, Mateo J, Bastien O, Martin C (2004) Survey of the use of catecholamines by French physicians. Intensive Care Med 30:984–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kellum JA, Pinsky MR (2002) Use of vasopressor agents in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Crit Care 8:236–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holmes CL (2005) Vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 11:413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beale RJ, Hollenberg SM, Vincent J-L, Parrillo JE (2004) Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med 32:S455–S465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Müllner M, Urbanek B, Havel C, Losert H, Waechter F, Gamper G (2004) Vasopressors for shock. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3):DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub2

  10. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, Gerlach H, Calandra T, Cohen J et al (2004) Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:858–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellomo R, Chapman M, Finfer S, Hickling K, Myburgh J (2000) Low-dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction: a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS). Clinical Trials Group. Lancet 356:2139–2143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EH, Palazzo M, Hinds CJ, Watson D (1994) Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 330:1717–1722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P, Latini R, Tognoni G, Pesenti A et al (1995) A trial of goal-oriented Hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 333(16):1025–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H et al (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprung CL, Sakr Y, Vincent JL, LeGall JR, Reinhart K, Ranieri VM et al (2006) An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) study. Intensive Care Med 32:421–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Sprung CL, Gerlach H, Ranieri VM (2005) Is albumin administration in acutely ill asociated with increased mortality? Results of the SOAP study. Crit Care 9:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, Sprung CL, Moreno R, Ranieri VM et al (2006) Does Dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) study. Crit Care Med 34:589–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20(6):864–874

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meier-Hellmann A, Bredle DL, Specht M, Spies C, Hannemann L, Reinhart K (1997) The effects of low dose dopamine on splanchnic blood flow and oxygen uptake in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med 23:31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruokonen E, Takala J, Kari A, Saxen H, Mertsola J, Hansen EJ (1993) Regional blood flow and oxygen transport in septic shock [see comments]. Crit Care Med 21(9):1296–1303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neviere R, Mathieu D, Chagnon JL, Lebleu N, Wattel F (1996) The contrasting effects of dobutamine and dopamine on gastric mucosal perfusion in septic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154(6 Pt 1):1684–1688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Silva E, De Backer D, Creteur J, Vincent J-L (1998) Effects of vasoactive drugs on gastric intramucosal pH. Crit Care Med 26(10):1749–1759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marik PE, Mohedin M (1994) The contrasting effects of dopamine and norepinephrine on systemic and splanchnic oxygen utilization in hyperdynamic sepsis. JAMA 272:1354–1357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. van den Berghe G, de Zegher F, Lauwers P (1994) Dopamine suppresses pituitary function in infants and children. Crit Care Med 22:1747–1753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van den Berghe G, de Zegher F (1996) Anterior pituitary function during critical illness and dopamine treatment. Crit Care Med 24:1580–1590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH, Sykora K, Mamdani M, Streiner DL, Garfinkel S et al (2005) Reader’s guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design. BMJ 330:895–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Benson K, Hartz AJ (2000) A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 342(25):1878–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Black N (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 1996; 312:1215–1218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Bias and causal association in observational research. Lancet 359:248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jadad AR, Rennie D (1998) The Randomized Controlled Trial Gets a Middle- aged Checkup. JAMA 279(4):319–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Altman DG, Doré CJ (1990) Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. Lancet 335:149–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes JA, Altman DG (1995) Empirical Evidence of the Bias. JAMA 273(5):408–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mamdani M, Sykora K, Li P, Normand SLT, Streiner DL, Austin PC et al (2005) Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ 330:960–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenland S, Morgenstern H (2001) Confounding in health research. Annu Rev Public Health 22:189–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shah BR, Laupacis A, Hux JE, Austin PC (2005) Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 58:550–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Normand SLT, Sykora K, Li P, Mamdani M, Rochon PA, Anderson GM (2005) Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytic strategies to reduce confounding. BMJ 330:1021–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bailey AR, Burchett KR (1997) Effect of low-dose dopamine on serum concentrations of prolactin in the critically ill. Br J Anaesth 78:97–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gunning K, Rowan K (1999) Outcome data and scoring systems. BMJ 319:241–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Suter PM (2005) Some ICUs save more lifes than others: we need to know why! Intensive Care Med 31:1301–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Graf J (2003) Guidelines for critical care services and personnel–Innovations and improvements in patient care? Crit Care Med 31(11):2709–2710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Levy MM, Macias WL, Vincent JL, Russel JA, Silva E, Trzaskoma B et al (2005) Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 33:2194–2201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2005) Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analyses. Lancet 355:1657–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaboration Group (1988) Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, or both, or neither among 17 187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 2:349–360

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sackett DL (2000) Why randomized controlled trials failed but needn't: 1. Failure to gain “coal-face” commitment and to use the uncertainty principle. CMAJ 162(9):1311–1314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sprung C, Eidelman LA (1997) Ethical issues of clinical trials for the pulmonary artery catheter. New Horiz 5:264–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Freedman B (1987) Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 317(3):141–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Graf J, Janssens U (2004) Evidenz-basierte Intensivmedizin: Praxis, Nutzen und Bedeutung. Anaesthesist 53(3):253–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Graf J (2004) The good, the bad and the ugly–Qualitätsmerkmale publizierter Studien. In: Kuhlen R, Rossaint R (eds) Evidenzbasierte Medizin in Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin. Springer, Heidelberg

  49. Bracco D (2006) Pharmacological support of the failing circulation: practice, evaluation, evidence and future directions. Crit Care Med 34:890–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bellomo R, Uchino S (2003) Cardiovascular monitoring tools: use and misuse. Curr Opin Crit Care 9:225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G et al (1999) A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 340(6):409–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hebert PC, Cook DJ, Wells G, Marshall J (2002) The design of randomized clinical trials in critically ill patients. Chest 121(4):1290–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B et al (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345(19):1368–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, Giles S, Fox S (2005) The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 9:R764–R770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Lipsett PA, Hobson D, Earsing K, Farley JE et al (2004) Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 32:2014–2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, Robinson KA, Dremsizov TT, Young TL (2002) Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA 288(17):2151–2162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pronovost PJ, Jenckes MW, Dorman T, Garrett E, Breslow MJ, Rosenfeld BA et al (1999) Organizational characteristics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. JAMA 281(14):1310–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Graf J (2006) Qualitätsmanagement und Leitlinien in der Intensivmedizin. Med Klinik 101(Sondernummer 1):115–118

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH Standort Marburg, Baldingerstraße 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany

    J. Graf &  H. Wulf

  2. Innere, St.-Antonius-Hospital, Dechant-Deckers-Str. 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Germany

    U. Janssens FESC

Authors
  1. J. Graf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Wulf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Janssens FESC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Graf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graf, J., Wulf, H. & Janssens, U. Daily SOAP. Intensivmed 44, 3–10 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00390-006-0743-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00390-006-0743-9

Search

Navigation