Abstract
Several new q-supercongruences are obtained using transformation formulas for basic hypergeometric series, together with various techniques such as suitably combining terms, and creative microscoping, a method recently developed by the first author in collaboration with Zudilin. More concretely, the results in this paper include q-analogues of supercongruences (referring to p-adic identities remaining valid for some higher power of p) established by Long, by Long and Ramakrishna, and several other q-supercongruences. The six basic hypergeometric transformation formulas which are made use of are Watson’s transformation, a quadratic transformation of Rahman, a cubic transformation of Gasper and Rahman, a quartic transformation of Gasper and Rahman, a double series transformation of Ismail, Rahman and Suslov, and a new transformation formula for a nonterminating very-well-poised \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) series. Also, the nonterminating q-Dixon summation formula is used. A special case of the new \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) transformation formula is further utilized to obtain a generalization of Rogers’ linearization formula for the continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Ramanujan, in his second letter to Hardy on February 27, 1913, mentioned the following identity
where \(\Gamma (x)\) is the Gamma function and where \((a)_k=a(a+1)\cdots (a+k-1)\) is the Pochhammer symbol. A p-adic analogue of (1.1) was conjectured by Van Hamme [55, Eq. (A.2)] as follows:
Here and throughout the paper, p always denotes an odd prime and \(\Gamma _p(x)\) is the p-adic Gamma function. The congruence (1.2) was later proved by McCarthy and Osburn [43] through a combination of ordinary and Gaussian hypergeometric series. Recently, the congruence (1.2) for \(p\equiv 3\pmod {4}\) and \(p>3\) was further generalized by Liu [37] to the modulus \(p^4\) case.
It is well known that some truncated hypergeometric series are closely related to Calabi-Yau threefolds over finite fields and are further relevant to the coefficients of modular forms. For example, using the fact that the Calabi-Yau threefold in question is modular, which was proved by Ahlgren and Ono [3], Kilbourn [34] succeeded in proving Van Hamme’s (M.2) supercongruence:
where \(a_p\) is the pth coefficient of a weight 4 modular form
Applying Whipple’s \(_7F_6\) transformation formula, Long [40] proved that
which in view of the supercongruence (1.3) can be written as
The main aim of this paper is to give q-analogues of some known supercongruences, including a partial q-analogue of Long’s supercongruence (1.4) (partial in the sense that the modulo \(p^4\) condition is replaced by the weaker condition modulo \(p^3\)). We provide such a result in Theorem 2.1 in the form of two transformations of truncated basic hypergeometric series. In addition, several other q-supercongruences are given. These results are proved by special instances of transformation formulas for basic hypergeometric series. (See Theorem A.1 in the Appendix for a new basic hypergeometric transformation formula which we make use of.)
Throughout we assume q to be fixed with \(0<|q|<1\). We refer to q as the “base”. For \(a,k\in {\mathbb {C}}\), the q-shifted factorial is defined by
For brevity, we frequently use the shorthand notation
Moreover, the q-binomial coefficients \(\begin{bmatrix}{\begin{matrix}x\\ k\end{matrix}}\end{bmatrix}\) are defined by
It is easy to see that
Following Gasper and Rahman [13], basic hypergeometric \({}_{r}\phi _s\) series with r upper parameters \(a_1,\dots ,a_r\), s lower parameters \(b_1,\dots ,b_s\), base q, and argument z are defined by
where \(q\ne 0\) when \(r>s+1\). Such a series terminates if one of the upper parameters, say, \(a_r\), is of the form \(q^{-n}\), where n is a nonnegative integer. If the series does not terminate, then it converges for \(|z|<1\).
In many of our proofs we will make use of Watson’s \(_8\phi _7\) transformation formula [13, Appendix (III.17)]:
which is valid whenever the \(_8\phi _7\) series converges and the \(_4\phi _3\) series terminates. In particular, we will also make use of the limiting case \(f=q^{-n}\rightarrow \infty \), which we state for convenience:
Other transformations we make use of are a quadratic transformation formula of Rahman, stated in (6.3), a cubic transformation formula of Gasper and Rahman, stated in (7.1), a quartic transformation formula by Gasper and Rahman, stated in (8.1), a double series transformation by Ismail, Rahman and Suslov, stated in (11.1), and a new transformation formula for a nonterminating \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) series into two multiples of nonterminating \({}_4\phi _3\) series, given as Theorem A.1 in the Appendix. We also make use of the q-Dixon summation, stated in (10.1).
For further material on basic hypergeometric series and more generally, on special functions, we refer to the text books by Gasper and Rahman [13], and by Andrews, Askey and Roy [2], respectively. In particular, in our computations we implicitly make heavy use of elementary manipulations of q-shifted factorials (see [13, Appendix I]).
Recall that the q-integer is defined as \([n]=[n]_q=1+q+\cdots +q^{n-1}\). Moreover, the nth cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi _n(q)\) is given by
where \(\zeta \) is an nth primitive root of unity. It is clear that \(\Phi _n(q)\) is a polynomial in q with integer coefficients. Further,
in particular, \(\Phi _p(q)=[p]\) for any prime p.
We say that two rational functions A(q) and B(q) in q are congruent modulo a polynomial P(q), denoted by \(A(q)\equiv B(q)\pmod {P(q)}\), if the numerator of the reduced form of \(A(q)-B(q)\) is divisible by P(q) in the polynomial ring \({\mathbb {Z}}[q]\). We refer the reader to [1, 7, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24, 27, 36, 39, 45, 49, 53, 54, 57, 58] for some interesting q-congruences.
2 The Main Results
The following is our q-analogue of (1.4), where the modulo \(p^4\) condition is replaced by the weaker condition modulo \(p^3\).
Theorem 2.1
Let n be a positive odd integer. Then
and
Noticing that the terms corresponding to k in the upper half range \((n-1)/2<k\leqslant n-1\) are congruent to 0 modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\) but not modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^2\) in general, we conclude that (2.1a) and (2.1b) are in fact different congruences. Of course, when \(n=p\) is an odd prime and \(q=1\), they are both equivalent to (1.4) modulo \(p^3\). The proof of Theorem 2.1 is deferred to Sect. 3.
Van Hamme [55, Eq. (H.2)] proved the following supercongruence:
The first author and Zeng [27, Cor. 1.2] gave a q-analogue of (2.2) as follows:
We do not know any q-analogue of (1.2). However, we are able to provide a q-analogue of a very closely related congruence. In particular, since \(\Gamma _p(\frac{1}{4})^4 \Gamma _p(\frac{3}{4})^4=1\), from (1.2) and (2.2) we deduce that
which was already noticed by Mortenson [44]. We are able to give the following complete q-analogue of (2.3).
Theorem 2.2
Let n be a positive odd integer. Then
and
Note that, just like in Theorem 2.1, the two congruences (2.4a) and (2.4b) are not equivalent. The proof of Theorem 2.2 is deferred to Sect. 3.
Long and Ramakrishna [41, Thm. 2] proved the following supercongruence:
This result is stronger than Van Hamme’s (D.2) supercongruence conjecture which asserts a congruence modulo \(p^4\) for \(p\equiv 1\pmod 6\). Long and Ramakrishna also pointed out that (2.5) does not hold modulo \(p^7\) in general.
We propose the following partial q-analogue of Long and Ramakrishna’s supercongruence (2.5).
Theorem 2.3
Let n be a positive integer coprime with 3. Then
We also partially confirm the \(a=1\) case of the second congruence in [28, Conj. 5.2].
Theorem 2.4
Let d and n be positive integers with \(d>2\) and \(n\equiv -1\pmod d\). Then
The proofs of Theorems 2.3 and 2.4 are deferred to Sect. 4.
In Sect. 3, we shall prove Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 using the creative microscoping method developed by the first author and Zudilin [28]. Roughly speaking, to prove a q-supercongruence modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\), we prove its generalization with an extra parameter a so that the corresponding congruence holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\). Since the polynomials \(\Phi _n(q)\), \(1-aq^n\), and \(a-q^n\) are pairwise relatively prime, this generalized q-congruence can be established modulo these three polynomials individually. Finally, by taking the limit \(a\rightarrow 1\), we obtain the original q-supercongruence of interest. We learned that this creative microscoping method has already caught the interests of Guillera [14] and Straub [50].
Further, we introduce a new idea for proving some congruences modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). In many instances in this paper, the congruences \(\sum _{k=0}^{(n-1)/2}a_{n,k}\equiv 0\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\) are proved by simply showing \(a_k+a_{(n-1)/2-k}\equiv 0\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\) (instead of, say, evaluating certain infinite series at roots of unity which was illustrated in [28]).
The proofs of Theorems 2.3 and 2.4 in Sect. 4 again are done by showing a more general identity but otherwise are accomplished in a slightly different way. All the proofs of Theorems 2.1–2.4 in Sects. 3 and 4, and of the further results from Sect. 5, are based on Watson’s \(_8\phi _7\) transformation formula. We also confirm a three-parametric q-congruence conjecture in Sect. 6 based on a quadratic transformation formula of Rahman. Further, in Sect. 7 we deduce some q-congruences from a cubic transformation formula of Gasper and Rahman. Similarly, in Sect. 8 we deduce some q-congruences from a quartic transformation formula of Gasper and Rahman. The q-supercongruences in Sect. 9 are proved similarly but are derived using a new \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) transformation formula. Since the latter formula is of independent interest, its derivation is given in the Appendix. It is also shown there how a special case of the \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) transformation formula can be utilized to obtain a generalization of Rogers’ linearization formula for the continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials. In Sect. 10 some q-supercongruences are deduced from the q-Dixon summation. In Sect. 11 we deduce q-super congruences—most of them only conjectural—from a double series transformation of Ismail, Rahman and Suslov. Finally, in Sect. 12, some concluding remarks are given and some related conjectures for further study are proposed. For example, we conjecture that the congruence (2.6) still holds modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^3\) for \(n\equiv 2\pmod {3}\).
3 Proofs of Theorems 2.1 and 2.2
We first give the following lemma.
Lemma 3.1
Let n be a positive odd integer. Then, for \(0\leqslant k\leqslant (n-1)/2\), we have
Proof
Since \(q^n\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\), we have
Further, modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\), we have
which in combination with (3.1) establishes the assertion. \(\square \)
We now use the above lemma to prove the following result which was originally conjectured by the first author and Zudilin [28, Conj. 5.6].
Theorem 3.2
Let \(n\equiv 3\pmod 4\) be a positive integer. Then
Proof
By Lemma 3.1, we have
and
Noticing that \(q^n\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\) and, for odd n, \(\Phi _n(q^2)=\Phi _n(q)\Phi _n(-q)\), we get
for any positive integer n with \(n\equiv 3\pmod 4\) and \(0\leqslant k\leqslant (n-1)/2\). This completes the proof of the theorem. \(\square \)
Similarly, we can prove that the third q-congruence in [28, Conj. 5.2] is true modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\) and is therefore further true modulo [n] (again as in the proof of Theorem 2.1).
We shall establish the following two-parameter generalization of Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 3.3
Let n be a positive odd integer. Then, modulo \(\Phi _n(q)(1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\),
Proof
For \(a=q^{-n}\) or \(a=q^n\) , the left-hand side of (3.2) is equal to
By Watson’s \(_8\phi _7\) transformation formula (1.7), we can rewrite the right-hand side of (3.3) as
It is easy to see that the fraction before the sum on the right-hand side of (3.4) is equal to \([n]q^{(1-n)/2}\). This proves that the congruence (3.2) holds modulo \(1-aq^n\) or \(a-q^n\).
Moreover, by Lemma 3.1, it is easy to see that, modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\), the kth and \(((n-1)/2-k)\)th terms on the left-hand side of (3.2) cancel each other, i.e.,
When the left-hand side of (3.2) has an odd number of factors, the central term will remain. This happens when \(n=4l+1\) for some positive integer l, and in this case the central term has index \(k=l\) and one directly sees that \([4k+1]=[n]\) is a factor of the summand. In total, this proves that the left-hand side of (3.2) is congruent to 0 modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\), and therefore the congruence (3.2) also holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). Since \(\Phi _n(q)\), \(1-aq^n\) and \(a-q^n\) are pairwise relatively prime polynomials, the proof of (3.2) is complete. \(\square \)
Proof of Theorem 2.1
The limits of the denominators on both sides of (3.2) as \(a\rightarrow 1\) are relatively prime to \(\Phi _n(q)\), since \(0\leqslant k\leqslant (n-1)/2\). On the other hand, the limit of \((1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\) as \(a\rightarrow 1\) has the factor \(\Phi _n(q)^2\). Thus, the limiting case \(a,b\rightarrow 1\) of (3.2) gives the following congruence
which also implies that
since \((q;q^2)_k^6/(q^2;q^2)_k^6\equiv 0\pmod {\Phi _n(q)^3}\) for k in the range \((n-1)/2<k\leqslant n-1\). It remains to show that the above two congruences are still true modulo [n], or equivalently,
and
For \(n>1\), let \(\zeta \ne 1\) be an nth root of unity, not necessarily primitive. That is, \(\zeta \) is a primitive root of unity of odd degree \(d\mid n\). Let \(c_q(k)\) denote the kth term on the left-hand side of the congruences in (3.7), i.e.,
The congruences (3.5) and (3.6) with \(n=d\) imply that
Observe that
We have
and
which means that the sums \(\sum _{k=0}^{n-1}c_q(k)\) and \(\sum _{k=0}^{(n-1)/2}c_q(k)\) are both divisible by the cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi _d(q)\). Since this is true for any divisor \(d>1\) of n, we conclude that they are divisible by
thus establishing (3.7). \(\square \)
Proof of Theorem 2.2
Similarly as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, letting \(a\rightarrow 1\) and \(b\rightarrow \infty \) in (3.2), we obtain
which also implies that
Along the same lines as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we can show that
Combining the above congruences, we are led to (2.4a) and (2.4b). \(\square \)
4 Proofs of Theorems 2.3 and 2.4
We shall prove the following common generalization of Theorems 2.3 and 2.4.
Theorem 4.1
Let n and d be positive integers with \(d\geqslant 3\) and \(\gcd (n,d)=1\). Then
Proof
Let \(\alpha \) and j be integers. Since
and \(1-q^{\alpha n}\equiv 0\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\), we obtain
It follows that
Similarly, we have
Since \(\gcd (n,d)=1\), we know that there exists a positive integer \(\alpha <d\) such that \(\alpha n\equiv 1\pmod {d}\). Then by [13, Appendix (III.18)] (i.e., (1.7) with \(f=q^{1-\alpha n}\)), modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^2\), the left-hand side of (4.1) is congruent to
It is clear that \((q^{d+1};q^d)_{(\alpha n-1)/d}\) in the numerator has the factor \(1-q^{\alpha n}\) and is therefore divisible by \(\Phi _n(q)\), while the denominator is coprime with \(\Phi _n(q)\). This proves (4.1) for the second case.
