Abstract
In the pediatric population, rectal injuries usually occur as a result of motor vehicle collisions. There has been an increased interest in selective diversion of rectal injuries in adults and increased utilization of laparoscopy both as a diagnostic and therapeutic adjunct. The aim of the study was to review our institutional experience with rectal injuries to determine if there was a subset of patients who could be managed with selective diversion. The medical records of children admitted with a rectal injury to Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, over the last 20 years (1984–2004) were retrospectively reviewed. Data abstraction included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, associated injuries, presenting symptoms, methods of diagnosis, treatment and resultant complications. Nine patients with rectal injuries were identified. The average injury severity score (ISS) was 19.3. Two patients with penetrating injuries underwent laparoscopy. Laparoscopy was able to define the intraperitoneal extension of injuries and guide the colostomy. Primary repair without a diverting colostomy was performed in 3 patients (2 intraperitoneal and 1 extraperitoneal injury) without complications. Based on the limited sample size, one should avoid making any definitive recommendations but, it appears, primary repair without fecal diversion can be performed safely in select children in spite of a longer time to surgery. Laparoscopy may be used for the immediate management of the penetrating trauma patient to rule out intraperitoneal extension, repair a perforation and guide the colostomy if necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA et al (1990) Organ injury scaling II: pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon and rectum. J Trauma 30:1427–1429
Debeugny P, Bonnevalle M (1988) Injuries of the rectum in children. 79 cases. Chir Pediatr 29:123–135
Esposito TJ, Ingraham A, Luchette FA et al (2005) Reasons to omit digital rectal exam in trauma patients: no fingers, no rectum, no useful additional information. J Trauma 59:1314–1319
Leaphart CL, Danko M, Cassidy L et al (2006) An analysis of proctoscopy vs computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis of rectal injuries in children: which is better? J Pediatr Surg 41:700–703
Ganchrow MI, Lavenson GS, McNamara JJ (1970) Surgical management of traumatic injuries of the colon and rectum. Arch Surg 100:515
Tuggle D, Huber PJ Jr (1984) Management of rectal trauma. Am J Surg 148:806–808
Grasberger RC, Hirsch EF (1983) Rectal trauma. A retrospective analysis and guidelines for therapy. Am J Surg 145:795–799
Burch JM, Feliciano DV, Matox KL(1989) Colostomy and drainage for civilian rectal injury: is that all? Ann Surg 209:600–611
Shatnawi NJ, Bani-Hani KE (2006) Management of civilian extraperitoneal rectal injuries. Asian J Surg 29:11–16
Vitale GC, Richardson JD, Flint LM (1983) Successful management of injuries to the extraperitoneal rectum. Am Surg 49:159–162
Haut ER, Nance ML, Keller MS et al (2004) Management of penetrating colon and rectal injuries in the pediatric patient. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1526–1532
Ameh EA(2000) Anorectal injuries in children. Pediatr Surg Int 16:388–391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonnard, A., Zamakhshary, M. & Wales, P.W. Outcomes and management of rectal injuries in children. Pediatr Surg Int 23, 1071–1076 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1996-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1996-5