Skip to main content
Log in

The role of orthogonal polynomials in adjusting hyperpolic secant and logistic distributions to analyse financial asset returns

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we will tackle the issue of accounting for skewness and potentially severe excess kurtosis of the empirical distribution of a random variable of interest by adjusting a parent leptokurtic distribution, using orthogonal polynomials. We will show that the polynomial shape adapter that allows the transformation from a given parent to a target distribution is a linear combination of the orthogonal polynomials associated to the former with coefficients depending on the difference between the moments of these two distributions. A recent work (Zoia, Commun Stat Theory Methods 39(1):52–64, 2010) has shown how to adjust the normal density by using Hermite polynomials but this application is suitable only for series with moderate kurtosis (lower than 5). This is why we provide two other parent distributions, the logistic and the hyperbolic secant which, once polynomially adjusted, can be used to reshape series with higher degrees of kurtosis. We will apply these results for modelling heavy-tailed and skewed distributions of financial asset returns by using both the conditional and unconditional approaches. We empirically demonstrate the advantages of using the polynomially adapted distributions in place of popular alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We have checked that the coefficients lie inside the relevant region shown in Fig. 1.

  2. Nyblom’s test (Nyblom 1989) is finalized for detecting possible changes in parameters when the observations are obtained sequentially in time. The null hypothesis of constancy of parameters over time is tested against the alternative of a martingale specification for the parameter variation. The test turns out to be based on cumulative sums of the score function (the derivative of the log-likelihod) whose limiting behavior is a standard Brownian bridge under the null.

References

  • Bagnato L, De Capitani L, Punzo A (2013) Testing serial independence via density-based measures of divergence. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 19:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GE, Tiao GC (1962) A further look at robustness via bayes’s theorem. Biometrika 49:419–432

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bronshtein IN, Semendyayev KA, Musiol G, Mühlig H (2007) Handbook of mathematics. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chihara TS (1978) An introduction to orthogonal polynomials. Gordon & Breach, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Curto JD, Pinto JC, Tavares GN (2009) Modeling stock markets’ volatility using garch models with normal, student’st and stable paretian distributions. Stat Pap 50(2):311–321

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of united kingdom inflation. Econom J Econom Soc 50:987–1007

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Faliva M, Zoia M, Poti V (2013) Orthogonal polynomials for tailoring density functions to excess kurtosis, asymmetry and dependence. Commun Stat Theory Methods. doi:10.1080/03610926.2013.818698

  • Feller W (1974) Introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol II POD. Wiley, New York

  • Fernández C, Steel MF (1998) On bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. J Am Stat Assoc 93(441):359–371

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MJ (2010) Generalized tukey-type distributions with application to financial and teletraffic data. Stat Pap 51(1):41–56

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MJ (2013) Generalized hyperbolic secant distribution—with application to finance. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Francq C (2011) GARCH models: structure, statistical inference and financial applications. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant AR, Tauchen G (1989) Seminonparametric estimation of conditionally constrained heterogeneous processes: asset pricing applications. Econom J Econom Soc 406:1091–1120

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant AR, Tauchen G (1993) A nonparametric approach to nonlinear time series analysis: estimation and simulation. In: Brillinger D, Caines P, Geweke J, Parzen E, Rosenblatt M, Taqqu MS (eds) New directions in time series analysis. Part II. Springer, New York, pp 71–92

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Granger C, Maasoumi E, Racine J (2004) A dependence metric for possibly nonlinear processes. J Time Ser Anal 25(5):649–669

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Handcock MS, Morris M (1999) Relative distribution methods in the social sciences (statistics for social science and behavorial sciences). Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen B (1994) Autoregressive conditional density estimation. Int Econom Rev 35(3):705–730

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi E, Racine J (2002) Entropy and predictability of stock market returns. J Econom 107(1–2):291–312

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald JB (1991) Parametric models for partially adaptive estimation with skewed and leptokurtic residuals. Econom Lett 37(3):273–278

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald JB, Newey WK (1988) Partially adaptive estimation of regression models via the generalized t distribution. Econom Theory 4(03):428–457

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mills TC, Markellos RN (2008) The econometric modelling of financial time series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nyblom J (1989) Testing for the constancy of parameters over time. J Am Stat Assoc 84(405):223–230

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Palmitesta P, Provasi C (2004) Garch-type models with generalized secant hyperbolic innovations. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econom 8(2):106–122

  • Papoulis A, Maradudin A (1963) The fourier integral and its applications. Phys Today 16:70–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provost S, Jiang M (2011) Orthogonal polynomial density estimates: alternative representation and degree selection. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 5:1074–1081

    Google Scholar 

  • Provost SB (2005) Moment-based density approximants. Math J 9(4):727–756

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Rachev ST, Hoechstoetter M, Fabozzi FJ, Focardi SM et al. (2010). Probability and statistics for finance, vol 176. Wiley

  • Shuangzhe L, Chris H (2006) On estimation in conditional heteroskedastic time series models under non-normal distributions. Stat Pap 49(3):455–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Szegö, G. (1967). Orthongonal polynomials, vol 23. AMS Bookstore

  • Szegö GP (2004) Risk measures for the 21st century. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoia MG (2010) Tailoring the gaussian law for excess kurtosis and skewness by hermite polynomials. Commun Stat Theory Methods 39(1):52–64

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Grazia Zoia.

