Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of lymph node size to predict nodal metastasis in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

During restaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the assessment of lymph node (LN) metastasis is vital for selecting further treatment strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of LN size to predict LN metastasis in rectal cancer patients after preoperative CRT.

Methods

A total of 30 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by curative resection of primary rectal cancer were selected as a study group (CRT group). As a control group (non-CRT group), 30 patients who underwent primary tumor resection were selected using a 1:1 case-match design. Matching criteria were gender, age, and clinical T stage. The size of each LN was measured from the surgical specimen. To clarify optimal cutoff values for node size according to the risk of detecting metastasis, receiving-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated.

Results

In the non-CRT group, 39/474 LNs were confirmed to have metastasis. In the CRT group, 29/422 LNs showed metastasis. The median size of metastatic LNs was 6.0 mm in CRT group, which was significantly larger than 4.0 mm in the non-CRT group (p = 0.006). The optimal cutoff value for determining metastasis in the CRT group was 4.5 mm, compared to 3.5 mm in the non-CRT group. The accuracy of the cutoff value was much higher in the CRT group (CRT vs. non-CRT, 77.9 vs. 59.9 %).

Conclusions

LN size is a strong indicator for prediction of regional LN metastasis in rectal cancer patients after preoperative CRT, compared to those without CRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med 336(14):980-987

  2. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ et al (2009) Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 27(31):5124–5130

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R et al (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 373(9666):811–820

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, La Guardia G, Psenner K, Bonatti G, Fichtel G, Egarter-Vigl E, Marzoli GP (1994) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 37(12):1189–1193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Starck M, Bohe M, Fork FT, Lindstrom C, Sjoberg S (1995) Endoluminal ultrasound and low-field magnetic resonance imaging are superior to clinical examination in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Eur J Surg 161(11):841–845

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Yun SH, Sohn SK, Min JS (1999) Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42(6):770–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunerbein M, Pegios W, Rau B, Vogl TJ, Felix R, Schlag PM (2000) Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results. Surg Endosc 14(11):1005–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schaffzin DM, Wong WD (2004) Endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 4(2):124–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW, Williams GT (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90(3):355–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, Dallimore NS, Williams GT (2003) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227(2):371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koh DM, George C, Temple L, Collins DJ, Toomey P, Raja A, Bett N, Farhat S, Husband JE, Brown G (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of nodal enhancement pattern of rectal cancer at MRI enhanced with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: findings in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):W505–W513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, Sabbaga J, Ribeiro U Jr, Silva e Sousa AH Jr, Campos FG, Kiss DR, Gama-Rodrigues J (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240(4):711–717, discussion 717-718

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Nishida Arazawa ST, Rawet V, Coelho Siqueira SA, Kiss DR, Gama-Rodrigues JJ (2005) Lymph node micrometastasis in stage II distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 20(5):434–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Perez RO, Pereira DD, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J, Rawet V, Sao Juliao GP, Kiss D, Cecconello I, Habr-Gama A (2009) Lymph node size in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation—can we rely on radiologic nodal staging after chemoradiation? Dis Colon Rectum 52(7):1278–1284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, Mescoli C, Belluco E, Burzi S, Rugge M, Muzzio PC, Nitti D (2007) The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14(2):455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koh DM, Chau I, Tait D, Wotherspoon A, Cunningham D, Brown G (2008) Evaluating mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation using thin-section T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(2):456–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suppiah A, Hunter IA, Cowley J, Garimella V, Cast J, Hartley JE, Monson JR (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in assessing tumour down-staging following chemoradiation in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 11(3):249–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soreide K, Korner H, Soreide JA (2011) Diagnostic accuracy and receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis in surgical research and decision making. Ann Surg 253(1):27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Detry RJ, Kartheuser AH, Lagneaux G, Rahier J (1996) Preoperative lymph node staging in rectal cancer: a difficult challenge. Int J Colorectal Dis 11(5):217–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsura Y, Yamada K, Ishizawa T, Yoshinaka H, Shimazu H (1992) Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 35(4):362–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotanagi H, Fukuoka T, Shibata Y, Yoshioka T, Aizawa O, Saito Y, Tur GE, Koyama K (1993) The size of regional lymph nodes does not correlate with the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph nodes in rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 54(4):252–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR et al (1996) CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology 200(2):443–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vogl TJ, Pegios W, Mack MG et al (1997) Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(6):1427–1434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, Kessels AG, Beets-Tan RG (2004) High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol 52(1):78–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stipa F, Zernecke A, Moore HG, Minsky BD, Wong WD, Weiser M, Paty PB, Shia J, Guillem JG (2004) Residual mesorectal lymph node involvement following neoadjuvant combined-modality therapy: rationale for radical resection? Ann Surg Oncol 11(2):187–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Read TE, Andujar JE, Caushaj PF, Johnston DR, Dietz DW, Myerson RJ, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Mutch MG, Kodner IJ (2004) Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: histologic response of the primary tumor predicts nodal status. Dis Colon Rectum 47(6):825–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pucciarelli S, Capirci C, Emanuele U, Toppan P, Friso ML, Pennelli GM, Crepaldi G, Pasetto L, Nitti D, Lise M (2005) Relationship between pathologic T-stage and nodal metastasis after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12(2):111–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pomerri F, Maretto I, Pucciarelli S, Rugge M, Burzi S, Zandona M, Ambrosi A, Urso E, Muzzio PC, Nitti D (2009) Prediction of rectal lymph node metastasis by pelvic computed tomography measurement. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(2):168–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarashina H, Inoue I, Saitoh N, Nunomura M, Nakayama H, Okui K (1991) Preoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma. 2. The effect of irradiation on lymph node involvement. Strahlenther Onkol 167(6):361–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wichmann MW, Muller C, Meyer G, Strauss T, Hornung HM, Lau-Werner U, Angele MK, Schildberg FW (2002) Effect of preoperative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 137(2):206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-720, South Korea

    Im-kyung Kim, Jeonghyun Kang, Seung-Kook Sohn & Kang Young Lee

  2. Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonjuro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-720, South Korea

    Beom Jin Lim

Authors
  1. Im-kyung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeonghyun Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beom Jin Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seung-Kook Sohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kang Young Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Beom Jin Lim or Kang Young Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Ik., Kang, J., Lim, B.J. et al. The impact of lymph node size to predict nodal metastasis in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 459–464 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2099-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2099-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation