Abstract
In the traditional incremental analysis update (IAU) process, all analysis increments are treated as constant forcing in a model’s prognostic equations over a certain time window. This approach effectively reduces high-frequency oscillations introduced by data assimilation. However, as different scales of increments have unique evolutionary speeds and life histories in a numerical model, the traditional IAU scheme cannot fully meet the requirements of short-term forecasting for the damping of high-frequency noise and may even cause systematic drifts. Therefore, a multi-scale IAU scheme is proposed in this paper. Analysis increments were divided into different scale parts using a spatial filtering technique. For each scale increment, the optimal relaxation time in the IAU scheme was determined by the skill of the forecasting results. Finally, different scales of analysis increments were added to the model integration during their optimal relaxation time. The multi-scale IAU scheme can effectively reduce the noise and further improve the balance between large-scale and small-scale increments in the model initialization stage. To evaluate its performance, several numerical experiments were conducted to simulate the path and intensity of Typhoon Mangkhut (2018) and showed that: (1) the multi-scale IAU scheme had an obvious effect on noise control at the initial stage of data assimilation; (2) the optimal relaxation time for large-scale and small-scale increments was estimated as 6 h and 3 h, respectively; (3) the forecast performance of the multi-scale IAU scheme in the prediction of Typhoon Mangkhut (2018) was better than that of the traditional IAU scheme. The results demonstrate the superiority of the multi-scale IAU scheme.
摘 要
在传统的分析增量更新 (IAU) 方案中, 所有的分析增量被当作强迫项, 在一段时间内加入模式预报方程中. 该方法能够有效地减少因资料同化而引入的高频振荡. 然而, 由于不同尺度的增量在数值模式中有各自不同的生命史和演变速度, 传统的 IAU 方法不能满足模式短临预报对于快速减少高频噪音的要求, 甚至有时候会进一步造成系统性的偏移. 因此, 本论文首次提出多尺度 IAU 方案. 通过空间滤波方法把分析增量分解成不同尺度的部分, 通过预报效果来确定不同尺度增量的最佳松弛时间. 最终, 不同尺度的分析增量在各自的最佳松弛时间中被加入到模式积分过程中. 多尺度 IAU 方案可以有效抑制模式积分过程中产生的噪音, 并进一步提高不同尺度增量在模式起始阶段的平衡. 为了评估这一方案的效果, 我们开展了几组数值试验对台风山竹的路径和强度进行模拟, 结果表明: (1) 多尺度 IAU 方案对资料同化初期所产生的噪音有明显的抑制效果; (2) 大尺度和小尺度增量的最佳松弛时间分别为 6 小时和 3 小时; (3) 多尺度 IAU 方案在台风山竹中的预报效果优于传统 IAU 方案. 这一系列模拟结果展现了多尺度 IAU 方案的优越性.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloom, S. C., L. L. Takacs, A. M. da Silva, and D. Ledvina, 1996: Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124(6), 1256–1271, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<1256:DAUIAU>2.0.CO;2.
Chen, D. H., and X. S. Shen, 2006: Recent progress on GRAPES research and application. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 17(6), 773–777, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2006.06.014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Chen, D. H., and Coauthors, 2008: New generation of multi-scale NWP system (GRAPES): General scientific design. Chinese Science Bulletin, 53(22), 3433–3445, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0494-z.
Chen, F., M.-Y. Dong, C.-X. Ji, and J.-J. Qiu, 2020: Application of a typhoon initialization scheme based on the incremental analysis updates technique in a rapid update cycle system. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 26(4), 428–440, https://doi.org/10.46267/j.1006-8775.2020.037.
Davies, H. C., 1983: Limitations of some common lateral boundary schemes used in regional NWP models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111(5), 1002–1012, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<1002:LOSCLB>2.0.CO;2.
Denis, B., J. Côté, and R. Laprise, 2002: Spectral decomposition of two-dimensional atmospheric fields on limited-area domains using the discrete cosine transform (DCT). Mon. Wea. Rev., 130(7), 1812–1829, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1812:SDOTDA>2.0.CO;2.
Dudhia, J., 1996: A multi-layer soil temperature model for MM5. Preprints. Proc. the Sixth Annual PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model Users’ Workshop, Bouilder.
Feng, J.-L., Y. Gao, X. Xia, Y.-L. Ma, J. Sun, Y. Li, D.-M. Chen, and Q.-L. Wan, 2021: Impacts of a large-scale adaptive blending scheme for CMA-MESO on regional forecasts-a case study of typhoon Haima. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 27(4), 330–345, https://doi.org/10.46267/j.1006-8775.2021.029.
Hong, S.-Y., and H.-L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124(10), 2322–2339, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2322:NBLVDI>2.0.CO;2.
Hong, S.-Y., and J.-O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 42(2), 129–151.
Hsiao, L.-F., and Coauthors, 2015: Blending of global and regional analyses with a spatial filter: Application to typhoon prediction over the western North Pacific Ocean. Wea. Forecasting, 30(3), 754–770, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00047.1.
Johansson, C., A.-S. Smedman, U. Högström, J. G. Brasseur, and S. Khanna, 2001: Critical test of the validity of Monin-Obukhov similarity during convective conditions. J. Atmos. Sci., 58(12), 1549–1566, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<1549:CTOTVO>2.0.CO;2.