Appendix

Appendix

The probability density function of the hyperbolic secant is

$$\begin{aligned} f(x;a,b)=a\ \text {sech}(bx), \end{aligned}$$

where \(a\) and \(b\) are parameters. By choosing these parameters so that the first two central moments of the variable \(x\) are zero and one, respectively, we get the density function of the normalized hyperbolic secant, that is

$$\begin{aligned} f(x)=\frac{1}{2}\text {sech}\left( \frac{\pi x}{2} \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(49)

Bearing in mind that the characteristic function of \(\text {sech}(x)\) is \(\pi \text {sech} \left( \displaystyle \frac{\pi t}{2} \right) \) and the time scaling property of the Fourier integrals (see Papoulis and Maradudin 1963) we conclude that the characteristic function of (49) is \(\text {sech}(it)\) which, likewise the Gaussian case, has the same functional form as the density to within a scalar factor. Expanding \(\text {sech}(it)\) about \(t=0\), yields

$$\begin{aligned} \text {sech}(it)=1+\frac{(it)^2}{2!}+\frac{(it)^4}{4!}5+\cdots +\frac{(it)^{r}}{r!}E_{r}+.... \end{aligned}$$

The coefficients of the expansion at stake, which are the Eulero numbers \(E_{r}\), provide the moments of this density. The first even Eulero numbers are

$$\begin{aligned} E_{2}=-m_{2}=-1,\ E_{4}=m_{4}=5,\ E_{6}=-m_{6}= -61,\ E_{8}=m_{8}=1385 . \end{aligned}$$

By taking the square of (49) we get the logistic density, that is

$$\begin{aligned} f(y)&= \frac{1}{4}\text {sech}^2 \left( \frac{\pi y}{2} \right) \nonumber \\&= \exp (-y)[1+\exp (-y)]^{-2}, \end{aligned}$$
(50)

Normalizing, we eventually get the density of a zero-mean and unit-variance variable, that is

$$\begin{aligned} f(x)&= \frac{\pi }{4\sqrt{3}}\text {sech}^2\left( \frac{ \pi x}{2\sqrt{3}}\right) \nonumber \\&= \frac{\pi }{\sqrt{3}}\exp \left( -\frac{\pi x}{\sqrt{3}}\right) \left[ 1+\exp \left( -\frac{\pi x}{\sqrt{3}}\right) \right] ^{-2} . \end{aligned}$$
(51)

Upon noting that the characteristic function of the random variable \(y\) with density (50) is

$$\begin{aligned} E[\exp (ity)]=it\pi \ \text {cosech}(it\pi ), \end{aligned}$$

and bearing in mind the time scaling property of the Fourier integrals, we conclude that the characteristic function corresponding to (51) is given by

$$\begin{aligned} E[\exp (itx)]=\frac{it\pi ^2}{3}\text {cosech} \left( \frac{it\pi ^2}{3} \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(52)

Expansion of the characteristic function (52) about \(t=0\) eventually yields to find out the moments. Referring to Feller (1974), the moments can be expressed in closed form as follows

$$\begin{aligned} E(x^r)=2\Gamma (r+1)(1-2^{r-1})\xi (r)\left( \frac{3}{\pi ^2}\right) ^{\frac{r}{2}} \end{aligned}$$

where \(\Gamma (\cdot )\) is the gamma function and \(\xi (r)=\sum _{j=1}^{\infty }j^{-r}\) is the Riemann zeta function. Upon noting that \(\Gamma (r+1)=r!\) and that

$$\begin{aligned} \xi (2)=\frac{\pi ^2}{6},\; \xi (4)=\frac{\pi ^4}{90},\; \xi (6)=\frac{\pi ^6}{945},\; \xi (8)=\frac{\pi ^8}{9450}, \end{aligned}$$

simple computations provide the moments of the said distribution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagnato, L., Potì, V. & Zoia, M.G. The role of orthogonal polynomials in adjusting hyperpolic secant and logistic distributions to analyse financial asset returns. Stat Papers 56, 1205–1234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-014-0633-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-014-0633-3

Keywords

Navigation