Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolution of trends in North Atlantic dynamic sea level in the twenty-first century

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study looks at the evolution of trends in the dynamic sea level (DSL) component of sea-level rise for the North Atlantic (18°–67° N), primarily over the twenty-first century but with some analysis extending to 2300. We use an 18-member climate model ensemble of projections under medium and high greenhouse gas scenarios. We find that the long-term trend pattern (1950–2099) tends to be indicated in the early twenty-first century: 14 (11) of the 18 models have pattern correlations between this period and 1993–2022 of > 0.5 under the medium (high) greenhouse gas scenario. Whether a particular 1993–2022 DSL trend indicates the long-term trend in our ensemble can be assessed from concurrent changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) at 30° N: those cases with larger AMOC weakening trends have high DSL-trend pattern correlations. This suggests that the observed AMOC (or a proxy for that) could indicate whether observed DSL trends are likely to be a constraint on projections, provided suitable AMOC trend indicators can be determined. More generally, North Atlantic DSL and the AMOC show a similar evolution of measures of their successive 30-year trends (with these being projection-onto-a-pattern and the ratio with the long-term trend, respectively), both in the ensemble mean and for individual models. Model-to-model differences in this evolution indicate that the changing DSL and AMOC trends are more interconnected than solely the common influence of external forcings associated with the climate-change scenario. Model simulations extending to 2300 indicate that the twenty-first century trend patterns do not generally persist into subsequent centuries, as has been shown in previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The CMIP5 datasets analysed during this study are available from the Earth System Grid Federation data portal at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip5/. Figure data for selected key figures is available in Supplementary Information; other figure data can be provided on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. The 5–95% range of model results is interpreted by AR5 as the “likely range” for which there is a probability of 66% or more that the outcome may lie within that range.

