Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental analysis of Lagrangian paths of drops generated by liquid/liquid sprays

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, Lagrangian measurements of drop motion of a two-phase spray are analyzed to estimate the collision, fragmentation, size and velocity field of the drops. An experimental setup is designed to record fluorescence images of drops, illuminated by a planar laser sheet. The recorded images are then processed with a commercially available Lagrangian tracking software, Track. The methodology for particle identification, tracking and size approximation in Track in the near interface region of spray is stated. With the stated methodology, the information about size, velocity, fragmentation, collision and change in the shape of the drops is obtained. The effectiveness of the developed methodology is tested against synthetically produced images and is then applied to a liquid/liquid jet. Similar behaviors for dispersed phase fragmentation–collision and mass fragmented along axial location normalized by breakup length of the jet are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Gharbieh R, Persson JL, Försth M, Rosen A, Karlström A, Gustavsson T (2000) Compensation method for attenuated planar laser images of optically dense sprays. Appl Opt 39(8):1260–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhmetbekov YK, Alekseenko SV, Dulin VM, Markovich DM, Pervunin KS (2010) Planar fluorescence for round bubble imaging and its application for the study of an axisymmetric two-phase jet. Exp Fluids 48(4):615–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgarian A, Yang Z, Tang Z, Bussmann M, Chattopadhyay K (2020) An image feature consolidation technique (IFCT) to capture multi-range droplet size distributions in atomizing liquid sheets. Exp Fluids 61(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaisot J, Yon J (2005) Droplet size and morphology characterization for dense sprays by image processing: application to the diesel spray. Exp Fluids 39(6):977–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordás R, Roloff C, Thévenin D, Shaw R (2013) Experimental determination of droplet collision rates in turbulence. New J Phys 15(4):045010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brochard F, Shalpegin A, Bardin S, Lunt T, Rohde V, Briançon J, Pautasso G, Vorpahl C, Neu R et al (2016) Video analysis of dust events in full-tungsten ASDEX upgrade. Nucl Fusion 57(3):036002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brochard F, Rohde V, Lunt T, López GS, Shalpegin A, Neu R, ASDEX Upgrade Team (2019) Intrinsic dust transport in ASDEX upgrade studied by fast imaging. Nuclear Mater Energy 18:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chigier N (1983) Drop size and velocity instrumentation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 9(1–2):155–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cierpka C, Lütke B, Kähler CJ (2013) Higher order multi-frame particle tracking velocimetry. Exp Fluids 54(5):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crimaldi J (2008) Planar laser induced fluorescence in aqueous flows. Exp Fluids 44(6):851–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Déchelette A, Babinsky E, Sojka P (2011) Drop size distributions. In: Handbook of atomization and sprays. Springer, pp 479–495

  • Desantes J, Pastor J, Pastor J, Julia J (2005) Limitations on the use of the planar laser induced exciplex fluorescence technique in diesel sprays. Fuel 84(18):2301–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Désécures M, Baude R. APREX solutions. https://www.aprex-solutions.com/fr/

  • Deshmukh D, Ravikrishna R (2013) A method for measurement of planar liquid volume fraction in dense sprays. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 46:254–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunand P, Castanet G, Gradeck M, Maillet D, Lemoine F (2013) Energy balance of droplets impinging onto a wall heated above the Leidenfrost temperature. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 44:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhimer M, Praud O, Marchal M, Cazin S, Bazile R (2017) Simultaneous PIV/PTV velocimetry technique in a turbulent particle-laden flow. J Vis 20(2):289–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elimelech M, Gregory J, Jia X (2013) Particle deposition and aggregation: measurement, modelling and simulation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnebäck G (2003) Two-frame motion estimation based on polynomial expansion. In: Scandinavian conference on image analysis. Springer, pp 363–370

  • Gorokhovski M, Herrmann M (2008) Modeling primary atomization. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:343–366

