Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in the immunocompromised patient

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The treatment of patients with multisuture craniosynostosis is complex and patient-dependent. Cranial distraction osteogenesis is a relatively new procedure for treatment of these patients, with its use increasing in many centers. With this increased use comes an expanding range of indications. Surgical management of multisuture craniosynostosis in therapeutically immunosuppressed patients following a solid organ transplant presents unique challenges. We describe our experience with posterior cranial vault distraction in two patients with multisuture craniosynostosis that had previously undergone organ transplantation.

Methods

Two solid-organ transplant recipient patients with multisuture craniosynostosis were identified. A detailed examination of their medical/transplant history and perioperative details were recorded.

Results

The first patient was a 3-year-old girl who received a kidney transplantation in infancy and subsequently presented with a symptomatic Chiari malformation and papilledema. Imaging revealed pansynostosis. She underwent posterior cranial vault distraction extending into a Chiari decompression. Her postoperative course was complicated by distractor site infection at the beginning of consolidation, necessitating early removal of distractors. The second patient was a 2-year-old boy who received a heart transplantation at the age of 3 months and subsequently presented with head shape concerns. Imaging revealed bicoronal and sagittal craniosynostosis. He underwent a posterior cranial vault distraction without complication. Following removal of the distractors, he developed an infection at one of the distractor sites with associated fever and leukocytosis, necessitating washout and drain placement. Both patients achieved successful cranial vault expansion with distraction osteogenesis and at a 2-year follow-up do not have evidence of elevated intracranial pressure.

Conclusions

Immunosuppressive therapy has the potential to inhibit wound healing and place patients at risk for wound infection. Although we have demonstrated successful cranial vault expansion with distraction in two immunosuppressed children, extra care must be taken with these patients when placing semi-buried hardware. Specifically, prompt identification and proactive management of potential infectious complications is critical to applying this technique safely in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

Code availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Renier D, Sainte-Rose C, Marchac D, Hirsch JF (1982) Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis. J Neurosurg 57:370–377. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1982.57.3.0370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapp-Simon KA, Speltz ML, Cunningham ML, Patel PK, Tomita T (2007) Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 23:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Derderian CA, Wink JD, McGrath JL et al (2015) Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1665–1672. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin LO, Zhang RS, Hoppe IC, Paliga JT, Swanson JW, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA (2019) Onset and resolution of Chiari malformations and hydrocephalus in syndromic craniosynostosis following posterior vault distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 144:932–940. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li J, Gerety PA, Xu W, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA (2016) A perioperative risk comparison of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis in an older pediatric population. J Craniofac Surg 27:1165–1169. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Palamuthusingam D, Kunarajah K, Pascoe EM, Johnson DW, Hawley CM, Fahim M (2020) Postoperative outcomes of kidney transplant recipients undergoing non-transplant-related elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol 21:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01978-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vandegrift MT, Nahai F (2016) Is aesthetic surgery safe in the solid organ transplant patient? An international survey and review. Aesthet Surg J 36

  8. Polcz ME, Barbul A (2019) The role of vitamin A in wound healing. Nutr Clin Pract 34:695–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. White N, Evans M, Dover S et al (2009) Posterior calvarial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis. Childs Nerv Syst 25:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0758-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor JA, Bartlett SP (2017) What’s new in syndromic craniosynostosis surgery? Plast Reconstr Surg 140:82e–93e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang RS, Wes AM, Naran S, Hoppe IC, Sun J, Mazzaferro D, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA (2018) Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis in nonsyndromic patients: an evaluation of indications and safety. J Craniofac Surg 29:566–571. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Derderian CA, Bartlett SP (2012) Open cranial vault remodeling. J Craniofac Surg 23:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e318241b93a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nowinski D, di Rocco F, Renier D, SainteRose C, Leikola J, Arnaud E (2012) Posterior cranial vault expansion in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Comparison of current techniques. Child’s Nervous System 28:1537–1544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1809-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi M, Flores RL, Havlik RJ (2012) Volumetric analysis of anterior versus posterior cranial vault expansion in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 23:455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein JA, Paliga JT, Wink JD, Low DW, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA (2013) A craniometric analysis of posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Serlo WS, Ylikontiola LP, Lähdesluoma N, Lappalainen OP, Korpi J, Verkasalo J, Sàndor GKB (2011) Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis: estimated increases in intracranial volume. Childs Nerv Syst 27:27–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1353-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ter Maaten NS, Mazzaferro DM, Wes AM, Naran S, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA (2018) Craniometric Analysis of frontal cranial morphology following posterior vault distraction. J Craniofac Surg 29:1169–1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazzaferro DM, ter Maaten NS, Wes AM, Naran S, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA (2019) A craniometric analysis of the posterior cranial base after posterior vault distraction. J Craniofac Surg 30:1692–1695. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimizu A, Komuro Y, Shimoji K, Miyajima M, Arai H (2016) Quantitative analysis of change in intracranial volume after posterior cranial vault distraction. J Craniofac Surg 27:1135–1138. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salokorpi N, Vuollo V, Sinikumpu JJ, Satanin L, Nestal Zibo H, Ylikontiola LP, Pirttiniemi P, Sándor GK, Serlo W (2017) Increases in cranial volume with posterior cranial vault distraction in 31 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 81:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bauder AR, Wink JD, Swanson JW, Derderian C, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA (2015) An analysis of posterior vault distraction and its effects on the posterior fossa and cranial base. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:52–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000472342.36900.c7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Greives MR, Ware BW, Tian AG, Taylor JA, Pollack IF, Losee JE (2016) Complications in posterior cranial vault distraction. Ann Plast Surg 76:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design, data collection, and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian C. Hoppe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Deemed “exempt” from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Mississippi Medical Center.

Consent to participate

Not applicable; the study was retrospective.

Consent for publication

All patients provided written consent for use of pictures in publications.

Conflict of interest

No authors report any conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, J.S., Snider, A.E., Farrington, J. et al. Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in the immunocompromised patient. Childs Nerv Syst 37, 2313–2318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05202-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05202-y

Keywords

Navigation