Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 years follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Controlled delivery of radio frequent energy (Secca) has been suggested as treatment for faecal incontinence (FI).

Objective

The objective of the study is to evaluate clinical response and sustainability of Secca for FI.

Design

This is a prospective cohort study.

Patients

This study involved patients who had failed full conservative management for FI.

Interventions

This study was performed between 2005 and 2010.

Main outcome measures

FI was scored using the Vaizey score (VS). A clinically significant response to Secca was defined as ≥50 % reduction in incontinence score. Impact of FI on quality of life (QOL) was measured using the FIQL. Data was obtained at baseline, at 6 months and at 1 and 3 years. Anal endosonography and anal manometry were performed at 3 months and compared to baseline.

Results

Thirty-one patients received Secca. During follow-up, 5/31 (16 %), 3/31 (10 %) and 2/31 (6 %) of patients maintained a clinically significant response after the Secca procedure. Mean VS of all patients was 18 (SD 3), 14 (SD 4), 14 (SD 4) and 15 (SD 4), at baseline, 6 months and 1 and 3 years. No increases in anorectal pressures or improvements in rectal compliance were found. Coping improved between baseline and t = 6 months. No predictive factors for success were found.

Limitations

This is a non-randomised study design.

Conclusion

This prospective non-randomised trial showed disappointing outcomes of the Secca procedure for the treatment of FI. The far minority of patients reported a clinically significant response of seemingly temporary nature. Secca might be valuable in combination with other interventions for FI, but this should be tested in strictly controlled randomised trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckley BS, Lapitan MC (2009) Prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence and nocturnal enuresis and attitudes to treatment and help-seeking amongst a community-based representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom. Int J Clin Pract 63(4):568–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leung FW, Rao SS (2009) Fecal incontinence in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 38(3):503–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bharucha AE, Wald AM (2010) Anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 105(4):786–794

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parisien CJ, Corman ML (2005) The Secca procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence: definitive therapy or short-term solution. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 18(1):42–45

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, Mass W, Jimenez R, Jauregui LA, Bobadilla J, Belmonte C, Edelstein PS, Utley DS (2002) Radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):915–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbas MA, Tam MS, Chun LJ (2012) Radiofrequency treatment for fecal incontinence: is it effective long-term? Dis Colon Rectum 55(5):605–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi-Monroy T, Morales M, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, Belmonte C, Barreto C, Zarate X, Bada O, Velasco L (2008) SECCA procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 51(3):355–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Felt-Bersma RJ, Szojda MM, Mulder CJ (2007) Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (SECCA) to the anal canal for the treatment of faecal incontinence offers moderate improvement. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19(7):575–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Efron JE, Corman ML, Fleshman J, Barnett J, Nagle D, Birnbaum E, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Sligh S, Rabine J, Wexner SD (2003) Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1606–1616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lefebure B, Tuech JJ, Bridoux V, Gallas S, Leroi AM, Denis P, Michot F (2008) Temperature-controlled radio frequency energy delivery (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of a prospective study. Int J Color Dis 23(10):993–997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim DW, Yoon HM, Park JS, Kim YH, Kang SB (2009) Radiofrequency energy delivery to the anal canal: is it a promising new approach to the treatment of fecal incontinence? Am J Surg 197(1):14–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruiz D, Pinto RA, Hull TL, Efron JE, Wexner SD (2010) Does the radiofrequency procedure for fecal incontinence improve quality of life and incontinence at 1-year follow-up? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, Belmonte C, Barreto C, Velasco L (2003) Extended two-year results of radio-frequency energy delivery for the treatment of fecal incontinence (the Secca procedure). Dis Colon Rectum 46(6):711–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bliss DZ, Jung HJ, Savik K, Lowry A, LeMoine M, Jensen L, Werner C, Schaffer K (2001) Supplementation with dietary fiber improves fecal incontinence. Nurs Res 50(4):203–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee BH, Kim N, Kang SB, Kim SY, Lee KH, Im BY, Jee JH, Oh JC, Park YS, Lee DH (2010) The long-term clinical efficacy of biofeedback therapy for patients with constipation or fecal incontinence. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 16(2):177–185

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrara A, De JS, Gallagher JT, Williamson PR, Larach SW, Pappas D, Mills J, Sepulveda JA (2001) Time-related decay of the benefits of biofeedback therapy. Tech Coloproctol 5(3):131–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA (2006) Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Color Dis 21(1):52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glasgow SC, Lowry AC (2012) Long-term outcomes of anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):482–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tjandra JJ, Lim JF, Hiscock R, Rajendra P (2004) Injectable silicone biomaterial for fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter dysfunction is effective. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2138–2146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Altomare DF, La TF, Rinaldi M, Binda GA, Pescatori M (2008) Carbon-coated microbeads anal injection in outpatient treatment of minor fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 51(4):432–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Devesa JM, Rey A, Hervas PL, Halawa KS, Larranaga I, Svidler L, Abraira V, Muriel A (2002) Artificial anal sphincter: complications and functional results of a large personal series. Dis Colon Rectum 45(9):1154–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, Corman ML, Tan P, Opelka FG, Burnstein M, Nogueras JJ, Bailey HR, Devesa JM, Fry RD, Cagir B, Birnbaum E, Fleshman JW, Lawrence MA, Buie WD, Heine J, Edelstein PS, Gregorcyk S, Lehur PA, Michot F, Phang PT, Schoetz DJ, Potenti F, Tsai JY (2002) The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 45(9):1139–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hull T, Giese C, Wexner SD, Mellgren A, Devroede G, Madoff RD, Stromberg K, Coller JA (2013) Long-term durability of sacral nerve stimulation therapy for chronic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 56(2):234–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Damon H, Barth X, Roman S, Mion F (2013) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients’ satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients. Int J Color Dis 28(2):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maeda Y1, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2013) Outcome of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence at 5 Years. Ann Surg, in press

  27. Frascio M, Mandolfino F, Imperatore M, Stabilini C, Fornaro R, Gianetta E, Wexner SD (2014) The SECCA procedure for faecal incontinence: a review. Colorectal Dis. 16(3):167–72. doi:10.1111/codi.12403

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared. The Secca devices are manufactured by Mederi Therapeutics. However, Mederi Therapeutics did not play any role in the design and conduct of the study. Furthermore, Mederi Therapeutics neither has any input into the review of the results and writing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    T. J. Lam, A. P. Visscher, M. M. Meurs-Szojda & R. J. F. Felt-Bersma

Authors
  1. T. J. Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. P. Visscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. M. Meurs-Szojda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Visscher.

Additional information

T. J. Lam and A. P. Visscher contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lam, T.J., Visscher, A.P., Meurs-Szojda, M.M. et al. Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 years follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 755–761 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1882-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1882-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation