Abstract
In the present study, Lagrangian measurements of drop motion of a two-phase spray are analyzed to estimate the collision, fragmentation, size and velocity field of the drops. An experimental setup is designed to record fluorescence images of drops, illuminated by a planar laser sheet. The recorded images are then processed with a commercially available Lagrangian tracking software, Track. The methodology for particle identification, tracking and size approximation in Track in the near interface region of spray is stated. With the stated methodology, the information about size, velocity, fragmentation, collision and change in the shape of the drops is obtained. The effectiveness of the developed methodology is tested against synthetically produced images and is then applied to a liquid/liquid jet. Similar behaviors for dispersed phase fragmentation–collision and mass fragmented along axial location normalized by breakup length of the jet are reported.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Gharbieh R, Persson JL, Försth M, Rosen A, Karlström A, Gustavsson T (2000) Compensation method for attenuated planar laser images of optically dense sprays. Appl Opt 39(8):1260–1267
Akhmetbekov YK, Alekseenko SV, Dulin VM, Markovich DM, Pervunin KS (2010) Planar fluorescence for round bubble imaging and its application for the study of an axisymmetric two-phase jet. Exp Fluids 48(4):615–629
Asgarian A, Yang Z, Tang Z, Bussmann M, Chattopadhyay K (2020) An image feature consolidation technique (IFCT) to capture multi-range droplet size distributions in atomizing liquid sheets. Exp Fluids 61(1):1–22
Blaisot J, Yon J (2005) Droplet size and morphology characterization for dense sprays by image processing: application to the diesel spray. Exp Fluids 39(6):977–994
Bordás R, Roloff C, Thévenin D, Shaw R (2013) Experimental determination of droplet collision rates in turbulence. New J Phys 15(4):045010
Brochard F, Shalpegin A, Bardin S, Lunt T, Rohde V, Briançon J, Pautasso G, Vorpahl C, Neu R et al (2016) Video analysis of dust events in full-tungsten ASDEX upgrade. Nucl Fusion 57(3):036002
Brochard F, Rohde V, Lunt T, López GS, Shalpegin A, Neu R, ASDEX Upgrade Team (2019) Intrinsic dust transport in ASDEX upgrade studied by fast imaging. Nuclear Mater Energy 18:268–274
Chigier N (1983) Drop size and velocity instrumentation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 9(1–2):155–177
Cierpka C, Lütke B, Kähler CJ (2013) Higher order multi-frame particle tracking velocimetry. Exp Fluids 54(5):1–12
Crimaldi J (2008) Planar laser induced fluorescence in aqueous flows. Exp Fluids 44(6):851–863
Déchelette A, Babinsky E, Sojka P (2011) Drop size distributions. In: Handbook of atomization and sprays. Springer, pp 479–495
Desantes J, Pastor J, Pastor J, Julia J (2005) Limitations on the use of the planar laser induced exciplex fluorescence technique in diesel sprays. Fuel 84(18):2301–2315
Désécures M, Baude R. APREX solutions. https://www.aprex-solutions.com/fr/
Deshmukh D, Ravikrishna R (2013) A method for measurement of planar liquid volume fraction in dense sprays. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 46:254–258
Dunand P, Castanet G, Gradeck M, Maillet D, Lemoine F (2013) Energy balance of droplets impinging onto a wall heated above the Leidenfrost temperature. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 44:170–180
Elhimer M, Praud O, Marchal M, Cazin S, Bazile R (2017) Simultaneous PIV/PTV velocimetry technique in a turbulent particle-laden flow. J Vis 20(2):289–304
Elimelech M, Gregory J, Jia X (2013) Particle deposition and aggregation: measurement, modelling and simulation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Farnebäck G (2003) Two-frame motion estimation based on polynomial expansion. In: Scandinavian conference on image analysis. Springer, pp 363–370
Gorokhovski M, Herrmann M (2008) Modeling primary atomization. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:343–366
Hadj-Achour M, Rimbert N, Gradeck M, Meignen R (2021) Fragmentation of a liquid metal droplet falling in a water pool. Phys Fluids 33(10):103315