Keresturi, E., Y. Wang, F. Meier, F. Weidle, C. Wittmann, and A. Atencia, 2019: Improving initial condition perturbations in a convection-permitting ensemble prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145(720), 993–1012, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3473.
Lei, L. L., and J. S. Whitaker, 2016: A four-dimensional incremental analysis update for the ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 441(7), 2605–2621, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0246.1.
Li, H. R., D. S. Xu, and B. L. Zhang, 2021: Implementation of the incremental analysis update initialization scheme in the tropical regional atmospheric modeling system under the replay configuration. J. Meteor. Res., 35(1), 198–208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-021-0078-2.
Lorenc, A. C., N. E. Bowler, A. M. Clayton, S. R. Pring, and D. Fairbairn, 2015: Comparison of hybrid-4DEnVar and hybrid-4DVar data assimilation methods for global NWP. Mon. Wea. Rev., 43(1), 212–229, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00195.1.
Lu, X. Q., H. Yu, M. Ying, B. K. Zhao, S. Zhang, L. M. Lin, L. N. Bai, and R. J. Wan, 2021: Western north pacific tropical cyclone database created by the china meteorological administration. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38(4), 690–699, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0211-7.
Ourmières, Y., J.-M. Brankart, L. Berline, P. Brasseur, and J. Verron, 2006: Incremental analysis update implementation into a sequential ocean data assimilation system. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23(12), 1729–1744, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1947.1.
Peng, S. Q., L. Xie, B. Liu, and F. Semazzi, 2010: Application of scale-selective data assimilation to regional climate modeling and prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138(4), 1307–1318, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2974.1.
Polavarapu, S., S. Z. Ren, A. M. Clayton, D. Sankey, and Y. Rochon, 2004: On the relationship between incremental analysis updating and incremental digital filtering. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132(10), 2495–2502, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2495:OTRBIA>2.0.CO;2.
Rosenkranz, P. W., 2003: Rapid radiative transfer model for AMSU/HSB channels. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41(2), 362–368, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808323.
Schwartz, C. S., G. S. Romine, and D. C. Dowell, 2021: Toward unifying short-term and next-day convection-allowing ensemble forecast systems with a continuously cycling 3-km ensemble Kalman filter over the entire conterminous United States. Wea. Forecasting, 36(2), 379–405, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0110.1.
Ulmer, F.-G., and U. Balss, 2016: Spin-up time research on the weather research and forecasting model for atmospheric delay mitigations of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 10(1), 016027, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.016027.
Wu, X. J., Z. Y. Jin, L. P. Huang, and D. H. Chen, 2005: The software framework and application of GRAPES model. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 16(4), 539–546, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2005.04.015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xu, D. S., B. L. Zhang, Q. C. Zeng, Y. R. Feng, Y. X. Zhang, and G. F. Dai, 2019: A typhoon initialization scheme based on incremental analysis updates technology. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 77(6), 1053–1061, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2019.060. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xue, J. S., S. Y. Zhuang, G. F. Zhu, H. Zhang, Z. Q. Liu, Y. Liu, and Z. R. Zhuang, 2008: Scientific design and preliminary results of three-dimensional variational data assimilation system of GRAPES. Chinese Science Bulletin, 53(22), 3446–3457, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0416-0.
Yang, X. H., 2005: Analysis blending using spatial filter in grid-point model coupling. HIRLAM Newsletter, 48, 49–55.
Ying, M., W. Zhang, H. Yu, X. Q. Lu, J. X. Feng, Y. X. Fan, Y. T. Zhu, and D. Q. Chen, 2014: An overview of the China meteorological administration tropical cyclone database. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 31(2), 287–301, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1.
Zhang, B. L., V. Tallapragada, F. Z. Weng, J. Sippel, and Z. Z. Ma, 2015: Use of incremental analysis updates in 4D-Var data assimilation. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32(12), 1575–1582, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-5041-7.
Zhuang Z. R., R. C. Wang, and X. L. Li, 2020: Application of global large scale information to GRAEPS RAFS system. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 78(1), 33–46, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2020.002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhuang, Z. R., J. Chen, L. P. Huang, L. T. Deng, and D. H. Chen, 2018: Impact experiments for regional forecast using blending method of global and regional analyses. Meteorological Monthly, 44(12), 1509–1517, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2018.12.001. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Acknowledgements
This research was jointly sponsored by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (Grant No. KCXFZ20201221173610028) and the key program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42130605). The model data in this study are available upon request from the authors via gaoyan@gbamwf.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• A multi-scale incremental analysis update (IAU) scheme was proposed in this paper for the first time.
• For the adopted multi-scale IAU scheme, the optimal relaxation time for large-scale and small-scale increments was estimated at 6 h and 3 h, respectively.
• The performance of the multi-scale IAU scheme in the prediction of Typhoon Mangkhut (2018) was better than that of the traditional IAU scheme.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, Y., Feng, J., Xia, X. et al. Multi-scale Incremental Analysis Update Scheme and Its Application to Typhoon Mangkhut (2018) Prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 40, 95–109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1425-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1425-7
Key words
- multi-scale incremental analysis updates
- optimal relaxation time
- 2-D discrete cosine transform
- GRAPES_Meso
- Typhoon Mangkhut (2018)