Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between tissue characteristics and mechanical properties of coronary plaques: a comparison between integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and speckle-tracking IVUS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-risk coronary plaques have certain morphological characteristics. Thus, comprehensive assessment is needed for the risk stratification of plaques in patients with coronary artery disease. Integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS) has been used successfully used to evaluate the tissue characteristics of coronary plaques; however, the mechanical properties of plaques have been rarely assessed. Therefore, we developed Speckle-tracking IVUS (ST-IVUS) to evaluate the mechanical properties of coronary plaque. This study aimed to evaluate the relation between the tissue characteristics of coronary plaques using IB-IVUS and their mechanical properties using ST-IVUS. We evaluated 95 non-targeted plaques in 95 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention to the left anterior descending artery. We set regions of interest (ROIs) in the cross-sectional images of coronary plaques where we divided 120 degree plaques into four quadrants (every 30 degrees), with the center at the area of maximum atheroma thickness. We measured relative calcification area (%CA, relative fibrous area (%FI) and relative lipid pool area (%LP) in a total of 380 ROIs. In ST-IVUS analysis, we measured strain in the circumferential direction of the lumen area (LA strain: %), the external elastic membrane area strain (EEM strain: %), and strain in the radial direction (radial strain: %). On global cross-sectional area IB-IVUS analysis, the %CA was 1.2 ± 1.2%; the %FI was 49.0 ± 15.9%, and the %LP was 49.7 ± 16.5%. In ST-IVUS analysis, the LA strain was 0.67 ± 0.43%; the EEM strain was 0.49 ± 0.33%, and the radial strain was 2.02 ± 1.66%. On regional analysis, the %LP was not associated with the LA strain (r = − 0.002 p = 0.97), the EEM strain (r = − 0.05 p = 0.35), or with the radial strain (r = − 0.04 p = 0.45). These trends were seen between the %FI and the LA strain (r = 0.02 p = 0.74), the %FI and the EEM strain (r = 0.05 p = 0.35), and the %FI and the radial strain (r = 0.04 p = 0.50). A significant correlation was only observed between the %CA and the LA strain (r = − 0.15 p = 0.0038). Our findings indicate that the associations between mechanical properties and tissue characteristics lacked statistical significance, more often than not, and that it is necessary to evaluate the mechanical properties as well as plaque characteristics for risk stratification of coronary plaques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kato T, Noda T, Tanaka S, Yagasaki H, Iwama M, Tanihata S, Arai M, Minatoguchi S, Okura H (2022) Impact of accelerated washout of Technetium-99m-sestamibi on exercise tolerance in patients with acute coronary syndrome: single-center experience. Heart Vessels. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02058-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amano H, Noike R, Yabe T, Watanabe I, Okubo R, Koizumi M, Toda M, Ikeda T (2020) Frailty and coronary plaque characteristics on optical coherence tomography. Heart Vessels 35:750–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E (2014) Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res 114:1852–1866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sano K, Kawasaki M, Ishihara Y, Okubo M, Tsuchiya K, Nishigaki K, Zhou X, Minatoguchi S, Fujita H, Fujiwara H (2006) Assessment of vulnerable plaques causing acute coronary syndrome using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:734–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishida T, Hiro T, Takayama T, Sudo M, Haruta H, Fukamachi D, Hirayama A, Okumura Y (2021) Clinical significance of microvessels detected by in vivo optical coherence tomography within human atherosclerotic coronary arterial intima: a study with multimodality intravascular imagings. Heart Vessels 36:756–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Murata N, Hiro T, Takayama T, Migita S, Morikawa T, Tamaki T, Mineki T, Kojima K, Akutsu N, Sudo M, Kitano D, Fukamachi D, Hirayama A, Okumura Y (2019) High shear stress on the coronary arterial wall is related to computed tomography-derived high-risk plaque: a three-dimensional computed tomography and color-coded tissue-characterizing intravascular ultrasonography study. Heart Vessels 34:1429–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sato H, Kawasaki M, Morita N, Fujiwara H, Minatoguchi S (2015) Distribution of tissue characteristics of coronary plaques evaluated by integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound: Differences between the inner and outer vessel curvature. J Cardiol 66:489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okubo M, Kawasaki M, Ishihara Y, Takeyama U, Yasuda S, Kubota T, Tanaka S, Yamaki T, Ojio S, Nishigaki K, Takemura G, Saio M, Takami T, Fujiwara H, Minatoguchi S (2008) Tissue characterization of coronary plaques: comparison of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Circ J 72:1631–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okubo M, Kawasaki M, Ishihara Y, Takeyama U, Kubota T, Yamaki T, Ojio S, Nishigaki K, Takemura G, Saio M, Takami T, Minatoguchi S, Fujiwara H (2008) Development of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound for tissue characterization of coronary plaques. Ultrasound Med Biol 34:655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawasaki M, Hattori A, Ishihara Y, Okubo M, Nishigaki K, Takemura G, Saio M, Takami T, Minatoguchi S (2010) Tissue characterization of coronary plaques and assessment of thickness of fibrous cap using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound. Comparison with histology and optical coherence tomography. Circ J 74:2641–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohota M, Kawasaki M, Ismail TF, Hattori K, Serruys PW, Ozaki Y (2012) A histological and clinical comparison of new and conventional integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS). Circ J 76:1678–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishihara Y, Kawasaki M, Hattori A, Imai H, Takahashi S, Sato H, Kubota T, Okubo M, Ojio S, Nishigaki K, Takemura G, Fujiwara H, Minatoguchi S (2012) Relationship among coronary plaque compliance, coronary risk factors and tissue characteristics evaluated by integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 10:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawasaki M, Tanaka R, Tanaka S, Minatogchi S, Yoshida A, Naruse G, Watanabe T, Tanaka T, Ono K, Kanamori A, Noda T (2018) Speckle-tracking on left atrium and coronary artery. J. JCS Cardiol. 27:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka S, Kawasaki M, Noda T, Segawa T, Tsugita N, Fuseya T, Iwama M, Yagasaki H, Kawaguchi T, Kato T, Watanabe S, Minagawa T, Minatoguchi S, Okura H (2022) Observation of plaque behavior and tissue characterization of coronary plaque using speckle tracking intravascular ultrasound (ST-IVUS) and iMap imaging system. Heart Vessels. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02056-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, García-García HM, Valgimigli M, Schaar JA, Pawar R, van der Giessen WJ, Regar E, van der Steen AF, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW (2006) In vivo relationship between compositional and mechanical imaging of coronary arteries. Insights from intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Am Heart J 15:1025.e1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brugaletta S, Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW, Maehara A, Farooq V, Mintz GS, de Bruyne B, Marso SP, Verheye S, Dudek D, Hamm CW, Farhat N, Schiele F, McPherson J, Lerman A, Moreno PR, Wennerblom B, Fahy M, Templin B, Morel MA, van Es GA, Stone GW (2012) Relationship between palpography and virtual histology in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:S19-27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Bruyne B, Hersbach F, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Heyndrickx GR, Gould KL, Wijns W (2001) Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but “Normal” coronary angiography. Circulation 104:2401–2406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loree HM, Kamm RD, Stringfellow RG, Lee RT (1992) Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels. Circ Res 71:850–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gijsen FJ, Wentzel JJ, Thury A, Mastik F, Schaar JA, Schuurbiers JC, Slager CJ, van der Giessen WJ, de Feyter PJ, van der Steen AF, Serruys PW (2008) Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295:H1608-1614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oishi Y, Miyoshi H, Mizuguchi Y, Iuchi A, Nagase N, Oki T (2011) Aortic stiffness is strikingly increased with age ≥ 50 years in clinically normal individuals and preclinical patients with cardiovascular risk factors: assessment by the new technique of 2D strain echocardiography. J Cardiol 57:354–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen HH, de Borst GJ, Bots ML, Moll FL, Pasterkamp G, de Korte CL (2016) Validation of noninvasive in vivo compound ultrasound strain imaging using histologic plaque vulnerability features. Stroke 47:2770–2775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Keymel S, Heinen Y, Balzer J, Rassaf T, Kelm M, Lauer T, Heiss C (2011) Characterization of macro-and microvascular function and structure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiovasc Dis 1:68–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chatterjee S, Fujiwara K, Pérez NG, Ushio-Fukai M, Fisher AB (2015) Mechanosignaling in the vasculature: emerging concepts in sensing, transduction and physiological responses. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308:H1451-1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chistiakov DA, Orekhov AN, Bobryshev YV (2015) Endothelial barrier and its abnormalities in cardiovascular disease. Front Physiol 6:365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Podgórski M, Grzelak P, Szymczyk K, Szymczyk E, Drożdż J, Stefańczyk L (2015) Peripheral vascular stiffness, assessed with two-dimensional speckle tracking versus the degree of coronary artery calcification, evaluated by tomographic coronary artery calcification index. Arch Med Sci 11:122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavi S, Bae JH, Rihal CS, Prasad A, Barsness GW, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A (2009) Segmental coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with minimal atherosclerosis is associated with necrotic core plaques. Heart 95:1525–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Choi BJ, Prasad A, Gulati R, Best PJ, Lennon RJ, Barsness GW, Lerman LO, Lerman A (2013) Coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with early coronary artery disease is associated with the increase in intravascular lipid core plaque. Eur Heart J 34:2047–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi BJ, Matsuo Y, Aoki T, Kwon TG, Prasad A, Gulati R, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A (2014) Coronary endothelial dysfunction is associated with inflammation and vasa vasorum proliferation in patients with early atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34:2473–2477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. de Korte CL, Sierevogel MJ, Mastik F, Strijder C, Schaar JA, Velema E, Pasterkamp G, Serruys PW, van der Steen AF (2002) Identification of atherosclerotic plaque components with intravascular ultrasound elastography in vivo: a Yucatan pig study. Circulation 105:1627–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schaar JA, De Korte CL, Mastik F, Strijder C, Pasterkamp G, Boersma E, Serruys PW, Van Der Steen AF (2003) Characterizing vulnerable plaque features with intravascular elastography. Circulation 108:2636–2641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gorcsan J 3rd, Tanaka H (2011) Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1401–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Beaussier H, Naggara O, Calvet D, Joannides R, Guegan-Massardier E, Gerardin E, Iacob M, Laloux B, Bozec E, Bellien J, Touze E, Masson I, Thuillez C, Oppenheim C, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S (2011) Mechanical and structural characteristics of carotid plaques by combined analysis with echotracking system and MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lopata RG, Nillesen MM, Hansen HH, Gerrits IH, Thijssen JM, de Korte CL (2009) Performance evaluation of methods for two-dimensional displacement and strain estimation using ultrasound radio frequency data. Ultrasound Med Biol 35:796–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tanaka S, Noda T, Kawasaki M, Segawa T, Tsugita N, Fuseya T, Kubota T, Iwama M, Nishigaki K, Watanabe S, Minagawa T, Ohashi H, Minatoguchi S (2019) Relationship between electrical conduction and phasic left atrial function: P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiography and time-left atrial volume curve assessments using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Heart Vessels 34:1212–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tanaka S, Segawa T, Noda T, Tsugita N, Fuseya T, Kawaguchi T, Iwama M, Watanabe S, Minagawa T, Minatoguchi S, Okura H (2021) Assessment of visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure over 5 years and phasic left atrial function by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Heart Vessels 36:827–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pirat B, Khoury DS, Hartley CJ, Tiller L, Rao L, Schulz DG, Nagueh SF, Zoghbi WA (2008) A novel feature-tracking echocardiographic method for the quantitation of regional myocardial function: validation in an animal model of ischemia-reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amzulescu MS, De Craene M, Langet H, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Pouleur AC, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL (2019) Myocardial strain imaging: review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:605–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We also would like to thank Mr. Onishi T, Ms. Nagaya M and Mr. Sato N for supporting experimental equipment and for assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by ST, MK and TN. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ST and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Tanaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center (approval number: 137).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained in the form of opt-out for the study on the Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center’s website.

Consent to publish

Consent to publish was obtained in the form of opt-out for the study on the Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center’s website.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, S., Kawasaki, M., Noda, T. et al. Relationship between tissue characteristics and mechanical properties of coronary plaques: a comparison between integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and speckle-tracking IVUS. Heart Vessels 38, 18–31 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02129-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02129-5

Keywords

Navigation