Furthermore, if \(n\equiv -1\pmod {d}\), then, modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^2\), the left-hand side of (4.1) is congruent to
It is easy to see that this time the numerator has the factor \((1-q^{(d-1)n})(1-q^{(2-d)n})\) and is therefore divisible by \(\Phi _n(q)^2\), and again the denominator is coprime with \(\Phi _n(q)\). This proves (4.1) for the first case. \(\square \)
Letting \(a=1\) and \(d=3\) in (4.1), we get
Similarly as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we can prove that
This completes the proof of (2.6).
Likewise, taking \(a\rightarrow 0\) in (4.1), we obtain
This completes the proof of (2.7).
It appears that the following generalization with one more parameter b is still true.
Conjecture 4.2
Let n and d be positive integers with \(d\geqslant 3\) and \(\gcd (n,d)=1\). Then
5 More q-Congruences from Watson’s Transformation
Throughout this section, m always stands for \(n-1\) or \((n+1)/2\). Note that the special case of [28, Thm. 4.9] with \(r=-1\), \(d=2\) and \(a=1\) gives
In this section, we shall give some similar congruences.
Theorem 5.1
Let \(n>1\) be an odd integer. Then
Proof
We first establish the following result:
For \(a=q^{-n}\) or \(a=q^n\), the left-hand side of (5.2) is equal to
By the limiting case of Watson’s transformation formula (1.8), we can rewrite the right-hand side of (5.3) as
It is easy to see that
This proves that the congruence (5.2) holds modulo \((1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\).
On the other hand, by Lemma 3.1, for \(0\leqslant k\leqslant (n+1)/2\), we have
It follows that the kth and \(((n+1)/2-k)\)th terms on the left-hand side of (5.2) cancel each other modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). When the respective sum has an odd number of factors, the central term will remain. This happens when \(n=4l-1\) for some positive integer l, and in this case the central term has index \(k=l\) and one directly sees that \([4k-1]=[n]\) is a factor of the summand. In total, this proves that the congruence (5.2) also holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). Since the polynomials \(\Phi _n(q)\), \(1-aq^n\) and \(a-q^n\) are coprime with one another, the proof of (5.2) is complete.
Letting \(a\rightarrow 1\) in (5.2), one sees that the congruence (5.1) holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\) by noticing that \((q^{-1};q^2)_5^k/(q^2;q^2)_k^5\equiv 0\pmod {\Phi _n(q)^3}\) for \((n+1)/2<k\leqslant n-1\). Along the same lines of the proof of Theorem 2.1, we can prove that
i.e., the congruence (5.1) holds modulo [n]. Since \({\text {lcm}}(\Phi _n(q)^3,[n])=[n]\Phi _n(q)^2\), the proof of the theorem is complete. \(\square \)
Corollary 5.2
We have
Theorem 5.3
Let \(n>1\) be an odd integer. Then
Proof
We first establish the following congruence:
Letting \(q\mapsto q^2\) and \(c\rightarrow 0\) followed by \(a=b=q^{-1}\), \(d=q^{-1-n}\) and \(e=q^{-1+n}\) in the limiting case of Watson’s transformation formula (1.8), we obtain
By the q-Chu–Vandermonde summation formula [13, Appendix (II.6)], for odd \(n>1\), we have
Letting \(q\mapsto q^{-1}\) in the above equality, we see that the summation on the right-hand side of (5.7) is equal to 0. This proves that the congruence (5.6) holds modulo \((1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\).
On the other hand, similarly as before, by (5.4) one sees that the sum of the kth and \(((n+1)/2-k)\)th terms on the left-hand side of (5.6) are congruent to 0 modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\) (and also, when the respective sum has an odd number of factors, i.e., when \(n=4l-1\) for some positive integer l, then the remaining central term has index \(k=l\) and one directly sees that \([4k-1]=[n]\) is a factor of the summand). This thus proves that the congruence (5.6) is also true modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). This completes the proof of (5.6).
Let \(c_q(k)\) denote the kth term on the left-hand side of (5.6). In the same vein as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we can further prove that
Thus, we have proved that
The parts of the denominators in (5.10) which contain the parameter a are the factors of \((aq^2, q^2/a;q^2)_{(n+1)/2}\) or \((aq^2, q^2/a;q^2)_{n-1}\). Their limits as \(a\rightarrow 1\) are relatively prime to \(\Phi _n(q)\). On the other hand, the limit of \((1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\) as \(a\rightarrow 1\) has the factor \(\Phi _n(q)^2\). Therefore, the limiting case \(a\rightarrow 1\) of the congruence (5.10) reduces to (5.5) modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\). But the congruences (5.9) are still true when \(a=1\) which implies that the congruence (5.5) holds modulo [n]. This completes the proof of the theorem. \(\square \)
It appears that the congruence conditions stated in Theorem 5.3 and its extension in (5.6) can be strengthened:
Conjecture 5.4
Let \(n>1\) be an odd integer. Then
and
Theorem 5.5
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then
Proof
The proof is similar to that of Theorem 5.3. We first establish
for odd \(n>1\). Letting \(q\mapsto q^2\) and \(c\rightarrow 0\) followed by \(a=b=q\), \(d=q^{-1-n}\), and \(e=q^{-1+n}\) in (1.8), we obtain
As we have already mentioned in the proof of Theorem 5.3, the summation on the right-hand side of (5.13) is equal to 0 by the \(q\mapsto q^{-1}\) case of (5.8). Thus, we have proved that the congruence (5.12) holds modulo \((1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\).
On the other hand, similarly as before, by (5.4) one sees that the sum of the kth and \(((n-1)/2-k)\)th terms on the left-hand side of (5.12) are congruent to 0 modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\) for \(0\leqslant k\leqslant (n-1)/2\). Moreover, the summand for \(k=(n+1)/2\) on the right-hand side of (5.13) is clearly congruent to 0 modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\) because of the factor \((q;q^2)_{(n+1)/2}\) in the numerator. This proves that the congruence (5.12) is also true modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). The proof of (5.12) is completed.
For \(n>3\), we have \((n+3)/2<n\) and so the denominator of the left-hand side of (5.12) is relatively prime to \(\Phi _n(q)\) when taking the limit as \(a\rightarrow 1\). Therefore, the congruence (5.11) holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\) for \(n>3\) by taking \(a\rightarrow 1\) in (5.12). On the other hand, it is also easy to see that the congruence (5.11) holds modulo \(\Phi _3(q)\) for \(n=3\). Let \(c_q(k)\) denote the kth term on the left-hand side of (5.12). Similarly to the proof of Theorem 2.1, we can further prove that
This proves (5.11). \(\square \)
We conjecture that the following generalization of (5.12) and Theorem 5.5 is still true.
Conjecture 5.6
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then
in particular,
Analogously, letting \(q\mapsto q^2\) and \(c\rightarrow 0\) followed by \(a=q\), \(b=q^{-1}\), \(d=q^{-1-n}\), and \(e=q^{-1+n}\) in (1.8), we can prove the following result:
We label the limiting case \(a\rightarrow 1\) as the following theorem.
Theorem 5.7
Let \(n>3\) be an odd integer. Then
Moreover, if \(\gcd (n,3)=1\), then the above congruence holds modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^2\).
It seems that the following generalization of (5.14) and (5.15) still holds.
Conjecture 5.8
Let \(n>3\) be a positive odd integer. Then
in particular,
We also have the following similar result.
Theorem 5.9
Let \(n>1\) be a positive odd integer. Then
Proof
It is easy to see by induction on N that
Putting \(N=(n-1)/2\) in the above identity and using (1.6), we get
The proof then follows from the fact that \(\gcd ([n],[n+1])=1\) and \(\gcd ([n],(-q;q)_N)=1\) (for odd n). \(\square \)
Let \(n=p\) and \(q=1\) in (5.17). Using Fermat’s little theorem, we immediately obtain the following conclusion.
