Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Weather regimes and rainfall over Tunisia in a multi-model ensemble versus a multi-member ensemble

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims at investigating for the first time the links of daily rainfall over Tunisia to large-scale atmospheric conditions by establishing a weather regime (WR) classification over a North African-Mediterranean domain mostly encompassing North Africa. Seven WRs are identified in the year-round ERA-Interim (ERA-I) Mean Sea Level Pressure field spanning 1992–2011. This classification then served as reference to determine WRs in a WRF 10-member ensemble and a regional climate simulations ensemble from Euro-Cordex all driven by ERA-I. Capabilities of both ensemble simulations in reproducing the ERA-I WRs main characteristics, and in reproducing the main features of observed rainfall over Tunisia from a high-resolution local observational dataset and two satellite-gauge merged rainfall products are evaluated for each WR. The models best reproduced the ERA-I two wintertime NAO-like WRs (WR1 and WR3). Better performances of the WRF ensemble and larger spread within the Euro-Cordex models are overall obtained in all WRs. Wet and extremely wet conditions are mainly observed north of Tunisia and seem to be primarily driven by WR5 and WR3 (partly by WR7) featuring strong negative MSLP anomalies and anomalous cyclonic circulation impacting Tunisia. Opposite atmospheric conditions associated with anomalously dry conditions however prevailing all over the country are particularly observed during WR1. Intensity and sign of the simulated rainfall errors over Tunisia, as well as the model uncertainties, as qualified by the Signal-to-Noise ratio, are regime-dependent. The highest (lowest) annual and DJF model errors among the two ensembles are frequently obtained during WR1 (WR3 and WR7) and are discussed with regard to the weakening (strengthening) of the lateral forcing’s magnitude over Tunisia. Model uncertainties are lower in DJF than in JJA. Lateral and orographic forcings restricting inter-member or inter-model spread are mostly associated with WR3 and WR5 in winter. Internal variability of the simulated rainfall field within the WRF ensemble is however persistently smaller than the inter-model spread for all WRs and for all considered timescales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

ERA-Interim and ERA5 data are available from ECMW’s Climate Data Store (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu). Euro-Cordex regional climate simulations were provided by the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) nodes available at https://cordex.org/data-access/esgf/. MSWEP V2.2 rainfall data is provided under request to Princeton Climate Labs (support@princetonclimatelabs.com). CHIRPS V2.0 rainfall data is available from the Climate Hazard Center, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA from their website at https://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data/chirps. Interpolated OLR and GPCP Precipitation data were provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.interp_OLR.html for OLR and https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.gpcp.html for GPCP. Mediterranean Sea SST Analysis L4 (cmems_SST_MED_SST_L4_REP_OBSERVATIONS_010_021) is provided by EU Copernicus Marine Service and available at https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/product-detail/SST_MED_SST_L4_REP_OBSERVATIONS_010_021/DATA-ACCESS. Daily NAO index is available from Climate Prediction Center’s website at https://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/.

Code availability

WRF is an open-source code provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA from their website at https://www.mmm.ucar.edu/weather-research-and-forecasting-model.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor Jian Lu, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive remarks. Calculations were performed using HPC resources from DNUM CCUB (Centre de Calcul de l’Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France).

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BF designed the study and drafted the main manuscript text. BP designed with TC the WRF ensemble and provided the scripts for k-means clustering. PQS and YT provided the local rainfall dataset over Tunisia (SAFRAN_Tun). AU contributed with BP, PQS, YT and TC to the discussion of the main results and to the substantial revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilel Fathalli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4855 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fathalli, B., Pohl, B., Quintana-Seguí, P. et al. Weather regimes and rainfall over Tunisia in a multi-model ensemble versus a multi-member ensemble. Clim Dyn 61, 1783–1813 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06656-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06656-9

Keywords

Navigation