Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Congenital hydrocephalus in the northeast of Brazil: epidemiological aspects, prenatal diagnosis, and treatment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Congenital hydrocephalus (CH) has higher proportions in developing countries such as Brazil, reaching rates of 3.16:1,000 newborns. Early diagnosis is essential and can be done during the second trimester of pregnancy, highlighting the importance of regular prenatal care. Our objective is to describe the epidemiological profile of children with CH in the state of Bahia.

Methods

Consecutive medical records of patients with CH, aged less than 2years and operated at a pediatric reference hospital between September 2009 and September 2012, were reviewed.

Results

One hundred twenty-one children underwent ventricular peritoneal shunt (VP shunt) due to CH. As for prenatal care, 38 % of pregnant women did it regularly. Males predominated with 56 % of cases with a median age of 3 months, and 68 % were from the countryside area. The most frequent clinical manifestations were bulging fontanelle (37 %) and increased head circumference (30 %). There were 13 (11 %) reports of complications associated with VP shunts. There were nine deaths (7 %), and respiratory complications were the main cause.

Conclusions

Public health measures are the key to increase mothers’ knowledge about the importance of regular prenatal monitoring. There was a predominance of male children, with a median age of 3 months, with the majority coming from the countryside.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2013) 2010 population census. In: Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics population census. http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil. Accessed 04 Jan 2013

  2. Brazilian Ministry of Health (2006) Prenatal and puerperal. Humanized and qualified care. Technical manual. Book no. 5, Ministry of Health. http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/pdf/manual_puerperio_2006.pdf. Accessed 04 Jan 2013

  3. Cavalcanti DP, Salomão MA (2003) Incidence of congenital hydrocephalus and the role of the prenatal diagnosis. J Pediatr 79(2):135–140. doi:10.1590/s0021-75572003000200008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavalheiro S, Moron AF, Almodin CG, Suriano IC, Hisaba V, Dastoli P, Barbosa M (2001) Fetal hydrocephalus. Child’s Nerv Syst 27(10):1575–1583. doi:10.1007/s00381-011-1539-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choux M (1994) Consensus: treatment. Child’s Nerv Syst 10:74–75. doi:10.1007//BF00313589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cinalli G, Spennato P, Nastro A, Aliberti F, Trishitta V, Ruggiero C, Mirone G, Cianciulli E (2011) Hydrocephalus in aqueductal stenosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 27:1621–1642. doi:10.1007/s00381-011-1546-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cochrane DD, Myles ST (1982) Management of intrauterine hydrocephalus. J Neurosurgery 57(5):590–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Wals P, Tairou F, Van Allen M, Uh SH, Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Evans JA, Van den Hof MC, Zimmer P, Crowley M, Fernandez B, Lee NS, Niyonsenga T (2007) Reduction in neural-tube defects after acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med 357:135–142. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa067103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Rocco F, Luedemenn W, Oi S (2009) Complications of neuroendoscopy. Journal of Hydrocephalus 1(1):15–20

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gorayeb RP, Cavalheiro S, Zymberg ST (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 1 year of age. J Neurosurgery 100(Suppl Pediatrics):427–429

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hommelstad J, Madso A, Eide PK (2013) Significant reduction of shunt infection rate in children below 1 year of age after implementation of a perioperative protocol. Acta Neurochir 155:523–531. doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1574-z./26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Juca CEB, Lins Neto A, de Oliveira RS, Machado HR (2002) Treatment of hydrocephalus by ventriculoperitoneal shunt: analysis of 150 consecutive cases in the Hospital of the Faculty of Medicina of Ribeirão Preto. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 70(2):59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch D, Wagner W (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants of less than 1 year of age: which factors influence the outcome? Child’s Nerv Syst 20(6):405–411. doi:10.1007/s00381-004-0958-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar R, Singh V, Kumar MVK (2005) Shunt revision in hydrocephalus. Indian J Pediatr 72:843–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lumenta CB, Skotarczak U (1995) Long-term follow-up in 233 patients with congenital hydrocephalus. Child’s Nerv Syst 11:173–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Massimi L, Paternoster G, Fasano T, Di Rocco C (2009) On the changing epidemiology of hydrocephalus. Child’s Nerv Syst 25:795–800. doi:10.1007/s00381-009-0844-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nomura ML, Barini R, Andrade KC, Milanez H, Simoni RZ, Peralta CFA, Machado IN, Zambelli H, Maio KT (2010) Congenital hydrocephalus: gestational and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:607–611. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1254-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oi S, Inagaki T, Shinoda M, Takahashi S, Ono S, Date I, Nomura S, Miwa T, Araki T, Ito S, Uchikado H, Takemoto O, Shirane R, Nishimoto H, Tashiro Y, Matsumara A (2011) Guideline for management and treatment of fetal and congenital hydrocephalus: Center of Excellence-Fetal and Congenital Hydrocephalus Top 10 Japan Guideline 2011. Child’s Nerv Syst 27(10):1563–1570. doi:10.1007/s00381-011-1541-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira DMP, Pereira CU, Freitas ZMP (2011) Socio-economic profile of caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. Arq Bras Neurocir 30(3):94–98

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oliveira DMP, Pereira CU, Freitas ZMP (2010) Knowledge of caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. Rev Bras Enferm 63(5):782–785. doi:10.1590/s0034-71672010000500014./10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pretorius DM, Davis K, Manco-Johnson ML, Manchester D, Meier PR, Clewell WH (1985) Clinical course of fetal hydrocephalus: 40 cases. American Journal of Roentgen (AJR) 144:827–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rekate H (2011) A Consensus on the classification of hydrocephalus: it’s utility in the assessment of abnormalities of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Child’s Nerv Syst 27:535–1541. doi:10.1007/s00381-011-1558-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Renier D, Sainte-Rose C, Pierre-Khan A, Hirsh JF (1988) Prenatal hydrocephalus: outcome and prognosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 4:213–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sgourus S, Kulkharni AV, Constantini S (2006) The international infant hydrocephalus study: concept and rational. Child’s Nerv Syst 22:338–345. doi:10.1007/s00381-005-1253-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tuli S, Tuli J, Drake J, Spears J (2004) Predictors of death in pediatric patients requiring cerebrospinal fluid shunts. J Neurosurg 100(Pediatrics 5):442–446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zahl SM, Wester K (2008) Routine measurement of head circumference as a tool for detecting intracranial expansion in infants: what is the gain? A nationwide survey. Pediatrics 21(3):416–420. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatric Neurosurgical Unit, Hospital Pediátrico Martagão Gesteira (Salvador/Bahia/Brazil), Jose Duarte 114, Tororó, CEP 40.000.000, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

    José Roberto Tude Melo, Emília Nunes de Melo, Ângela Gomes de Vasconcellos & Pollyana Pacheco

Authors
  1. José Roberto Tude Melo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emília Nunes de Melo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ângela Gomes de Vasconcellos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pollyana Pacheco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Roberto Tude Melo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melo, J.R.T., de Melo, E.N., de Vasconcellos, Â.G. et al. Congenital hydrocephalus in the northeast of Brazil: epidemiological aspects, prenatal diagnosis, and treatment. Childs Nerv Syst 29, 1899–1903 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2111-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2111-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation