Abstract
Enzyme assays that use fluorescently labeled substrates and microplate formats have been incorporated into laboratory protocols to improve sensitivity and reduce the time and labor involved in traditional bench-scale analyses. Microplate protocols vary, and the methods have not been evaluated systematically for comparability and reproducibility. In this study, p-nitrophenol (pNP)-based and 4-methylumbelliferone (MUF)-based microplate methods for estimating β-glucosidase activity were compared in two soils with different properties. Microplate method reproducibility was evaluated in replicate soil suspensions, and Michaelis–Menten kinetics for the microplate assays were compared to those of a standard pNP bench-scale assay. The effect of soil sample sonication on reproducibility was determined for the MUF microplate method. The MUF microplate method was reproducible in five replicate soil suspensions, but the pNP microplate method showed greater variability. The K m Michaelis–Menten constant was significantly different in the microplate methods compared to the bench method. Enzyme activities measured by the MUF and bench methods were comparable, but the pNP microplate method resulted in more variable measurements and was less sensitive in the soils studied. Sonication of soil at an intensity of 15 W ml−1 resulted in higher (MUF) measurements, but greater variability. The effects of high background absorbance on the reproducibility, sensitivity, and accuracy of the pNP microplate method do not support this method as a substitute for the standard bench method. A robust comparison study of the MUF microplate method across laboratories is recommended to further validate its use in comparative analyses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey VL, Fansler SJ, Smith JL, Bolton H (2011) Reconciling apparent variability in effects of biochar amendment on soil enzyme activities by assay optimization. Soil Biol Biochem 43:296–301
Cervelli S, Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Sequi P (1973) Michaelis constant of soil acid phosphatase. Soil Biol Biochem 5:841–845
Coolen MJL, Overmann J (2000) Functional exoenzymes as indicators of metabolically active bacteria in 124,000-year-old sapropel layers of the eastern Mediterranean sea. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2589–2598
Darrah PR, Harris PJ (1986) A fluorimetric method for measuring the activity of soil enzymes. Plant Soil 92:81–88
De Cesare F, Garzillo AMV, Buonocore V, Badalucco L (2000) Use of sonication for measuring acid phosphatase activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:825–832
DeForest JL (2009) The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and l-DOPA. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1180–1186
Deng S, Popova IE, Dick R (2010) The Use of p-nitrophenol and 4-methylumbelliferone in soil enzyme assay. Paper presented at the ASA, CSSA, and SSSA 2010 International Annual Meetings, Long Beach, CA, 31 October–4 November 2010
Deng S, Kang H, Freeman C (2011) Microplate fluorimetric assay of soil enzymes. In: Dick RP (ed) Methods of soil enzymology, vol 9. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 311–318
Deng S, Popova IE, Dick L, Dick R (2013) Bench scale and microplate format assay of soil enzyme activities using spectroscopic and fluorometric approaches. Appl Soil Ecol 64:84–90
Dick RP, Breakwell DP, Turco RF (1996) Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrative microbiological indicators. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality, vol 49, SSSA Special Publication. Soil Science Socity of America, Madison, pp 9–17
Freeman C, Liska G, Ostle NJ, Jones SE, Lock MA (1995) The use of fluorogenic substrates for measuring enzyme activity in peatlands. Plant Soil 175:147–152
German DP, Weibtraub MN, Grandy AS, Lauber CL, Rinkes ZL, Allison SD (2011) Optimization of hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme methods for ecosystem studies. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1387–1397
International Conference on Harmonisation (2005) International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for the registration or parmaceuticals for human use. Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. ICH-Q2(R1), Geneva
Kilmer VJ, Alexander LT (1949) Methods of making mechanical analysis of soils. Soil Sci 68:15–24
Lindahl V (1995) Evaluation of methods for extraction of bacteria from soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 16:135–142
Marx MC, Wood M, Jarvis SC (2001) A microplate fluorimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1633–1640
Marx MC, Kandeler E, Wood M, Wermbter N, Jarvis SC (2005) Exploring the enzymatic landscape: distribution and kinetics of hydrolytic enzymes in soil particle-size fractions. Soil Biol Biochem 37:35–48
Moscatelli MC, Lagomarsino A, Garzillo AMV, Pignataro A, Grego S (2012) β-Glucosidase kinetic parameters as indicators of soil quality under conventional and organic cropping systems applying two analytical approaches. Ecol Indicators 13:322–327
Nannipieri P, Gianfreda L (1998) Kinetics of enzyme reactions in soil environments. In: Senesi N, Buffle J (eds) Structure and surface reactions. Wiley, New York, pp 449–479
Nannipieri P, Giagnoni L, Renella G, Puglisi E, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Fornasier F, Moscatelli MC, Marinari S (2012) Soil enzymology: classical and molecular approaches. Biol Fertility Soils 48:743–762
Popova IE, Deng S (2010) A high-throughput microplate assay for simultaneous colorimetric quantification of multiple enzyme activities in soil. Appl Soil Ecol 45:315–318
Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR (2002) The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1309–1315
Shrivastava A, Gupta VB (2011) Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chron Young Sci 2:21–25
Stemmer M, Gerzabeck MH, Kandeler E (1998) Organic matter and enzyme activity in particle-size fractions of soils obtained after low-energy sonication. Soil Biol Biochem 30:9–17
Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 775–833
Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphatase for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307
Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1971) Michaelis constants of soil enzymes. Soil Biol Biochem 3:317–323
Trap J, Riah W, Akpa-Vinceslas M, Bailleul C, Laval K, Trinsoutrot-Gattin I (2012) Improved effectiveness and efficiency in measuring soil enzymes as universal soil quality indicators using microplate fluorimetry. Soil Biol Biochem 45:98–101
Wittmann C, Suominen KP, Salkinoja-Salonen MS (2000) Evaluation of ecological disturbance and intrinsic bioremediation potential of pulp mill-contaminated lake sediment using key enzymes as probes. Environ Pollut 107:255–261
Yang XM, Drury CF, Reynolds WD, MacTavish DC (2009) Use of sonication to determine the size distributions of soil particles and organic matter. Can J Soil Sci 89:413–419
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dick, L.K., Jia, G., Deng, S. et al. Evaluation of microplate and bench-scale β-glucosidase assays for reproducibility, comparability, kinetics, and homogenization methods in two soils. Biol Fertil Soils 49, 1227–1236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0820-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0820-8