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hadj-Achour M, Rimbert N, Gradeck M, Meignen R (2021) Fragmentation of a liquid metal droplet falling in a water pool. Phys Fluids 33(10):103315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang L-P, Faeth GM (1992) Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup. Int J Multiph Flow 18(5):635–652

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kannaiyan K, Banda MVK, Vaidyanathan A (2016) Planar Sauter mean diameter measurements in liquid centered swirl coaxial injector using laser induced fluorescence, MIE scattering and laser diffraction techniques. Acta Astronaut 123:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan JT, Shrimpton JS, Whybrew A (2007) A digital image analysis technique for quantitative characterisation of high-speed sprays. Opt Lasers Eng 45(1):106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney RV, Bewley GP (2020) Lagrangian tracking of colliding droplets. Exp Fluids 61(7):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegl M, Mishra YN, Baderschneider K, Conrad C, Lehnert B, Will S, Zigan L (2020) Planar droplet sizing for studying the influence of ethanol admixture on the spray structure of gasoline sprays. Exp Fluids 61(10):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson E, Berrocal E, Richter M, Pettersson S-G, Aldén M (2008) High-speed structured planar laser illumination for contrast improvement of two-phase flow images. Opt Lett 33(23):2752–2754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre AH, McDonell VG (2017) Atomization and sprays. CRC Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Shen L (2008) Fluid flow and optical flow. J Fluid Mech 614:253–291

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malot H, Blaisot J-B (2000) Droplet size distribution and sphericity measurements of low-density sprays through image analysis. Part Part Syst Charact 17(4):146–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metivier C, Brochard F, Darbouli M, Magnin A (2020) Oscillatory rayleigh-bénard convection in elasto-viscoplastic gels. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 286:104428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishino K, Kato H, Torii K (2000) Stereo imaging for simultaneous measurement of size and velocity of particles in dispersed two-phase flow. Meas Sci Technol 11(6):633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Or C, Lam KM, Liu P (2011) Potential core lengths of round jets in stagnant and moving environments. J Hydro-environ Res 5(2):81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou W, Brochard F, Morgan T (2021) Bubble formation in liquid SN under different plasma loading conditions leading to droplet ejection. Nucl Fusion 61(6):066030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimbert N, Escobar S.C, Meignen R, Hadj-Achour M, Gradeck M (2020) Spheroidal droplet deformation, oscillation and breakup in uniform outer flow. J Fluid Mech 904

  • Villermaux E (2007) Fragmentation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:419–446

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Von der Linden W, Dose V, Von Toussaint U (2014) Bayesian probability theory: applications in the physical sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu P-H, Agarwal A, Hess H, Khargonekar PP, Tseng Y (2010) Analysis of video-based microscopic particle trajectories using Kalman filtering. Biophys J 98(12):2822–2830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagoh K, Ogawara K, Iida S-I (1992) The particle tracking method using the Kalman filter. In: Flow visualization VI. Springer, Berlin, pp 838–842

  • Zimmer L, Domann R, Hardalupas Y, Ikeda Y (2003) Simultaneous laser-induced fluorescence and MIE scattering for droplet cluster measurements. AIAA J 41(11):2170–2178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The experiments were performed under the research program on nuclear safety and radioprotection (RSNR). The experiments were funded from French government managed by the National Research Agency (ANR) under Future Investments Program (PIA), research Grant No.: ANR-10-RSNR-01. The authors are grateful to Engineering Department of LEMTA for their support on the development of the experimental setup. The purchase of Track was funded by the research grant PALAGRAM granted by the French National Research Agency (ANR-19-CE30-0041). The authors also acknowledge partial support from COST action MP1305 “Flowing Matter,” supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Gagan Kewalramani's PhD stipendship has been funded by LUE (Lorraine Universite d'Excellence) grant registered as PFI:Ro1PJZCX.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gagan Kewalramani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Image generation

