Abstract
Purpose
Hartmann’s procedure is commonly practiced in emergent cases with the restoration of bowel continuity planned at a second stage. This study assessed the rate of restorations following Hartmann’s procedure and evaluated factors affecting decision-making.
Methods
Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, causes for Hartmann’s procedure, reversal rate, and complications were collected in a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent Hartmann’s procedure in five medical centers.
Results
Six hundred forty patients underwent Hartmann’s procedure for diverticular disease (36.1%), obstructing malignancy (31.8%), benign obstruction (5%), and other reasons (23.1%). Overall, 260 (40.6%) patients underwent subsequent restoration of bowel continuity. One hundred twenty-one (46.5%) patients had post-reversal complications, with an average Clavien-Dindo score of 1.4 and a mortality rate of 0.77%. Decision to avoid reversal was mostly related to comorbidities (49.7%) and metastatic disease (21.6%). Factors associated with the decision to restore bowel continuity included male gender (P = 0.02), patient age (62.3 years in Hartmann’s reversal patients vs 73.5 years in non-reversal patients; P < 0.0001), number of comorbidities (1.1 vs 1.58; P < 0.001), average Charlson score (1.93 vs 3.44; P < 0.001), and a neoplastic etiology (P < 0.0001). A sub-analysis excluding all patients who died in the 30 days following Hartmann’s procedure showed similar factors associated with ostomy closure.
Conclusion
Many patients do not have restoration of bowel continuity after undergoing Hartmann’s procedure. Hartmann’s reversal is associated with a significant postoperative morbidity. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the possibility that the colostomy might become permanent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hartmann H (1921) Nouveau procede d’ablation des cancers de la partie terminale du colon pelvien. Trentieme Congres de Chirurgie p 411
DeMaio E, Naranjo C, Johnson P (1996) Hartmann’s pouch, the Hartmann operation, the Hartmann procedure. Surg Endosc 10:81–82
Roig JV, Cantos M, Balciscueta Z et al (2011) Hartmann’s operation: how often is it reversed and at what cost? A multicentre study. Color Dis: Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 13:e396–e402
Hodgson R, An V, Stupart DA, Guest GD, Watters DA (2016) Who gets Hartmann’s reversed in a regional centre? Surg: J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel 14:184–189
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A New method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196
Van Gulik T, Mallonga E, Taat C (1986) Henri Hartmann, lord of the Hotel-Dieu. Neth J Surg 38:45–47
Feingold D, Steele SR, Lee S et al (2014) Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 57:284–294
de Korte N, Klarenbeek BR, Kuyvenhoven JP, Roumen RM, Cuesta MA, Stockmann HB (2011) Management of diverticulitis: results of a survey among gastroenterologists and surgeons. Color Dis: Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 13:e411–e417
Ansaloni L, Andersson RE, Bazzoli F et al (2010) Guidelines in the management of obstructing cancer of the left colon: consensus conference of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and Peritoneum and Surgery (PnS) Society. World J Emerg Surg: WJES 5:29
Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, Nelson R, Chu D (2007) Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res 138:79–87
Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920
McMullen CK, Hornbrook MC, Grant M et al (2008) The greatest challenges reported by long-term colorectal cancer survivors with stomas. J Support Oncol 6:175–182
Shabbir J, Britton DC (2010) Stoma complications: a literature overview. Color Dis: Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 12:958–964
Roque-Castellano C, Marchena-Gomez J, Hemmersbach-Miller M et al (2007) Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann’s procedure. Int J Color Dis 22:1091–1096
Fleming FJ, Gillen P (2009) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything? Int J Color Dis 24:1219–1225
Maitra RK, Pinkney TD, Mohiuddin MK, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Williams JP, Acheson AG (2013) Should laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure be the first line approach in all patients? Int J Surg (London, England) 11:971–976
Melkonian E, Heine C, Contreras D et al (2016) Reversal of the Hartmann’s procedure: a comparative study of laparoscopic versus open surgery. J Minim Access Surg 13:47–50
Richards CH, Roxburgh CS (2015) Surgical outcome in patients undergoing reversal of Hartmann’s procedures: a multicentre study. Color Dis: Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 17:242–249
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval to conduct this study was granted by the institutional review board of each participating medical centers.
Additional information
The study was presented as an oral poster at the 11th annual meeting of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), Milan, Italy, September 28–30, 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horesh, N., Lessing, Y., Rudnicki, Y. et al. Considerations for Hartmann’s reversal and Hartmann’s reversal outcomes—a multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 1577–1582 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2897-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2897-2