Abstract
Let G be a finite abelian group viewed a \({\mathbb {Z}}\)-module and let \({\mathcal {G}} = (V, E)\) be a simple graph. In this paper, we consider a graph \(\Gamma (G)\) called as a group-annihilator graph. The vertices of \(\Gamma (G)\) are all elements of G and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent in \(\Gamma (G)\) if and only if \([x : G][y : G]G = \{0\}\), where \(x, y\in G\) and \([x : G] = \{r\in {\mathbb {Z}} : rG \subseteq {\mathbb {Z}}x\}\) is an ideal of a ring \({\mathbb {Z}}\). We discuss in detail the graph structure realised by a group G. Moreover, we study the creation sequence, hyperenergeticity and hypoenergeticity of group-annihilator graphs. Finally, we conclude the paper with a discussion on Laplacian eigen values of the group-annihilator graph. We show that the Laplacian eigen values are representatives of orbits of the group action: \(Aut(\Gamma (G)) \times G \rightarrow G\).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D.F., Livingston, P.S.: The zero-divisor graph of a commutative ring. J. Algebra 217, 434–447 (1999)
Bapat, R.B.: Graphs and matrices. Springer/Hindustan Book Agency, London (2010)
Beck, I.: Coloring of commutative rings. J. Algebra 116, 208–226 (1988)
Bohdan, Z.: Intersection graphs of finite abelian groups. Czechoslov. Math. J. 25(2), 171–174 (1975)
Brauer, R., Fowler, K.A.: On groups of even order. Ann. Math. 62(2), 565–583 (1955)
Cameron, P., Ghosh, S.: The power graph of a finite group. Discret. Math. 311(13), 1220–1222 (2011)
Chvátal, V., Hammer, P.L.: Aggregation of inequalities in integer programming. Ann. Discret. Math. 1, 145–162 (1977)
Chung, F.: Spectral graph theory. AMS 92 (1997)
Hammer, P.L., Kelmans, A.K.: Laplacian spectra and spanning trees of threshold graphs. Discret. Appl. Math. 65, 255–273 (1996)
Henderson, P.B., Zalcstein, Y.: A graph-theoretic characterization of the PV class of synchronizing primitives. SIAM J. Comput. 6(1), 88–108 (1977)
Liebeck, M.W., Shalev, A.: Simple groups, probabilistic methods, and a conjecture of Kantor and Lubotzky. J. Algebra 184, 31–57 (1996)
Merris, R.: Graph theory. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken (2011)
Merris, R.: Laplacian matrices of graphs: a survey. Linear Algebra Appl. 197, 143–176 (1994)
Nikiforov, V.: The energy of graphs and matrices. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 326, 1472–1475 (2007)
Dutta, K., Prasad, A.: Degenerations and orbits in finite abelian groups. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 118, 1685–1694 (2011)
Gutman, I.: Hyperenergetic and hypoenergetic graphs. Zbornik Radova 22, 113–135 (2011)
Jacobs, D.P., Trevisan, V., Tura, F.: Eigenvalues and energy in threshold graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 465, 412–425 (2015)
Jacobs, D.P., Trevisan, V., Tura, F.: Computing the characteristic polynomial of threshold graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 18(5), 709–719 (2014)
Mahadev, N.V.R., Peled, U.N.: Threshold graphs and related topics. Ann. Discret. Math. 56 (1995)
Miller, G.A.: Determination of all the characteristic subgroups of any abelian group. Am. J. Math. 27(1), 15–24 (1905)
Pirzada, S., Raja, R., Redmond, S.P.: Locating sets and numbers of graphs associated to commutative rings. J. Algebra Appl. 13(7), 1450047 (2014)
Pirzada, S., Raja, R.: On the metric dimension of a zero-divisor graph. Commun. Algebra 45(4), 1399–1408 (2017)
Raja, R., Pirzada, S., Redmond, S.P.: On Locating numbers and codes of zero-divisor graphs associated with commutative rings. J. Algebra Appl. 15(1), 1650014 (2016)
Raja, R., Pirzada, S.: On annihilating graphs of modules over commutative rings. Algebra Colloq. (To appear)
Redmond, S.P.: An ideal-based zero-divisor graph of a commutative ring. Commun. Algebra 31, 4425–4443 (2003)
Schwachhöfer, M., Stroppel, M.: Finding representatives for the orbits under the automorphism group of a bounded abelian group. J. Algebra 211(1), 225–239 (1999)
Acknowledgements
This research project was initiated when the authors visited the Stat-Math Unit, Indian Statistical Institute Bangaluru, India. So, we are immensely grateful to ISI Bangaluru for all the facilities. Moreover, the authors would like to thank Amitava Bhattacharya of TIFR Mumbai for the motivation of this research work. The first author’s research is being partially supported by National Board of Higher Mathematics, Department of Atomic Energy, Govt. of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Proof of Theorem 3
Appendix: Proof of Theorem 3
We furnish the proof of Theorem 3 in this section.
