Abstract
The flow field on solid and porous airfoils subjected to turbulence shed by an upstream cylindrical rod and the corresponding far-field noise radiations are studied through particle image velocimetry (PIV) and microphone measurements, respectively. Three different Reynolds numbers based on the rod diameter are considered in a range between \({2.7\times 10^4}\) and \({5.4\times 10^4}\), and two porous airfoil models are tested to analyze the influence of the design elements of the permeable treatment. A standard proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) algorithm is employed to band filter the different length scales that characterize the turbulent flow, making it feasible to determine which turbulence scales are affected by porosity. The aeroacoustic results indicate that the porous treatment of the wing profile leads to a noise reduction at low frequencies and a noise regeneration at high frequencies due to surface roughness. The investigation on the flow field shows that the main effect of porosity is to mitigate the turbulent kinetic energy in the stagnation region, attenuating the distortion of turbulence interacting with the airfoil surface. The application of the POD algorithm indicates that this effect acts mainly on the largest scales of turbulence.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amiet R (1975) Acoustic radiation from an airfoil in a turbulent stream. J Sound Vib 41(4):407–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(75)80105-2
Amiet R (1976) Noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge. J Sound Vib 47(3):387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(76)90948-2
Bampanis G, Roger M (2020) On the turbulence-impingement noise of a naca-12 airfoil with porous inclusions. In: AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM, AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2577
Bingham H, Larsen P, Barker V (2018) Computational Fluid Dynamics. Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Brindise M, Vlachos P (2017) Proper orthogonal decomposition truncation method for data denoising and order reduction. Exp Fluids 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2320-3
Cenedese A, Miozzi M, Querzoli G (1997) Comparison between fourier and proper orthogonal decomposition of a velocity field within a convective vessel. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on computational methods and experimental measurements, computational mechanics publications, 1:319–329
Deri E, Braza M, Cid E, Cazin S, Michaelis D, Degouet C (2014) Investigation of the three-dimensional turbulent near-wake structure past a flat plate by tomographic piv at high reynolds number. J Fluids Struct 47:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.11.005
Devenport WJ, Staubs JK, Glegg SAL (2010) Sound radiation from real airfoils in turbulence. J Sound Vib 329(17):3470–3483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.02.022
Foucaut JM, Carlier J, Stanislas M (2004) PIV optimization for the study of turbulent flow using spectral analysis. Meas Sci Technol 15(6):1046–1058. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/15/6/003
Garcia D (2010) Robust smoothing of gridded data in one and higher dimensions with missing values. Comput Stat Data Anal 54(4):1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.09.020
Geyer T, Sarradj E, Fritzsche C (2010) Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Exp Fluids 48(2):291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x
Geyer T, Sarradj E, Giesler J, Hobracht M (2011) Experimental assessment of the noise generated at the leading edge of porous airfoils using microphone array techniques. In: 17th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference 2011 (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-2713
Geyer T, Sarradj E, Giesler J (2012) Application of a beamforming technique to the measurement of airfoil leading edge noise. Advances in Acoustics and Vibration 2012: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/905461
Graftieaux L, Michard M, Grosjean N (2001) Combining piv, pod and vortex identification algorithms for the study of unsteady turbulent swirling flows. Meas Sci Technol 12:1422. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/12/9/307
Howe MS (1991) Surface pressures and sound produced by turbulent flow over smooth and rough walls. J Acoust Soc Am 90(2):1041–1047
Jacob M, Boudet J, Casalino D, Michard M (2005) A rod-airfoil experiment as a benchmark for broadband noise modeling. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 19:171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-004-0108-6
Kroeger RA, Grushka HD, Helvey TC (1972) Low speed aerodynamics for ultra-quiet flight. Tech. Rep. AD893426, Air force flight dynamics laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
Liu Y, Dowling A, Shin HC (2006) Effects of surface roughness on airframe noise. In: 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, MA
Liu Y, Dowling A, Shin HC, Quayle A (2007) Experimental study of surface roughness noise. In: 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Rome, Italy
Lumley JL (1967) The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence. In: Atmospheric turbulence and wave propagation, Nauka, Moscow, Russia
Melling A (1997) Tracer particles and seeding for particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8(12):1406–1416. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/005
Mendez MA, Hess D, Watz BB, Buchlin JM (2020) Multiscale proper orthogonal decomposition (mpod) of tr-piv data-a case study on stationary and transient cylinder wake flows. Meas Sci Technol 31(9): https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab82be
Merino-Martinez R, Rubio Carpio A, Pereira L, Herk S, Avallone F, Ragni D, Kotsonis M (2020) Aeroacoustic design and characterization of the 3d-printed, open-jet, anechoic wind tunnel of delft university of technology. Appl Acoust 170: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107504
