Abstract
Now more than ever before, scientific decisions have ethical and political implications. This means that both doctors and society as a whole are involved. If we consider the changes there have been in the paradigms that underlie medicine and the greater stress now placed on biology in medicine, it is obvious that we need to rethink standard definitions and thus, in turn, to redefine what is normal and what is pathologic. Medicine acts on what is pathologic, but how is this defined? Is medicine unique in needing new definitions? We have to give some thought to doctors’ new responsibilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 3 January 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dupont, BM. Diagnosis, therapy, responsibility, and ethical considerations. Child's Nerv Syst 16, 613–617 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810000315
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810000315