Corollary 5.10
We have
We end this section with the following conjecture, which is similar to Conjecture 4.2. As in the proof of Theorem 4.1, we can confirm it for \(b=1\).
Conjecture 5.11
Let n and d be positive integers with \(d\geqslant 3\) and \(\gcd (n,d)=1\). Then
6 Proof of a Three-Parametric q-Congruence from a Quadratic Transformation of Rahman
In this section, we confirm a three-parametric q-congruence conjecture of the first author and Zudilin [28, Conj. 4.6].
Theorem 6.1
Let n be a positive odd integer. Then, modulo \([n](1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\),
where \(M=n-1\) or \((n-1)/2\).
The congruence (6.1) modulo \((1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\) has already been proved by the first author and Zudilin [28, Thm. 4.7]. Moreover, the congruence (6.1) with \(c=1\) was established in [28, Thm. 4.8]. Therefore, it remains to prove that (6.1) holds modulo [n]; i.e.,
Proof
We need to use a quadratic transformation formula of Rahman [47] (see also [13, Eq. (3.8.13)]):
provided d or aq/d is not of the form \(q^{-2n}\), n a non-negative integer. It is clear that (6.2) is true for \(n=1\). We now suppose that \(n>1\). Let \(a=q^{1-n}\) in (6.3) and then we further set \(d=aq\) and replace b and c with q/b and q/c, respectively. Then the left-hand side of (6.3) terminates at \(k=(n-1)/2\), and the right-side of (6.3) vanishes because the numerator contains the factor \((q^{3-n};q^2)_\infty \). Namely, we have
Since \(q^{n}\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\), we immediately get
Finally, the proof of (6.2) is completely analogous to that of Theorem 2.1 (more precisely, to the proofs of (3.7a) and (3.7b)). \(\square \)
Letting \(a,b\rightarrow 1\) and \(c\rightarrow 0\) in (6.1), we obtain
(see also [21]), while letting \(a,b\rightarrow 1\) and \(c\rightarrow -1\) in (6.1), we get
It is easy to see that both (6.4) and (6.5) are q-analogues of the following supercongruence:
where \(M=p-1\) or \(M=(p-1)/2\). The congruence (6.6) with \(M=(p-1)/2\) was first proved by Guillera and Zudilin [15] using the WZ (Wilf–Zeilberger) method. For \(M=p-1\), Hu [30] proved an even stronger congruence, namely
Also the \(M=(p-1)/2\) case of (6.6) can be extended to a congruence modulo \(p^4\), namely
where \(E_{p-3}\) is the \((p-3)\)th Euler number, which was conjectured by Sun [51, Conj. 5.1(ii)] and recently proved by Mao and Zhang [42].
Here we would like to propose a supercongruence similar to (6.6).
Conjecture 6.2
We have
Unfortunately, we were not able to find any q-analogue of (6.9), even for the simple case modulo p.
Moreover, letting \(a\rightarrow 1\), \(b\rightarrow -1\), and \(c\rightarrow 0\) in (6.1), we get
while letting \(a\rightarrow 1\) and \(b,c\rightarrow 0\) in (6.1), we arrive at
It is worth mentioning that both (6.10) and (6.11) are q-analogues of the following supercongruence due to Guillera and Zudilin [15]:
The congruence (6.11) with \(M=n-1\) was first established by the first author [21] using the q-WZ method. The congruence (6.10) is new.
Sun [51, Conj. 5.1(ii)] conjectured that
(where \(E_{p-3}\) is again the \((p-3)\)th Euler number), for any prime \(p>3\), which was confirmed by Chen, Xie and He [8].
Motivated by Conjecture 6.2, (6.8) and (6.13), we would like to raise the following problems.
Problem 6.3
Is there a “\(3k-1\) version” of the supercongruence (6.12)?
Problem 6.4
Are there any q-analogues of hypergeometric supercongruences involving Euler numbers as in (6.8) or (6.13)?
7 Some q-Congruences from a Cubic Transformation of Gasper and Rahman
Gasper and Rahman [12] (see also [13, Eq. (3.8.18)]) obtained the following cubic transformation:
This transformation for \(d=0\) becomes a summation formula and has been used by the first author and Zudilin [28] to prove the following q-congruence: modulo \([n](1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\),
where \(M=n-1\) or \((n-1)/2\), \(\big (\frac{\cdot }{\cdot }\big )\) is the Jacobi–Kronecker symbol, and \(\gcd (n,6)=1\).
In this section, we shall deduce some q-congruences from (7.1) with \(d\ne 0\).
Theorem 7.1
Let \(n>1\) be an integer coprime with 6. Then
Proof
We specialize (7.1) by taking \(q\mapsto q^2\), then \(c=q^{1-n}/a\), \(d=q\), and replace a by aq. The right-hand side of the resulting identity vanishes, because the numerator of the first fraction contains the factors \((q^{5-n};q^6)_\infty \) and \((q^{7-n};q^6)_\infty \), and the numerator of the second fraction has the factor \((q^{3-n};q^2)_\infty \). At the same time, the left-hand side terminates at \(k=(n-1)/2\) (in fact, much earlier, at \(k=\lfloor n/4\rfloor \)), for the summand involves the term \((q^{1-n};q^2)_{2k}\). This proves that
Since \(q^n\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\), we deduce that the congruence (7.3) holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\).
We now assume that \(n\equiv 5\pmod {6}\). It remains to show that
or equivalently,
This identity again follows straightforwardly from (7.1) by setting \(q\mapsto q^2\), \(a=q^{1-n}\), \(c=q^n\), and \(d=q\). In fact, the left-hand side of the resulting identity terminates at \(k=(n-1)/2\) and is therefore just the left-hand side of (7.4). On the other hand, the right-hand side of the resulting identity vanishes because the first fraction is equal to
and the second fraction is equal to
This completes the proof of the theorem. \(\square \)
As in the proof of Theorem 7.1, we can prove the following result.
Theorem 7.2
Let \(n>1\) be an integer coprime with 6. Then
Letting \(a\rightarrow 1\) in Theorems 7.1 and 7.2, we obtain
Corollary 7.3
Let \(n>1\) be an integer coprime with 6. Then
and
We shall also prove the following results.
Theorem 7.4
Let n be a positive integer coprime with 6. Then
where \(M=n-1\) or \((n-1)/2\).
Proof
It is easy to see by induction on N that
Note that \(\frac{1}{[N+1]} \begin{bmatrix}{\begin{matrix}2N\\ N\end{matrix}}\end{bmatrix}\) is the well-known q-Catalan number (see [9]), a polynomial in q. Hence, the q-binomial coefficient \(\begin{bmatrix}{\begin{matrix}2N\\ N\end{matrix}}\end{bmatrix}\) is divisible by \([N+1]\), so is \(\begin{bmatrix}{\begin{matrix}2N\\ N\end{matrix}}\end{bmatrix}_{q^3}\) if \(N+1\) is coprime with 3. It is also not difficult to prove that \(\begin{bmatrix}{\begin{matrix}4N\\ 2N\end{matrix}}\end{bmatrix}\) is divisible by \([N+1]\) whenever \(N+1\) is coprime with 6. Therefore, putting \(N=n-1\) in (7.7), we can prove that the right-hand side is congruent to 0 modulo \([n]^2\). Similarly, taking \(N=(n-1)/2\) in (7.7), we arrive at the same conclusion. This time one [n] comes from \([2N+1]\) and another [n] comes from \(\begin{bmatrix}{\begin{matrix}4N\\ 2N\end{matrix}}\end{bmatrix}\). \(\square \)
8 Some q-Congruences from a Quartic Transformation of Gasper and Rahman
Gasper and Rahman [12] (see also [13, Ex. 3.33]) also obtained the following quartic transformation:
In this section, we shall deduce two congruences from the quartic transformation (8.1).
Theorem 8.1
Let n be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 5,7\pmod {8}\). Then
Proof
Replacing q by \(q^2\), a by \(q^{1-n}\), and b by \(q^{2-n}\) in (8.1), we see that the left-hand side terminates at \(k=(n-1)/2\), while the right-hand side vanishes. (Note that we cannot make such a replacement if \(n\equiv 1,3\pmod {8}\).) Namely, we have
Since \(q^n\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\), we immediately obtain (8.2) from the above identity. \(\square \)
It is not difficult to see that the congruence (8.2) can also be derived from the following quartic summation formula of Gasper [11] (see also [13, Ex. 3.30]):
Theorem 8.2
Let n be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 5,7\pmod {8}\). Then
Proof
Replacing q by \(q^2\), a by \(q^{1-n}\), and b by \(q^3\) in (8.1), we see that the left-hand side again terminates at \(k=(n-1)/2\), while the right-hand side vanishes. That is,
The proof of (8.3) then follows from the above identity and the fact \(q^n\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\). \(\square \)
We have the following two related conjectures.
Conjecture 8.3
The congruence (8.2) is still true modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^2\) for \(n\equiv 5\pmod {8}\). In particular, if \(p\equiv 5\pmod {8}\), then
Conjecture 8.4
The congruence (8.3) is still true modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\). In particular, if \(p\equiv 5,7\pmod {8}\), then
9 Some q-Congruences from a New \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) Transformation
In this section, we shall deduce some q-congruences from Theorem A.1, a new \(_{12}\phi _{11}\) transformation formula, whose proof we give in the appendix. Although all of the q-congruences are modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\), the \(q=1\) cases sometimes can be generalized to supercongruences modulo higher powers (see Conjectures 12.6 and 12.7 in the next section).
Theorem 9.1
Let \(n\equiv 1\pmod {3}\) be an integer and \(n>1\). Then
and
Proof
Replacing \(q\mapsto q^3\) and then letting \(a=q^{1-n}\), \(b=c=d=q\) in (A.2), we obtain
because the right-hand side of (A.2) contains the factor \((q^{1-n};q^3)_\infty \), which vanishes for \(n\equiv 1\pmod {3}\). Since \(q^{n}\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\), we immediately deduce (9.1a) from (9.2) .
Similarly, if we change \(c=q\) to \(c\rightarrow 0\) in the above procedure, then we can prove (9.1b), while if we change \(c=d=q\) to \(c,d\rightarrow 0\) then we are led to (9.1c). \(\square \)
Theorem 9.2
Let \(n\equiv 2\pmod {3}\) be an integer and \(n>2\). Then
and
Proof
Replacing \(q\mapsto q^3\) and then letting \(a=q^{-1-n}\) and \(b=c=d=q^{-1}\) in (A.2), we obtain
because the right-hand side of (A.2) contains the factor \((q^{2-n};q^3)_\infty \), which vanishes for \(n\equiv 2\pmod {3}\). It is easy to see that the denominator of (9.4) is relatively prime to \(\Phi _n(q)\) for \(n>2\). Therefore, applying \(q^{n}\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)}\), we obtain the desired congruence in (9.3a). Similarly (see the proof of (9.1b) and (9.1c)), we can prove (9.3b) and (9.3c). \(\square \)
10 Some Other q-Congruences from the q-Dixon Sum
By using the q-Dixon sum [13, Eq. (II.13)],
the first author and Zudilin [28, Thm. 4.12] proved the following result.
in particular,
They [28, Conj. 4.13] also conjectured that the congruence (10.3) still holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^2 \Phi _n(-q)\).
In this section we shall give further similar congruences from the q-Dixon sum.
Theorem 10.1
Let \(n\equiv 1\pmod {4}\) be a positive integer. Then
in particular,
Proof
Letting \(q\mapsto q^4\), \(a\mapsto a^2/q^2\), \(b\mapsto b/q^2\), and \(c\mapsto c/q^2\) in (10.1), we get
Since \(n\equiv 1\pmod 4\), putting \(a=\pm q^{-n}\) in (10.6) we see that the left-hand side terminates at \(k=(n+1)/2\), while the right-hand side vanishes. This proves (10.4). For \(n>1\), taking the limit as \(a,b,c\rightarrow 1\) in (10.4) we are led to (10.5). \(\square \)
We conjecture that the following stronger version of (10.5) is also true.
Conjecture 10.2
Let \(n\equiv 1\pmod {4}\) be an integer and \(n>1\). Then
Similarly to the proof of Theorem 10.1, taking \(q\mapsto q^4\), \(a\mapsto a^2q^2\), and \(b=c= q^{-2}\) in (10.1), we can prove the following result.
Theorem 10.3
Let \(n>1\) be an odd integer. Then
in particular,
Note that, for \(n\equiv 3\pmod {4}\), we can prove the following three-parametric congruence:
Besides, for the \(q=-1\) case of (10.8), it seems that the corresponding congruence can be strengthened as follows.
Conjecture 10.4
Let \(p\equiv 3\pmod {4}\). Then
Likewise, performing another set of parameter replacements \(q\mapsto q^4\), \(a\mapsto a^2q^2\), \(b\mapsto bq^2\), and \(c\mapsto c/q^2\) in (10.1), we can deduce the following result.
Theorem 10.5
Let \(n\equiv 3\pmod {4}\) be a positive odd integer. Then
in particular,
We have the following conjectures.
Conjecture 10.6
For any integer \(n\equiv 3\pmod {4}\) and \(n>3\), the congruence (10.10) still holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^2 \Phi _n(-q)\).
Conjecture 10.7
Let \(n\equiv 3\pmod {4}\) be a positive integer. Then
It is easy to see that the congruence (10.11) is true modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\Phi _n(-q)\) by taking \(a,b\rightarrow 1\), and \(c\rightarrow -1\) in (10.2). Moreover, it is also true when \(q=1\) and \(n=p\) is an odd prime, since Tauraso observed that
While a q-analogue of (10.12) was given by the first author [16], namely
there is no closed form of the left-hand side of (10.11).
11 Some q-Congruences from a Double Series Transformation of Ismail, Rahman and Suslov
In [32, Thm. 1.1] Ismail, Rahman, and Suslov derived the following transformation formula:
provided \(|a^2q^2/bcdef|<1\).
If in (11.1) we replace q by \(q^3\), take \(a=g=q\), \(h=aq\), and \(b=c=d=e=f=q^2\), and suitably truncate the sum, then the following “divergent” q-supercongruence appears to be true.
Conjecture 11.1
Let \(n>1\) be an integer with \(n\equiv 1\pmod 3\).Then
Furthermore, the above congruence holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\) when \(a=1\).
On the other hand, if in (11.1) we replace q by \(q^3\), take \(a=g=q^{-1}\), \(h=aq^{-1}\), and \(b=c=d=e=f=q\), and suitably truncate the sum, then the following “divergent” q-supercongruence appears to be true.
Conjecture 11.2
Let \(n>2\) be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 2\pmod 3\). Then
Furthermore, the above congruence holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\) when \(a=1\).
If in (11.1) we replace q by \(q^4\), take \(a=b=c=d=e=f=q\), \(g=q^{-1}\), \(h=aq^{-1}\), and suitably truncate the sum, then the following q-supercongruence appears to be true.
