Abstract
The interest for the impact of climate change on ocean waves within the Mediterranean Sea has motivated a number of studies aimed at identifying trends in sea states parameters from historical multi-decadal wave records. In the last two decades progress in computing and the availability of suitable time series from observations further supported research on this topic. With the aim of identifying consensus among previous research on the Mediterranean Sea and its sub-basins, this review analysed the results presented in peer reviewed articles researching historical ocean waves trends published after the year 2000. Most studies focused on the significant wave height trends, while direction and wave period appear to be under-studied in this context. We analysed trends in mean wave climate and extreme sea states. We divided the Mediterranean basin in 12 sub-basins and analysed the results available in the literature from a wide range of data sources, such as satellite altimetry and numerical models, among others. The consensus on the significant wave height mean climate trends is limited, while statistically significant trends in extreme values are detected in the western Mediterranean Sea, in particular in the Gulf of Lion and in the Tyrrhenian Sea, with complex spatial distributions. Negative extreme sea state trends in the sub-basins, although frequently identified, are mostly not significant. We discuss the sources of uncertainty in results introduced by the data used, statistics employed to characterise mean or extreme conditions, length of the time period used for the analysis, and thresholds used to prove trends statistical significance. The reduction of such uncertainties, and the relationship between trends in sea states and weather processes are identified as priority for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The effects of post industrial climate change (CC) on the environment have been investigated by the scientific community since the mid twentieth century. However, the volume of research on the impacts of CC on a wide range of natural physical processes and, in turn, on mitigation measures has rapidly increased in the 2000s. This is the case of ocean/marine processes, for which a large literature is available on the quantification of historical and future impact of CC on, e.g. water temperature (Meredith and King 2005; Abraham et al. 2013; Wijffels et al. 2016), salinity (Helm et al. 2010; Durack et al. 2012), marine biota (Scavia et al. 2002; Munday et al. 2008), ocean circulation (Toggweiler and Russell 2008; Winton et al. 2013), sea level (Milne et al. 2009; Watson et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2017; Dangendorf et al. 2017, among others), and ocean waves climate. The latter aspect has received increased interest thanks to the relevance of coastal erosion and wave energy conversion in recent years. The much improved computing capacity accessible to research groups worldwide, the availability of extensive numerical databases, satellite observations, and wave projections, have all contributed to the development of a large body of work on the analysis of ocean waves trends that can be detected from time series spanning several decades in the past, hereinafter referred to as historical trends. Their analysis is essential to understand the present climate trends.
The topic is of great interest in micro- and meso-tidal environments, such as those found in the Mediterranean Sea (MS), as long-term changes in wave conditions may have strong implications for increased coastal erosion (Satta et al. 2017; Enríquez et al. 2017; Toimil et al. 2020; Simeone et al. 2021) and, in turn, for tourism revenue (Alexandrakis et al. 2015), harbors operation (Casas-Prat and Sierra 2010a; Sánchez-Arcilla et al. 2016) and ships navigation (note that several major ports connect the Mediterranean countries worldwide, making it one of the busiest basins in the world, Mayer et al. 2018), and finally for blue energy production, given that the MS hosts promising hot spots for the conversion of wave energy, see Mattiazzo (2019) and references therein. As such, it is important to provide a broad insight in the wave climate variability in the MS, as well as to identify statistically significant climatic trends.
A large body of research has been devoted to identify historical trends in wave parameters since the 2000s; most of the studies reconstructed multi-decadal time series of ocean waves parameters for the whole MS or one of its sub-basins, from which trends are investigated. The available studies focus on the analysis of trends of the significant wave height \(H_s\), with very few studying other sea states parameters. Even a very quick overview of the literature allows to understand that trends show a rather large spatial variability, with adjacent MS sub-basins sometimes showing opposite behaviour. It is equally evident that the existence of a consensus among these studies is not apparent. Therefore, the aim of the present review is to identify evidence of consistent historical trends of sea states within the MS and its sub-basins. To do so, we analysed the current literature using a top down approach: first we considered articles investigating sea states at whole Earth scale, then at the scale of the whole MS, subsequently we looked into studies of individual or groups of sub-basins; finally, we reviewed articles studying trends at regional or individual locations scale.
This article is organised as follows. Section 2 describes the methodology used for the review. Section 3 describes the trends in \(H_s\) found in the literature and identifies the consensus among studies. Section 4 describes sea state parameters other than \(H_s\). Finally, Sect. 5, draws the conclusions of the article and sets out recommendations for future studies on the topic.
2 Materials and methods
For the present review we considered only peer reviewed articles published starting from 2000; indeed, the time span covered by prior researches would be too short for comparison with up-to-date studies; a list of the articles initially reviewed can be found in the Supplement. Within those we considered only studies that analyse multi-decadal trends in sea states, which excludes, for example, analyses of long term storms characteristics (e.g. Besio et al. 2017; Amarouche and Akpınar 2021). Within the reviewed literature the domain of analysis varies from the whole Earth, to regional studies of stretches of coast of the order of \(10^2\) km. We refer to global scale of analysis to indicate studies that examined the MS as part of a worldwide dataset. Similarly, regional scale is used for the analysis of the MS only or, at least, one of the sub-basins into which it is traditionally divided. Finally, local scale refers to studies of single locations or coastal stretches. Note that no global scale study was found to discuss sub-basins, due to the coarser resolution used with respect to the other two scales of analysis. The mesh resolution for the numerical simulations used, however, does not consistently increase for local scale studies with respect to regional ones. Studies at regional scale often discuss trends at sub-basin scale, but these are analysed in this review separately from studies in which the focus is purely local.
