Experimental animals
Shorthorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus scorpius, Linnaeus, 1758) were caught in baited traps by a local fisherman near Grundsund (Gullmarsfjorden) on the west coast of Sweden (Fig. 1). Sculpins were transported in aerated insulated cooler bins to the University of Gothenburg and held in a 1500 L tank (salinity: 33 ppt; temperature: 10 °C; 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod) for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to experiments to ensure acclimation to the new environment. The bottom of the tank was covered with gravel and half clay pots to supply suitable bottom substrates and dark hiding places for the fish. Fish were fed to satiation once a week with whole juvenile herring (Clupea harengus) and fasted for 6 days prior to experiments. All experimental protocols were approved by the ethical committee in Gothenburg (permit #165-2015).
Experimental setup and experimental protocols
Two different experiments were performed as outlined below (see Table 1 for the biometrics of the experimental animals). In both experiments, fish were placed in respirometers (see below for details) submerged into a larger tank with recirculating water. The tanks were covered with black plastic and shielded by dark curtains to minimize visual disturbances. The water in the experimental tank was continuously aerated and maintained at 10 ± 1 °C.
Table 1 Morphological characteristics of Shorthorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus scorpius) Experiment 1: Metabolic and plasma homeostatic responses to reduced water salinity in uninstrumented sculpin
Fish were netted and placed into one of four custom-made PVC respirometers (3.1 L) and left undisturbed for at least 35 h before the experiments started. In this experiment, half of the fish were first kept in full-strength seawater (33 ppt) for the first 24 h (day 1), thereafter gradually exposed to reduced seawater salinity (i.e., 15 ppt) by the addition of freshwater over a 3-h period, and then continuously monitored for 4 days (i.e., days 2–5). The remaining fish served as controls and were treated identical but remained in seawater (i.e., 33 ppt) throughout the entire experimental protocol (i.e., 5 days in total). To standardize the experimental protocol, all steps involved in the procedure of changing the water salinity were performed for both groups after the first 24 h, with the exception that seawater instead of freshwater entered the tank for the control group. The oxygen consumption rate (MO2, a proxy for metabolic rate) was continuously recorded throughout the experimental protocol using intermittent flow respirometry (see details below). At the end of the experiment, fish were euthanized with a sharp blow to the head and a blood sample was immediately taken from the caudal vein using a heparinized syringe with a 23-gauge needle and analyzed as described below.
Experiment 2: Cardiovascular and metabolic responses to short-term acclimation to reduced water salinity
In this experiment, half of the fish where acclimated to 15 ppt seawater for 4–9 days, while remaining fish where maintained in full-strength seawater (33 ppt) throughout the experiment. For surgical instrumentation, sculpins were anaesthetized in water corresponding to their acclimation salinity (i.e., 33 or 15 ppt) containing 100 mg l−1 of MS-222 (Tricaine methanesulfonate, Scanvacc, Hvam, Norway). The 15 ppt seawater was buffered with 200 mg l−1 of NaHCO3 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Body mass and length were then determined before placing the sculpin on water-soaked foam on a surgical table. The gills were irrigated throughout the surgery with recirculating aerated seawater (33 or 15 ppt) at 10 °C containing 50 mg l−1 of MS-222. Again, the 15 ppt seawater was buffered with 100 mg l−1 of NaHCO3.
To record gut blood flow, a Transonic 1.5 PRS blood flow probe (Transonic systems, Inc, Ithaca, NY, USA) was placed around the celiacomesenteric artery, which branches from the dorsal aorta and is the main artery perfusing the stomach and intestine (Fig. 2; Seth and Axelsson 2009). The abdominal cavity was accessed via a ~ 1 cm lateral incision posterior to the pectoral fin. The celiacomesenteric artery was accessed by gently moving covering organs (i.e., liver, spleen, stomach and gonads) using cotton free compressors, and dissected free from surrounding tissues using blunt forceps without damaging surrounding nerves or vessels (Gräns et al. 2013). The probe was placed around the exposed vessel and coupling gel (Surgilube, HR pharmaceuticals, Inc, York, USA) was added in the flow probe and the surrounding area to optimize the flow signal. The probe lead was secured with a 4–0 silk suture at the edge of the wound opening before closing the wound with interrupted 4–0 silk sutures. To measure cardiac output, a 2.5 PSL Transonic blood flow probe was placed around the ventral aorta. The fish was placed on its side with the operculum and the gill arches gently retracted to expose the opercular cavity. The ventral aorta, which in this species can be visibly identified underneath the tissue layers in the opercular cavity, was gently dissected free taking care not to damage surrounding nerves or vessels (Gräns et al. 2013; Seth and Axelsson 2009). The probe head was secured with two 4–0 silk sutures inside the opercular cavity, and the probe lead was secured with additional sutures along the side of the fish. The leads from both flow probes were then secured along the dorsal ridge, anterior to the dorsal fin (Fig. 2). The instrumented fish were then transferred into one of two identical custom-made polyethylene respirometers (6.1 L), and the flow probe leads were exited through an opening at the top of each respirometer. Fish were left undisturbed for at least 24 h at their acclimation salinity before cardiovascular and metabolic parameters were recorded for another 24 h (see Data acquisition and analyses for details). After the experiments, fish were euthanized with a sharp blow to the head.