Hsiang L-P, Faeth GM (1992) Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup. Int J Multiph Flow 18(5):635–652
Kannaiyan K, Banda MVK, Vaidyanathan A (2016) Planar Sauter mean diameter measurements in liquid centered swirl coaxial injector using laser induced fluorescence, MIE scattering and laser diffraction techniques. Acta Astronaut 123:257–270
Kashdan JT, Shrimpton JS, Whybrew A (2007) A digital image analysis technique for quantitative characterisation of high-speed sprays. Opt Lasers Eng 45(1):106–115
Kearney RV, Bewley GP (2020) Lagrangian tracking of colliding droplets. Exp Fluids 61(7):1–11
Koegl M, Mishra YN, Baderschneider K, Conrad C, Lehnert B, Will S, Zigan L (2020) Planar droplet sizing for studying the influence of ethanol admixture on the spray structure of gasoline sprays. Exp Fluids 61(10):1–20
Kristensson E, Berrocal E, Richter M, Pettersson S-G, Aldén M (2008) High-speed structured planar laser illumination for contrast improvement of two-phase flow images. Opt Lett 33(23):2752–2754
Lefebvre AH, McDonell VG (2017) Atomization and sprays. CRC Press, Cambridge
Liu T, Shen L (2008) Fluid flow and optical flow. J Fluid Mech 614:253–291
Malot H, Blaisot J-B (2000) Droplet size distribution and sphericity measurements of low-density sprays through image analysis. Part Part Syst Charact 17(4):146–158
Metivier C, Brochard F, Darbouli M, Magnin A (2020) Oscillatory rayleigh-bénard convection in elasto-viscoplastic gels. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 286:104428
Nishino K, Kato H, Torii K (2000) Stereo imaging for simultaneous measurement of size and velocity of particles in dispersed two-phase flow. Meas Sci Technol 11(6):633
Or C, Lam KM, Liu P (2011) Potential core lengths of round jets in stagnant and moving environments. J Hydro-environ Res 5(2):81–91
Ou W, Brochard F, Morgan T (2021) Bubble formation in liquid SN under different plasma loading conditions leading to droplet ejection. Nucl Fusion 61(6):066030
Rimbert N, Escobar S.C, Meignen R, Hadj-Achour M, Gradeck M (2020) Spheroidal droplet deformation, oscillation and breakup in uniform outer flow. J Fluid Mech 904
Villermaux E (2007) Fragmentation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:419–446
Von der Linden W, Dose V, Von Toussaint U (2014) Bayesian probability theory: applications in the physical sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wu P-H, Agarwal A, Hess H, Khargonekar PP, Tseng Y (2010) Analysis of video-based microscopic particle trajectories using Kalman filtering. Biophys J 98(12):2822–2830
Yagoh K, Ogawara K, Iida S-I (1992) The particle tracking method using the Kalman filter. In: Flow visualization VI. Springer, Berlin, pp 838–842
Zimmer L, Domann R, Hardalupas Y, Ikeda Y (2003) Simultaneous laser-induced fluorescence and MIE scattering for droplet cluster measurements. AIAA J 41(11):2170–2178
Acknowledgements
The experiments were performed under the research program on nuclear safety and radioprotection (RSNR). The experiments were funded from French government managed by the National Research Agency (ANR) under Future Investments Program (PIA), research Grant No.: ANR-10-RSNR-01. The authors are grateful to Engineering Department of LEMTA for their support on the development of the experimental setup. The purchase of Track was funded by the research grant PALAGRAM granted by the French National Research Agency (ANR-19-CE30-0041). The authors also acknowledge partial support from COST action MP1305 “Flowing Matter,” supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Gagan Kewalramani's PhD stipendship has been funded by LUE (Lorraine Universite d'Excellence) grant registered as PFI:Ro1PJZCX.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Image generation