Wave data series employed in the articles reviewed were retrieved from different sources, such as hindcast and re-analysis with numerical models, satellite altimeters, buoys, pressure transducers, and ship observations (from Voluntary Observing Ships, VOS). Most of the articles reviewed used modelled data (either hindcast or reanalysis; see Fig. 1), as these provided the longest continuous time-series, allowing for sounder trend estimates. A note of caution should be provided in considering trends identified in the literature from studies using multiple data sources or numerical results from different products, or reference periods. For example data availability in time series obtained from satellite altimeters, i.e. the density of satellite tracks, was found to affect high percentile trends (Young and Ribal 2022), together with data calibration, i.e. on whether this is performed and what is the benchmark considered. The importance of the specific satellite wave products analysed was also highlighted by Timmermans et al. (2020), who pointed out discrepancies in trend estimates which depend on the data employed. Significant divergences in trend estimates can also be found when comparing hindcast and reanalysis products. As for the latter, modelled wave climate can be greatly affected by data assimilation (Meucci et al. 2020; Erikson et al. 2022). This occurs because there was a significant surge in data assimilated by the models during the early 1990s when satellite assimilation began (Timmermans et al. 2020; Erikson et al. 2022). Furthermore, the trends in model reanalysis are influenced by the growing number of satellite observations assimilated over the years (Sharmar et al. 2021). A further influence on the trends estimate in modelled data using VOS assimilation, may be the lack of standards for measuring surface wind speed in VOS in part of the twentieth century. Even a single model, when initialized with different initial conditions, can yield opposite trends worldwide (Casas-Prat et al. 2022). These factors are crucial when assessing conflicting results, such as opposing trends observed in numerical studies.
Data sources used for the analysis of wave parameters in the literature reviewed. Note that the number of sources exceeds the number of articles reviewed because multiple sources are used by some articles. For the sake of clarity, both reanalysis and hindcast are referred as “simulations” (although they differ as the former use ocean wave data assimilation while the latter do not). “Point” denotes point measurements using buoys (Timmermans et al. 2020) and pressure transducers (Pomaro et al. 2017)
Trends were mainly detected using the Mann-Kendall test (Mann 1945; Kendall 1948, hereinafter shortened as MK) and the corresponding seasonal test for monthly averaged series (Hirsch et al. 1982), and were quantified either through linear fit (LF), or the Theil–Sen estimator (Theil 1992, TS), which is based on the Kendall’s rank estimator and it is therefore often used along with MK (the two parameters are in fact well correlated, as shown e.g. in De Leo et al. 2020). Indeed, TS and MK are the most popular methods used to quantify trends and assess their significance, respectively (see Fig. 2). The TS slope allows to filter possible outliers and it is therefore more robust than simple LF, although the two metrics were proved to yield comparable results (Timmermans et al. 2020; Lin and Oey 2019). A group of works assessed trend significance through the Student’s t-test (Gulev and Grigorieva 2004; Martucci et al. 2010; Sharmar et al. 2021; Amarouche et al. 2022); the Wilcoxon test, and the test of Hayashi (1982) (Gulev and Grigorieva 2004); an F-test (Lionello and Sanna 2005); the time-varying location of a non-stationary Generalised Extreme Value Distribution (De Leo et al. 2021a) denoted with \(\mu _t\); methods based on bootstrap (Casas-Prat and Sierra 2010b, a, 2012; Timmermans et al. 2020); the analysis of LF confidence intervals (CI) (Young et al. 2012); the Innovative Trend Analysis (or ITA; Şen 2012), to be coupled with other trend metrics (Caloiero et al. 2019; De Leo et al. 2020; Lo Feudo et al. 2022). The latter test was proved to be affected by few shortcomings (Serinaldi et al. 2020), thus it should be used with caution.
Number of occurrences of tests employed for trend detection and quantification in the literature reviewed. The group labeled with “other” embeds the tests used only in a single article (Wilcoxon and Hayashi tests, \(\mu _t\), F-test, either LF or TS with no significance measures). Note that the number of tests exceeds the number of articles reviewed because multiple tests are used in some articles
In order to assess the results on changes in wave climate for each area of the MS, we only considered studies presenting analysis of \(H_s\). This restricted the review to 26 articles, which are listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3 (global, regional, local analysis respectively); these report the products employed (note that numerical models are here collectively referred as simulations), time periods covered by the data, and analysed wave statistics.
To facilitate the comprehension of the results, the MS is here grouped in the sub-basins shown in Fig. 3, namely: Alboran Sea (A\(_l\)S), Balearic Sea (BS), South-West MS (SW-MS), Gulf of Lion (GL), Ligurian Sea (L\(_i\)S), Tyrrhenian Sea (T\(_y\)S), Straight of Sicily (SS), Gulf of Sirte (GS), Ionian Sea (IS), Aegean Sea (A\(_e\)S), Adriatic Sea (A\(_d\)S), and Levantine Sea (L\(_e\)S). Note that, for the sake of simplicity, some of the basins were named after well known features they include, although they span wider areas (for example, the Gulf of Sirte extends to Egypt beyond the Lybian coastline).
Basins used to group trend estimates in the MS: Alboran Sea (A\(_\text {l}\)S in the figure); Balearic Sea (BS); South-West MS (SW-MS); Gulf of Lion (GL); Ligurian Sea (L\(_\text {i}\)S); Tyrrhenian Sea (T\(_\text {y}\)S); Straight of Sicily (SS); Gulf of Sirte (GS); Ionian Sea (IS); Adriatic Sea (A\(_\text {d}\)S); Aegean Sea (A\(_\text {e}\)S); Levantine Sea (L\(_\text {e}\)S)
We counted the number of articles detecting either positive or negative trends in each of the sub-basins. A preliminary analysis of the literature showed that, within some sub-basins, trends with opposite signs in different areas were identified; therefore, we split the analysis between upward and downward trends, extracting the respective ranges of variability and checking for the presence of significant ones. However, inferring the exact trends magnitude from the spatial maps provided in the literature is not trivial, especially when continuous color scales are used to show results. Besides, in case of blank areas, it is sometimes difficult to understand whether an article detected negligible trends or the area was not covered by data (especially at low spatial resolution; see for example the trends in the Adriatic Sea resulting from Young and Ribal, 2019; Cao et al., 2021). For this reason, in this review more attention is paid to trends sign and significance rather than the exact annual rates of change.
