Understanding the geographic distribution of tropical cyclone formation for applications in climate models

Article

Abstract

Projections of Tropical cyclone (TC) formation under future climate scenarios are dependent on climate model simulations. However, many models produce unrealistic geographical distributions of TC formation, especially in the north and south Atlantic and eastern south Pacific TC basins. In order to improve confidence in projections it is important to understand the reasons behind these model errors. However, considerable effort is required to analyse the many models used in projection studies. To address this problem, a novel diagnostic is developed that provides compelling insight into why TCs form where they do, using a few summary diagrams. The diagnostic is developed after identifying a relationship between seasonal climatologies of atmospheric variables in 34 years of ECMWF reanalysis data, and TC detection distributions in the same data. Geographic boundaries of TC formation are constructed from four threshold quantities. TCs form where Emanuel’s Maximum Potential Intensity, \(V_{{PI}}\), exceeds \(40\,\,{\text{ms}}^{{ - 1}}\), 700 hPa relative humidity, \(RH_{{700}}\), exceeds 40%, and the magnitude of the difference in vector winds between 850 and 200 hPa, \(V_{{sh}}\), is less than \(20~\,\,{\text{ms}}^{{ - 1}}\). The equatorial boundary is best defined by a composite quantity containing the ratio of absolute vorticity \((\eta )~\) to the meridional gradient of absolute vorticity (\(\beta ^{*}\)), rather than \(\eta\) alone. \({\beta ^*}\) is also identified as a potentially important ingredient for TC genesis indices. A comparison of detected Tropical Depression (TD) and Tropical Storm (TS) climatologies revealed TDs more readily intensify further to TS where \({V_{PI}}\) is elevated and \({V_{sh}}\) is relatively weak. The distributions of each threshold quantity identify the factors that favour and suppress TC formation throughout the tropics in the real world. This information can be used to understand why TC formation is poorly represented in some climate models, and shows potential for understanding anomalous TC formation behaviour in the real world.

Keywords

Tropical cyclone Tropical cyclone formation Tropical cyclone climatology Climate change Climate modelling 

