Abstract
The Arctic warms much faster than other places under increasing greenhouse gases, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification (AA). Arctic positive lapse-rate feedback (LRF) and oceanic heating induced by sea-ice loss have been considered as major causes of Arctic warming and AA, and Arctic high atmospheric stability has been considered as a key factor for the occurrence of the bottom-heavy warming profile and thus positive LRF in the Arctic. Here we analyze model simulations with and without large AA and sea-ice loss and long-term changes in ERA5 reanalysis data to examine the relationships among Arctic sea-ice loss, stability, LRF, Arctic warming, and AA. Results show that the Arctic bottom-heavy warming profile and the resultant positive LRF are produced primarily by increased oceanic heating of the air due to sea-ice loss in Arctic winter, rather than high atmospheric stability. Without the oceanic heating induced by sea-ice loss, most Arctic climate feedbacks weaken greatly, and all other processes can only produce slightly enhanced surface warming and thus weak positive LRF under stable Arctic air. A non-convective Arctic environment allows the oceanic heating to warm near-surface air more than the upper levels, resulting in large positive LRF that roughly doubles the surface warming compared with the case without the LRF. We conclude that enhanced cold-season oceanic heating due to sea-ice loss is the primary cause of Arctic large positive LRF, which in turn allows the surface heating to produce more Arctic warming and large AA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The CESM1 model data used here are available from https://doi.org/10.4121/14699514. ERA5 data are available from https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5.
References
Barnes EA, Polvani LM (2015) CMIP5 projections of Arctic amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic circulation, and of their relationship. J Clim 28:5254–5271. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00589.1
Bintanja R, Graversen RG, Hazeleger W (2011) Arctic winter warming amplified by the thermal inversion and consequent low infrared cooling to space. Nat Geosci 4:758–761. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1285
Boeke RC, Taylor PC (2018) Seasonal energy exchange in sea ice retreat regions contributes to differences in projected Arctic warming. Nat Comm 9:5017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07061-9
Boeke RC, Taylor PC, Sejas SA (2021) On the nature of the Arctic’s positive lapse-rate feedback. Geophys Res Lett 48:e2020GL091109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091109
Burt MA, Randall DA, Branson MD (2016) Dark warming. J Clim 29:705–719
Cai M (2005) Dynamical amplification of polar warming. Geophys Res Lett 32:L22710. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024481
Chung E-S, Ha K-J, Timmermann A, Stuecker MF, Bodai T, Lee S-K (2021) Cold-season Arctic amplification driven by Arctic ocean-mediated seasonal energy transfer. Earth’s Future, 9, e2020EF001898. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001898
Dai A (2022) Arctic amplification is the main cause of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation weakening under large CO2 increases. Clim Dyn 58:3243–3259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06096-x
Dai A, Deng J (2021) Arctic amplification weakens the variability of daily temperatures over northern middle-high latitudes. J Clim 34:2591–2609
Dai A, Song M (2020) Little influence of Arctic amplification on midlatitude climate. Nat Clim Chang 10:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0694-3
Dai A, Wigley TML, Boville BA, Kiehl JT, Buja LE (2001) Climates of the 20th and 21st centuries simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model. J Clim 14:485–519
Dai A, Luo D, Song M, Liu J (2019) Arctic amplification is caused by sea-ice loss under increasing CO2. Nat Comm 10:121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07954-9
Dai A, Huang D, Rose BEJ, Zhu J, Tian X (2020) Improved methods for estimating equilibrium climate sensitivity from transient warming simulations. Clim Dyn 54:4515–4543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05242-1
Deng J, Dai A (2022) Sea ice-air interactions amplify multidecadal variability in the North Atlantic and Arctic region. Nat Commun 13:2100. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-29810-7
Deser C, Tomas R, Alexander M, Lawrence D (2010) The seasonal atmospheric response to projected Arctic sea ice loss in the late twenty-first century. J Clim 23:333–351. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3053.1
England MR, Eisenman I, Lutsko NJ, Wagner TJW (2021) The recent emergence of Arctic amplification. Geophys. Res. Lett, 48, e2021GL094086. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094086
Feldl N, Po-Chedley S, Singh HKA, Hay S, Kushner PJ (2020) Sea ice and atmospheric circulation shape the high-latitude lapse rate feedback. Clim Atmos Sci 3:41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-00146-7
Gong T, Feldstein S, Lee S (2017) The role of downward infrared radiation in the recent Arctic winter warming trend. J Clim 30:4937–4949. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0180.1
Goosse H, Kay JE, Armour KC, Bodas-Salcedo A, Chepfer H, Docquier D et al (2018) Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions. Nature Comm, 9, 1919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04173-0
Graham RM, Cohen L, Ritzhaupt N, Segger B, Graverson RG, Rinke A et al (2019) Evaluation of six atmospheric reanalyses over Arctic sea ice from winter to early summer. J Clim 32:4121–4143
Graversen RG, Langen PL, Mauritsen T (2014) Polar amplification in CCSM4: contributions from the lapse rate and surface albedo feedbacks. J Clim 27:4433–4450. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00551.1
Hahn LC, Armour KC, Zelinka MD, Bitz CM, Donohue A (2021) Contribution to polar amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Front Earth Sci 9:710036. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0626.1
Hansen JE, Lacis A, Rind D, Russell G, Stone P, Fung I et al (1984) Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms. Clim Processes Clim Sensit Geophysical Monograph 29:130–163
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J et al (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 146:1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
