Skip to main content
Log in

SECCA® Procedure for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Results of Five-Year Follow-Up

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the long-term (5-year) durability of radiofrequency energy delivery for fecal incontinence.

Methods

This was an extension of the follow-up from our original prospective study in which patients who suffered from fecal incontinence were treated with the SECCA® system for radiofrequency energy delivery to the anal canal muscle. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Scale (0–20), fecal incontinence-related quality of life score, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 were administered to five years. Differences between baseline and follow-up were analyzed by using paired t-test.

Results

A total of 19 patients were treated and followed for five years, including 18 females (aged 57.1 (range, 44–77) years). The mean duration for fecal incontinence was 7.1 (range, 1–21) years. At five-year follow-up, the mean fecal incontinence score had improved from 14.37 to 8.26 (P < 0.00025) with 16 patients (84.2 percent) demonstrating >50 percent improvement. All fecal incontinence-related quality of life scores improved, including lifestyle (2.43 to 3.15; P < 0.00075), coping (1.73 to 2.6; P < 0.00083), depression (2.24 to 3.15; P < 0.0002), and embarrassment (1.56 to 2.51; P < 0.0003). The social function component of the Short-Form 36 improved from 38.3 to 60 (P < 0.05). There was a trend toward improvement in the mental component summary of the Short-Form 36 from 38.1 to 48.14. There were no long-term complications.

Conclusions

Significant and sustained improvements in fecal incontinence symptoms and quality of life are seen at five years after treatment with the SECCA® system. This treatment should be considered for patients suffering from fecal incontinence not amenable to surgery and who have failed conservative management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:1460–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macmillan KA, Merrie AE, Marshall R, Bryan R. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1341–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. Quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Norton NJ. Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:131–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Talley NJ. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in a community. Gut 2002;50:480–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakanishi N, Tatara K, Nakajima K, et al. Urinary and fecal incontinence in a community residing elderly population, prevelance, correlates and prognosis [in Japanese]. Nippon Koshu Elsei Zasshi 1997;44:192–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudolph W, Galandiuk S. A practical guide to the diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;45:915–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, et al. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1139–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls J, Kamm MA. Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Ann Surg 2000;232:143–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Conaghan P, Farouk R. Sacral nerve stimulation can be successful in patients with ultrasound evidence of external anal sphincter disruption. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1610–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, et al. Radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:915–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, et al. Extended two-year results of radio-frequency energy delivery for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:711–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Efron JE, Corman ML, Fleshman J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca® procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1606–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parisien CJ, Corman ML. The Secca procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence: definitive therapy or short-term solution. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2005;18:42–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item health survey (SF-36): tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Norton C, Chelvanavagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2003;125:1320–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr, Oliveira L, Gilleland JE, Wexner SD. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1516–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Halverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:345–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao SS. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 2004,99:1585–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khaikin M, Wexner S. Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:3168–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Takahashi-Monroy M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi-Monroy, T., Morales, M., Garcia-Osogobio, S. et al. SECCA® Procedure for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Results of Five-Year Follow-Up. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 355–359 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9169-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9169-0

Key words

Navigation