Skip to main content
Log in

Coupled measurements of interface topography and three-dimensional velocity field of a free surface flow

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complete energy balance evaluations for interfacial flow require simultaneous coupled estimations of the free surface topography and the flow velocity beneath the surface. We describe here an extension of the tomographic PIV and volumetric LPT technique for this coupled measurement. We applied this optical measurement technique to the study of three-dimensional (3D) flow at the air–water interface during the controlled fall of a droplet. Our original setup made it possible to monitor, in real time, the 3D position of fluorescent tracer particles, both on the surface and in the bulk flow. We overcame the shadow effect due to the presence of waves at the interface by illuminating the flow through the underside of a truncated squared pyramidal water tank. We chose to use a water tank of this shape to ensure that optical access could be established orthogonally through the walls of the tank. Four high-speed cameras were focused on the illuminated volume of the flow through the four lateral sides of the pyramidal water tank. The images of the four cameras were analyzed by 3D Lagrangian particle tracking velocimetry (Schanz et al. 2016). With this technique, we were able to track particles accurately at seeding densities compatible with the thresholds for tomographic PIV and to reduce considerably the number of ghost particles. We then obtained local 3D velocities by interpolating vector volumes from the discrete particles. The energy balance was determined by evaluating interface position and bulk flow velocity. Surface curvature and potential energy were determined from surface topography. The kinetic energy of the flow was derived from the bulk flow velocities. We then compared the energy balance thus obtained with that derived from direct visualization of the impact of the same drop. Our findings demonstrate the ability of this technique to characterize such complex interfacial flows in terms of their energetics.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agbaglah G, Thoraval MJ, Thoroddsen ST, Zhang LV, Fezzaa K, Deegan RD (2015) Drop impact into a deep pool: vortex shedding and jet formation. J Fluid Mech 764:764R1–764R12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aureli F, Maranzoni A, Mignosa P, Ziveri C (2011) An image processing technique for measuring free surface of dam-break flows. Exp Fluids 50:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benusiglio A, Quéré D, Clanet C (2014) Explosions at the water surface. J Fluid Mech 752:123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler O (2007) Impulsive fluid forcing and water strider locomotion. J Fluid Mech 573:211–236

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bush JW, Hu DL (2006) Walking on water: biolocomotion at the interface. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:339–369

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chatellier L, Jarny S, Gibouin F, David L (2013) A parametric PIV/DIC method for the measurement of free surface flows. Exp Fluids 54:1488–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobelli PJ, Maurel A, Pagneux V, Petitjeans P (2009) Global measurement of water waves by Fourier transform profilometry. Exp Fluids 46:1037–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douxchamps D, Devriendt D, Capart H, Craeye C, MacQ B, Zech Y (2005) Stereoscopic and velocimetric reconstructions of the free surface topography of antidune flows. Exp Fluids 39:533–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Noüy PL (1925) An interfacial tensiometer for universal use. J Gen Physiol 7:625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouras A, Lo Jacono D, Sheard GJ, Hourigan K (2008) Measurement of instantaneous velocity and surface topography in the wake of a cylinder at low Reynolds number. J Fluids Struct 24:1271–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Feng JJ (2010) A numerical investigation of the propulsion of water walkers. J Fluid Mech 668:363–383

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gesemann S, Huhn F, Schanz D, Schröder A (2016) From particle tracks to velocity and acceleration fields using B-splines and penalties. In: 18th international symposium on the application of laser and imaging techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Ghabache E, Antkowiak A, Josserand C, Séon T (2014) On the physics of fizziness: how bubble bursting controls droplets ejection. Phys Fluids 26:121701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilet T, Bourouiba L (2015) Fluid fragmentation shapes rain-induced foliar disease transmission. J R Soc Interface 12

  • Gomit G, Chatellier L, Calluaud D, David L (2013) Free surface measurement by stereo-refraction. Exp Fluids 54:1540–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu DL, Chan B, Bush JWM (2003) The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion. Nature 424:663–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon YJ, Gomit G, Earl T, Chatellier L, David L (2018) Sequential least-square reconstruction of instantaneous pressure field around a body from TR-PIV. Exp Fluids 59:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joung YS, Buie CR (2015) Aerosol generation by raindrop impact on soil. Nat Commun 6:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng LJ (2002) Splash formation by spherical drops. J Fluid Mech 427:73–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michon GJ, Josserand C, Séon T (2017) Jet dynamics post drop impact on a deep pool. Phys Rev Fluids 2:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moisy F, Rabaud M, Salsac K (2009) A synthetic Schlieren method for the measurement of the topography of a liquid interface. Exp Fluids 46:1021–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng I, Kumar V, Sheard GJ, Hourigan K, Fouras A (2011) Experimental study of simultaneous measurement of velocity and surface topography: in the wake of a circular cylinder at low Reynolds number. Exp Fluids 50:587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novara M, Batenburg KJ, Scarano F (2010) Motion tracking-enhanced MART for tomographic PIV. Meas Sci Technol 21:035401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein M (1993) Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces. Fluid Dyn Res 12:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein M (1996) The transitional regime between coalescing and splashing drops. J Fluid Mech 306:145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saylor JR (2003) The fate of soluble and insoluble surfactant monolayers subjected to drop impacts. Exp Fluids 34:540–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saylor JR, Grizzard NK (2003) The effect of surfactant monolayers on vortex rings formed from an impacting water drop. Phys Fluids 15:2852–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarano F (2013) Tomographic PIV: principles and practice. Meas Sci Technol 24:012001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanz D, Gesemann S, Schröder A (2016) Shake-The-Box: Lagrangian particle tracking at high particle image densities. Exp Fluids 57:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiders JF, Pröbsting S, Dwight RP, van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2016) Pressure estimation from single-snapshot tomographic PIV in a turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 57:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann T, Arutkin M, Cochard P, Raphaël E, Casas J, Benzaquen M (2018) Unsteady wave pattern generation by water striders. J Fluid Mech 848:370–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoraval MJ, Li Y, Thoroddsen ST (2016) Vortex-ring-induced large bubble entrainment during drop impact. Phys Rev E 93:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney DE, Anderer A, Banerjee S (2009) A method for three-dimensional interfacial particle image velocimetry (3D-IPIV) of an air–water interface. Meas Sci Technol 20:045403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieneke B (2008) Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 45:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieneke B (2013) Iterative reconstruction of volumetric particle distribution. Meas Sci Technol 24:024008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman S (2018) Real-time quantitative Schlieren imaging by fast Fourier demodulation of a checkered backdrop. Exp Fluids 59:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarin A (2006) Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 38:159–192

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Liu P, Qu Q, Hu T (2019) Energy conversion during the crown evolution of the drop impact upon films. Int J Multiphase Flow 115:40–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their work and their valuable insights, which enabled us to improve this paper. We thank Miguel Pineirua for his help with data analysis, and the ARC and Université de Tours/ Université de Poitiers for providing financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Steinmann.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steinmann, T., Casas, J., Braud, P. et al. Coupled measurements of interface topography and three-dimensional velocity field of a free surface flow. Exp Fluids 62, 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-03115-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-03115-1

Navigation