A three-dimensional domain with dimensions 120 pixels (width) \(\times\) 200 pixels length in flow direction \(\times\) 40 units depth with N number of the particle initiated at random locations. The domain is set such that the particles going out the domain are entering again in the domain. The particle is reflected from the side walls (directions perpendicular to flow direction). The initial velocity of the particles at random locations is also initiated with the random velocity in any given interval. The initialized random velocity follows a uniform (Gaussian) distribution in the given interval. The velocity is positive in the flow direction. The initiated particles are allowed to flow with zero acceleration until there is collision or fragmentation. In order to model the fragmentation of particles, a fragmentation factor is assigned to each particle. This factor consists of a random constant (in interval 0 to 1) and is proportional to kinetic energy. As the flow progress, this factor increases and the particle is fragmented into two particles when the value of the fragmentation factor reaches a threshold value. The fragmentation threshold value of 5 is used for all cases. The radius and velocities of new particles are prescribed randomly while following the conservation of mass and momentum. For collision, distances between every two particles are calculated and compared with particle radius at each time to estimate their contact. Two particles are merged as soon as two particles are found in contact. The mass and momentum of the merging particle are also conserved. Since the synthetic images are used just to examine the procedure of collision and fragmentation, the shape of the particle is kept spherical at all the times, even while fragmentation and collision. To replicate the experimental condition, a Gaussian thickness of particle illumination along depth is included. For generating images, an averaged intensity along the depth is assigned to generate two-dimensional images.

Appendix 2: Volume fraction and Eulerian particle velocity from Track

The Lagrangian information of particles can be used to obtain information about the volume fraction. Using the information about the location of centroid, width (W) and height (H) of an identified drop, the pixels occupied by the drop are assigned with the phase indicator function such that, \(Y = 1 \text { if the drop is present in pixel else } Y=0\). While plotting the phase indicator function we also use the approximation that its shape is approximated by an ellipse with it borders satisfying the equation \(\frac{x_{pix}^2}{(0.5 \cdot W)^2} + \frac{y_{pix}^2}{(0.5 \cdot H)^2} =1\). Using the indicator defined, the average volume fraction \({\bar{Y}}\) over 1500 images for each pixel (\({\bar{Y}}(i,j)=\frac{1}{1500}\sum _{n=1}^{1500} Y(i,j;n)\)). Using the Lagrangian velocity information, Eulerian information of velocity is also obtained. With Track, the particle velocity is directly obtained by substituting pixels with the velocity of particle occupied by it.

Appendix 3: Eulerian particle velocity from optical flow

The Farnebäck (2003) optical flow methodology module in Matlab with an interrogative window size of 5 pixels is used. The velocity from optical flow (\(U_{of}\)) is obtained by solving Eq. 2 with the method stated by Farnebäck (2003) optical flow as,

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial g}{\partial t} + \nabla _{12} \cdot \left( g \langle U_{of} \rangle \right)&=0. \end{aligned}$$
(2)

In Eq. 2, g is the intensity measured by detector and \(\nabla _{12}\) and is the spatial gradient in two directions. Liu and Shen (2008) in their detailed derivation for optical flow with laser sheet-induced fluorescence have stated the expression for \(U_{of}\) as, \(U_{of}= \frac{\int \phi U_{12} dV}{\int \phi dV}\) where \(\phi\) is the scalar concentration in flow (e.g., dye), or particle number per unit total volume for particulate flows. Since fluorescence is recorded only at the pixels occupied by the particle, therefore \(\int \phi U_{12} dV = U_p\) and \(\int \phi dV ={\bar{Y}}\), here \(U_p\) is the average velocity of particle and \({\bar{Y}}\) is the volume fraction in the interrogation window. \({\bar{Y}}\) can be calculated with the procedure stated in “Appendix 2”. Using the simplifications stated, the particle velocity from Optical flow can be stated as \(U_p = U_{of} \cdot {\bar{Y}}\).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kewalramani, G., Ji, B., Dossmann, Y. et al. Experimental analysis of Lagrangian paths of drops generated by liquid/liquid sprays. Exp Fluids 63, 147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03496-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03496-5

Navigation