References

  • Baldwin MP, Stephenson DB, Jolliffe IT (2009) Spatial weighting and iterative projection methods for EOFs. J Clim 22:234–243. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2147.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilbao RAF, Gregory JM, Bouttes N (2015) Analysis of the regional pattern of sea level change due to ocean dynamics and density change for 1993–2099 in observations and CMIP5 AOGCMs. Clim Dyn 45:2647–2666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2499-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouttes N, Gregory JM (2014) Attribution of the spatial pattern of CO2-forced sea-level change to ocean surface flux changes. Environ Res Lett 9:034004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Liu W, Wang G (2019) Understanding the uncertainty in the 21st century dynamic sea level projections: the role of the AMOC. Geophys Res Lett 46(1):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church JA, Clark PU, Cazenave A, Gregory JM, Jevrejeva S, Levermann A, Merrifield MA, Milne GA, Nerem RS, Nunn PD, Payne AJ, Pfeffer WT, Stammer D, Unnikrishnan AS (2013) Sea level change. In: Stocker TF, Qui D, Plattnrt GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boshung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark PU, Church JA, Gregory JM, Payne AJ (2015) Recent progress in understanding and projecting regional and global mean sea level change. Curr Clim Change Rep 1:224–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0024-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldrey MP, Gregory JM, Boeira Dias F, Dobrohotoff P, Domingues CM, Garuba O, Griffies SM, Haak H, Hu A, Ishii M, Jungclaus J, Köhl A, Marsland SJ, Ojha S, Saenko OA, Savita A, Shao A, Stammer D, Suzuki T, Todd A, Zanna L (2021) What causes the spread of model projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change in response to greenhouse gas forcing? Clim Dyn 56:155–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05471-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldrey MP, Gregory JM, Dong X et al (2022) Greenhouse-gas forced changes in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and related worldwide sea-level change. Clim Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06386-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasullo JT, Nerem RS (2018) Altimeter-era emergence of the patterns of forced sea-level rise in climate models and implications for the future. PNAS 115(51):12944–12949. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813233115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasullo JT, Gent PR, Nerem RS (2020) Forced patterns of sea level rise in the community earth system model large ensemble from 1920 to 2100. J Geophys Res Ocns 125:e2019JC016030. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC016030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Kemper B, Hewitt HT, Xiao C, Aðalgeirsdóttir G, Drijfhout SS, Edwards TL, Golledge NR, Hemer M, Kopp RE, Krinner G, Mix A, Notz D, Nowicki S, Nurhati IS, Ruiz L, Sallée J-B, Slangen ABA, Yu YY (2021) Ocean, cryosphere and sea level change. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, Zhou B (eds) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM, Church JA, Boer GJ, Dixon KW, Flato GM, Jackett GM, Lowe JA, O’Farrell SP, Roeckner E, Russell GL, Stouffer RJ, Winton M (2001) Comparison of results from several AOGCMs for global and regional sea-level change 1900–2100. Clim Dyn 18:225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820100180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM, Bouttes N, Griffies SM, Haak H, Hurlin WJ, Jungclaus J, Kelley M, Lee WG, Marshall J, Romanou A, Saenko OA, Stammer D, Winton M (2016) The Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP) contribution to CMIP6: Investigation of sea-level and ocean climate change in response to CO2 forcing. Geosci Model Dev 9:3993–4017. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3993-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM, Griffies SM, Hughes CW, Lowe JA, Church JA, Fukimori I, Gomez N, Kopp RE, Landerer F, Le Cozannet G, Ponte RM, Stammer D, Tamisiea ME, van de Wal RSW (2019) Concepts and terminology for sea level: mean, variability and change, both local and global. Surv Geophys 40:1251–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09525-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall A, Cox P, Huntingford C, Klein S (2019) Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change. Nat Clim Change 9:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0436-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlington BD, Fasullo JT, Nerem RS, Kim K-Y, Landerer RW (2019) Uncovering the pattern of forced sea level rise in the satellite altimeter record. Geophys Res Lett 46:4844–4853. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs W, Palmer MD, Monselesan D (2016) An energy conservation analysis of ocean drift in the CMIP5 global coupled models. J Clim 29:1639–1653. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0477.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard T, Ridley J, Pardaens AK, Hurkmans RTWL, Payne AJ, Giesen RH, Lowe JA, Bamber JL, Edwards TL, Oerlemans J (2014) The land-ice contribution to 21st-century dynamic sea level rise. Ocean Sci 10:485–500. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-485-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LC, Biastoch A, Buckley MW et al (2022) The evolution of the North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation since 1980. Nat Rev Earth Environ 3:241–254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00263-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerer FW, Jungclaus JH, Marotzke J (2007) Regional dynamic and steric sea level change in response to the IPCC-A1B scenario. J Phys Oceanogr 37:296–312. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3013.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legeais J-F, Ablain M, Zawadzki L, Zuo H, Johannessen JA, Scharffenberg MG, Fenoglio-Marc L, Fernandes MJ, Andersen OB, Rudenko S, Cipollini P, Quartly GD, Passaro M, Cazenave A, Benveniste J (2018) An improved and homogeneous altimeter sea level record from the ESA climate change initiative. Earth Syst Sci Data 10:281–301. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-281-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe JA, Gregory JM (2006) Understanding projections of sea level rise in a Hadley Centre coupled climate model. J Geophys Res 111:C11014. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu K, Zhang X, Church JA, Slangen ABA, Hu J (2014) Time of emergence for regional sea-level change. Nat Clim Change 4:1006–1010. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu K, Zhang X, Church JA (2020) Regional dynamic sea level simulated in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models: mean biases, future projections, and their linkages. J Clim 33:6377–6396. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1029.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu K, Zhang X, Church JA (2021) Projected ocean warming constrained by the ocean observational record. Nat Clim Change 11:834–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01151-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AK, Zhao A (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Wuin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin KV, Daniel JS, Kainuma MLT, Lamarque J-F, Matsumoto K, Montzka SA, Raper SCB, Riahi K, Thomson AM, Velders GJM, van Vuuren DPP (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extension from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change 109:213–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menary MB, Robson J, Allan RP, Booth BBB, Cassou C, Gastineau G, Gregory J, Hodson D, Jones C, Mignot J, Ringer M, Sutton R, Wilcox L, Zhang R (2020) Aerosol-forced AMOC changes in CMIP6 historical simulations. Geophys Res Lett 47(14):e2020GL088166. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C, van Vuuren DP, Eyring V, Friedlingstein P, Hurtt G, Knutti R, Kriegler E, Lamarque J-F, Lowe J, Meehl GA, Moss R, Riahi K, Sanderson BM (2016) The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci Model Dev 9:3461–3482. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer M, Glavovic BC, Hinkel J, van de Wal R, Magnan AK, Abd-Elgawad A, Cai R, Cifuentes-Jara M, DeConto RM, Ghosh T, Hay J, Isla F, Marzeion B, Meyssignac B, Sebesvari Z (2019) Sea level rise and implications for low-lying islands, coasts and communities. In: Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Tignor M, Poloczanska E, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Nicolai M, Okem A, Petzold J, Rama B, Weyer NM (eds) IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA, pp 321–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.006

