Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perianal abscess in children: an evaluation of microbiological etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the demographic characteristics of children with perianal abscess, distribution of microbiological etiology, antibiotic susceptibility, and identify the effectiveness and coverage of antibiotics due to culture results.

Methods

A retrospective study was designed to evaluate pediatric patients with perianal abscesses between January 2013 and December 2022.

Results

A total of 197 episodes in 135 patients were evaluated. The median age of the patients was 10 months (22 days–17 years). The isolated microorganisms were Gram-positive bacteria in 56 (28.4%) patients and Gram-negative bacteria in 141 (71.6%) patients. The most common isolated species was Escherichia coli (n = 70, 35.5%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (n = 48, 24.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 37, 18.9%), and Enterobacter spp. (n = 9, 4.5%). Forthy-two percent (n = 58) of isolates were positive for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, 8% (n = 11) were carbapenem-resistant in Gram-negative bacteria, and 37.5% (n = 21) were methicillin-resistant, 7.1% (n = 4) were vancomycin-resistant in Gram-positive bacteria. According to bacterial culture results, ertapenem plus glycopeptide had the highest antimicrobial coverage rate (92.3%), followed by ertapenem plus clindamycin (89.8%), ertapenem (81.7%), third-generation cephalosporin plus glycopeptide (82.2%), third-generation cephalosporin plus clindamycin (69.5%).

Conclusion

Ertapenem can be a good choice in the empirical treatment of perianal abscesses in children due to its high coverage rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the fndings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CAM:

Amoxicillin-clavulanate

SAM:

Ampicillin-sulbactam

ESBL:

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase

References

  1. Juth Karlsson A, Salö M, Stenström P (2016) Outcomes of various interventions for first-time perianal abscesses in children. Biomed Res Int 2016:9712854. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9712854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sueyoshi R, Lane GJ, Kusafuka J et al (2019) Combination therapy with traditional medicines for perianal abscess in children. Pediatr Int 61:1025–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.13988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. BałażTrypensPolnik KAD et al (2020) Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in children–evaluation of treatment efficacy. Is it possible to avoid recurrence? Pol Przegl Chir 92:29–33. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.8158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gosemann JH, Lacher M (2020) Perianal abscesses and fistulas in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 30:386–390. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding W, Sun YR, Wu ZJ (2021) Treatment of perianal abscess and fistula in infants and young children: from basic etiology to clinical features. Am Surg 87:927–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820954829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park J (2020) Management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in infants and children. Clin Exp Pediatr 63:261–262. https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2020.00150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Leung E, McArdle K, Yazbek-Hanna M (2009) Pus swabs in incision and drainage of perianal abscesses: what is the point? World J Surg 33:2448–2451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0190-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaughnessy MP, Park CJ et al (2019) The limited utility of routine culture in pediatric pilonidal, gluteal, and perianal abscesses. J Surg Res 239:208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buddicom E, Jamieson A, Beasley S et al (2012) Perianal abscess in children: aiming for optimal management. ANZ J Surg 82:60–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05941.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Eighteenth informational supplement M100-S18 Wayne PA CLSI 2008

  11. Tanır Basaranoglu S, Ozsurekci Y, Cengiz AB et al (2019) Absceso perianal en niños: perspectiva desde el campo de la infectología pediátrica [Perianal abscess in children: A pediatric infectious disease perspective]. An Pediatr (Engl Ed) 90:370–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Serour F, Gorenstein A (2006) Characteristics of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in healthy children. World J Surg 30:467–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0415-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Afşarlar CE, Karaman A, Tanır G et al (2011) Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in children: clinical characteristic, management and outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 27:1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2956-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murthi GV, Okoye BO, Spicer RD et al (2002) Perianal abscess in childhood. Pediatr Surg Int 18:689–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0761-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng S-F (2010) Microbiological analysis of perianal abscess and its treatment. J Soc Colon Rectal 21:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu RW, Tan KK, Chong CS (2016) Bacteriological study in perianal abscess is not useful and not cost-effective. ANZ J Surg 86:782–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gong Z, Han M, Wu Y et al (2018) Treatment of first-time perianal abscess in childhood, balance recurrence and fistula formation rate with medical intervention. Eur J Pediatr Surg 28:373–377. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Serour F, Somekh E, Gorenstein A (2005) Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in infants: a different entity? Dis Colon Rectum 48:359–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0844-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mocanu V, Dang JT, Ladak F et al (2019) Antibiotic use in prevention of anal fistulas following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 217:910–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaertner WB, Burgess PL, Davids JS, et al; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and Rectovaginal Fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Aug 1;65:964–985. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002473.

  21. Ulug M, Gedik E, Girgin S et al (2010) The evaluation of bacteriology in perianal abscesses of 81 adult patients. Braz J Infect Dis 14:225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rasane RK, Centeno Coleoglou AA, Horn CB et al (2020) Inadequate antibiotic therapy results in higher recurrence rate after drainage of complicated peri-rectal abscess. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 21:823–827. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2019.308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Food and Drug Agency, Ertapenem Highlights of Prescribing Information, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/021337s038lbl.pdf. Accessed on: 05/03/2023.

Download references

Funding

No specific funding was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GGO: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, writing the article, AAK: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, AO: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, PK: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, DE: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, AA: Data collection, IAG: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, KP: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, ADP: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, YS: Analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the article, AO: Analysis and interpretation, data collection, NB: Conception and design, critical revision of the article, ID: Conception and design, critical revision of the article. All authors listed reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gizem Guner Ozenen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guner Ozenen, G., Akaslan Kara, A., Ozer, A. et al. Perianal abscess in children: an evaluation of microbiological etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotics. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 272 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05556-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05556-1

Keywords

Navigation