Migliore P, Oerlemans S (2004) Wind tunnel aeroacoustic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines. J Sol Energy Eng 126(4):974–985
Moreau S, Roger M (2005) Effect of angle of attack and airfoil shape on turbulence-interaction noise. In: Collection of technical papers - 11th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, vol 3. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-2973
Ninni D, Mendez MA (2020) Modulo: a software for multiscale proper orthogonal decomposition of data. 2004.12123
Niskanen M, Groby JP, Duclos A, Dazel O, Le Roux JC, Poulain N, Huttunen T, Lähivaara T (2017) Deterministic and statistical characterization of rigid frame porous materials from impedance tube measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 142(4):2407–2418. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5008742
Olsen W, Wagner J (1982) Effect of thickness on airfoil surface noise. AIAA J 20(3):437–439. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7922
Paruchuri C, Joseph P, Chong T, Priddin M, Ayton L (2020) On the noise reduction mechanisms of porous aerofoil leading edges. J Sound Vib 485: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115574
Paterson R, Amiet R (1976) Acoustic radiation and surface pressure characteristics of an airfoil due to incident turbulence. In: 3rd AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustic conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1976-571
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840531
Raiola M, Discetti S, Ianiro A (2015) On PIV random error minimization with optimal POD-based low-order reconstruction. Exp Fluids 56(56):75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1940-8
Roger M, Moreau S (2016) Airfoil turbulence-impingement noise reduction by porosity or wavy leading-edge cut: experimental investigations. In: 45th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, INTER-NOISE, Hamburg, Germany
Roger M, Schram C, Santana LD (2013) Reduction of airfoil turbulence-impingement noise by means of leading-edge serrations and/or porous material. In: 19th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2108
Sarradj E, Geyer T (2007) Noise generation by porous airfoils. In: 13th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), AIAA paper. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-3719
Satcunanathan S, Meinke M, Schröder W (2019) Prediction of noise mitigation by porous media based on a direct-hybrid cfd/caa method. In: 25th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2696
Satcunathan S, Zamponi R, Meinke M, Van de Wyer N, Schram C, Schröder W (2019) Validation of a model for acoustic absorption in porous media. In: 48th International congress and exhibition on noise control engineering, INTER-NOISE, Madrid
Scarano F, Moore P (2011) An advection-based model to increase the temporal resolution of piv time series. Exp Fluids 52:919–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1158-3
Schrijer FFJ, Scarano F (2008) Effect of predictor-corrector filtering on the stability and spatial resolution of iterative PIV interrogation. Exp Fluids 45(5):927–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0511-7
Sciacchitano A, Wieneke B (2016) PIV uncertainty propagation. Meas Sci Technol 27(8): https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/8/084006
Tandalam A, Balachandar R, Barron R (2010) Reynolds number effects on the near-exit region of turbulent jets. J Hydraul Eng 136(9):633–641. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000232
Teruna C, Avallone F, Casalino D, Ragni D (2020) Numerical investigation of leading edge noise reduction on a rod-airfoil configuration using porous materials and serrations. J Sound Vib 494: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115880
Towne A, Schmidt OT, Colonius T (2018) Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis. J Fluid Mech 847:821–867. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.283
Welch P (1967) The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 15(2):70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901
Westerweel J (1997) Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8(12):1379–1392. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/002
Westerweel J, Dabiri D, Gharib M (1997) The effect of a discrete window offset on the accuracy of cross-correlation analysis of digital PIV recordings. Exp Fluids 23(1):20–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050082
Wieneke B (2015) PIV uncertainty quantification from correlation statistics. Measur Sci Technol 26. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/7/074002
Zamponi R, Ragni D, Van de Wyer N, Schram C (2019) Experimental investigation of airfoil turbulence-impingement noise reduction using porous treatment. In: 25th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, 2019, AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2649
Zamponi R, Satcunanathan S, Moreau S, Ragni D, Meinke M, Schröder W, Schram C (2020) On the role of turbulence distortion on leading-edge noise reduction by means of porosity. J Sound Vib 485: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115561
Zamponi R, Moreau S, Schram C (2021) Rapid distortion theory of turbulent flow around a porous cylinder. J Fluid Mech 915:A27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.8
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the European Commission’s Framework Program “Horizon2020,” through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN) “SmartAnswer - Smart mitigation of flow-induced acoustic radiation and transmission” grant agreement No. 722401, to the present research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tamaro, S., Zamponi, R., Ragni, D. et al. Experimental investigation of turbulent coherent structures interacting with a porous airfoil. Exp Fluids 62, 94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03170-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03170-2