  • Palmer MD, Gregory JM, Bagge M, Calvert D, Hagedoorn JM, Howard T, Klemann V, Lowe JA, Roberts CD, Slangen ABA, Spada G (2020) Exploring the Drivers of Global and Local Sea-Level Change over the 21st Century and Beyond. Earth’s Future. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardaens AK, Gregory JM, Lowe JA (2011) A model study of factors influencing projected changes in regional sea level over the twenty-first century. Clim Dyn 36(9–10):2015–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0738-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reintges A, Martin T, Latif M, Keenlyside NS (2017) Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMiP5 models. Clim Dyn 49:1495–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter K, Nilsen JEO, Raj RP, Bethke I, Johannessen JA, Slangen ABA, Marzeion B (2017) Northern North Atlantic sea level in CMIP5 climate models: evaluation of mean state, variability, and trends against altimetric observations. J Clim 30:9383–9398. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0310.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson J, Menary MB, Sutton RT, Mecking J, Gregory JM, Jones C, Sunha B, Stevens DP, Wilcox LJ (2022) The role of anthropogenic aerosol forcing in the 1850–1985 strengthening of the AMOC in CMIP6 historical simulations. J Clim. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0124.1. (published online ahead of print 2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slangen ABA, Carson M, Katsman CA, van de Wal RSW, Köhl A, Vermeersen LLA, Stammer D (2014) Projecting twenty-first century regional sea-level changes. Clim Change 124(1–2):317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1080-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeed DA, Josey SA, Beaulieu C, Johns WE, Moat BI, Frajka-Williams E, Rayner D, Meinen CS, Baringer MO, Bryden HL, McCarthy GD (2018) The North Atlantic ocean is in a state of reduced overturning. Geophys Res Lett 45(3):1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experimental design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weijer W, Cheng W, Garuba OA, Hu A, Nadiga BT (2020) CMIP6 models predict significant 21st century decline of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Geophys Res Lett 47:e2019GL086075. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Zhang X, Church JA, Hu J, Gregory JM (2021) Evolving patterns of sterodynamic sea-level rise under mitigation scenarios and insights from linear system theory. Clim Dyn 57:635–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05727-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J (2012) Century to multi-century sea level rise projections from CMIP5 models. Geophys Res Lett 39:L17709. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Griffies SM, Stouffer R (2010) Spatial variability of sea level rise in twenty-first century projections. J Clim 23:4585–4607. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3533.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Anne Pardaens was supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by BEIS and Defra. I acknowledge the climate modelling groups and the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling for making the CMIP5 model output available. I would like to thank Matt Palmer and Richard Wood for comments and suggestions on drafts of this paper. I would also like to thank Jonathan Gregory for comments on early parts of this work. I thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments have been very useful.

Funding

This work was supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by BEIS and Defra.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne K. Pardaens.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1137 kb)

Supplementary file2 (CSV 34 kb)

Supplementary file3 (CSV 34 kb)

Supplementary file4 (CSV 31 kb)

Supplementary file5 (CSV 31 kb)

Supplementary file6 (CSV 29 kb)

Supplementary file7 (CSV 23 kb)

Supplementary file8 (CSV 1 kb)

Supplementary file9 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file10 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file11 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file12 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file13 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file14 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file15 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file16 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file17 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file18 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file19 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file20 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file21 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file22 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file23 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file24 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file25 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file26 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file27 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file28 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file29 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file30 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file31 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file32 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file33 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file34 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file35 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file36 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file37 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file38 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file39 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file40 (NC 54 kb)

Supplementary file41 (NC 55 kb)

Supplementary file42 (NC 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pardaens, A.K. Evolution of trends in North Atlantic dynamic sea level in the twenty-first century. Clim Dyn 61, 1847–1865 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06659-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06659-0

Keywords

Navigation