To summarise \(H_s\) trends for each sub-basin, we pooled together all the findings on mean, median (p50), and modal \(H_s\), deemed representative of mean climate conditions. On the other hand, results for percentiles higher than 90th and annual maxima \(H_s\) were considered jointly and referred to as extreme sea states (see Fig. 4; a similar approach is used by Ratsimandresy et al. 2008). Note that the ith percentile is henceforth shortened to pi (e.g. the 90th percentile is indicated as p90). We retained trends arising from both annual and monthly series; although the latter may be affected by seasonal periodicity, this is usually filtered out using appropriate metrics, such as seasonal-MK; in this respect, see e.g. Young and Ribal (2019), who claimed that trends of monthly series can be extended to annual statistics. As for trends on seasonal subsets, we only retained those computed for extreme sea states over winter months, as these are representative of yearly extremes in the MS. By contrast, trends on seasonal mean such as in Timmermans et al. (2020) cannot be directly compared to annual statistics. In case of studies presenting analysis at both yearly and seasonal results (Zacharioudaki et al. 2015; Caloiero et al. 2022), we only considered the former. As for the significance of trends, we consider that a significant trend is present in a sub-basin if this is detected in any area regardless of its extension. While this approach may overestimate the number of articles finding trends at given basins, it allows for a quick assessment and to refine the analysis in hot-spots if needed.
Number of occurrences of \(H_s\) statistics employed for trend detection and quantification in the literature reviewed. Black, grey, and white bins denote annual, seasonal, and monthly statistics, respectively. \(H^{100}\) indicates 100 years return period wave (Young et al. 2012)
3 Significant wave height trends
3.1 Global analysis
Studies examining global-scale trends employed VOS (Volunteer Observing Ships), satellite altimetry data, and numerical results with resolutions ranging from \(0.25^{\circ }\) to \(4^{\circ }\) in both latitude and longitude, which corresponds to approximately 25 km to 400 km at the MS latitudes (see Table 1). Inevitably, this has an impact on the resolution of the results for the sub-basins. Besides, time-series related to nearby locations are often pooled together, potentially adding further uncertainty to the trend estimates.
For mean wave climates, widespread significant and positive trends over the whole MS were detected by Lin and Oey (2019) (with the exception of the Straight of Sicily), and Meucci et al. (2020) when using reanalysis products (while they found no trends when relying on a model-only integration). Also Gulev and Grigorieva (2004) found positive and significant trends based on VOS; however, their results may be biased since ships tend to avoid stormy conditions. By contrast, Young et al. (2011) mostly detected significant and negative trends over vast areas in the central MS, while no significant trends could be later identified by Young and Ribal (2019). Their results greatly diverge for mode and mean \(H_s\) series, suggesting that changes have occurred in the shapes of the wave height pdf’s over the 33-year measurement period. No significant trends were neither found by Casas-Prat et al. (2022) nor by Cao et al. (2021); as for the latter, they only spotted positive and significant trends during the so called slow-down period (1999–2013) especially in the Ionian Sea. Such discrepancies call into question the reliability of trends found using short time series. In this respect, Sharmar et al. (2021) showed how to rely on different periods can result in opposite trends within the Northeast Pacific Ocean, Northeast Atlantic Ocean, and South Indian Ocean; they also found diverging results when comparing trends based on ERA products (which incorporates both wind speed and wave height measurements) and Climate Forecast System Reanalysis, CFSR (which only only assimilate wind speed data). On the contrary, a high consensus in seasonal p50 and p90 trends estimates was pointed out by Erikson et al. (2022) based on a 7-members ensemble of global wave products by not considering CFSR data. The season analysed plays also a crucial role in trends assessment: for example, all data used in Timmermans et al. (2020) yield significant upward trends in the Gulf of Lion for January, February, and March, but none leads to significant-positive trends for June, August, and September. However, note that seasons at the MS latitudes are more commonly grouped in December, January, and February (winter)–March, April, and May (spring)–June, July, and August (summer)–September, October, and November (fall; e.g., Erikson et al. 2022) and an objective definition of season (e.g. Kotsias et al. 2021) is not always used in the reviewed literature.
In case of extreme wave climates, no significant trend patters were highlighted by Young et al. (2011) and Sharmar et al. (2021), while Casas-Prat et al. (2022) found widespread and positive (negative) trends in the eastern (western) MS, although not significant. By contrast, positive and significant trends characterize the western Mediterranean in Young and Ribal (2019). No significant trends can be appreciated in the MS for high return period waves: Young et al. (2012) assessed trends for 100 years \(H_s\) computed starting from 4-year long time slices, an interval too short to obtain reliable estimates; in fact, the computed variability due to trends is comparable to the confidence intervals of the return levels. Also Takbash and Young (2020) investigated trends in the 100 years \(H_s\), but did not include the MS in their analysis.
