Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Biology and Fertility of Soils 58, 307–319 (2022)
Introductory statement
Much to our regret, we have identified some inaccuracies in our article Egenolf et al. (2022), which we would like to correct. In the following, we repeat the flawed or incomplete phrases from the original text with corrections and insertions printed in boldface.
Material & Methods
Experimental setup
With respect to soil pH levels, the text should read as follows: Soil pH (H2O extracts) were verified at the end of the experiment, levelling out in the planted pots at 6.3 versus 6.8 (Taluma soil) and 5.8 versus 6.3 (Porvenir soil) for non-limed and limed treatments, respectively (Fig. S3).
With respect to N fertilization, the experimental setup should be adjusted as follows: Through the course of the experiment, plants were regularly fertilized with N (80 kg N ha-1 as urea at month 6, and 160 kg N ha-1 as (NH4)2SO4 at month 12) to stimulate soil nitrification potential.
Quantification of gene copy numbers
With respect to quantification of gene copy numbers, one additional reference should be included. The respective section should read as follows: Quantification of archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA and amoA genes via quantitative PCR (qPCR) (StepOnePlus™ Real Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA)) was performed according to Rasche et al. (2014) and Nunez et al. (2018), respectively.
Reference of Rasche et al. (2014):
Rasche F, Musyoki MK, Rohl C, Muema EK, Vanlauwe B, and Cadisch G (2014) Lasting influence of biochemically contrasting organic inputs on abundance and community structure of total and proteolytic bacteria in tropical soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 74, 204–213. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.017.
Results
The caption of Table 1 should read as follows: In situ (pot trial) and ex situ (incubation study) estimation of nitrification and N immobilization potential. Depicted values are model-based means. Genotypes that share a common letter do not differ significantly at α=0.05 level. Percentage values in parenthesis refer to the share of applied fertilizer N encountered in the respective pool. DANF = Days after NH4+ fertilization. N.d. ~ not detected.
Figure 4 should read as follows:
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Egenolf, K., Schad, P., Arevalo, A. et al. Correction to: Inter-microbial competition for N and plant NO3- uptake rather than BNI determine soil net nitrification under intensively managed Brachiaria humidicola. Biol Fertil Soils 59, 705–706 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-023-01748-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-023-01748-y