Data acquisition and calculations
Respirometry
The mass to volume ratios of the fish and the respirometers was 1:26 for experiment 1 and 1:27 for experiment 2, which is within the desirable ranges of 1:20–1:100 (Clark et al. 2013). Each respirometer was connected to an individual recirculation pump and a common flush pump (Eheim, Deizisau, Germany) through Tygon tubing. The recirculation pump inflow and outflow were connected diagonal on opposite sides of the respirometers to ensure a continuous recirculation and mixing of water inside the respirometer. A fiberoptic FireStingO2 system (FSO2-4, PyroScience, Aachen, Germany) continuously recorded the partial pressure of oxygen in the water within the respirometers. The oxygen optodes were two-point calibrated prior to each experiment in water maintained at 0% air saturation using sodium sulphite to remove oxygen from the water, and in fully oxygen-saturated water (100% air saturation) achieved by vigorous air-bubbling of the water. The flush pump was set to flush the respirometers with oxygen-saturated water for 10 min and was turned off for 15 min to measure the MO2 of the fish, which was determined from the decline in the partial pressure of oxygen in the respirometer water. Thus, each respirometer cycle was 25 min. When the respirometer was closed, the oxygen saturation never declined below 80%. Analog outputs from the FireStingO2 system were relayed to a 16SP PowerLab system connected to a computer with LabChart pro data acquisition software (7.3.2; ADInstruments, Castle Hill, Australia). The negative slopes in water oxygen saturation were used to calculate MO2 (mg O2 h−1) using Eq. 1:
$${\text{MO}}_{2} = \left( {\frac{{\left[{\left( {V_{r} - V_{f} } \right)*\Delta C_{{wO2}} } \right] }}{{\Delta t}}} \right) - \left( {\frac{{\left[ {V_{r} *\Delta C_{{wO2}} } \right] }}{{\Delta t}}} \right),$$
(1)
where Vr is the volume (L) of the respirometer, Vf is the volume (L) of the fish (derived from the body mass of the fish with the assumption that the fish density is 1 g ml of tissue−1), ΔCwO2 (% s−1) is the change in oxygen concentration in the water in the closed respirometer (calculated from the partial pressure of oxygen in the water taking salinity and temperature into account), and Δt (s) is the time period during which ΔCwO2 was measured (Clark et al. 2013). Background (microbial) oxygen consumption was recorded for 2 h in empty respirometers after each experiment. This generated a minimum of four slopes used to calculate the mean background respiration, which was subtracted from the calculated MO2 to account for background respiration (Eq. 1; Svendsen et al. 2016). Since it took some time for the water to equilibrate in the respirometer after the flush pump was turned off, the ΔCwO2 was taken from the last 10 min of each closed cycle.
In experiment 1, the standard metabolic rate (SMR) was calculated from metabolic rate measurements during 24-h periods. In total, 50–60 metabolic rate measurements were obtained for each fish from each 24-h period, which were used to calculate the SMR during that 24-h period. If measurements of metabolic rate deviated more than two standard deviations from the 24 h mean, they were considered as outliers and excluded from the dataset. The SMR was determined as the mean of the lowest 10% of the remaining metabolic rate measurements (Clark et al. 2013; Svendsen et al. 2016). In experiment 2, metabolic rate measurements were obtained during a ~ 2–3 h period when the fish appeared calm and the cardiovascular recordings were stable (see Blood flow measurements below). Thus, 4–6 metabolic rate measurements were typically obtained from these periods, which were averaged to calculate routine metabolic rate (RMR) for each fish. Thus, we refer to the metabolic rate in experiment 2 as RMR rather than SMR as the metabolic rate data were obtained during a limited time interval and may have been affected by spontaneous activity (Fry 1971; Steffensen 2005).