3.2 Mediterranean basin analysis
In case of articles investigating trends at the regional and sub-basin scales, more detailed analysis can be often drawn thanks to higher spatial resolutions, which is found in the literature to range between \(0.05^{\circ }\) and \(0.25^{\circ }\) in studies using numerical hindcast. High-resolution numerical weather hindcasts can indeed reproduce small-scale structures even if these are not fully captured by large-scale forcing (Skamarock 2004), hence wave hindcast benefit from increased resolution in wind forcing. However, uncertainties may arise from the model physical calibration parameters, from boundary conditions in case sub-basins are numerically simulated, and/or propagate across different scales (Wilby and Dessai 2010) throughout the downscaling process (Shepherd et al. 2018). For example, Caloiero et al. (2019) downscaled hindcast data from deep waters to several coastal location around Calabria (South of Italy), and found trends not fully consistent to their offshore counterparts. As a matter of fact, wave propagation can be another step affecting trend estimates, prompting the need to carefully calibrate wave models for coastal environments (see in this respect De Leo et al. 2022). The above considerations can partly explain the divergences in trends results identified by studies using different model setups/products, as shown below.
For the mean wave climate, Caloiero et al. (2022) and Amarouche et al. (2022) highlighted positive and significant trends distributed over the whole MS and the western MS, respectively; on the contrary, Musić and Nicković (2008) mainly found negative trends in the western MS. Similar findings were presenred by Zacharioudaki et al. (2015), De Leo et al. (2020), Barbariol et al. (2021), and Elshinnawy and Antolínez (2023), who highlighted negative and significant trends clustered in the Levantine Basin, with Elshinnawy and Antolínez (2023)showing positive and significant trends in the Alboran Sea only. Sub-basins and single locations within the MS were analysed in few works. Negative and significant trends were computed in the Adriatic, the Ionian, and the Tyrrhenian Seas by Martucci et al. (2010), while Pomaro et al. (2017) found positive trends in the North Adriatic Sea. Finally, Lo Feudo et al. (2022) analysed trends in mean wave climate on annual, seasonal, and monthly time scales at a single site in front of Calabria coastline (South Tyrrhenian Sea) and could not find significant ones for \(H_s\).
For the extreme sea states, results from De Leo et al. (2020), Amarouche et al. (2022) diverge from those by Caloiero et al. (2022), in particular for the annual maxima \(H_s\) south of the Gulf of Lion. Both De Leo et al. (2020) and Amarouche et al. (2022) found negative trends there, contrarily to Caloiero et al. (2020), whose results are consistent with those by Elshinnawy and Antolínez (2023). The aforementioned differences can be also explained by the different confidence levels used to detect trends through the MK, i.e., 5% (De Leo et al. 2020; Amarouche et al. 2022) and 10% (Caloiero et al. 2022; Elshinnawy and Antolínez 2023); and different statistics to characterise extreme and mean conditions (p99.5 and median rather than AM and mean in Elshinnawy and Antolínez 2023). Results by De Leo et al. (2020) were further confirmed by De Leo et al. (2021a), who assessed the rate of change of the location parameter (\(\mu _t\)) of non-stationary Generalised Extreme Value distribution for annual maxima \(H_s\). Interestingly, all the above mentioned researches found negative and significant trends in the Southern Thyrrenian Sea. Zacharioudaki et al. (2015) highlighted widespread positive and significant trends west of the Crete Island (Greece) for annual p99 \(H_s\) series when taking 1960–1981 as a reference interval. The same analysis led to opposite trends for the 1981–2001 period, showing consistency issues discussed in Sect. 2; even more so, since trends showed a marked seasonal variability. Similar findings were pointed out by Barbariol et al. (2021); Amarouche et al. (2022); Caloiero et al. (2022); Elshinnawy and Antolínez (2023) who remarked that, in case of seasonal analysis, trends can change dramatically depending on the months subset considered; in particular, trends computed for June–September subsets are milder, because of the low magnitude of sea states compared to extreme data, such as AM, that usually occur during winter time. Additional analysis were carried out by Caloiero et al. (2020) and Caloiero and Aristodemo (2021) based on the ERA-Iterim dataset (Dee et al. 2011); however, further on in the article we only consider Caloiero et al. (2022), as this embeds the results of the previous works (in the latter work authors have extended the analysed area adopting the same data and the same methodology).
3.3 Consensus
Using the distinction between mean climate conditions and extreme sea states and the methodology explained in Sect. 2 we counted the negative and positive trends found for each sub-basin of the MS and distinguished between significant and not significant ones. Summary of the results are shown in Fig. 5 (mean wave climate) and Fig. 6 (extreme sea states). The number of researches either detecting trends (significant and not significant) or not finding any are normalised over the total number of research per each basin (such ratio is referred to as \(\chi\) in the figures, with subscript \({-}\) and + to indicate negative and positive trends respectively). Note that negative and positive trends can be detected in different parts of the same sub-basin, hence \(\chi ^++\chi ^-\) can be larger than 1. In the figure NA indicates either that the significance was not assessed in the study considered or that no trends were identified.
Summary of the research investigating trends for mean wave climate. Left side: positive trends; right side: negative trends. The number of researches either detecting trends (significant and not significant) or not finding any are normalised over the total number of research per each basin (such ratio is referred to as \(\chi\) in the figures)
Same as Fig. 5 for extreme sea states
Overall, for mean climate trends, works finding mean negative trends represent the majority for most basins (right side of Fig. 5). However, when significant trends only are considered, positive and negative trends are almost as frequent. Significant trends are detected predominantly in the the western MS and in the Gulf of Sirte. In particular in the Gulf of Lion, and the South-West MS (left side of Fig. 5) positive significant trends are more abundant than non significant or unclassified trends. This is never the case for negative trends. In case of extreme sea states trends, there are many basins where, although some trends could be identified, these were mostly found to be unclassified or not statistically significant; such consideration holds for 10 out of 12 basins for positive trends, and for all basins in case of negative trends.
