Abstract
Purpose
The association between hospital volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery is still subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of hospital volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery in the Netherlands in 2011.
Methods
In this collaborative research with a cross-sectional study design, patients who underwent rectal cancer resection in 71 Dutch hospitals in 2011 were included. Annual hospital volume was stratified as low (< 20), medium (20–50), and high (≥ 50).
Results
Of 2095 patients, 258 patients (12.3%) were treated in 23 low-volume hospitals, 1329 (63.4%) in 40 medium-volume hospitals, and 508 (24.2%) in 8 high-volume hospitals. Median length of follow-up was 41 months. Clinical tumor stage, neoadjuvant therapy, extended resections, circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity, and 30-day or in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between volume groups. Significantly, more laparoscopic procedures were performed in low-volume hospitals, and more diverting stomas in high-volume hospitals. Three-year disease-free survival for low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals was 75.0, 74.8, and 76.8% (p = 0.682). Corresponding 3-year overall survival rates were 75.9, 79.1, and 80.3% (p = 0.344). In multivariate analysis, hospital volume was not associated with long-term risk of mortality.
Conclusions
No significant impact of hospital volume on rectal cancer surgery outcome could be observed among 71 Dutch hospitals after implementation of a national audit, with the majority of patients being treated at medium-volume hospitals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137
Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslavsky AM et al (2003) Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:708–716
Harling H, Bülow S, Møller LN et al (2005) Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994-99. Color Dis 7:90–95
Leonard D, Penninckx F, Kartheuser A et al (2014) Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 101:1475–1482
Meyerhardt JA, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D et al (2004) Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study. J Clin Oncol 22:166–174
Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D et al (2013) The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:1063–1070
Dutch Snapshot Research Group (2017) Benchmarking recent national practice in rectal cancer treatment with landmark randomized controlled trials. Color Dis 19:O219–O231
Strobe statement (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. http://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists
Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (2011) Annual reports, 2011. http://www.clinicalaudit.nl
Gietelink L, Henneman D, van Leersum NJ et al (2016) The influence of hospital volume on circumferential resection margin involvement: results of the Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Ann Surg 263:745–750
Atkinson SJ, Daly MC, Midura EF et al (2016) The effect of hospital volume on resection margins in rectal cancer surgery. J Surg Res 204:22–28
Baek JH, Alrubaie A, Guzman EA et al (2013) The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes. Int J Color Dis 28:191–196
Kressner M, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M et al (2009) The impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 52:1542–1549
Ortiz H, Biondo S, Codina A et al (2016) Hospital variability in postoperative mortality after rectal cancer surgery in the Spanish Association of Surgeons project: the impact of hospital volume. Cir Esp 94:22–30
Ortiz H, Biondo S, Codina A et al (2016) Hospital variation in anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery in the Spanish Association of Surgeons project: the contribution of hospital volume. Cir Esp 94:213–220
Engel J, Kerr J, Eckel R et al (2005) Influence of hospital volume on local recurrence and survival in a population sample of rectal cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:512–520
Bos AC, van Erning FN, Elferink MA et al (2016) No difference in overall survival between hospital volumes for patients with colorectal cancer in the Netherlands. Dis Colon rectum 59:943–952
Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E et al (2002) Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 236:583–592
Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland, Landelijke Werkgroep Gastro Intestinale Tumoren (2014) Colorectal cancer, National guideline, Version 3.0. http://www.oncoline.nl/colorectaalcarcinoom
Acknowledgements
Collaborators: A Aalbers, Y Acherman, GD Algie, B Alting von Geusau, F Amelung, TS Aukema, IS Bakker, SA Bartels, S Basha, AJNM Bastiaansen, E Belgers, WA Bemelman, W Bleeker, J Blok, RJI Bosker, JW Bosmans, MC Boute, ND Bouvy, H Bouwman, A Brandt-Kerkhof, DJ Brinkman, S Bruin, ERJ Bruns, JPM Burbach, S Clermonts, PPLO Coene, C Compaan, ECJ Consten, T Darbyshire, SML de Mik, EJR de Graaf, I de Groot, RJL de vos tot Nederveen Cappel, JHW de Wilt, J van der Wolde, FC den Boer, JWT Dekker, A Demirkiran, M Derkx-Hendriksen, FR Dijkstra, P van Duijvendijk, MS Dunker, QE Eijsbouts, H Fabry, F Ferenschild, JW Foppen, EJB Furnée, MF Gerhards, P Gerven, JAH Gooszen, JA Govaert, WMU Van Grevenstein, R Haen, JJ Harlaar, E Harst, K Havenga, J Heemskerk, JF Heeren, B Heijnen, P Heres, C Hoff, W Hogendoorn, P Hoogland, A Huijbers, JAH Gooszen, P Janssen, AC Jongen, EG Karthaus, A Keijzer, JMA Ketel, J Klaase, FWH Kloppenberg, ME Kool, R Kortekaas, PM Kruyt, JT Kuiper, B Lamme, JF Lange, T Lettinga, DJ Lips, F Logeman, MF Lutke Holzik, E Madsen, A Mamound, CC Marres, I Masselink, M Meerdink, AG Menon, JS Mieog, D Mierlo, GD Musters, PA Neijenhuis, J Nonner, M Oostdijk, SJ Oosterling, PMP Paul, KCMJC Peeters, ITA Pereboom, F Polat, P Poortman, M Raber, BMM Reiber, RJ Renger, CC van Rossem, HJ Rutten, A Rutten, R Schaapman, M Scheer, L Schoonderwoerd, N Schouten, AM Schreuder, WH Schreurs, GA Simkens, GD Slooter, HCE Sluijmer, N Smakman, R Smeenk, HS Snijders, DJA Sonneveld, B Spaansen, EJ Spillenaar Bilgen, E Steller, WH Steup, C Steur, E Stortelder, J Straatman, HA Swank, C Sietses, HA ten Berge, HG ten hoeve, WW ter Riele, IM Thorensen, B Tip-Pluijm, BR Toorenvliet, L Tseng, JB Tuynman, J van Bastelaar, SC van beek, AWH van de Ven, MAJ van de Weijer, C van den Berg, I van den Bosch, JDW van der Bilt, SJ van der Hagen, R van der hul, G van der Schelling, A van der Spek, N van der Wielen, E van duyn, C van Eekelen, JA van Essen, K van Gangelt, AAW van Geloven, C van kessel, YT van Loon, A van Rijswijk, SJ van Rooijen, T van Sprundel, L van Steensel, WF van Tets, HL van Westreenen, S Veltkamp, T Verhaak, PM Verheijen, L Versluis-Ossenwaarde, S Vijfhuize, WJ Vles, S Voeten, FJ Vogelaar, WW Vrijland, E Westerduin, ME Westerterp, M Wetzel,K Wevers, B Wiering, AC Witjes, MW Wouters, STK Yauw, EC Zeestraten, DD Zimmerman, and T Zwieten
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jonker, F.H.W., Hagemans, J.A.W., Burger, J.W.A. et al. The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 1741–1747 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2889-2