Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Late anastomotic leakage after anal sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: is it different from early anastomotic leakage?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although multiple studies have examined anastomotic leakage (AL) after low anterior resection (LAR), their definitions of AL varied, and few have studied late diagnosed AL after surgery. This study aimed to characterize late AL after anal sphincter saving surgery (SSS) for rectal cancer by examining clinical characteristics, risk factors, and management of patients with late AL compared with early AL.

Methods

Data from January 2005 to December 2014 were collected from a total of 1903 consecutive patients who underwent anal sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer and were retrospectively reviewed. Late AL was defined as AL diagnosed more than 30 days after surgery. Variables and risk factors associated with early and late diagnosed AL were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Overall, early, and late rates of AL were 13.7%, 6.7%, and 7%, respectively. Receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) was a risk factor for developing late AL, but not early AL (OR, 3.032; 95% CI, 1.947–4.722; p < 0.001). Protective ileostomy did not protect against late AL. Among the 134 patients with late AL, 26 (19.4%) were classified as asymptomatic and 108 patients (80.6%) as symptomatic. The most frequent symptomatic complications related to late AL were fistula (42 cases, 39.7%), chronic sinus (33 cases, 31.1%), and stenosis (31 cases, 29.2%).

Conclusion

Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and management of patients with late AL after SSS were different from early AL. Close attention should be given to consider late AL as the continuation of early AL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC (2006) Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 355(11):1114–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Bonnel C, Caudry M, Saric J, Parneix M (1999) Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42(9):1168–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marks G, Mohiuddin M, Eitan A, Masoni L, Rakinic J (1991) High-dose preoperative radiation and radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 126(12):1534–1540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swellengrebel HA, Marijnen CA, Verwaal VJ, Vincent A, Heuff G, Gerhards MF, van Geloven AA, van Tets WF, Verheij M, Cats A (2011) Toxicity and complications of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Br J Surg 98(3):418–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246(2):207–214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJ (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(2):211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson AR, Stitz R, Ho YH (2011) Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg 35(1):186–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim CW, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Kim NK (2016) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal Cancer is different between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery. Ann Surg 263(1):130–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang JS, Keum KC, Kim NK, Baik SH, Min BS, Huh H, Lee CG, Koom WS (2014) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy effects on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching analysis. Ann Surg 259(3):516–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jang JH, Kim HC, Huh JW, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Lee WY, Yu JI, Park HC, Park YS, Park JO (2017) Anastomotic leak does not impact oncologic outcomes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 269:678–685. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qin C, Ren X, Xu K, Chen Z, He Y, Song X (2014) Does preoperative radio(chemo)therapy increase anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014:910956

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Qin Q, Ma T, Deng Y, Zheng J, Zhou Z, Wang H, Wang L, Wang J (2016) Impact of preoperative radiotherapy on anastomotic leakage and stenosis after rectal cancer resection: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 59(10):934–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2017) Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection: results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 266(5):870–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Kim JC (2016) Late anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: clinical characteristics and predisposing factors. Color Dis 18(4):O135–O140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jutesten H, Draus J, Frey J, Neovius G, Lindmark G, Buchwald P, Lydrup ML (2017) Late leakage after anterior resection: a defunctioning stoma alters the clinical course of anastomotic leakage. Color Dis 20:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morks AN, Ploeg RJ, Sijbrand Hofker H, Wiggers T, Havenga K (2013) Late anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a significant problem. Color Dis 15(5):e271–e275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Floodeen H, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R, Matthiessen P (2013) Early and late symptomatic anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: are they different entities? Color Dis 15(3):334–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Arumainayagam N, Chadwick M, Roe A (2009) The fate of anastomotic sinuses after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Color Dis 11(3):288–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Snijders HS, Bakker IS, Dekker JW, Vermeer TA, Consten EC, Hoff C, Klaase JM, Havenga K, Tollenaar RA, Wiggers T (2014) High 1-year complication rate after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):831–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hain E, Maggiori L, Manceau G, Zappa M, Prost a la Denise J, Panis Y (2016) Persistent asymptomatic anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: can diverting stoma be reversed safely at 6 months? Dis Colon Rectum 59(5):369–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8(4):297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Benson AB 3rd, Bekaii-Saab T, Chan E et al (2012) Rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 10(12):1528–1564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer. Surgery 147(3):339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ambrosetti P, Francis K, De Peyer R, Frossard JL (2008) Colorectal anastomotic stenosis after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease: a prospective evaluation of 68 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51(9):1345–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schlegel RD, Dehni N, Parc R, Caplin S, Tiret E (2001) Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Dis Colon Rectum 44(10):1464–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Figueiredo MN, Mege D, Maggiori L, Ferron M, Panis Y (2015) When is the best time for temporary stoma closure in laparoscopic sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer? A study of 259 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol 19(8):469–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thornton FJ, Barbul A (1997) Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 77(3):549–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shin US, Kim CW, Yu CS, Kim JC (2010) Delayed anastomotic leakage following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 25(7):843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fong SS, Chen K, Sim R (2011) Chronic anastomotic sinus after low anterior resection: when can the defunctioning stoma be reversed? Color Dis 13(6):644–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Matthiessen P, Hansson L, Sjodahl R, Rutegard J (2010) Anastomotic-vaginal fistula (AVF) after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer--occurrence and risk factors. Color Dis 12(4):351–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Park EJ, Baik SH, Kang J, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK (2016) The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(14):e3271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang SY, Han J, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Lee KY, Kim NK, Min BS (2017) Intraoperative colonoscopy for the assessment and prevention of anastomotic leakage in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 32(5):709–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SYY: Study idea, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing

YDH: Data collection and critical review

MSC: Data collection and critical review

HH: Data collection and critical review

BSM: Data collection and critical review

KYL: Data collection and critical review

NKK: Study idea, design, data collection and analysis, and writing manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nam Kyu Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, S.Y., Han, Y.D., Cho, M.S. et al. Late anastomotic leakage after anal sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: is it different from early anastomotic leakage?. Int J Colorectal Dis 35, 1321–1330 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03608-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03608-9

Keywords

Navigation