Looking at the significant trends, the Gulf of Lion is the basin most affected by upward significant trends, that are mostly located in the west part of this sub-basin. The Tyrrhenian Sea is also interested by positive and significant extreme sea states trends. This basin is also the one showing the largest amount of researches finding negative and significant trends. These trends coexist in the same sub-basin and show a clear north/south split, with negative trends located in the southern sub-basin (off the Calabria coast, Italy) and the positive in the northern part (towards the Ligurian Sea), respectively, (De Leo et al. 2020; De Leo et al. 2021a; Caloiero et al. 2022; Amarouche et al. 2022), therefore they should be further analysed.
The consensus on the relation between trends in sea states and long-term changes in weather patterns is also not general. Correlations between winter averaged \(H_s\) series and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Scandinavian index have been investigated (Lionello and Sanna 2005; Barbariol et al. 2021), as well as links between wave climate variability and the Mediterranean Oscillation Index and the East Atlantic pattern (Elshinnawy and Antolínez 2023; Izaguirre et al. 2010). However, inter-annual variability in wave climate can only partly be explained by teleconnections (Barbariol et al. 2021), since wave regimes are more closely related to local centers of action (Lionello and Sanna 2005) and local generated wind (Lin and Oey 2019; Cao et al. 2021), although this does not imply that wave trends mirror trends in wind climate (Alves 2006).
4 Other sea state parameters
For most coastal and off-shore projects and operations, \(H_s\) is the most relevant parameter. Hence, the vast majority of articles reviewed attempted to assess climatic trends by analysing time series of \(H_s\) data. However, other parameters can also play a crucial note; in particular, changes in waves direction of propagation \(\theta\) can directly affect shoreline dynamics (Zacharioudaki and Reeve 2011; Casas-Prat and Sierra 2012; Chataigner et al. 2022) and harbour agitation (Casas-Prat and Sierra 2012; Sierra et al. 2017). Trends in \(\theta\) need to be assessed independently, as this cannot be inferred from \(H_s\), unlike the wave period, for which simplified parametric formulae can be employed, at least in case of extreme waves when the two parameters are almost linearly related (see e.g., Goda 2003; Callaghan et al. 2008). Moreover, estimation of trends in wave direction is a challenging task due to the intrinsic nature of the data to analyse: peak direction \(\theta _p\), for example, is a non-continuous quantity that depends strongly on the spectral grid resolution and hence could present different behaviour depending on the number of bins employed for partitioning the spectrum; mean direction \(\theta _m\), on the other hand, may not represent the real direction of propagation of wave storms, especially in an enclosed sea such as the MS, where swell conditions are rare, while ocean waves and multiple wave systems occur frequently. For these reasons, to date, little research has been carried out on trends in time-series of \(\theta\) in the MS. Time-series of storms belonging to different directional sectors can be characterised by opposite trends (Casas-Prat and Sierra 2010b), shedding light on a crucial aspect: CC may differently affect storms that propagate from different directions (results were further confirmed in Casas-Prat and Sierra 2010a, 2012). Sierra et al. (2017) and De Leo et al. (2021b) assessed trends in future wave projections and could not find relevant changes with respect to present conditions, while Erikson et al. (2022) highlighted mild counter clockwise trends in annual series of mean \(\theta _m\) in the Levantine Basin. Trends in wave period are even less studied. To the best of our knowledge, wave periods at global scale were analysed only by Gao et al. (2021) and Erikson et al. (2022). However, previous works estimated trends in wave storminess, therefore coupling information about \(H_s\) with storms frequency and duration, which could dramatically affect wave climate trends (Casas-Prat and Sierra 2010b; Lira-Loarca et al. 2021b). In this respect, the analysis of trends in series of Total Storm Wave Energy (Arena et al. 2015) and Storm Power Index (Dolan and Davis 1992) carried out by Amarouche and Akpınar (2021) found patterns similar to \(H_s\) trends in the Tyrrhenian Sea; other hot spots were spotted in the Gulf of Lion (towards the Balearic Sea) and in the Alboran Sea. Such patterns were altered when computing trends on a decadal base (Amarouche et al. 2022). Finally, no significant trends in the yearly number of rough sea states were reported by Erikson et al. (2022).
5 Conclusions
This review analysed the results of peer reviewed articles researching historical ocean waves trends in the Mediterranean Sea (MS). Most of the studies focused on the significant wave height \(H_s\) trends, while other sea state parameters, notably wave direction and period appear to be under-studied in this context. Previous research indicated limited consensus across all levels of \(H_s\) analysed in the MS, neither for mean (Fig. 5) nor for extreme (Fig. 6) \(H_s\). Negative mean wave climate trends are more frequently detected across the MS than positive ones. However, the western MS shows notable, statistically significant, positive trends. Similarly, for extreme sea state positive trends are detected in the western MS, in particular in the Gulf of Lion and the Tyrrhenian Sea, with complex spatial distribution. The western MS is, therefore, the only sub-basin in which positive historical trends are found for both mean wave climate and extreme values of \(H_s\) by a number of studies.
Some considerations should be provided on the links between historical trends and future projected trends, which have not been the focus of this review. However, given the importance of the use of projections in studies aimed at assessing climate scenarios, it is worth pointing out that, for the MS, historical trends and future projected trends diverge. Projections are obtained from future emissions scenarios, which differ from the past, therefore this difference is not surprising. The works by Sierra et al. (2017) off the island of Menorca, Benetazzo et al. (2012); Ruol et al. (2022) in the Adriatic Sea, De Leo et al. (2021b); Lira-Loarca et al. (2021a, 2021b); Simonetti and Cappietti (2023) and Morim et al. (2021) at regional and global scales, respectively, all indicate a decrease in the magnitude of future wave climate within the MS.