Proof
-
Consider the case \(a \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\alpha , p^{\alpha }}\), and \(b\in {\mathcal {O}}_{\beta , p^{\beta }}\)
-
For \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^{\gamma }},\) it is trivially true that \([(a,b,c):G]= p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(0\le i \le \beta -1.\) Clearly, \(p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we see that \(y (0 ,1, 0)= n (0,0,c)\) for some integer n. That completes the other part.
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(\beta \le i \le \gamma -1.\) Then \(c= p^i k'\), where \((k',p) = 1.\) Clearly, \(p^{i}{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we again see that \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (0,0,c)\) for some integer n. So, we are done.
-
-
Consider the case \(a \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\alpha , p^{\alpha }}\), so \(a=0\) and \(b\in {\mathcal {O}}_{\beta , p^{j}}\), where \(0 \le j \le \beta -1.\) So, \(b= p^jb'\) for some \(b'\), where \((b',p)=1.\)
-
For \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^{\gamma }},\) it is trivially true that \([(a,b,c):G]= p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(0\le i \le j\). So, \(c= p^ic'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p)=1.\) Then for any \(y = p^{\beta }k \in p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}},\) \(y (u,v,w) = (0, 0, p^\beta ) kw = wkc'^{-1}p^{\beta -i} (a,b,c)\) as \(j-i \ge 0.\) So \(p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,1, 0)= n (0,0,c)\) for some integer n, so we are done, since \(j-i \ge 0.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(j+1\le i \le \gamma - \beta +j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) For any \(y = p^{i+\beta -j}k' \in p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}},\) \(y (u,v,w) = (0, 0, p^{\beta +i-j}) k'w = k'wc'^{-1}p^{\beta -j} (a,b,c)\) as \(\beta - j \ge 1.\) So, \(p^{\beta +i -j}{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (0,b,c)\) for some integer n, this implies \(p^{\beta -j}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{\beta +i-j}c' (\bmod p^{\gamma } )\), hence the result follows.
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(\gamma - \beta +j+1\le i \le \gamma - 1.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Clearly \(p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (0,b,c)\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\beta -j}\mid n\) and since \(i+\beta - j \ge \gamma +1\), so \(y = p^{\beta +i-j}c' (\bmod p^{\gamma } )\).
-
-
Consider the case \(a \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\alpha , p^k}\). Assume that \(a= p^ka'\) for some \(a'\), where \((a',p)=1\) for \(0\le k \le \alpha -1\) and \(b\in {\mathcal {O}}_{\beta , p^{\beta }},\)
-
For \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^{\gamma }},\) it is trivially true that \([(a,b,c):G]= p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(0\le i \le \beta - \alpha +k\). So \(c= p^ic'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p)=1.\) For any \(y = p^{\beta }k' \in p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned}&y (u,v,w) = (0, 0, p^\beta ) k'w \\&\quad = k'wc'^{-1}(p^{\beta -i+k}a', 0 , p^{\beta -i} p^i c') \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,0,c), \end{aligned}$$since \(\beta -i+k \ge \alpha .\) So, \(p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,1, 0)= n (a,0,c)\) for some integer n, so we get \(y\in p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}}\) and we are done.
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(\beta - \alpha +k +1\le i \le \gamma - \alpha +k-1.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) For any \(y = p^{i+\alpha -k}k' \in p^{i+\alpha -k}{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0, 0, p^{\alpha +i-k}c') c'^{-1}k'w\\= & {} (p^{\alpha -k}p^ka',0,p^{\alpha -k} p^i c') c'^{-1}k'w \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c), \end{aligned}$$since \(i+\alpha -k \ge \beta +1.\) So, \(p^{\alpha +i -k}{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (p^ka',0,p^ic')\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\alpha -k}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{\alpha - k +i}n' (\bmod p^{\gamma } )\) for some integer \(n'\). Since \(\alpha - k +i \le \gamma -1,\) so \(y\in p^{\alpha - k +i} {\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(\gamma - \alpha +k\le i \le \gamma - 1.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Clearly \(p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (a,0,c)\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\alpha - k}\mid n\) and since \(\alpha -k+i \ge \gamma\), so \(y = p^inc' (\bmod p^{\gamma } )\).
-
-
Consider the case \(a \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\alpha , p^k}\). Assume that \(a= p^ka'\) for some \(a'\), where \((a',p)=1\) for \(0\le k \le \alpha -1\) and \(b\in {\mathcal {O}}_{\beta , p^{j}},\) so \(b=p^jb'\) for some \(b'\), where \((b',p)=1\) for \(0 \le j \le \beta -1.\)
-
For \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^{\gamma }},\) it is trivially true that \([(a,b,c):G]= p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(0\le i \le \gamma - \beta +j\). So \(c= p^ic'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p)=1.\) Note that \(\beta -i \ge \alpha .\) Then for any \(y = p^{\beta }k' \in p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0, 0, p^\beta ) k'w = k'c'^{-1}w (p^{\beta -i}p^k a',\\&p^{\beta -i}p^j b', p^{\beta -i} p^i c') \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c). \end{aligned}$$So \(p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,1, 0)= n (a,b,c)\) for some integer n. Then \(p^{\gamma -i} \mid n\) and \(y\equiv p^jc' (\bmod )\), so \(y \in p^{\beta } {\mathbb {Z}}\), since \(\gamma + (j-i) > \beta .\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(0\le i \le \gamma - \beta +j\). So, \(c= p^ic'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p)=1.\) Since \(i> j\), so \(\beta -j \ge \alpha .\) Then for any \(y = p^{\beta +i -j}k' \in p^{\beta +i-j}{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0, 0, p^{\beta +i-j}c') k' w= k' w(0, p^{\beta -j}p^jb', p^{\beta +i-j}c') \\= & {} k'w (p^{\beta -j}p^ka', p^{\beta -j}p^jb', p^{\beta +i-j}c') \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c) \end{aligned}$$as \(i>j.\) So \(p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (a,b,c)\) for some integer n. Then \(p^{\beta -j} \mid n\) and \(y\equiv p^ic' (\bmod )\), so \(y \in p^{\beta +i-j} {\mathbb {Z}}\), since \(i< \gamma -\beta +j.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i \ge j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(i>\beta -\alpha >j.\) For any \(y = p^{i+\beta -j}k' \in p^{i+\beta -j}{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0,0,p^{\beta +i-j} c')c'^{-1}k'wa'\\= & {} (p^{\beta -j}p^ka',p^{\beta -j}p^jb',p^{\beta +i-j} c')k'wc'^{-1} \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c) \end{aligned}$$as \(\beta -\alpha >j.\) So, \(p^{\beta +i -j}{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (p^ka',p^jb',p^ic')\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\beta -j}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{i}nc' (\bmod p^{\gamma })\). Since \(i < \gamma -\beta +j,\) so \(y\in p^{\beta +i - j +} {\mathbb {Z}}.\).
