Skip to main content
Log in

Laser-induced withdrawal test for electrophysiological recordings of nociception

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CO2 lasers are often used in pain research. However, the stimulation parameters of the CO2 lasers, such as beam diameter, laser power, etc., used for these animal nociceptive studies vary across laboratories. The differences of the parameters usually make novices who want to reproduce the laser-evoked responses confused to follow. In this study, we quantitatively measured the laser-withdrawal reflex of the rat to ascertain the individual laser-withdrawal threshold and then found the thresholds were diverse among the rats we adopted. Furthermore, the optimal stimulation distance, the most conveniently modified stimulation parameter of CO2 laser stimuli, was also determined. We suggest that laser-withdrawal tests should be applied before the electrophysiological recordings in order to verify the efficiency of the induced nociception and substantiate the operational parameters of the CO2 laser device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Agostino R, Cruccu G, Iannetti GD, Romaniello A, Truini A, Manfredi M (2000) Topographical distribution of pinprick and warmth threshold to CO2 laser stimulation on the human skin. Neurosci Lett 285:115–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almási R, Petho G, Bolcskei K, Szolcsanyi J (2003) Effect of resiniferatoxin on the noxious heat threshold temperature in the rat: a novel heat allodynia model sensitive to analgesics. Br J Pharmacol 139:49–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt-Nielsen L, Bjerring P (1988) Sensory and pain threshold characteristics to laser stimuli. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:35–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RR, Fillingim RB (2001) Age-associated differences in responses to noxious stimuli. J Gerontol Med Sci 56:180–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan RJ, Shyu BC, Hsiao S (1995) Analysis of nociceptive behavior induced in rats by CO2 laser pulse stimulation. Physiol Behav 57:1131–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan RJ, Kung JC, Olausson BA, Shyu BC (2009) Nocifensive behaviors components evoked by brief laser pulses are mediated by C fibers. Physiol Behav 98:108–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood-Walker SM, Quinn JP, Blackburn-Munro G, Kelly BG, Fiskerstrand CE, Nash AA, Dalziel RG (1990) Behavioural changes in the rat following infection with varicella-zoster virus. J Gen Virol 80:2433–2436

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo CC, Chiou RJ, Liang KC, Yen CT (2009) Differential involvement of the anterior cingulate and primary sensorimotor cortices in sensory and affective functions of pain. J Neurophysiol 101:1201–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bars D, Gozaru M, Cadden SW (2001) Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev 53:597–652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plaghki L, Delisle D, Godfraind JM (1994) Heterotopic nociceptive conditioning stimulation and mental task modulate differently the perception and physiological correlates of short CO2 laser stimuli. Pain 57:181–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao ZM, Wang JY, Han JS, Luo F (2008) Dynamic processing of nociception in cortical network in conscious rats: a laser-evoked field potential study. Cell Mol Neurobiol 28:671–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raut A, Ratkam A (2009) Oxidative damage and sensitivity to nociceptive stimulus and opioids in aging rats. Neurobiol Aging 30:910–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheouenborg J, Kalliomaki J (1990) Functional organization of the nociceptive withdrawal reflexes. Exp Brain Res 83:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw FZ, Chen RF, Yen CT (2001) Dynamic changes of touch- and laser-evoked field potentials of primary somatosensory cortex in awake and pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Brain Res 911:105–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, French AM (2002) Age-related differences in sensitivity to the antinociceptive effects of kappa opioids in adult male rats. Psychopharmacology 162:255–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson P, Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Nielsen JC (1991) Comparison of four laser types for experimental pain stimulation on oral mucosa and hairy skin. Lasers Surg Med 11:313–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin MR, Zoppi M, Meucci R, Jafrancesco D, Bartoli A (2003) Factors influencing pricking pain threshold using a CO2 laser. Physiol Meas 24:57–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weng HR, Scheouenborg J (1996) Cutaneous inhibitory receptive fields of withdrawal reflexes in the decerebrate spinal rat. J Physiol 493:253–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yen CT, Huang CH, Fu SE (1994) Surface temperature change, cortical evoked potential and pain behavior elicited by CO2 lasers. Chin J Physiol 37:193–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by NSC 97-2221-E-002-004-MY3. All experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the National Taiwan University College of Medicine and the College of Public Health Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) as well as the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publications No. 80-23). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals required and to prevent any suffering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fu-Shan Jaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kao, YC., Jaw, FS. Laser-induced withdrawal test for electrophysiological recordings of nociception. J Comp Physiol A 198, 79–83 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-011-0686-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-011-0686-x

Keywords

Navigation