The lack of consensus found in this review may be due to the sources of uncertainty that have been proven to affect trend estimates, such as data source (Timmermans et al. 2020), statistics employed to characterise mean or extreme conditions (Young and Ribal 2019), length of the time period used for the analysis (Zacharioudaki et al. 2015; Cao et al. 2021; Sharmar et al. 2021), and thresholds used to prove trends statistical significance (De Leo et al. 2020; Caloiero et al. 2022). Also, in addition to the effect of the different sources of data, within the same source, the varying spatial and time resolution used in various studies may contribute to the lack of a wider consensus on regional trends. This aspect has not been analysed in detail yet. Similarly, for studies using numerical models, the effect of increase of observations in assimilation, known to introduce spurious trends (Wohland et al. 2019; Meucci et al. 2020), is not always considered in the studies in which reanalysis is used. The availability of increasingly longer time series, such as the ERA5 database, may drive studies on the reconstruction of historical trends spanning longer periods, therefore the quantification of the effect of different data assimilated on trends should be considered as a priority.
Based on the above-mentioned aspects, it is clear that the current state of the art on the knowledge of historical trends in the MS, while providing useful insights, needs to improve the reliability of the results by an improved quantification of the uncertainty due to the data and models used. Additionally, also methods used to detect trends and their statistical significance should be improved, above all when multiple studies are compared. While linear trends represent a helpful and straightforward information, the variability of the modelling hypotheses and observations used can generate large variability among studies (Morim et al. 2019), as also observed in the studies reviewed here. Future research should mitigate this by, for example, using an approach similar to that used for projections, where local results are corrected for bias and averaged on individual grid points before determining a trend, (see Lira-Loarca et al. 2023, and references therein), although this does not ensure to span the total uncertainty (Shepherd et al. 2018). Linear trends estimates based on time series at one location themselves should be thoroughly validated by e.g., using multiple tests and possibly analysing the sensitivity to the reference time period and data employed.
A further area in which research is needed is the establishment of links between sea state trends and weather patterns, in which, as discussed in Sect. 3.3, a wide consensus is not present. In this aspect it is needed to understand the role of indexes interpreting weather processes at scales larger than the MS, and changes in local ones. However, this analysis is complicated by the lack of consensus on the significant trends. As noted throughout this review, available studies mainly focus on \(H_s\) trends, with other sea states parameter being understudied. In addition the spatial coherence of the trends within sub-basins has not yet been assessed. For the former aspect, an alternative to analyse spectral periods, is potentially the analysis of full spectra, which has been shown to allow for more robust analysis than the integrated wave parameters, see Lira-Loarca and Besio (2022). For the latter aspect, it is crucial to understand the actual spatial coherence of trends, as done in the field of sea level trends analysis (Calafat et al. 2022).
6 Supplementary information
The list of articles reviewed with their bibliographical information and type of analysis (global, regional, or local) is provided as supplementary spreadsheet file.
Data availability
The datasets analysed in this review article are not generated within this study. Data used to generate the figures and tables, which result from the analysis of the available literature. are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abraham JP, Baringer M, Bindoff NL et al (2013) A review of global ocean temperature observations: implications for ocean heat content estimates and climate change. Rev Geophys 51(3):450–483
Alexandrakis G, Manasakis C, Kampanis NA (2015) Valuating the effects of beach erosion to tourism revenue. A management perspective. Ocean Coast Manag 111:1–11
Alves JHG (2006) Numerical modeling of ocean swell contributions to the global wind-wave climate. Ocean Model 11(1–2):98–122
Amarouche K, Akpınar A (2021) Increasing trend on storm wave intensity in the western Mediterranean. Climate 9(1):11
Amarouche K, Akpınar A, Semedo A (2022) Wave storm events in the Western Mediterranean Sea over four decades. Ocean Model 170:101933
Amarouche K, Bingölbali B, Akpinar A (2022) New wind-wave climate records in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Clim Dyn 58(5):1899–1922
Arena F, Laface V, Malara G et al (2015) Estimation of downtime and of missed energy associated with a wave energy converter by the equivalent power storm model. Energies 8(10):11575–11591
Barbariol F, Davison S, Falcieri FM et al (2021) Wind waves in the Mediterranean Sea: an ERA5 reanalysis wind-based climatology. Front Mar Sci 8:760614
Benetazzo A, Fedele F, Carniel S et al (2012) Wave climate of the Adriatic Sea: a future scenario simulation. Nat Hazard 12(6):2065–2076
Besio G, Briganti R, Romano A et al (2017) Time clustering of wave storms in the Mediterranean Sea. Nat Hazard 17(3):505–514
Calafat FM, Wahl T, Tadesse MG et al (2022) Trends in Europe storm surge extremes match the rate of sea-level rise. Nature 603(7903):841–845
Callaghan D, Nielsen P, Short A et al (2008) Statistical simulation of wave climate and extreme beach erosion. Coast Eng 55(5):375–390
Caloiero T, Aristodemo F (2021) Trend detection of wave parameters along the Italian Seas. Water 13(12):1634
Caloiero T, Aristodemo F, Algieri Ferraro D (2019) Trend analysis of significant wave height and energy period in southern Italy. Theoret Appl Climatol 138:917–930
