Skip to main content

The Changing Role of Uncertainty in Physician-Patient Relationships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnoses Without Names
  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

In ancient times, but persisting even today in some societies, the physician as a shaman possessed omnipotence through his divinely privileged connections in the eyes of his patient. In this exclusively authoritarian, paternalistic relationship, there was no place for uncertainty in the practitioner. The Hippocratic tradition brought egalitarianism to the physician-patient relationship but still supported the authoritarian role of the doctor as a hardline form of beneficence. The explosion of knowledge in medical science in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, accompanied for the first time with the promise of rational treatment, created an even greater gap between physician and patient in understanding medical science, leading to the physician assuming an even more authoritarian position in their interactions. Beginning in the second half of the twentieth century, with the advent of “patient-centered medicine” and codes of patient rights, the doctor-patient relationship evolved into one of partnership, respecting the patient’s values, and more transparent sharing of the uncertainties of medical practice. Looking to the future, with its massively accumulating molecular information and its seemingly infinite amount of new data of as yet unknown significance, one can only speculate how physician (or robot)-patient relationships will shift again.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fins JJ. “When a diagnosis has no name” workshop; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iannello P, et al. Ambiguity and uncertainty tolerance, need for cognition, and their association with stress. A study among Italian practicing physicians. Med Edu Online. 2017;22(1):1270009. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2016.1270009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fox RC. Training for uncertainty. In: Merton RK, Reader G, Kendall P, editors. The student-physician: introductory studies in the sociology of medical education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press; 1957. p. 207–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Szasz TS, et al. The doctor-patient relationship and its historical context. Am J Psychiatry. 1958;115:522–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss GB. Paternalism modernized. J Med Ethics. 1985;11:184–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander GC, et al. Brief report: physician narcissism, ego threats, and confidence in the face of uncertainty. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2010;40:947–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz J. Why doctors don’t disclose uncertainty. Hast Cent Rep. 1984;14:35–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Waitzkin H, Stoeckle JD. The communication of information about illness. Clinical, sociological, and methodological considerations. Adv Psychosom Med. 1972;8:180–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cushing A. History of the doctor-patient relationship. In: Brown J, Noble LM, editors. Clinical communication in medicine. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ludmir EB, et al. The physician as dictator. Lancet. 2017;390(10099):1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32147-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Osmond H. God and the doctor. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:555–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goranson A, et al. Doctors are seen as godlike: moral typecasting in medicine. Soc Sci Med. 2020;258:113008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ecclesiasticus. 38:1–25. King James Bible. https://www.bibleopening.com/passage?query=sirach. 38:1–25.

  14. Siegler M, Osmond H. Aesculapian authority. Hastings Cent Rep. 1973;1:41–52, including Paterson TT. Notes on Aesculapian authority. Unpublished manuscript. 1957, p. 7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart M, et al. Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaba R, Sooriakumaran P. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. Int J Surg. 2007;5:57–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Byrne PS, Long BEL. Doctors talking to patients. A professional evolution. J Am Med Assoc. 1996;275:152–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noorbakhsh-Sabet N, et al. Artificial intelligence transforms the future of healthcare. Am J Med. 2019;132:795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wachter R. The digital doctor: Hope, hype, and harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s computer age. New York: McGraw Hill; 2017. p. 94–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Schafer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schafer, A. (2022). The Changing Role of Uncertainty in Physician-Patient Relationships. In: Lockshin, M.D., Crow, M.K., Barbhaiya, M. (eds) Diagnoses Without Names. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04935-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04935-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04934-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04935-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics