Abstract
We present a case of a unique stenosis in a 12-year-old saphenous vein graft (SVG), to the right coronary artery, which was visualized by optical coherence tomography (OCT), before percutaneous coronary intervention. The patient was an 80-year-old man in whom the stenosis was documented by area-detector coronary computed tomography. OCT imaging demonstrated that the culprit lesion was a venous valve containing a thrombus before preintervention imaging. Coronary stenting was performed with a distal protection device, and pathologic examination of the aspirate verified the OCT findings. Coronary angiography 12 years previously, just after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), had shown a completely normal SVG without any suspicion of a venous valve. These OCT images suggested the possibility that the culprit lesion was an “upside down” venous valve that was not visualized by angiography just after surgery, but could be a cause of late SVG stenosis following CABG. OCT imaging is very useful for clarifying the etiology of the stenosis in cases of ambiguous angiographic lesions.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is established as a means of restoring blood flow to areas of myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Owing to substantial advances in therapeutic strategies and optimal medical therapy, clinical outcomes after CABG have been improved even in octogenarians [1]. However, in patients who require coronary angiography after CABG, coronary risk factors tend to be poorly controlled, and these patients are at high risk for adverse cardiac events [2]. Therefore, extensive assessment and management would be essential to improve outcomes in patients with prior CABG requiring coronary angiograms. Although saphenous vein grafting (SVG) is generally used, it has lower patency rates compared with internal thoracic artery implantation, which is referred to as vein graft disease. Various factors are pointed out as a cause of vein graft disease [3]. In this case report we describe the occurrence of a unique SVG stenosis detected by OCT imaging, and suggest that structural alterations in relation to venous valves may be responsible for other cases of vein graft disease as well.
An 80-year-old Japanese man with hypertension and dyslipidemia, with a history of acute inferior myocardial infarction 12 years previously, had undergone CABG to treat triple-vessel disease. His grafts were as follows: aorta → SVG → right coronary artery (RCA), right internal thoracic artery graft → left anterior descending artery, left internal thoracic artery graft → left circumflex coronary artery. Three months following CABG he again underwent coronary angiography (CAG) as a routine follow up (there were no clinical symptoms), which did not disclose any stenosis of the SVG, or of any other graft (Fig. 1). Twelve years later, the patient underwent computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) in ambulatory care, because he experienced chest oppression during effort. A stenosis was documented at the mid portion of the SVG (Fig. 2). CAG revealed a nonsignificant stenosis at the mid portion of the SVG to RCA (Fig. 3A). We decided to use intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) (Fig. 3B, C) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging (Fig. 3D, E) to clarify the nature of the SVG stenosis. The long-axis OCT image (Fig. 3E) disclosed morphology possibly representing a venous valve at the site of the culprit lesion, leading us to speculate that the graft might have been attached upside down during CABG 12 years previously. According to the operative note at the time, surgeons had not intentionally selected a nonreversed SVG with some modification [4, 5] to the venous valve. There was no indication of the direction of the SVG in the record, or that it had been modified. This in turn may have caused thrombus formation and graft stenosis at the site of a venous valve. Compared with venous valves of normal SVGs [6], the valve in this case was clearly thickened. Venous valves differ in size or thickness depending on several factors, such as position, vessel diameter, and dynamic stress caused by blood. Thickening of the venous valve in an upside-down SVG might be due to its position, which is against the direction of the blood flow, leading to thrombus formation. This unique OCT image should be differentiated from spontaneous dissection or a ruptured atheromatous plaque. However, after checking multiple long-axis OCT angles, we believe that it corresponds to a venous valve because of its short symmetric and regular structure. Nevertheless, it is not clear from the three-dimensional OCT images whether the venous valve was indeed upside-down (Fig. 4). On the other hand, IVUS was not helpful in clarifying the nature of this lesion. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed using a distal protection device, Filtrap (Osaka, Japan), and a drug-eluting stent, Nobori (3.5 × 16 mm) (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 3F). Thrombus was retained by the distal protection device (Fig. 5), and consisted of red blood cells and platelets. There were also a few neutrophils, eosinophils, phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin (PTAH)-positive fibrin, and CD68-positive macrophages. These pathologic findings are consistent with organized chronic thrombus. The presence of the venous valve may have played a role in the formation of organized thrombus, which in turn may have affected the thickened appearance of the valve. It is known that SVGs deteriorate following CABG (vein graft disease), with half being totally occluded or severely stenosed within 10 years [7, 8]. However, this patient’s vein graft was patent for 12 years, a relatively favorable outcome.
In conclusion, OCT is a very useful imaging modality for clarification of the nature of angiographically ambiguous lesions, as it sheds light on the potential mechanisms and physiology of coronary artery and graft disease progression.
References
Nicolini F, Molardi A, Verdichizzo D, Gallazzi MC, Spaggiari I, Cocconcelli F, Budillon AM, Borrello B, Rivara D, Beghi C, Gherli T (2012) Coronary artery surgery in octogenarians: evolving strategies for the improvement in early and late results. Heart Vessels 27(6):559–567
Boatman DM, Saeed B, Varghese I, Peters CT, Daye J, Haider A, Roesle M, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2009) Prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography have multiple uncontrolled coronary artery disease risk factors and high risk for cardiovascular events. Heart Vessels 24(4):241–246
Muto A, Model L, Ziegler K, Eghbalieh SD, Dardik A (2010) Mechanisms of vein graft adaptation to the arterial circulation: insights into the neointimal algorithm and management strategies. Circ J 74(8):1501–1512
Connolly JE (2010) The history of the in situ saphenous vein bypass. J Vasc Surg 53(1):241–244
Molina JE (1988) Nonreversed saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 48(5):624–627
Brown EN, Burris NS, Gu J, Kon ZN, Laird P, Kallam S, Tang CM, Schmitt JM, Poston RS (2007) Thinking inside the graft: applications of optical coherence tomography in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Biomed Opt 12(5):051704
Bulkley BH, Hutchins GM (1977) Accelerated “atherosclerosis”. A morphologic study of 978 saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts. Circulation 55(1):163–169
Kalan JM, Roberts WC (1990) Morphologic findings in saphenous veins used as coronary arterial bypass conduits for longer than 1 year: necropsy analysis of 53 patients, 123 saphenous veins, and 1865 five-millimeter segments of veins. Am Heart J 119(5):1164–1184
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Koeda, Y., Itoh, T., Fusazaki, T. et al. A unique stenosis in saphenous vein graft visualized by optical coherence tomography. Heart Vessels 29, 278–281 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-013-0362-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-013-0362-x