Caloiero T, Aristodemo F, Ferraro DA (2020) Changes of significant wave height, energy period and wave power in Italy in the period 1979–2018. Environ Sci Proc 2(1):3
Caloiero T, Aristodemo F, Ferraro DA (2022) Annual and seasonal trend detection of significant wave height, energy period and wave power in the Mediterranean Sea. Ocean Eng 243:110322
Cao Y, Dong C, Young IR et al (2021) Global wave height slowdown trend during a recent global warming slowdown. Remote Sens 13(20):4096
Casas-Prat M, Sierra J (2010a) Trend analysis of the wave storminess: the wave direction. Adv Geosci 26:89–92
Casas-Prat M, Sierra J (2010b) Trend analysis of wave storminess: wave direction and its impact on harbour agitation. Nat Hazard 10(11):2327–2340
Casas-Prat M, Sierra J (2012) Trend analysis of wave direction and associated impacts on the Catalan coast. Clim Change 115(3):667–691
Casas-Prat M, Wang XL, Mori N et al (2022) Effects of internal climate variability on historical ocean wave height trend assessment. Front Mar Sci 9:847017
Chataigner T, Yates M, Le Dantec N et al (2022) Sensitivity of a one-line longshore shoreline change model to the mean wave direction. Coast Eng 172:104025
Chen X, Zhang X, Church JA et al (2017) The increasing rate of global mean sea-level rise during 1993–2014. Nat Clim Chang 7(7):492–495
Dangendorf S, Marcos M, Wöppelmann G et al (2017) Reassessment of 20th century global mean sea level rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(23):5946–5951
De Leo F, De Leo A, Besio G et al (2020) Detection and quantification of trends in time series of significant wave heights: an application in the Mediterranean Sea. Ocean Eng 202:107155
De Leo F, Besio G, Briganti R et al (2021a) Non-stationary extreme value analysis of sea states based on linear trends. Analysis of annual maxima series of significant wave height and peak period in the Mediterranean Sea. Coast Eng 167:103896
De Leo F, Besio G, Mentaschi L (2021b) Trends and variability of ocean waves under RCP8. 5 emission scenario in the Mediterranean Sea. Ocean Dyn 71(1):97–117
De Leo F, Enríquez AR, Orfila A et al (2022) Uncertainty assessment of significant wave height return levels downscaling for coastal application. Appl Ocean Res 127:103303
Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ et al (2011) The era-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597
Dolan R, Davis RE (1992) An intensity scale for Atlantic coast northeast storms. J Coast Res 1992:840–853
Durack PJ, Wijffels SE, Matear RJ (2012) Ocean salinities reveal strong global water cycle intensification during 1950 to 2000. Science 336(6080):455–458
Elshinnawy AI, Antolínez JA (2023) A changing wave climate in the Mediterranean Sea during 58-years using UERRA-MESCAN-SURFEX high-resolution wind fields. Ocean Eng 271:113689
Enríquez AR, Marcos M, Álvarez-Ellacuría A et al (2017) Changes in beach shoreline due to sea level rise and waves under climate change scenarios: application to the balearic islands (western mediterranean). Nat Hazard 17(7):1075–1089
Erikson L, Morim J, Hemer M et al (2022) Global ocean wave fields show consistent regional trends between 1980 and 2014 in a multi-product ensemble. Commun Earth Environ 3(1):320
Gao H, Liang B, Shao Z (2021) A global climate analysis of wave parameters with a focus on wave period from 1979 to 2018. Appl Ocean Res 111:102652
Goda Y (2003) Revisiting Wilson’s formulas for simplified wind-wave prediction. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 129(2):93–95
Gulev SK, Grigorieva V (2004) Last century changes in ocean wind wave height from global visual wave data. Geophys Res Lett 31(24):1
Hayashi Y (1982) Confidence intervals of a climatic signal. J Atmos Sci 39(9):1895–1905
Helm KP, Bindoff NL, Church JA (2010) Changes in the global hydrological-cycle inferred from ocean salinity. Geophys Res Lett 37(18):1
Hirsch RM, Slack JR, Smith RA (1982) Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour Res 18(1):107–121
Izaguirre C, Mendez FJ, Menendez M et al (2010) Extreme wave climate variability in southern Europe using satellite data. J Geophys Res Oceans 115(C4):1
Kendall MG (1948) Rank correlation methods. Springer, London
Kotsias G, Lolis CJ, Hatzianastassiou N et al (2021) An objective definition of seasons for the mediterranean region. Int J Climatol 41(S1):E1889–E1905
Lin Y, Oey L (2019) Global trends of sea surface gravity wave, wind, and coastal wave setup. J Clim 33(3):769–785
Lionello P, Sanna A (2005) Mediterranean wave climate variability and its links with NAO and Indian Monsoon. Clim Dyn 25(6):611–623
Lira-Loarca A, Besio G (2022) Future changes and seasonal variability of the directional wave spectra in the Mediterranean Sea for the 21st century. Environ Res Lett 17(10):104015
Lira-Loarca A, Cobos M, Besio G et al (2021a) Projected wave climate temporal variability due to climate change. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 35(9):1741–1757
Lira-Loarca A, Ferrari F, Mazzino A et al (2021b) Future wind and wave energy resources and exploitability in the Mediterranean Sea by 2100. Appl Energy 302:117492
Lira Loarca A, Berg P, Baquerizo A et al (2023) On the role of wave climate temporal variability in bias correction of GCM–RCM wave simulations. Climate Dyn 2023:1–28
Lo Feudo T, Mel RA, Sinopoli S et al (2022) Wave climate and trends for the marine experimental station of Capo Tirone based on a 70-year-long hindcast dataset. Water 14(2):163
Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econ J Econ Soc 1945:245–259
Martucci G, Carniel S, Chiggiato J et al (2010) Statistical trend analysis and extreme distribution of significant wave height from 1958 to 1999—an application to the Italian Seas. Ocean Sci 6(2):525–538
Mattiazzo G (2019) State of the art and perspectives of wave energy in the Mediterranean Sea: backstage of ISWEC. Front Energy Res 7:114
Mayer L, Jakobsson M, Allen G et al (2018) The Nippon Foundation-GEBCO seabed 2030 project: the quest to see the world’s oceans completely mapped by 2030. Geosciences 8(2):63
Meredith MP, King JC (2005) Rapid climate change in the ocean west of the Antarctic Peninsula during the second half of the 20th century. Geophys Res Lett 32(19):1
