Abstract
The article defines measures of individual and household willingness to pay (and to accept) in a general and flexible framework. It completely clarifies the relationship between the household measures and the sum of the individual welfare measures (the aggregate measures) which are in general different. The aggregate measures form only an upper bound for the corresponding household measures. The bounds (based on the information about individual measures) can be tightened by introducing additional assumptions about the decision process within the household. The results derived prove helpful for the theoretical analysis of household behavior, for the evaluation of nonmarket goods in environmental and public economics and for contingent valuation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apps P, Rees R (2009) Public economics and the household. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Attanasio O, Lechene V (2002) Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Rev Econ Dyn 5: 720–748
Becker GS (1991) A treatise on the family, enlarged edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Bergstrom TC (1997) A survey of theories of the family. In: Rosenzweig MR, Stark O (eds) Handbook of population and family economics, vol 1, part 1. Elsevier, North-Holland, pp 21–79
Bergstrom TC, Blume L, Varian H (1986) On the private provision of public goods. J Public Econ 29: 25–49
Bourguignon F, Chiappori P-A (1994) The collective approach to household behavior. In: Blundell R, Preston I, Walker I (eds) The measurement of household welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Browning M, Bourguignon F, Chiappori P-A, Lechene V (1994) Income and outcomes: a structural model of intrahousehold allocation. J Political Econ 102: 1067–1096
Browning M, Chiappori PA (1998) Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica 66: 1241–1278
Browning M, Chiappori P-A, Lechene V (2006) Collective and unitary models: a clarification. Rev Econ Househ 4: 5–14
Cornes R, Sandler T (1986) The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cornes R (1992) Duality and modern economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Couprie H, Peluso E, Trannoy A (2010) Is power more evenly balanced in poor households?. J Public Econ 94: 493–507
D’Aspremont C, Dos Santo Ferreira R (2009) Household behavior and individual autonomy, Working papers of BETA 2009-17
Dasgupta D, Itaya J (1992) Comparative statics for the private provision of public goods in a conjectural variations model with heterogeneous agents. Public Finance 47: 17–31
Donaldson D (1992) On the aggregation of money measures of well being in applied welfare economics. J Agric Resour Econ 17: 88–102
Ebert U (1984) Exact welfare measures and economic index numbers. J Econ 44: 27–38
Ebert U (1987) Axiomatic foundations of Hicksian measures of welfare change. J Public Econ 33: 115–124
Ebert U (1993) A note on willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Soc Choice Welf 10: 363–370
Ebert U (2010) Household willingness to pay and income pooling: a comment. Econ Lett 107: 7–9
Ebert U, Moyes P (2009) Household decisions and equivalence scales. J Popul Econ 22: 1039–1062
Ermisch JF (2003) An economic analysis of the family. Princeton University Press, Princeton
ERE: (2009) Special issue: household and environmental economics. Environ Resour Econ 43: 1–135
Freeman AM III (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values. 2nd edn. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Hanemann WM (1991) Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ?. Am Econ Rev 81: 635–647
Hicks JR (1943) The four consumer’s surpluses. Rev Econ Stud 11: 31–41
Just RE, Hueth DL, Schmitz A (2004) The welfare economics of public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Konrad K, Lommerud KE (1995) Family policy with non-cooperative families. Scand J Econ 97: 581–601
Manser M, Brown M (1980) Marriage and household decision making: a bargaining analysis. Int Econ Rev 21: 31–44
Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation methods. Resour Future, Washington, DC
Munro A (2005) Household willingness to pay equals individual willingness to pay if and only if the household income pools. Econ Lett 88: 227–230
Phipps SA, Burton PS (1998) What’s mine is yours? The influence of male and female incomes on patterns of household expenditure. Economica 65: 599–613
Pollak RA (1981) The social cost of living index. J Public Econ 15: 311–336
Quiggin J (1998) Individual and household willingness to pay for public goods. Am J Agric Econ 80: 58–63
Samuelson PA (1956) Social indifference curves. Q J Econ 70: 1–22
Slesnick DT (1998) Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare. J Econ Lit 36: 2108–2165
Slivinski A (1987) The normative characterization of aggregate consumer’s surplus measures. Int Econ Rev 28: 559–581
Strand J (2007) Public good valuation and intra-family allocation. Environ Resour Econ 38: 527–543
Warr P (1983) Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. J Public Econ 19: 131–138
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebert, U. The relationship between individual and household measures of WTP and WTA. Soc Choice Welf 40, 367–390 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0607-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0607-5