Skip to main content

A comparison of two canopy radiative models in land surface processes

Advances in Atmospheric Sciences volume 24, pages 421–434 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper compares the predictions by two radiative transfer models—the two-stream approximation model and the generalized layered model (developed by the authors) in land surface processes—for different canopies under direct or diffuse radiation conditions. The comparison indicates that there are significant differences between the two models, especially in the near infrared (NIR) band. Results of canopy reflectance from the two-stream model are larger than those from the generalized model. However, results of canopy absorptance from the two-stream model are larger in some cases and smaller in others compared to those from the generalized model, depending on the cases involved. In the visible (VIS) band, canopy reflectance is smaller and canopy absorptance larger from the two-stream model compared to the generalized model when the Leaf Area Index (LAI) is low and soil reflectance is high. In cases of canopies with vertical leaf angles, the differences of reflectance and absorptance in the VIS and NIR bands between the two models are especially large.

Two commonly occurring cases, with which the two-stream model cannot deal accurately, are also investigated. One is for a canopy with different adaxial and abaxial leaf optical properties; and the other is for incident sky diffuse radiation with a non-uniform distribution. Comparison of the generalized model within the same canopy for both uniform and non-uniform incident diffuse radiation inputs shows smaller differences in general. However, there is a measurable difference between these radiation inputs for a canopy with high leaf angle. This indicates that the application of the two-stream model to a canopy with different adaxial and abaxial leaf optical properties will introduce non-negligible errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Carson, D. J., and A. B. Sangster, 1981: The influence of land-surface albedo and soil moisture on general circulation model simulations. Numerical Experimentation Programme, Report No. 2, 5.14–5.21.

  • Charney, J. G., 1975: Dynamics of deserts and droughts in the Sahel. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 101, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charney, J. G., W. J. Quirk, S. H. Chow, and J. Kornfield, 1977: A comparative study of the effects of albedo change on drought in semi-arid regions. J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1366–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chervin, R. M., 1979: Response of the NCAR general circulation model to changed land surface albedo. Report of the JOC Study Conference on Climate Models: Performance, Intercomparison and Sensitivity Studies, GARP Publication Series, 22(1), 563–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Qiudan, and Sun Shufen, 2006: A generalized layered radiative transfer model in the vegetation canopy. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 23(2), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, R. E., 1983: Land surface processes and climate-surface albedos and energy balance. Advances in Geophysics, 25, 305–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, R. E., A. Henderson-Sellers, P. J. Kennedy, and M. F. Wilson, 1986: Biosphere Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR, TN275+STR, 69pp.

  • Goudriaan, J., 1977: Crop Micrometeorology: A Simulation Study. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 249pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan, J., 1988: The bare bones of leaf angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 43, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahmann, A. N., and R. E. Dickinson, 2001: A fine-mesh land approach for general circulation models and its impact on regional climate. J. Climate, 14, 1634–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-Sellers, A., and M. F. Wilson, 1983: Surface albedo data for climatic modeling. Rev. Geophys., 21, 1743–1778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Chongyin, 2000: Introduction to Climate Dynamics. 2nd ed., China Meteorological Press, Beijing, 515pp. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meador, W. E., and W. R. Weaver, 1980: Two-stream approximations to radiative transfer in planetary atmospheres: A unified description of existing methods and a new improvement. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 630–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myneni, R. B., J. Ross, and G. Asrar, 1989: A review on the theory of photon transport in leaf canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 45, 1–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. M., and P. G. Jarvis, 1975: Photosynthesis in sitka spruce (picea sitchensis (bong.) carr.) v. radiation penetration theory and a test case. Journal of Applied Ecology, 12, 839–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., 1981: The Radiation Regime and the Architecture of Plant Stands. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Netherlands, 391pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. J., 1985: Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6, 1335–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. J., 1993: Remote sensing of the land surface for studies of global change. NASA/GSFC International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project Report, NASA Goddard Space Flight Cent., Greenbelt, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. J., Y. Mintz, Y. C. Sud, and A. Dalcher, 1986: A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 505–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. J., and Coauthors, 1996a: A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs, Part I: Model formulation. J. Climate, 9, 676–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. J., S. O. Los, C. J. Tucker, C. O. Justice, D. A. Dazlich, G. J. Collatz, and D. A. Randall, 1996b: A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs, Part II: The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from satellite data. J. Climate, 9, 706–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sud, Y. C., and M. J. Fennessy, 1982: A study of the influence of surface albedo on July circulation in semiarid regions using the GLASS GCM. Journal of Climatology, 2, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. P., 2003: A comparison of three different canopy radiation models commonly used in plant modelling. Functional Plant Biology, 30, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

    Dai Qiudan & Sun Shufen

Authors
  1. Dai Qiudan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sun Shufen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, Q., Sun, S. A comparison of two canopy radiative models in land surface processes. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 24, 421–434 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-0421-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-0421-2

Key words

  • generalized canopy radiative transfer model
  • two-stream approximation model
  • canopy reflectance
  • canopy absorptance