Blood flow measurements
All Transonic flow probes were calibrated at 10 °C taking potential temperature effects on probe readings into account. The probes were connected to a Transonic flow meter (Transonic systems, Inc, Ithaca, NY, USA) and a 16SP PowerLab, which was connected to a computer with LabChart pro software. Heart rate was calculated in LabChart pro using the phasic cardiac output recording. Mean values for cardiac output, gut blood flow and heart rate were obtained during the 2–3-h period when metabolic rate measurements were taken. Stroke volume was calculated from cardiac output and heart rate according to Eq. 2, and the total tissue oxygen extraction (ml O2 ml blood−1) was estimated according to Eq. 3.
$${\text{Stroke volume}} = \frac{{\text{Cardiac output}}}{{\text{Heart rate}}},$$
(2)
$${\text{Tissue oxygen extraction}} = \frac{{{\text{RMR}}}}{{\text{Cardiac output}}}.$$
(3)
Analyses of hematological parameters and plasma composition
Blood samples were analyzed for hematocrit (%) and hemoglobin concentration ([hemoglobin]; mg ml−1). Hematocrit was determined as the fractional red cell volume after centrifugation of a sub-sample of blood in 80 μl heparinized microcapillary tubes at 10,000 rcf for 5 min in a hematocrit centrifuge (Haematokrit 210, Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany). A handheld hemoglobin 201+ meter (Hemocue® AB, Ängelholm, Sweden) was used to determine hemoglobin concentration and the values were corrected for fish blood (Clark et al. 2008). Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, g dl−1) was calculated according to Eq. 4.
$${\text{MCHC = }}\frac{{\left[ {{\text{hemoglobin}}} \right]}}{{{\text{hematocrit}}}}*10.$$
(4)
The whole blood was then centrifuged at 10,000 rcf for 5 min in a microcentrifuge (Eppendorf® 5415D, Sigma-Aldrich Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and the plasma was collected and frozen at − 18 °C for later analyses of plasma ion composition. The concentrations (i.e., [X]) of Na+, Cl−, K+ and Ca2+ were determined using an ISE comfort Electrolyte Analyzer (Convergent technologies, Cölbe, Germany) and plasma osmolality was determined with a freezing point osmometer (Micro osmometer 3300, Advanced instruments, Norwood, USA). All blood and plasma analyses were performed in duplicates and averaged.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All data used were assessed to ensure that they did not violate the assumptions of the specific models outlined below. F-, t- and P-values obtained from the statistical analyses are reported throughout the text and all P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Unless otherwise specified, all data are presented as means ± S.E.M.
In experiment 1, an independent sample t-tests was used to compare blood hematocrit, [hemoglobin] and MCHC, as well as plasma [K+] and [Ca2+] between the two treatments (the 33 ppt and 15 ppt seawater). A Welch's t-test was used to compare plasma [Cl−] between treatments as this variable had a heterogenic distribution. For comparing plasma [Na+] between treatments, and in order to verify that the two experimental groups did not differ in SMR before the treatment was initiated (i.e., day 1 when both groups remained in 33 ppt water), a one-way ANCOVA with body mass as a covariate was used. Consequently, for the comparisons of SMR and plasma [Na+] between treatments all mean values were standardized, using body mass as a covariate, to an averaged-sized sculpin of 119 g. To compare SMR between the two treatments following the salinity change (i.e., days 2–5), a linear mixed model was used. In the mixed model, individuals were set as subjects, time (days 2–5) as the repeated factor and body mass was included as a covariate. Time (days 2–5), treatment (the two salinities) and their interaction (i.e., time × treatment) were included as fixed factors in the model. An unstructured covariance matrix was used in the model as this provided the best fit to the data (i.e., the lowest Akaike’s Information Criterion). To meet the assumptions of the model, we applied a natural logarithm transformation on SMR.
In experiment 2, one-way ANCOVAs, using body mass as a covariate, were used to analyze differences between treatment groups for cardiac output, stroke volume, RMR and gut blood flow, as all of these parameters were affected by body mass. Consequently, for the comparisons, all mass-dependent variables were standardized to an averaged-sized sculpin (i.e., 225 g for cardiac output, stroke volume and RMR, and 219 g for gut blood flow). Independent sample t-tests were used to assess differences in heart rate and tissue oxygen extraction.