Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of earthworms, botanical diversity and fertiliser type on the vertical distribution of soil nutrients and plant nutrient acquisition

A mesocosm study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of phosphorus (P)-based fertiliser to agricultural soils can result in a skewed vertical distribution of P down the soil profile, since the element tends to accumulate at the soil surface. Such accumulation can have detrimental effects on the environment, as the erosion of surface soil can facilitate the transfer of large quantities of P out of the field into water bodies. Earthworm and plant communities are intricately linked to vertical nutrient distributions in soil, with both communities either facilitating or negating the incorporation of nutrients into the soil matrix. This study aimed to investigate the effect of earthworm presence, plant community structure and fertiliser type to affect the distribution of nutrients in experimental mesocosms; with particular emphasis on the vertical distribution of P. Mesocosms were designed to simulate a soil which has a high P concentration at the surface compared to further down the soil profile. It was hypothesised that the presence of earthworms would facilitate the incorporation of P into the soil matrix and the presence of a more botanically diversity community would assimilate a greater quantity of soil nutrients. After 1 year, mesocosms were deconstructed into five depth ranges, and the distribution of nutrients were modelled and analysed. Results indicated that the presence of earthworms did redistribute soil nutrients from the surface into the matrix beneath. This redistribution was apparent from a reduction in nutrient concentrations in the 0–1 cm depth range. The presence of a more botanically diverse community not only assimilated greater soil nutrient concentrations, but also promoted a less even vertical distribution of soil nutrients, demonstrating the importance of soil biota and plant diversity in the redistribution of soil nutrients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bunemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E (2011) Phosphorus in action: biological processes in soil phosphorus cycling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chardon WJ, Aalderink GH, van der Salm C (2007) Phosphorus leaching from cow manure patches on soil columns. J Environ Qual 36:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Change 19:292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter BS, Lalor S (2008) Major and micro nutrient advice for productive agricultural crops, 3rd edn. Teagasc: Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Oak Park, Co Carlow, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry JP, Doherty P, Purvis G, Schmidt O (2008) Relationships between earthworm populations and management intensity in cattle-grazed pastures in Ireland. Appl Soil Ecol 39:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry JP, Schmidt O (2007) The feeding habits of earthworms – a review. Pedobiologia 50:463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly K (2005) Evaluating Morgan's phosphorus test as an environmental indicator, RMIS 4976. Teagasc: Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford, Co Wexford, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Lofty JR (1977) Biology of earthworms, 2nd edn. Richard Clay Group, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felten D, Emmerling C (2009) Earthworm burrowing behaviour in 2D terraria with single- and multi-species assemblages. Biol Fertil Soils 45:789–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forde B, Lorenzo H (2001) The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil 232:51–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser S (1993) Distribution and activity of earthworms and contribution to nutrient recycling in alley cropping. Biol Fertil Soils 15:16–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Berta G, Doussan C, Merchan F, Crespi M (2009) Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 321:153–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jegou D, Cluzeau D, Wolf HJ, Gandon Y, Trehen P (1998) Assessment of the burrow system of Lumbricus terrestris, Aporrectodae giardi and Aporrectodae caliginosa using X-ray computed tomography. Biol Fertil Soils 26:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2001) The distribution of soil nutrients with depth: global patterns and the imprint of plants. Biogeochemistry 53:51–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kautz T, Amelung W, Ewert F, Gaiser T, Horn R, Jahn R, Javaux M, Kemna A, Kuyakov Y, Munch JC, Patzold S, Peth S, Scherer HW, Schloter M, Schneider H, Vanserborght J, Vetterlein D, Walter A, Wiesenberg GLB, Kopke U (2013) Nutrient acquisition from arable subsoils in temperate climates: a review. Soil Biol Biochem, in press, 1–20.

  • Kayer M, Isselstein J (2005) Potassium cycling and losses in grassland systems: a review. Grass Forage Sci 60:213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P, Spain AV (2001) Soil ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bayon RC, Binet F (2006) Earthworms change the distribution and availability of phosphorous in organic substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 38:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lixuan R, Yunsheng L, Ning Z, Xudong Z (2013) Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal networks in carbon and phosphorus transfer between plants. Biol Fertil Soil 49:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LECO Corporation (2010) LECO TruSpec CN carbon nitrogen determinator instruction manual. LECO Corporation, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack S (2002) Analysis of agricultural materials: methods used at Johnstown Castle Research Centre, 2nd edn. Teagasc: Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford, Co Wexford, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay AD, Syers JK, Springett JA, Gregg PEH (1982) Plant availability of phosphorus in superphosphate and a phosphate rock as influenced by earthworms. Soil Biol Biochem 14:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay AD, Springett JA, Syers JK, Gregg PEH (1983) Origin of the effect of earthworms on the availability of phosphorus in a phosphate rock. Soil Biol Biochem 15:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM (2003) Statistical methods in agriculture and environmental biology, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall CRC press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard P, Singh BK (2010) Does grassland vegetation drive soil microbial diversity? Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Giagnoni L, Landi L, Renella G (2011) Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil. In: Bunemann EK, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action. Soil biology 26. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 215–241

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Orwin KH, Buckland SM, Johnson D, Turner BL, Smart S, Oakley S, Bardgett RD (2010) Linkages of plant traits to soil properties and the functioning of temperate grassland. J Ecol 98:1074–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens PN, Deeks LK, Wood GA, Betson MJ, Lord EI, Davison PS (2008) Variations in the depth distribution of phosphorus in soil profiles and implications for model-based catachment-scale predictions of phosphorus delivery to surface waters. J Hydrol 350:317–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, McDowell R, Moyer B, Littlejohn R (2011) Land application of manure can influence earthworm activity and soil phosphorus distribution. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:194–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, Syers JK (1976) Potential role of earthworm casts for phosphorus enrichment of run-off waters. Soil Biol Biochem 8:341–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, Syers JK (1977) Seasonal-variation in casting activity and in amounts and release to solution of phosphorus forms in earthworm casts. Soil Biol Biochem 9:227–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shipitalo MJ, Nuutinen V, Butt KR (2004) Interaction of earthworm burrows and cracks in a clayey, subsurface-drained, soil. Appl Soil Ecol 26:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims JT, Sharpley AN (2005) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims RW, Gerard BM (1999) Earthworms. Field Studies Council Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Smettem KRJ (1992) The relation of earthworms to soil hydraulic properties. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1539–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistica v9 (2011) Stats Soft Inc, USA.

  • Stewart BA (1991) Advances in soil science. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL (2008) Resource partitioning for soil phosphorus: a hypothesis. J Ecol 96:698–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vadas PA (2006) Distribution of phosphorus in manure slurry and its infiltration after application to soils. J Environ Qual 35:542–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Ruijven J, Berendse F (2005) Diversity–productivity relationships: Initial effects, long-term patterns, and underlying mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:695–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Teagasc Walsh Fellowship scheme. The authors wish to thank the technical staff located at Teagasc Environment, Soils and Land Use Research centre for their help with laboratory analyses, and three reviewers for their insightful comments which helped improve drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teagasc, Environment, Soils and Land Use Research Department, Johnstown Castle, Ireland

    P. A. Massey, R. E. Creamer & R. P. O. Schulte

  2. National Soil Resources Institute, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK

    P. A. Massey, R. E. Creamer & K. Ritz

  3. Department of Geography, Bennett Building, University of Leicester, Leicester, LEI 7RH, UK

    M. J. Whelan

Authors
  1. P. A. Massey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. E. Creamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. P. O. Schulte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Whelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Ritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. E. Creamer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massey, P.A., Creamer, R.E., Schulte, R.P.O. et al. The effects of earthworms, botanical diversity and fertiliser type on the vertical distribution of soil nutrients and plant nutrient acquisition. Biol Fertil Soils 49, 1189–1201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0817-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0817-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation