Skip to main content
Log in

Testing convexity of the generalised hazard function

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 April 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Let FG be a pair of absolutely continuous cumulative distributions, where F is the distribution of interest and G is assumed to be known. The composition \(G^{-1}\circ F\), which is referred to as the generalised hazard function of F with respect to G, provides a flexible framework for statistical inference of F under shape restrictions, determined by G, which enables the generalisation of some well-known models, such as the increasing hazard rate family. This paper is concerned with the problem of testing the null hypothesis \({\mathscr {H}}_0\): “\(G^{-1}\circ F\) is convex”. The test statistic is based on the distance between the empirical distribution function and a corresponding isotonic estimator, which is denoted as the greatest relatively-convex minorant of the empirical distribution with respect to G. Under \({\mathscr {H}}_0\), this estimator converges uniformly to F, giving rise to a rather simple and general procedure for deriving families of consistent tests, without any support restriction. As an application, a goodness-of-fit test for the increasing hazard rate family is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. Local tests of this kind, that is, evaluated over a restricted interval, have also been considered by Durot (2008) and Groeneboom and Jongbloed (2012).

  2. Evaluated over the whole support.

  3. The computational work has been performed in Mathematica (Wolfram Research 2019).

  4. Scale and location parameters are not considered, because they do not affect the test statistic. As usual, \(\varPhi \) denotes the standard normal distribution.

References

  • Barlow RE, Proschan F (1969) A note on tests for monotone failure rate based on incomplete data. Ann Math Stat 40(2):595–600

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow RE, Van Zwet WR (1969) Asymptotic properties of isotonic estimators for the generalized failure rate function. part 1: Strong consistency. Tech. rep., California Univ Berkeley operations research center

  • Barlow RE, Marshall AW, Proschan F (1963) Properties of probability distributions with monotone hazard rate. Ann Math Stat 34(2):375–389

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow R, Bartholomew D, Bremner J, Brunk H (1971) Statistical inference under order restrictions. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel P (1969) Tests for monotone failure rate II. Ann Math Stat 40(4):1250–1260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel PJ, Doksum KA (1969) Tests for monotone failure rate based on normalized spacings. Ann Math Stat 40(4):1216–1235

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Samworth RJ (2013) Smoothed log-concave maximum likelihood estimation with applications. Stat Sinica 23:1373–1398

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande JV (1983) A class of tests for exponentiality against increasing failure rate average alternatives. Biometrika 70(2):514–518

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dümbgen L, Rufibach K et al (2009) Maximum likelihood estimation of a log-concave density and its distribution function: basic properties and uniform consistency. Bernoulli 15(1):40–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Durot C (2008) Testing convexity or concavity of a cumulated hazard rate. IEEE Trans Reliab 57(3):465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Barmi H, Malla G, Mukerjee H (2021) Estimation of a distribution function with increasing failure rate average. J Stat Plann Inference 213:179–192

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gijbels I, Heckman N (2004) Nonparametric testing for a monotone hazard function via normalized spacings. J Nonparametr Stat 16(3–4):463–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grenander U (1956) On the theory of mortality measurement: part ii. Scand Actuar J 1956(2):125–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneboom P (2020) Grenander functionals and Cauchy’s formula. Scand J Stat. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12449

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneboom P, Jongbloed G (2012) Isotonic \({L}_2\)-projection test for local monotonicity of a hazard. J Stat Plann Inference 142(7):1644–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneboom P, Jongbloed G (2013) Testing monotonicity of a hazard: asymptotic distribution theory. Bernoulli 19(5A):1965–1999

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneboom P, Jongbloed G (2014) Nonparametric estimation under shape constraints, vol 38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneboom P, Jongbloed G (2018) Some developments in the theory of shape constrained inference. Stat Sci 33(4):473–492

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Van Keilegom I (2005) Testing for monotone increasing hazard rate. Ann Stat 33(3):1109–1137

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Huang LS, Gifford JA (2001) Nonparametric estimation of hazard rate under the constraint of monotonicity. J Comput Graph Stat 10(3):592–614

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Khan RA, Bhattacharyya D, Mitra M (2021) Exact and asymptotic tests of exponentiality against nonmonotonic mean time to failure type alternatives. In: Statistical Papers, pp 1–31

  • Kiefer J, Wolfowitz J (1977) Asymptotically minimax estimation of concave and convex distribution functions. ii. In: Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics, Elsevier, pp 193–211

  • Kirmani S, Gupta RC (2001) On the proportional odds model in survival analysis. Ann Inst Stat Math 53(2):203–216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lando T (2021) A test for the increasing log-odds rate family. Stat Probab Lett 170:109017

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lando T, Arab I, Oliveira PE (2020) Properties of increasing odds rate distributions with a statistical application. preprint

  • Majumder P, Mitra M (2019) Detecting trend change in hazard functions-an L-statistic approach. Stat Pap 62:31–52

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AW, Proschan F (1965) Maximum likelihood estimation for distributions with monotone failure rate. Ann Math Stat 36(1):69–77

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AW, Olkin I (2007) Life distributions, vol 13. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah S (2009) Bathtub-shaped failure rate functions. Qual Quant 43(5):855–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9152-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WB (2003) Applied life data analysis, vol 521. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Proschan F, Pyke R (1967) Tests for monotone failure rate. Fifth Berkley Symp 3:293–313

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson T, Wright FT, Dykstra RL (1988) Order restricted statistical inference. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo S, Sengupta D (2017) Testing the hypothesis of increasing hazard ratio in two samples. Comput Stat Data Anal 114:119–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Samworth RJ (2018) Recent progress in log-concave density estimation. Stat Sci 33(4):493–509

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta D, Paul D (2005) Some tests for log-concavity of life distributions. Preprint available at http://anson.ucdavis.edu/~debashis/techrep/logconca.pdf

  • Sweet AL (1990) On the hazard rate of the lognormal distribution. IEEE Trans Reliab 39(3):325–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenga R, Santner TJ (1984) Testing goodness of fit to the increasing failure rate family. Naval Res Logist Q 31(4):617–630

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zwet WR (1964) Convex transformations of random variables. MC Tracts

  • Wang Y, Hossain AM, Zimmer WJ (2005) Tables of bounds for distributions with monotone log-odds rate. Commun Stat Simul Comput 34(1):1–20

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram Research I (2019) Mathematica, Version 12.0. Champaign, IL

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Italian funds ex MURST 60% 2020. I acknowledge the support of the Czech Science Foundation (GACR) under Project 20-16764S and VŠB-TU Ostrava under the SGS Project SP2021/15.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Lando.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lando, T. Testing convexity of the generalised hazard function. Stat Papers 63, 1271–1289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-021-01273-w

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation