Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunt and predictors of shunt revision in infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts in infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) are prone to failures, with some patients at risk for multiple revisions. The objective of our study is to observe long-term outcomes and identify factors leading to proximal and distal multiple failures.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of infants with PHH that required VP shunt placement between 1982 and 2014. These patients were monitored clinically and radiographically after VP shunt placement.

Results

A total of 502 surgical procedures (initial shunt insertion and revisions) were performed, with 380 shunt revisions in 102 (84 %) patients. Median shunt survival time was 54 months (0.03–220 months). Shunt survival was significantly affected by the following factors: intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH, grade II–III, 95 months vs. grade IV, 28 months, p = 0.022), birth weight (<1.5 kg, 59 months vs. >1.5 kg, 22 months, p = 0.005), gestational age (>27 weeks, 90 months vs. <27 weeks, 20 months, p < 0.0001), distal vs. proximal revision (133 months vs. 48 months, p = 0.013), obstruction (yes, 78 months vs. no, 28 months, p = 0.007), and infection (no, 75 months vs. yes, 39 months, p = 0.045). Regression analysis revealed that multiple gestation, head circumference (>27 cm), congenital anomalies, infection, and obstruction increased the proximal and distal shunt malfunction.

Conclusion

Long-term outcome of VP shunt placement in infants revealed a relatively high rate of complications requiring shunt revision as late as 30 years after initial placement. Infants with VP shunts should be monitored lifelong of these patients by neurosurgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freimann FB, Vajkoczy P, Sprung C (2013) Patients benefit from low-pressure settings enabled by gravitational valves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1982–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemcke J, Meier U (2010) Improved outcome in shunted iNPH with a combination of a Codman Hakim programmable valve and an Aesculap-Miethke ShuntAssistant. Cent Eur Neurosurg 71:113–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Limbrick DD Jr, Mathur A, Johnston JM, Munro R, Sagar J, Inder T, Park TS, Leonard JL, Smyth MD (2010) Neurosurgical treatment of progressive posthemorrhagic ventricular dilation in preterm infants: a 10-year single-institution study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee IC, Lee HS, Su PH, Liao WJ, Hu JM, Chen JY (2009) Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in newborns: clinical characteristics and role of ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Pediatr Neonatol 50:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Willis B, Javalkar V, Vannemreddy P, Caldito G, Matsuyama J, Guthikonda B, Bollam P, Nanda A (2009) Ventricular reservoirs and ventriculoperitoneal shunts for premature infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus: an institutional experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:94–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherian S, Whitelaw A, Thoresen M, Love S (2004) The pathogenesis of neonatal post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Brain Pathol 14:305–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mwachaka PM, Obonyo NG, Mutiso BK, Ranketi S, Mwang’ombe N (2010) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications: a three-year retrospective study in a Kenyan national teaching and referral hospital. Pediatr Neurosurg 46:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patwardhan RV, Nanda A (2005) Implanted ventricular shunts in the United States: the billion-dollar-a-year cost of hydrocephalus treatment. Neurosurgery 56:139–144 discussion 144-135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daszkiewicz P, Barszcz S (2007) Multiple shunt system revisions in patients with hydrocephalus - causes, effects, regularities and prognostic factors. Neurol Neurochir Pol 41:404–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koksal V, Oktem S (2010) Ventriculosubgaleal shunt procedure and its long-term outcomes in premature infants with post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1505–1515

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadri H, Mawla AA, Kazah J (2006) The incidence, timing, and predisposing factors of germinal matrix and intraventricular hemorrhage (GMH/IVH) in preterm neonates. Childs Nerv Syst 22:1086–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor AG, Peter JC (2001) Advantages of delayed VP shunting in post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus seen in low-birth-weight infants. Childs Nerv Syst 17:328–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reinprecht A, Dietrich W, Berger A, Bavinzski G, Weninger M, Czech T (2001) Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in preterm infants: long-term follow-up and shunt-related complications. Childs Nerv Syst 17:663–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chittiboina P, Pasieka H, Sonig A, Bollam P, Notarianni C, Willis BK, Nanda A (2013) Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus and shunts: what are the predictors of multiple revision surgeries? J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:37–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tuli S, Drake J, Lawless J, Wigg M, Lamberti-Pasculli M (2000) Risk factors for repeated cerebrospinal shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 92:31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choksey MS, Malik IA (2004) Zero tolerance to shunt infections: can it be achieved? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:87–91

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutierrez-Gonzalez R, Boto GR, Perez-Zamarron A (2012) Cerebrospinal fluid diversion devices and infection. A comprehensive review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:889–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okazaki M, Fukuhara T, Namba Y (2013) Delayed germinal matrix hemorrhage induced by ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion for congenital hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:67–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone JJ, Walker CT, Jacobson M, Phillips V, Silberstein HJ (2013) Revision rate of pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunts after 15 years. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Y, Green NL, Wrensch MR, Zhao S, Gupta N (2007) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in California: 1990 to 2000. Neurosurgery 61:557–562 discussion 562-553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Simon TD, Hall M, Riva-Cambrin J, Albert JE, Jeffries HE, Lafleur B, Dean JM, Kestle JR, Hydrocephalus Clinical Research N (2009) Infection rates following initial cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement across pediatric hospitals in the United States. Clinical article J Neurosurg Pediatr 4:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naftel RP, Safiano NA, Falola M, Blount JP, Oakes WJ, Wellons JC 3rd (2013) The association between race and frequent shunt failure: a single-center study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Nanda.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclosure

None

Conflict of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bir, S.C., Konar, S., Maiti, T.K. et al. Outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunt and predictors of shunt revision in infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 32, 1405–1414 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3090-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3090-6

Keywords

Navigation