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i \ge j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(\beta -\alpha < i\) , \(i <\gamma -\alpha +k\) and \(j> \beta -\alpha +k.\) For any \(y = p^{i+\alpha -k}k' \in p^{i+\alpha -k}{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0,0,p^{\alpha +i-k} c')k'wc'^{-1} \\= & {} (p^{\alpha -k}p^k a',p^{\alpha -k}p^jb',p^{\alpha +i-k} c')k'wc'^{-1} \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c) \end{aligned}$$as \(\alpha -k > \beta -j.\) So, \(p^{\alpha +i -k}{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (p^ka',p^jb',p^ic')\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\alpha -k}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{i}nc' (\bmod p^{\gamma })\). Since \(i < \gamma - \alpha +k,\) so \(y\in p^{\alpha +i - k} {\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i \ge j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(\beta -\alpha < i\) , \(\gamma -\alpha +k \le i\) and \(j> \beta -\alpha +k.\) From the previous argument \(i \ge \gamma -\alpha +k\), therefore we have \(p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}}= [(a,b,c):G].\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i \ge j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(\beta - \alpha < j \le \beta -\alpha +k.\) For any \(y = p^{i+\beta -j}k' \in p^{i+\beta - j}{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0,0,p^{\beta +i-j} c')k'wc'^{-1}\\= & {} (p^{\beta -j+k}a',p^{\beta -j}p^jb',p^{\beta +i-j} c')k'wc'^{-1} \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c) \end{aligned}$$as \(\beta -\alpha < j \le \beta -\alpha +k.\) So, \(p^{\beta +i -j}{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (p^ka',p^jb',p^ic')\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\beta -j}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{i}nc' (\bmod p^{\gamma })\). Since \(i < \gamma - \beta +j,\) so \(y\in p^{\beta +i - j} {\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i < j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(i> \beta -\alpha\) and \(\beta +k-j \ge \alpha .\)
For any \(y = p^{\beta }k' \in p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0,0,p^{\beta -i}p^ic')k'wc'^{-1}\\= & {} (p^{\beta -i}p^ka',p^{\beta -i}p^jb',p^{\beta -i}p^i c')k'wc'^{-1} \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c) \end{aligned}$$as \(\beta -\alpha < i.\) So, \(p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,1, 0)= n (p^ka',p^jb',p^ic')\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\gamma -i}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{j}nb' (\bmod p^{\gamma } )\). Since \(i < \gamma - \beta +j,\) so \(y\in p^{\beta } {\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i < j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\) such that \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(\beta -\alpha +k>i> \beta -\alpha\) and \(j> \beta -\alpha +k.\) For any \(y = p^{\beta }k' \in p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}},\) then
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0,0,p^{\beta -i}p^ic')k'wc'^{-1}\\= & {} (p^{\beta -i}p^ka',p^{\beta -i}p^jb',p^{\beta -i}p^i c')k'wc'^{-1} \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c) \end{aligned}$$as \(\beta -\alpha +k> i.\) So \(p^{\beta }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,1, 0)= n (p^ka',p^jb',p^ic')\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\alpha -k}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{j}nc' (\bmod p^{\beta })\). Since \(j > \beta -\alpha +k,\) so \(y\in p^{\beta } {\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i < j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(\gamma -\alpha +k> i \ge \beta -\alpha +k\). For any \(y = p^{\alpha +i-k }k' \in p^{\alpha +i-k }{\mathbb {Z}},\)
$$\begin{aligned} y (u,v,w)= & {} (0,0,p^{\alpha -k}p^ic')k'wc'^{-1}\\= & {} (p^{\alpha -k}p^ka',p^{\alpha -k}p^jb',p^{\alpha -k}p^i c')k'wc'^{-1} \in {\mathbb {Z}}(a,b,c) \end{aligned}$$as \(\alpha -k+j> \beta .\) So, \(p^{\alpha +i-k}{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\)
Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (p^ka',p^jb',p^ic')\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\alpha -k}\mid n\) and \(y = p^{i}nc' (\bmod p^{\gamma })\). Since \(i < \gamma -\alpha +k,\) so \(y\in p^{\alpha -k+i} {\mathbb {Z}}.\)
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\), where \(i < j.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Also assume \(i \ge \gamma -\alpha +k\) and \(j> \beta -\alpha +k\). By assuming that \(i \ge \gamma -\alpha +k\) and follow the same proof as above, we trivially have the required result.
-
Let \(c \in {\mathcal {O}}_{\gamma , p^i}\) where \(\gamma - \beta +j\le i \le \gamma - 1.\) Then \(c= p^i c'\) for some \(c'\), where \((c',p) = 1.\) Clearly \(p^{\gamma }{\mathbb {Z}} \subset [(a,b,c): G].\) Now by considering \(y \in [(a,b,c):G]\), we have \(y (0 ,0, 1)= n (a,b,c)\) for some integer n. This implies \(p^{\beta - j}\mid n\) and since \(\beta +i -j \ge \gamma\), so \(y = p^inc' (\bmod p^{\gamma } )\).
This completes the proof.
-
\(\square\)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazumdar, E., Raja, R. Group-Annihilator Graphs Realised by Finite Abelian Groups and Its Properties. Graphs and Combinatorics 38, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-021-02422-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-021-02422-6