A three-dimensional domain with dimensions 120 pixels (width) \(\times\) 200 pixels length in flow direction \(\times\) 40 units depth with N number of the particle initiated at random locations. The domain is set such that the particles going out the domain are entering again in the domain. The particle is reflected from the side walls (directions perpendicular to flow direction). The initial velocity of the particles at random locations is also initiated with the random velocity in any given interval. The initialized random velocity follows a uniform (Gaussian) distribution in the given interval. The velocity is positive in the flow direction. The initiated particles are allowed to flow with zero acceleration until there is collision or fragmentation. In order to model the fragmentation of particles, a fragmentation factor is assigned to each particle. This factor consists of a random constant (in interval 0 to 1) and is proportional to kinetic energy. As the flow progress, this factor increases and the particle is fragmented into two particles when the value of the fragmentation factor reaches a threshold value. The fragmentation threshold value of 5 is used for all cases. The radius and velocities of new particles are prescribed randomly while following the conservation of mass and momentum. For collision, distances between every two particles are calculated and compared with particle radius at each time to estimate their contact. Two particles are merged as soon as two particles are found in contact. The mass and momentum of the merging particle are also conserved. Since the synthetic images are used just to examine the procedure of collision and fragmentation, the shape of the particle is kept spherical at all the times, even while fragmentation and collision. To replicate the experimental condition, a Gaussian thickness of particle illumination along depth is included. For generating images, an averaged intensity along the depth is assigned to generate two-dimensional images.
Appendix 2: Volume fraction and Eulerian particle velocity from Track
The Lagrangian information of particles can be used to obtain information about the volume fraction. Using the information about the location of centroid, width (W) and height (H) of an identified drop, the pixels occupied by the drop are assigned with the phase indicator function such that, \(Y = 1 \text { if the drop is present in pixel else } Y=0\). While plotting the phase indicator function we also use the approximation that its shape is approximated by an ellipse with it borders satisfying the equation \(\frac{x_{pix}^2}{(0.5 \cdot W)^2} + \frac{y_{pix}^2}{(0.5 \cdot H)^2} =1\). Using the indicator defined, the average volume fraction \({\bar{Y}}\) over 1500 images for each pixel (\({\bar{Y}}(i,j)=\frac{1}{1500}\sum _{n=1}^{1500} Y(i,j;n)\)). Using the Lagrangian velocity information, Eulerian information of velocity is also obtained. With Track, the particle velocity is directly obtained by substituting pixels with the velocity of particle occupied by it.
Appendix 3: Eulerian particle velocity from optical flow
The Farnebäck (2003) optical flow methodology module in Matlab with an interrogative window size of 5 pixels is used. The velocity from optical flow (\(U_{of}\)) is obtained by solving Eq. 2 with the method stated by Farnebäck (2003) optical flow as,
In Eq. 2, g is the intensity measured by detector and \(\nabla _{12}\) and is the spatial gradient in two directions. Liu and Shen (2008) in their detailed derivation for optical flow with laser sheet-induced fluorescence have stated the expression for \(U_{of}\) as, \(U_{of}= \frac{\int \phi U_{12} dV}{\int \phi dV}\) where \(\phi\) is the scalar concentration in flow (e.g., dye), or particle number per unit total volume for particulate flows. Since fluorescence is recorded only at the pixels occupied by the particle, therefore \(\int \phi U_{12} dV = U_p\) and \(\int \phi dV ={\bar{Y}}\), here \(U_p\) is the average velocity of particle and \({\bar{Y}}\) is the volume fraction in the interrogation window. \({\bar{Y}}\) can be calculated with the procedure stated in “Appendix 2”. Using the simplifications stated, the particle velocity from Optical flow can be stated as \(U_p = U_{of} \cdot {\bar{Y}}\).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kewalramani, G., Ji, B., Dossmann, Y. et al. Experimental analysis of Lagrangian paths of drops generated by liquid/liquid sprays. Exp Fluids 63, 147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03496-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03496-5