Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The association between hospital volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery is still subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of hospital volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery in the Netherlands in 2011.

Methods

In this collaborative research with a cross-sectional study design, patients who underwent rectal cancer resection in 71 Dutch hospitals in 2011 were included. Annual hospital volume was stratified as low (< 20), medium (20–50), and high (≥ 50).

Results

Of 2095 patients, 258 patients (12.3%) were treated in 23 low-volume hospitals, 1329 (63.4%) in 40 medium-volume hospitals, and 508 (24.2%) in 8 high-volume hospitals. Median length of follow-up was 41 months. Clinical tumor stage, neoadjuvant therapy, extended resections, circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity, and 30-day or in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between volume groups. Significantly, more laparoscopic procedures were performed in low-volume hospitals, and more diverting stomas in high-volume hospitals. Three-year disease-free survival for low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals was 75.0, 74.8, and 76.8% (p = 0.682). Corresponding 3-year overall survival rates were 75.9, 79.1, and 80.3% (p = 0.344). In multivariate analysis, hospital volume was not associated with long-term risk of mortality.

Conclusions

No significant impact of hospital volume on rectal cancer surgery outcome could be observed among 71 Dutch hospitals after implementation of a national audit, with the majority of patients being treated at medium-volume hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslavsky AM et al (2003) Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:708–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harling H, Bülow S, Møller LN et al (2005) Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994-99. Color Dis 7:90–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leonard D, Penninckx F, Kartheuser A et al (2014) Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 101:1475–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyerhardt JA, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D et al (2004) Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study. J Clin Oncol 22:166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D et al (2013) The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:1063–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dutch Snapshot Research Group (2017) Benchmarking recent national practice in rectal cancer treatment with landmark randomized controlled trials. Color Dis 19:O219–O231

  8. Strobe statement (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. http://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists

  9. Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (2011) Annual reports, 2011. http://www.clinicalaudit.nl

  10. Gietelink L, Henneman D, van Leersum NJ et al (2016) The influence of hospital volume on circumferential resection margin involvement: results of the Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Ann Surg 263:745–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Atkinson SJ, Daly MC, Midura EF et al (2016) The effect of hospital volume on resection margins in rectal cancer surgery. J Surg Res 204:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baek JH, Alrubaie A, Guzman EA et al (2013) The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes. Int J Color Dis 28:191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kressner M, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M et al (2009) The impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 52:1542–1549

  14. Ortiz H, Biondo S, Codina A et al (2016) Hospital variability in postoperative mortality after rectal cancer surgery in the Spanish Association of Surgeons project: the impact of hospital volume. Cir Esp 94:22–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz H, Biondo S, Codina A et al (2016) Hospital variation in anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery in the Spanish Association of Surgeons project: the contribution of hospital volume. Cir Esp 94:213–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Engel J, Kerr J, Eckel R et al (2005) Influence of hospital volume on local recurrence and survival in a population sample of rectal cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:512–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bos AC, van Erning FN, Elferink MA et al (2016) No difference in overall survival between hospital volumes for patients with colorectal cancer in the Netherlands. Dis Colon rectum 59:943–952

  18. Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E et al (2002) Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 236:583–592

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland, Landelijke Werkgroep Gastro Intestinale Tumoren (2014) Colorectal cancer, National guideline, Version 3.0. http://www.oncoline.nl/colorectaalcarcinoom

Download references

Acknowledgements

Collaborators: A Aalbers, Y Acherman, GD Algie, B Alting von Geusau, F Amelung, TS Aukema, IS Bakker, SA Bartels, S Basha, AJNM Bastiaansen, E Belgers, WA Bemelman, W Bleeker, J Blok, RJI Bosker, JW Bosmans, MC Boute, ND Bouvy, H Bouwman, A Brandt-Kerkhof, DJ Brinkman, S Bruin, ERJ Bruns, JPM Burbach, S Clermonts, PPLO Coene, C Compaan, ECJ Consten, T Darbyshire, SML de Mik, EJR de Graaf, I de Groot, RJL de vos tot Nederveen Cappel, JHW de Wilt, J van der Wolde, FC den Boer, JWT Dekker, A Demirkiran, M Derkx-Hendriksen, FR Dijkstra, P van Duijvendijk, MS Dunker, QE Eijsbouts, H Fabry, F Ferenschild, JW Foppen, EJB Furnée, MF Gerhards, P Gerven, JAH Gooszen, JA Govaert, WMU Van Grevenstein, R Haen, JJ Harlaar, E Harst, K Havenga, J Heemskerk, JF Heeren, B Heijnen, P Heres, C Hoff, W Hogendoorn, P Hoogland, A Huijbers, JAH Gooszen, P Janssen, AC Jongen, EG Karthaus, A Keijzer, JMA Ketel, J Klaase, FWH Kloppenberg, ME Kool, R Kortekaas, PM Kruyt, JT Kuiper, B Lamme, JF Lange, T Lettinga, DJ Lips, F Logeman, MF Lutke Holzik, E Madsen, A Mamound, CC Marres, I Masselink, M Meerdink, AG Menon, JS Mieog, D Mierlo, GD Musters, PA Neijenhuis, J Nonner, M Oostdijk, SJ Oosterling, PMP Paul, KCMJC Peeters, ITA Pereboom, F Polat, P Poortman, M Raber, BMM Reiber, RJ Renger, CC van Rossem, HJ Rutten, A Rutten, R Schaapman, M Scheer, L Schoonderwoerd, N Schouten, AM Schreuder, WH Schreurs, GA Simkens, GD Slooter, HCE Sluijmer, N Smakman, R Smeenk, HS Snijders, DJA Sonneveld, B Spaansen, EJ Spillenaar Bilgen, E Steller, WH Steup, C Steur, E Stortelder, J Straatman, HA Swank, C Sietses, HA ten Berge, HG ten hoeve, WW ter Riele, IM Thorensen, B Tip-Pluijm, BR Toorenvliet, L Tseng, JB Tuynman, J van Bastelaar, SC van beek, AWH van de Ven, MAJ van de Weijer, C van den Berg, I van den Bosch, JDW van der Bilt, SJ van der Hagen, R van der hul, G van der Schelling, A van der Spek, N van der Wielen, E van duyn, C van Eekelen, JA van Essen, K van Gangelt, AAW van Geloven, C van kessel, YT van Loon, A van Rijswijk, SJ van Rooijen, T van Sprundel, L van Steensel, WF van Tets, HL van Westreenen, S Veltkamp, T Verhaak, PM Verheijen, L Versluis-Ossenwaarde, S Vijfhuize, WJ Vles, S Voeten, FJ Vogelaar, WW Vrijland, E Westerduin, ME Westerterp, M Wetzel,K Wevers, B Wiering, AC Witjes, MW Wouters, STK Yauw, EC Zeestraten, DD Zimmerman, and T Zwieten

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik H. W. Jonker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jonker, F.H.W., Hagemans, J.A.W., Burger, J.W.A. et al. The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 1741–1747 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2

Keywords

Navigation