Hirahara S, Balmaseda MA, de Boisseson E, Hersbach H (2016) Sea surface temperature and sea ice concentration for ERA5. ERA Report Series No. 26, 25pp. Available at https://www.ecmwf.int/file/46880/download?token=4pKnkudy
Huang Y, Xia Y, Tan X (2017) On the pattern of CO2 radiative forcing and poleward energy transport. J Geophys Research: Atmos 122(20):10578–10593. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027221
Hurrell JW, Holland MM, Gent PR, Ghan S, Kay JE, Kushner PJ et al (2013) The Community Earth System Model: a framework for collaborative research. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 94:1339–1360. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00121.1
Jenkins M, Dai A (2021) The impact of sea-ice loss on Arctic climate feedbacks and their role for Arctic amplification. Geophys Res Lett 48:e2021GL094599. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094599
Jenkins MT, Dai A (2022) Arctic climate feedbacks in ERA5 reanalysis: Seasonal and spatial variations and the impact of sea-ice loss. Geophys Res Lett 49:e2022GL099263. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099263
Jenkins MT, Dai A, Deser C (2023) Seasonal variations and spatial patterns of Arctic cloud changes in association with sea-ice loss during 1950–2019 in ERA5. J. Climate, submitted
Kay JE, Gettelman A (2009) Cloud influence on and response to seasonal Arctic sea ice loss. J Geophys Res 114:D18204. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011773
Kumar A, Perlwitz J, Eischeid J, Quan X, Xu T, Zhang T et al (2010) Contribution of sea ice loss to Arctic amplification. Geophys Res Lett 37:L21701. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045022
Lawrence H, Bormann N, Sandu I, Day J, Farnan J, Bauer P (2019) Use and impact of Arctic observations in the ECMWF numerical weather prediction system. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 145:3432–3454
Manabe S, Wetherald RT (1975) The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 32:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032%3C0003:TEODTC%3E2.0.CO;2
Mayer M, Teitsche S, Haimberger L, Tsubouchi T, Mayer J, Zuo H (2019) An improved estimate of the coupled Arctic energy budget. J Clim 32:7915–7934. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0233.1
Miyawaki O, Tan Z, Shaw TA, Jansen MF (2020) Quantifying key mechanisms that contribute to the deviation of the tropical warming profile from a moist adiabat. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL089136. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089136
Pendergrass AG, Conley A, Vitt FM (2018) Surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative feedback kernels for CESM-CAM5. Earth Syst Sci Data 10:317–324. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-317-2018
Pithan F, Mauritsen T (2014) Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models. Nat Geosci 7:181–184. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2071
Previdi M, Janoski TP, Chiodo G, Smith KL, Polvani LM (2020) Arctic amplification: a rapid response to radiative forcing. Geophys Res Lett 47:e2020GL089933. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089933
Previdi M, Smith KL, Polvani LM (2021) Arctic amplification of climate change: a review of underlying mechanisms. Environ Res Lett 16:093003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c29
Renfrew IA, Barrell C, Elvidge AD, Brooke JK, Duscha C, King JC et al (2021) An evaluation of surface meteorology and fluxes over the Iceland and Greenland Seas in ERA5 reanalysis: the impact of sea ice distribution. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 147:691–712
Screen JA, Simmonds I (2010a) The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification. Nature 464:1334–1337
Screen JA, Simmonds I (2010b) Increasing fall-winter energy loss from the Arctic Ocean and its role in Arctic temperature amplification. Geophys Res Lett 37:L16707. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044136
Serreze MC, Francis JA (2006) The Arctic amplification debate. Clim Change 76:241–264
Serreze MC, Barrett AP, Stroeve JC, Kindig DM, Holland MM (2009) The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification. Cryosphere 3, 11–19
Soden BJ, Held IM, Colman R, Shell KM, Kiehl JT, Shields CA (2008) Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J Clim 21:3504–3520. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI2110.1
Soldatenko S (2021) Effects of global warming on the poleward heat transport by non-stationary large-scale atmospheric eddies, and feedbacks affecting the formation of the Arctic climate. J Mar Sci Eng 9:867. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080867
Stuecker MF, Bitz CM, Armour KC, Proistosescu C, Kang SM, Xie S-P et al (2018) Polar amplification dominated by local forcing and feedbacks. Nat Clim Chang 8:1076–1081. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0339-y
Taylor PC, Boeke RC, Boisvert LN, Feldl N, Henry M, Huang Y et al (2022) Process drivers, inter-model spread, and the path forward: a review of amplified Arctic warming. Front Earth Sci 9:758361. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.758361
Wang Y, Huang Y (2021) A single-column simulation-based decomposition of the tropical upper-tropospheric warming. J Clim 34:5337–5348. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0726.1
Wang C, Graham RM, Wang K, Gerland S, Granskog MA (2019) Comparison of ERA5 and ERA-interim near surface air temperature, snowfall and precipitation over Arctic Sea ice: effects on sea ice thermodynamics and evolution. The Cryosphere 13:1661–1679
Yeo H, Kim M-H, Son S-W, Jeong J-H, Yoon J-H, Kim B-M et al (2022) Arctic cloud properties and associated radiative effects in three newer reanalysis datasets (ERA5, MERRA-2, JRA-55): discrepancies and possible causes. Atmos Res 270:106080
Funding
This work was funded by University at Albany of SUNY and NSF (Grants AGS-2015780 and OISE-1743738).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A. Dai designed the study, helped formulate the data analysis and design of the figures, wrote the manuscript; M. Jenkins helped design the study, made all the figures and helped improve the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors agree to publish the paper in Climate Dynamics.
Competing interests
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, A., Jenkins, M.T. Relationships among Arctic warming, sea-ice loss, stability, lapse rate feedback, and Arctic amplification. Clim Dyn 61, 5217–5232 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06848-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06848-x