Conjecture 11.3
Let n be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 3\pmod 4\). Then
Furthermore, the above congruence holds modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^3\) when \(a=1\).
On the other hand, if in (11.1) we replace q by \(q^4\), take \(a=b=c=d=e=f=q^{-1}\), \(g=q^{-3}\), \(h=aq^{-3}\), and suitably truncate the sum, then the following q-supercongruence appears to be true.
Conjecture 11.4
Let \(n>1\) be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 1\pmod 4\). Then
Furthermore, the above congruence holds modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^3\) when \(a=1\).
Ismail, Rahman, and Suslov [32, Eq. (5.4)] also noted the following transformation formula (which can be obtained from (11.1) by taking \(d=aq/c\) and \(h=0\)):
If in (11.2) we replace q by \(q^4\), take \(a=b=c=e=f=q^{-2}\), \(g=q^5\), and truncate the sum, then the following q-supercongruence appears to be true.
Conjecture 11.5
Let n be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 3\pmod {8}\). Then
As before, we can show that all the congruences in Conjectures 11.1–11.5 are true modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). For example, we have the following parametric generalization of the congruence (11.3) modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\Phi _n(-q)\).
Theorem 11.6
Let n be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 3\pmod {8}\). Then, modulo \(\Phi _n(q) \Phi _n(-q)\),
Proof
Let \(q\rightarrow q^4\), \(a=q^{-2-2n}\), \(b=c=q^{-2}\), \(e=aq^{-2}\), and \(f=q^{-2}/a\) in (11.2). Then the left-hand side terminates at \(k=(n+1)/2\) because of the factor \((q^{-2-2n};q^4)_k\) in the numerator, while the right-hand side vanishes because of the factor \((q^{2-2n};q^4)_\infty \). The described specialization thus yields the following identity:
Since \(q^{2n}\equiv 1\pmod {\Phi _n(q)\Phi _n(-q)}\), we immediately deduce the desired congruence from the above identity. \(\square \)
12 Concluding Remarks and Further Open Problems
Most of the congruences in the manuscript [28] are modulo \([n](1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\). However, the congruence (3.2) does not hold modulo \([n](1-aq^n)(a-q^n)\) in general. We only have a generalization of (3.2) with \(a=1\).
It is easy to see that the following generalization of (2.1b) in Theorem 2.1 is true.
Theorem 12.1
Let n be a positive odd integer. Then, modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^2\),
Letting \(a=1\) in Theorem 3.3, we see that the congruence (12.1) holds modulo \(\Phi _n(q)^3\). Therefore, Theorem 12.1 is equivalent to the left-hand side of (12.1) being congruent to 0 modulo [n]. By (3.2), we see that the left-hand side of (12.1) is congruent to 0 modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\). And the same technique to prove congruences modulo [n] from congruences modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\) as used in the proofs of (3.7a) and (3.7b) still works here.
We conjecture that the following generalization of the second part of Theorem 2.3 is true.
Conjecture 12.2
Let n be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 2\pmod 3\). Then
We also have the following similar conjecture.
Conjecture 12.3
Let \(n>1\) be a positive integer with \(n\equiv 1\pmod 3\). Then
Note that, similar to the proof of Theorem 2.3, we can show that the above congruence holds modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)\). We point out that q-congruences modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^3\) or \(\Phi _n(q)^4\) are very difficult to prove. As far as we know, the following result
due to the first author and Wang [26], is the first q-congruence modulo \([n]\Phi _n(q)^3\) in the literature that is completely proved. It is natural to ask whether there is a complete q-analogue of Long’s supercongruence (1.4).
Inspired by the q-congruences in the previous sections, we shall propose the following conjecture.
Conjecture 12.4
Let n be a positive odd integer. Then
Note that the left-hand side is not a truncated form of (A.2) with \(q\mapsto q^4\) and \(a=b=c=d=q\). Therefore, even for the case modulo \(\Phi _n(q)\), the above conjecture is still open. Moreover, we cannot find any parametric generalization of the above conjecture, though one would believe that such a generalization should exist.
Similarly, the following conjecture seems to be true.
Conjecture 12.5
Let \(n>1\) be an odd integer. Then
For the \(q=1\) case of (9.1b), much more seems to be true. Numerical computations suggest the following result.
Conjecture 12.6
Let \(p\equiv 1\pmod {3}\). Then
We also have a similar conjecture related to (9.3b).
Conjecture 12.7
Let \(p\equiv 2\pmod {3}\). Then
Unfortunately, we failed to find complete q-analogues of the above two conjectures. In particular, we do not know how to use the creative microscoping method to tackle them.
In [16, Conj. 5.4] the first author has made the following conjecture.
Conjecture 12.8
Let n and r be positive integers. Then
and
Note that the congruences (12.2a) for \(r=1,2\) and (12.2b) for \(r=1\) have been proved by the first author [16] himself, and the congruence (12.2b) for \(r=2\) has been established by the first author and Wang [26].
In this section, we shall prove the following weaker form of the above conjecture.
Theorem 12.9
The congruences (12.2a) and (12.2b) are true modulo \([n+1][2n+1]\).
Proof
The proof is similar to the second step of that of Theorem 3.3. By Lemma 3.1, it is easy to see that for odd n we have
and
This proves that, for odd n,
and
Similar to the proofs of (3.7a) and (3.7b), we can further show that
and
where \(M=n-1\) or \((n-1)/2\). It is easy to see that the polynomials \([n+1]\) and \([2n+1]\) are relatively prime. The proof then follows from the above two congruences by replacing n with \(n+1\) or \(2n+1\) and using the relation (1.6). \(\square \)
Finally, we consider the general very-well-poised \({}_{2d}\phi _{2d-1}\) series (which satisfies Slater’s transformation [13, \(r=d\) and \(b_{2r}=a\) in Eq. (5.5.2)]) where we replace q by \(q^d\) and take all upper parameters to be q. Then the following further generalization of Conjecture 12.2 appears to be true.
Conjecture 12.10
Let \(d\geqslant 3\) and n be positive integers with \(n\equiv -1\pmod {d}\). Then
where \(M=((d-1)n-1)/d\) or \(n-1\).
Similarly, we consider the general very-well-poised \({}_{2d}\phi _{2d-1}\) series where we replace q by \(q^d\) and take all upper parameters to be \(q^{-1}\). Then the following generalization of Conjecture 12.3 appears to be true.
Conjecture 12.11
Let \(d\geqslant 3\) and \(n>1\) be integers with \(n\equiv 1\pmod {d}\). Then
where \(M=((d-1)n+1)/d\) or \(n-1\).
Remark
Since the submission of the original version of this paper (which also appeared as a preprint on the arXiv) and the present final version, relevant developments have taken place. In particular, some of our conjectures have been confirmed by other authors. Recently, Wang [56] proved Conjecture 6.2 and he further extended it to the modulus \(p^4\) case. The first author and Zudilin [29] proved Conjecture 10.2, Jana and Kalita [33] proved Conjectures 10.4, 12.6 and 12.7, Ni and Pan [45] proved Conjecture 12.8, and the authors themselves [23, 25] confirmed Conjectures 5.4, 12.10 and 12.11. Moreover, Liu [38] generalized Conjectures 12.6 and 12.7 to the modulus \(p^4\) case.
References
Andrews, G.E.: \(q\)-Analogs of the binomial coefficient congruences of Babbage, Wolstenholme and Glaisher. Discrete Math. 204, 15–25 (1999)
Andrews, G.E., Askey, R.A., Roy, R.: Special functions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 71. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Ahlgren, S., Ono, K.: Gaussian hypergeometric series evaluation and Apéry number congruences. J. Reine Angew. Math. 518, 187–212 (2000)
Askey, R.A., Ismail, M.E.H.: A Generalization of the Ultraspherical Polynomials, in Studies in Pure Mathematics, pp. 55–78. Birkhäuser, Basel (1983)
Bailey, W.N.: Generalized Hypergeometric Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1964)
Bressoud, D.: Some identities for terminating \(q\)-series. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 81, 211–223 (1981)
Cao, H.-Q., Pan, H.: Factors of alternating binomial sums. Adv. Appl. Math. 45, 96–107 (2010)
Chen, Y.-G., Xie, X.-Y., He, B.: On some congruences of certain binomials sums. Ramanujan J. 40, 237–244 (2016)
Fürlinger, J., Hofbauer, J.: \(q\)-Catalan numbers. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 2, 248–264 (1985)
Gasper, G.: Rogers’ linearization formula for the continuous \(q\)-ultraspherical polynomials and quadratic transformation formulas. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 16, 1061–1071 (1985)
Gasper, G.: Summation, transformation, and expansion formulas for bibasic series. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 312, 257–277 (1989)
Gasper, G., Rahman, M.: An indefinite bibasic summation formula and some quadratic, cubic and quartic summation and transformation formulas. Can. J. Math. 42, 1–27 (1990)
Gasper, G., Rahman, M.: Basic Hypergeometric Series. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 96, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Guillera, J.: WZ pairs and \(q\)-analogues of Ramanujan series for \(1/\pi \). J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 24, 1871–1879 (2018)
Guillera, J., Zudilin, W.: “Divergent” Ramanujan-type supercongruences. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 140, 765–777 (2012)
Guo, V.J.W.: A \(q\)-analogue of a Ramanujan-type supercongruence involving central binomial coefficients. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 458, 590–600 (2018)
Guo, V.J.W.: A \(q\)-analogue of the (A.2) supercongruence of Van Hamme for primes \(p\equiv 1~(mod \; 4)\). Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. 114, Art. 123 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W.: \(q\)-Analogues of Dwork-type supercongruences. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 487, Art. 124022 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W.: \(q\)-Analogues of three Ramanujan-type formulas for \(1/\pi \). Ramanujan J. 52, 123–132 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W.: \(q\)-Supercongruences modulo the fourth power of a cyclotomic polynomial via creative microscoping. Adv. Appl. Math. 120, Art. 102078 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W.: \(q\)-Analogues of two “divergent” Ramanujan-type supercongruences. Ramanujan J. 52, 605–624 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J.: Some new \(q\)-congruences for truncated basic hypergeometric series. Symmetry 11(2), Art. 268 (2019)
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J.: Proof of a basic hypergeometric supercongruence modulo the fifth power of a cyclotomic polynomial. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 25, 921–929 (2019)
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J.: Some new \(q\)-congruences for truncated basic hypergeometric series: even powers. Results Math. 75, Art. 1 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J.: A family of \(q\)-hypergeometric congruences modulo the fourth power of a cyclotomic polynomial. Israel J. Math. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-020-2081-1
Guo, V.J.W., Wang, S.-D.: Some congruences involving fourth powers of central \(q\)-binomial coefficients. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 150, 1127–1138 (2020)
Guo, V.J.W., Zeng, J.: Some \(q\)-supercongruences for truncated basic hypergeometric series. Acta Arith. 171, 309–326 (2015)
Guo, V.J.W., Zudilin, W.: A \(q\)-microscope for supercongruences. Adv. Math. 346, 329–358 (2019)
Guo, V.J.W., Zudilin, W.: A common \(q\)-analogue of two supercongruences. Results Math. 75, Art. 46 (2020)
Hu, D.W.: On combinatorial congruences and additive combinatorics. Ph.D. thesis, Nanjing University, China (2017)
Ismail, M.E.H.: Classical and Quantum Orthogonal Polynomials in One Variable, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 98. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Ismail, M.E.H., Rahman, M., Suslov, S.: Some summation theorems and transformations for \(q\)-series. Can. J. Math. 49, 543–567 (1997)
Jana, A., Kalita, G.: Proof of some conjectural supercongruences of Guo and Schlosser. Ramanujan J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11139-019-00221-5
Kilbourn, T.: An extension of the Apéry number supercongruence. Acta Arith. 123, 335–348 (2006)
Langer, R., Schlosser, M.J., Warnaar, S.O.: Theta functions, elliptic hypergeometric series, and Kawanaka’s Macdonald polynomial conjecture. SIGMA 05, 055, p. 20 (2009)
Liu, J., Pan, H., Zhang, Y.: A generalization of Morley’s congruence. Adv. Differ. Equ. 254, 7 (2015)
Liu, J.-C.: On Van Hamme’s (A.2) and (H.2) supercongruences. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 471(1–2), 613–622 (2019)
Liu, J.-C.: Some supercongruences arising from symbolic summation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 488, Art. 124062 (2020)
Liu, J.-C., Petrov, F.: Congruences on sums of \(q\)-binomial coefficients. Adv. Appl. Math. 116, Art. 102003 (2020)
Long, L.: Hypergeometric evaluation identities and supercongruences. Pac. J. Math. 249, 405–418 (2011)
Long, L., Ramakrishna, R.: Some supercongruences occurring in truncated hypergeometric series. Adv. Math. 290, 773–808 (2016)
Mao, G.-S., Zhang, T.: Proof of Sun’s conjectures on super congruences and the divisibility of certain binomial sums. Ramanujan J. 50(1), 1–11 (2019)
McCarthy, D., Osburn, R.: A \(p\)-adic analogue of a formula of Ramanujan. Arch. Math. 91, 492–504 (2008)
Mortenson, E.: A \(p\)-adic supercongruence conjecture of Van Hamme. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 136, 4321–4328 (2008)
Ni, H.-X., Pan, H.: Divisibility of some binomial sums. Acta Arith. 194, 367–382 (2020)
Rahman, M.: The linearization of the product of the continuous \(q\)-Jacobi polynomials. Can. J. Math. 33, 255–284 (1981)
Rahman, M.: Some quadratic and cubic summation formulas for basic hypergeometric series. Can. J. Math. 45, 394–411 (1993)
Rogers, L.J.: Third memoir on the expansion of certain infinite products. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 26, 15–32 (1894)
Shi, L.-L., Pan, H.: A \(q\)-analogue of Wolstenholme’s harmonic series congruence. Am. Math. Mon. 114, 529–531 (2005)
Straub, A.: Supercongruences for polynomial analogs of the Apéry numbers. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 147, 1023–1036 (2019)
Sun, Z.-W.: Super congruences and Euler numbers. Sci. China Math. 54, 2509–2535 (2011)
Tannery, J.: Introduction a la Théorie des Fonctions d’une Variable, 2nd edn. Tome 1, Libraire Scientifique A. Hermann, Paris (1904)
Tauraso, R.: \(q\)-Analogs of some congruences involving Catalan numbers. Adv. Appl. Math. 48, 603–614 (2009)
Tauraso, R.: Some \(q\)-analogs of congruences for central binomial sums. Colloq. Math. 133, 133–143 (2013)
Van Hamme, L.: Some conjectures concerning partial sums of generalized hypergeometric series. In: \(p\)-Adic Functional Analysis (Nijmegen, 1996), Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 192, Dekker, New York, pp. 223–236 (1997)
Wang, C.: Symbolic summation methods and hypergeometric supercongruences. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 488, Art. 124068 (2020)
Wang, X., Yue, M.: A \(q\)-analogue of the (A.2) supercongruence of Van Hamme for any prime \(p\equiv 3~(mod \; 4)\). Int. J. Number Theory 16, 1325–1335 (2020)
Zudilin, W.: Congruences for \(q\)-binomial coefficients. Ann. Combin. 23, 1123–1135 (2019)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for very careful readings of a previous version of this paper. Both authors thank Prof. Shishuo Fu at Chongqing University in China for hosting them for several days in September 2018, during which parts of the present research were performed.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Vienna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Mourad Ismail.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The first author was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 11771175). The second author was partially supported by Austrian Science Fund Grant P32305.
Appendix A. A New Nonterminating \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) Transformation and Linearization of the Continuous q-Ultraspherical Polynomials
Appendix A. A New Nonterminating \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) Transformation and Linearization of the Continuous q-Ultraspherical Polynomials
Our starting point for deriving the nonterminating transformation formula in Theorem A.1 is the following transformation formula between two terminating very-well-poised \({}_{14}\phi _{13}\) series from [35, Thm. 4.1].
where \({{\hat{a}}}=q^{-n}cd/ab\).
We now have the following new transformation for a nonterminating very-well-poised \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) series into two multiples of nonterminating \({}_4\phi _3\) series.
Theorem A.1
We have
where \(|q/b|<1\).
This result extends Gasper’s [10, Eq. (3.2)] (see also [13, Ex. 8.15]). Observe that the two \({}_4\phi _3\) series on the right-hand side are not balanced, nor well-poised. However, they satisfy the remarkable property that the quotient (not the product!) of corresponding upper and lower parameters is throughout the same, namely b/q.
By replacing a, b, c, d in (A.2) by \(q^a\), \(q^b\), \(q^c\), \(q^d\), respectively, and letting \(q\rightarrow 1^-\) we obtain the following transformation between a nonterminating very-well-poised \({}_9F_8\) series into two multiples of nonterminating \({}_4F_3\) series. (For the notion of a hypergeometric \({}_rF_s\) series, see [2]. In the following, we employ the condensed notation for products of Pochhammer symbols, \((a_1,\dots ,a_m)_k=(a_1)_k\cdots (a_m)_k\).)
where, for convergence, \(\mathfrak {R}(b)<\frac{3}{4}\).
The transformation in (A.3) extends [10, Eq. (3.3)].
Proof of Theorem A.1
We would like to take \(n\rightarrow \infty \) in (A.1) but the series on the right-hand side has large terms near the end compared to those in the middle of the series which prevents us from taking the term-by-term limit directly. We thus apply a similar analysis as applied by Bailey [5, Eq. 8.5(3)] in his derivation of the nonterminating Watson transformation (who started with the terminating balanced very-well-poised \({}_{10}\phi _9\) transformation to derive a transformation of a nonterminating very-well-poised \({}_8\phi _7\) series into two multiples of balanced \({}_4\phi _3\) series), see also [13, Sec. 2.10]. In (A.1), we first replace n by \(2m+1\). Then we write the series on the right-hand side as
after which in each of the sums we can term-wise let \(m\rightarrow \infty \) (which is justified by Tannery’s theorem [52, p. 292] under the restriction \(|q/b|<1\)). The identity in (A.2) thus follows. \(\square \)
Notice that if in (A.2) we take \(d=a/c\) the first series on the right-hand side reduces to 1. (If instead \(d=ab^2/c\) then the second series on the right-hand side reduces to 1. The resulting series is equivalent to (A.5) by the substitution \(c\mapsto c/b\).) We thus have the following nonterminating very-well-poised \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) summation:
Corollary A.2
We have
where \(|q/b|<1\).
A further special case of Corollary A.2 is worth stating separately. If we take \(b=-1\), the second sum reduces to its first term. We then obtain the following nonterminating very-well-poised \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) summation where the two terms on the right-hand side satisfy a nice symmetry.
Corollary A.3
We have
If in (A.2) we take (instead of \(d=a/c\) which led to Corollary A.2) \(d=aq/c\) the prefactor of the first series on the right-hand vanishes. (If instead \(d=ab^2/cq\) then the prefactor of the second series on the right-hand vanishes. The resulting series is equivalent to (A.7) by the substitution \(c\mapsto ab/c\).) We thus have the following nonterminating very-well-poised \({}_{10}\phi _9\) transformation:
Corollary A.4
We have
where \(|q/b|<1\).
We also record another (simpler) special case of (A.1), obtained by taking \(d\rightarrow \infty \). Alternatively, it can be obtained from Theorem A.1 by choosing \(d=q^{-n}\).
Corollary A.5
We have
We use Corollary A.5, which is equivalent to Gasper’s aforementioned identity in [10, Eq. (3.2)] (also stated in [13, Ex. 8.15]), to provide a generalization of Rogers’ linearization formula for the continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials in (A.12).
The continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials, which depend on a parameter \(\beta \) and the base q, are given by
(Note that \(\theta \) need not be real.) They were originally considered by Rogers [48] in 1884 (not aware of their orthogonality) in the pursuit of (what is now called) the Rogers–Ramanujan identities.
These functions, which can be written as
are polynomials in x of degree n.
As was established by Askey and Ismail [4] (see also [31, Thm. 13.2.1]), the continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials satisfy for \(|\beta |<1\) the orthogonality relation
Rogers [48] (see also [31, Thm. 13.3.2]) derived the following linearization formula:
Rogers’ proof of (A.12) involved induction. Other proofs have been given by Bressoud [6], Rahman [46], and by Gasper [10] (see also [13, Sec. 8.5]). For our extension of Rogers’ linearization formula we define, for \(\beta \) and \(\nu \) being any two complex numbers,
which is an even analytic function in z. (Recall that in (1.5) the q-shifted factorials were defined for any complex subindex.) These functions can be written as
where \(|qz^2/\beta |<1\), for absolute convergence. For \(\nu =n\) being a nonnegative integer, we have \(F_n(z;\beta \,|\,q)=z^nC_n(x;\beta \,|\,q)\), where \(x=(z+z^{-1})/2\) (or, equivalently, \(x=\cos \theta \) with \(z=e^{i\theta }\)).
Theorem A.6
Let \(\mu ,\nu \) and \(\beta \) be three complex numbers. Then we have the following identity of power series in z.
where \(|qz^2/\beta |<1\), for absolute convergence.
Proof
In the subsequent manipulations of series we silently interchange double sums which is justified as all the involved series absolutely converge (if they do not terminate) for \(|qz^2/\beta |<1\). We start with expanding the product of the two functions on the left-hand side of (A.15) using (A.13):
Now the inner sum over l, which is a special terminating \({}_4\phi _3\) series, can be transformed into a multiple of a \({}_{12}\phi _{11}\) series using the \((a,b,c,n)\mapsto (\beta q^{\mu +\nu -2k},\beta ,q^{\mu -k}\beta ,k)\) case of (A.8). We thus obtain
which, after identifying the inner sum as \(F_{\mu +\nu -2k}(z;\beta \,|\,q)\) according to (A.13), establishes the assertion. \(\square \)
Corollary A.7
Rogers’ linearization formula for the continuous ultraspherical polynomials in (A.12) is true.
Proof
In Theorem A.6 choose \(\mu =m\) and \(\nu =n\) for two nonnegative integers m and n. The identity (A.15) then reduces, after dividing both sides by \(z^{n+m}\), to (A.12).\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, V.J.W., Schlosser, M.J. Some q-Supercongruences from Transformation Formulas for Basic Hypergeometric Series. Constr Approx 53, 155–200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-020-09524-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00365-020-09524-z