Meucci A, Young IR, Aarnes OJ et al (2020) Comparison of wind speed and wave height trends from twentieth-century models and satellite altimeters. J Clim 33(2):611–624
Milne GA, Gehrels WR, Hughes CW et al (2009) Identifying the causes of sea-level change. Nat Geosci 2(7):471–478
Morim J, Hemer M, Wang XL et al (2019) Robustness and uncertainties in global multivariate wind-wave climate projections. Nat Clim Chang 9(9):711–718
Morim J, Vitousek S, Hemer M et al (2021) Global-scale changes to extreme ocean wave events due to anthropogenic warming. Environ Res Lett 16(7):074056
Munday PL, Jones GP, Pratchett MS et al (2008) Climate change and the future for coral reef fishes. Fish Fish 9(3):261–285
Musić S, Nicković S (2008) 44-year wave hindcast for the Eastern Mediterranean. Coast Eng 55(11):872–880
Pomaro A, Cavaleri L, Lionello P (2017) Climatology and trends of the Adriatic Sea wind waves: analysis of a 37-year long instrumental data set. Int J Climatol 37(12):4237–4250
Ratsimandresy A, Sotillo M, Albiach JC et al (2008) A 44-year high-resolution ocean and atmospheric hindcast for the Mediterranean Basin developed within the HIPOCAS project. Coast Eng 55(11):827–842
Ruol P, Martinelli L, Favaretto C et al (2022) Representative and morphological waves along the Adriatic Italian coast in a changing climate. Water 14(17):2678
Sánchez-Arcilla A, Sierra JP, Brown S et al (2016) A review of potential physical impacts on harbours in the Mediterranean Sea under climate change. Reg Environ Change 16:2471–2484
Satta A, Puddu M, Venturini S et al (2017) Assessment of coastal risks to climate change related impacts at the regional scale: the case of the Mediterranean region. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 24:284–296
Scavia D, Field JC, Boesch DF et al (2002) Climate change impacts on US coastal and marine ecosystems. Estuaries 25:149–164
Şen Z (2012) Innovative trend analysis methodology. J Hydrol Eng 17(9):1042–1046
Serinaldi F, Chebana F, Kilsby CG (2020) Dissecting innovative trend analysis. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 34:733–754
Sharmar V, Markina MY, Gulev S (2021) Global ocean wind-wave model hindcasts forced by different reanalyzes: a comparative assessment. J Geophys Res Oceans 126(1):e2020JC016710
Shepherd TG, Boyd E, Calel RA et al (2018) Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change. Clim Change 151:555–571
Sierra J, Casas-Prat M, Campins E (2017) Impact of climate change on wave energy resource: the case of Menorca (Spain). Renew Energy 101:275–285
Simeone S, Palombo L, Molinaroli E et al (2021) Shoreline response to wave forcing and sea level rise along a geomorphological complex coastline (Western Sardinia, Mediterranean Sea). Appl Sci 11(9):4009
Simonetti I, Cappietti L (2023) Mediterranean coastal wave-climate long-term trend in climate change scenarios and effects on the optimal sizing of OWC wave energy converters. Coast Eng 179:104247
Skamarock WC (2004) Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra. Mon Weather Rev 132(12):3019–3032
Takbash A, Young IR (2020) Long-term and seasonal trends in global wave height extremes derived from era-5 reanalysis data. J Mar Sci Eng 8(12):1015
Theil H (1992) A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. In: Henri Theil’s contributions to economics and econometrics. Springer, London, pp 345–381
Timmermans B, Gommenginger C, Dodet G et al (2020) Global wave height trends and variability from new multimission satellite altimeter products, reanalyses, and wave buoys. Geophys Res Lett 47(9):e2019GL086880
Toggweiler JR, Russell J (2008) Ocean circulation in a warming climate. Nature 451(7176):286–288
Toimil A, Camus P, Losada I et al (2020) Climate change-driven coastal erosion modelling in temperate sandy beaches: methods and uncertainty treatment. Earth Sci Rev 202:103110
Watson CS, White NJ, Church JA et al (2015) Unabated global mean sea-level rise over the satellite altimeter era. Nat Clim Chang 5(6):565–568
Wijffels S, Roemmich D, Monselesan D et al (2016) Ocean temperatures chronicle the ongoing warming of Earth. Nat Clim Chang 6(2):116–118
Wilby RL, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65:180–185
Winton M, Griffies SM, Samuels BL et al (2013) Connecting changing ocean circulation with changing climate. J Clim 26(7):2268–2278
Wohland J, Omrani NE, Witthaut D et al (2019) Inconsistent wind speed trends in current twentieth century reanalyses. J Geophys Res Atmos 124(4):1931–1940
Young IR, Ribal A (2019) Multiplatform evaluation of global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science 364(6440):548–552
Young IR, Ribal A (2022) Can multi-mission altimeter datasets accurately measure long-term trends in wave height? Remote Sens 14(4):974
Young I, Zieger S, Babanin AV (2011) Global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science 332(6028):451–455
Young I, Vinoth J, Zieger S et al (2012) Investigation of trends in extreme value wave height and wind speed. J Geophys Res Oceans 117(C11):1
Zacharioudaki A, Reeve DE (2011) Shoreline evolution under climate change wave scenarios. Clim Change 108(1–2):73–105
Zacharioudaki A, Korres G, Perivoliotis L (2015) Wave climate of the hellenic seas obtained from a wave hindcast for the period 1960–2001. Ocean Dyn 65(6):795–816
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out within the RETURN Extended Partnership and received funding from the European Union Next-GenerationEU (National Recovery and Resilience Plan NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3 D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005).
Funding
This study was carried out within the RETURN Extended Partnership and received funding from the European Union Next-GenerationEU (National Recovery and Resilience Plan NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3 D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
De Leo, F., Briganti, R. & Besio, G. Trends in ocean waves climate within the Mediterranean Sea: a review. Clim Dyn 62, 1555–1566 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06984-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06984-4