References

  1. Aiyyer AR, Thorncroft C (2006) Climatology of vertical wind shear over the tropical Atlantic. J Climate 19:2969–2983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bister M, Emanuel KA (1998) Dissipative heating and hurricane intensity. Meteor Atmos Phys 65:233–240. doi:10.1007/BF01030791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bister M, Emanuel KA (2002) Low frequency variability of tropical cyclone potential intensity. 1. Interannual to interdecadal variability. J Geophys Res 107:4801. doi:10.1029/2001JD000776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruyère CL, Holland GJ, Towler E (2012) Investigating the use of a genesis potential index for tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic basin. J Climate 25:8611–8626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camargo SJ (2013) Global and regional aspects of tropical cyclone activity in the CMIP5 models. J Climate 26:9880–9902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camargo SJ, Tippett MK, Sobel AH, Vecchi GA, Zhao M (2014) Testing the performance of tropical cyclone genesis indices in future climates using the HIRAM model. J Climate 27:9171–9196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charney GJ, Stern ME (1962) On the stability of internal baroclinic jets in a rotating atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 19:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis CA, Bosart LF (2003) Baroclinically induced tropical cyclogenesis. Mon Wea Rev 131:2730–2747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hólm EV, Isaksen L, Kållberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette J-J, Park B-K, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut J-N, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 137:553–597. doi:10.1002/qj.828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickinson M, Molinari J (2000) Climatology of sign reversals of the meridional potential vorticity gradient over Africa and Australia. Mon Wea Rev 128:3890–3900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ditchek SD, Boos WR, Camargo SJ, Tippett MK (2016) A genesis index for monsoon disturbances. J Clim 29:5189–5203. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0704.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duvel J-P (2015) Initiation and intensification of tropical depressions over the Southern Indian Ocean: Influence of the MJO. Mon Wea Rev 143:2170–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duvel J-P, Camargo SJ, Sobel AH (2017) Role of the convection scheme in modeling initiation and intensification of tropical depressions over the North Atlantic. Mon Wea Rev 145:1495–1509. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-16-0201.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dvorak VF (1973) A technique for the analysis and forecasting of tropical cyclone intensities from satellite pictures. NOAA Tech. Memo. NESS 45, p 19Google Scholar
  15. Emanuel KA (2010) Tropical cyclone activity downscaled from NOAACIRES reanalysis, 1908–1958. J Adv Model Earth Syst. doi:10.3894/JAMES.2010.2.1 Google Scholar
  16. Emanuel KA, Nolan DS (2004) Tropical cyclone activity and the global climate system. Preprints. In: 26th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Miami, Fl, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 10 A.2Google Scholar
  17. Emanuel KA, Sobel A (2013) Response of tropical sea surface temperature, precipitation, and tropical cyclone-related variables to changes in global and local forcing. J Adv Model Earth Syst 5:447–458. doi:10.1002/jame.20032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emanuel K, Sundararajan R, Williams J (2008) Hurricanes and global warming: results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 89:347–367. doi:10.1175/BAMS-89-3-347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira RN, Schubert WH (1997) Barotropic aspects of ITCZ breakdown. J Atmos Sci 54:261–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank WM (2008) What role do tropical cyclones play in the general circulation? In: Proc. 28th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, 28 April–2 May 2008, Orlando, Fl, American Meteorological SocietyGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank WM, Roundy PE (2006) The role of tropical waves in tropical cyclogenesis. Mon Wea Rev 134:2397–2417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray WM (1968) Global view of the origin of tropical disturbances and storms. Mon Wea Rev 96:669–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray WM (1975) Tropical cyclone genesis. Dept. of Atmos. Sci. Paper No.232, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, p 121Google Scholar
  24. Gray WM (1979) Hurricanes: their formation, structure and likely role in the tropical circulation. In: Shaw DB (ed) Meteorology over the tropical oceans. Royal Meteorological Society, pp 155–218Google Scholar
  25. Haynes PH, McIntyre ME (1987) On the evolution of vorticity and potential vorticity in the presence of diabatic heating and frictional or other forces. J Atmos Sci 44:828–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim J-H, Brown S, McDonald RE (2010) Future changes in tropical cyclone genesis in fully dynamic ocean- and mixed layer ocean-coupled climate models: a low-resolution model study. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-010-0855-6 Google Scholar
  27. Knapp KR, Kruk MC, Levinson DH, Diamond HJ, Neumann CJ (2010) The international best track archieve for climate stewardship (IBTrACS) unifying tropical cyclone data. Bull Am Meteor Soc 91:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knutson TR, McBride JL, Chan J-C, Emanuel K, Holland G, Landsea C, Held I, Kossin JP, Srivastava AK, Sugi M (2010) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korty RL, Camargo SJ, Galewsky J (2012a) Tropical cyclone genesis factors in simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum. J Clim 25:4348–4365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Korty RL, Camargo SJ, Galewsky J (2012b) Variations in tropical cyclone genesis factors in simulations of the Holocene epoch. J Climate 25:8196–8211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGauley MG, Nolan DS (2011) Measuring environmental favorability for tropical cyclogenesis by statistical analysis of threshold parameters. J Climate 24:5968–5997. doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4176.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Menkes CE, Lengaigne M, Marchesiello P, Jourdain NC, Vincent EM, Lef_evre J, Chauvin F, Royer J-F (2012) Comparison of tropical cyclogenesis indices on seasonal to interannual timescales. Climate Dyn 38:301–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nolan DS, McGauley MG (2012) Tropical cyclogenesis in wind shear: climatological relationships and physical processes. In: Oouchi K, Fudeyasu H (eds) Cyclones: formation, triggers, and control. Chapter 1. Nova Science Publishers, Happauge, New York (ISBN 10: 1619429764; ISBN 13: 9781619429765)Google Scholar
  34. Palmén EH (1948) On the formation and structure of tropical cyclones. Geophysica, Helsinki 3:26–38Google Scholar
  35. Polvani LM, Camargo SJ, Garcia RR (2016) The importance of the Montreal Protocol in mitigating the potential intensity of tropical cyclones. J Climate 29:2275–2289. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0232.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Royer J-F, Chauvin F, Timbal B, Araspin P, Grimal D, 1998: A GCM study of the impact of greenhouse gas increase on the frequency of occurrence of tropical cyclones. Clim Change 38:307–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang B, Emanuel KA (2012) A ventilation index for tropical cyclones. Bull Am Meteor Soc 93:1901–1912. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00165.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteor Soc 93:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tippett MK, Camargo SJ, Sobel AH (2011) A Poisson regression index for tropical cyclone genesis and the role of large-scale vorticity in genesis. J Clim 24:2335–2357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tory KJ, Dare RA (2015) Sea surface temperature thresholds for tropical cyclone formation. J Clim 28:8171–8183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tory KJ, Dare RA, Davidson NE, McBride JL, Chand SS (2013a) The importance of low-deformation vorticity in tropical cyclone formation. Atmos Chem Phys 13:2115–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tory KJ, Chand SS, Dare RA, McBride JL (2013b) The development and assessment of a model-, grid- and basin independent tropical cyclone detection scheme. J Clim 26:5493–5507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tory KJ, Chand SS, Dare RA, McBride JL (2013c) An assessment of a model-independent tropical cyclone detection procedure in selected CMIP3 global climate models. J Clim 26:5508–5522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tory KJ, Chand SS, McBride JL, Ye H, Dare RA (2013d) Projected changes in late 21st century tropical cyclone frequency in thirteen coupled climate models from the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5. J Clim 26:9946–9959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tory KJ, Chand S, McBride JL, Ye H, Dare R (2014) Projected changes in late 21st century tropical cyclone frequency in CMIP5 models. In: Proc. 31st Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, 30 March–4 April 2014. American Meteorological Society, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  46. Vecchi GA, Soden BJ (2007a) Increased tropical Atlantic wind shear in model projections of global warming. Geophys Res Lett 34:L08702. doi:10.1029/2006GL028905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vecchi GA, Soden BJ (2007b) Effect of remote sea surface temperature change on tropical cyclone potential intensity. Nature 450:1066–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walsh KJE, McBride JL, Klotzbach PJ, Balachandran S, Camargo SJ, Holland G, Knutson TR, Kossin JP, Lee TC, Sobel A, Sugi M (2015) Tropical cyclones and climate change. WIREs Clim Change doi:10.1002/WCC.371
  49. Yokoi S, Takayabu YN (2009) Multi-model projection of global warming impact on tropical cyclone genesis frequency over the western North Pacific. J Meteor Soc Japan 87:525–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yoneyama K, Zhang C, Long CN (2013) Tracking pulses of the Madden–Julian Oscillation. Bull Am Meteor Soc 94:1871–1891. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00157.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Development Branch, Bureau of MeteorologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations