Advertisement

Passive control of coherent structures in a modified backwards-facing step flow

  • Pedro C. Ormonde
  • André V. G. Cavalieri
  • Roberto G. A. da Silva
  • Ana C. Avelar
Research Article
  • 237 Downloads

Abstract

We study a modified backwards-facing step flow, with the addition of two different plates; one is a baseline, impermeable plate and the second a perforated one. An experimental investigation is carried out for a turbulent reattaching shear layer downstream of the two plates. The proposed setup is a model configuration to study how the plate characteristics affect the separated shear layer and how turbulent kinetic energies and large-scale coherent structures are modified. Measurements show that the perforated plate changes the mean flow field, mostly by reducing the intensity of reverse flow close to the bottom wall. Disturbance amplitudes are significantly reduced up to five step heights downstream of the trailing edge of the plate, more specifically in the recirculation region. A loudspeaker is then used to introduce phase-locked, low-amplitude perturbations upstream of the plates, and phase-averaged measurements allow a quantitative study of large-scale structures in the shear-layer. The evolution of such coherent structures is evaluated in light of linear stability theory, comparing the eigenfunction of the Kelvin–Helmholtz mode to the experimental results. We observe a close match of linear-stability eigenfunctions with phase-averaged amplitudes for the two tested Strouhal numbers. The perforated plate is found to reduce the amplitude of the Kelvin–Helmholtz coherent structures in comparison to the baseline, impermeable plate, a behavior consistent with the predicted amplification trends from linear stability.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by CNPq Grant 444796/2014-2 and also by The Boeing Research and Technology–Brazil through the Boeing University Relations Program. The authors gratefully acknowledge the FENG laboratory for the support in the design, manufacturing and operation of the experimental campaign. We also thank Peter Jordan, Ardeshir Hanifi and Dan Henningson for the useful discussions. Pedro C. Ormonde acknowledges the financial support from CAPES via a M.Sc. scholarship. André Cavalieri was supported by a CNPq research scholarship.

References

  1. Adams EW, Johnston JP (1988) Effects of the separating shear layer on the reattachment flow structure Part 1: Pressure and turbulence quantities. Exp Fluids 6:400–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams EW, Johnston JP (1988) Effects of the separating shear layer on the reattachment flow structure Part 2: Reattachment length and wall shear stress. Exp Fluids 6:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adrian RJ (1991) Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23(1):261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adrian RJ, Yao CS (1985) Pulsed laser technique application to liquid and gaseous flows and the scattering power of seed materials. Appl Opt 24(1):44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayton LJ (2016) Acoustic scattering by a finite rigid plate with a poroelastic extension. J Fluid Mech 791:414–438MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Beneddine S, Sipp D, Arnault A, Dandois J, Lesshafft L (2016) Conditions for validity of mean flow stability analysis. J Fluid Mech 798:485–504MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharjee S, Scheelke B, Troutt TR (1986) Modification of vortex interactions in a reattaching separated flow. AIAA J 24(4):623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boujo E, Gallaire F (2015) Sensitivity and open-loop control of stochastic response in a noise amplifier flow: the backward-facing step. J Fluid Mech 762:361–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Brederode V, Bradshaw P (1972) Three-dimensional flow in nominally two-dimensional separation bubbles: flow behind a rearward-facing step I. Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College of Science and Technology, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bridges TJ, Morris PJ (1984) Differential eigenvalue problems in wich the parameter appears nonlinearly. J Comput Phys 55(3):437–460MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunn HH, Khan MA, Al-Kayiem HH, Fardad AA (1988) Velocity calibration relationships for hot-wire anemometry. J Phys E Sci Instrum 21(2):225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantwell BJ (1981) Organized motion in turbulent flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:457–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavalieri AVG, Wolf WR, Jaworski JW (2016) Numerical solution of acoustic scattering by finite perforated elastic plates. Proc R Soc A 472(2188):20150767MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavalieri AVG, Agarwal A (2013) The effect of base-flow changes in Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. In: Proceedings of the nineteenth AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, AIAA, Berlin, GER, vol 2088, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  15. Chun KB, Sung HJ (1996) Control of turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing step by local forcing. Exp Fluids 21(6):417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen J, Wygnanski I (1987) The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. Part 1. The linear growth of disturbances near the nozzle. J Fluid Mech 176:191–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crow SC, Champagne FH (1971) Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J Fluid Mech 48:547–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eaton JK, Johnston JP (1981) A review of research on subsonic turbulent flow reattachment. AIAA J 19(9):1093–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fontaine RA, Elliott GD, Austin JM, Freund JB (2015) Very near-nozzle shear-layer turbulence and jet noise. J Fluid Mech 770:27–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freymuth P (1966) On transition in a separated laminar boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 25:683–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gautier N, Aider JL (2013) Control of the separated flow downstream of a backward-facing step using visual feedback. Proc R Soc A 469(2160):20130404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ho CM, Huerre P (1984) Perturbed free shear layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 16(1):365–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Host-Madsen A, McCluskey DR (1994) On the accuracy and reliability of PIV measurements. In: Seventh international symposium on the application of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  24. Hussain AKMF, Reynolds WC (1970) The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. J Fluid Mech 41(2):241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaunet V, Jordan P, Cavalieri AVG (2017) Two-point coherence of wave packets in turbulent jets. Phys Rev Fluids 2(2):024604Google Scholar
  26. Jaworski JW, Peake N (2013) Aerodynamic noise from a poroelastic edge with implications for the silent flight of owls. J Fluid Mech 723:456-479Google Scholar
  27. Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1992) Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images. Appl Sci Res 49(3):191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo H, Fang X, Ertas B (2009) Hilbert transform and its engineering applications. AIAA J 47(4):923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Michalke A (1965) On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer. J Fluid Mech 23(3):521–544MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore CJ (1977) The role of shear-layer instability waves in jet exhaust noise. J Fluid Mech 80(2):321–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oberleithner K, Rukes L, Soria J (2014) Mean flow stability analysis of oscillating jet experiments. J Fluid Mech 757:1–32MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pralits JO, Hanifi A, Henningson DS (2002) Adjoint-based optimization of steady suction for disturbance control in incompressible flows. J Fluid Mech 467:129-161Google Scholar
  33. Prasad AK, Adrian RJ, Landreth CC, Offutt PW (1992) Effect of resolution on the speed and accuracy of particle image velocimetry interrogation. Exp Fluids 13(2–3):105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rienstra SW, Hirschberg A (2004) An introduction to acoustics. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  35. Roos F, Kegelman J (1986) Control of coherent structures in reattaching laminar and turbulent shear layers. AIAA J 24(12):1956–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sasaki K, Cavalieri AVG, Jordan P, Schmidt O, Colonius T, Brès GA (2017) High-frequency wavepackets in turbulent jets. J Fluid Mech 830Google Scholar
  37. Schmid PJ (2007) Nonmodal stability theory. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:129–162MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmid PJ, Henningson DS (2001) Stability and transition in shear flows. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Simpson RL (1989) Turbulent boundary-layer separation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 21(1):205–232CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Sinha SN, Gupta AK, Oberai MM (1981) Laminar separating flow over backsteps and cavities Part I: Backsteps. AIAA J 19(12):1527–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soria J (1996) An investigation of the near wake of a circular cylinder using a video-based digital cross-correlation particle image velocimetry technique. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 12(2):221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trefethen LN (2000) Spectral methods in MATLAB. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Trip R, Fransson JHM (2014) Boundary layer modification by means of wall suction and the effect on the wake behind a rectangular forebody. Phys Fluids 2(12):125105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trip R, Fransson JHM (2017) Bluff body boundary-layer modification and its effect on the near-wake topology. Phys Fluids 29(9):095105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wee D, Yi T, Annaswamy A, Ghoniem AF (2004) Self-sustained oscillations and vortex shedding in backward-facing step flows: simulation and linear instability analysis. Phys Fluids 16:3361CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Westerweel J (1994) Efficient detection of spurious vectors in particle image velocimetry data. Exp Fluids 16(3–4):236–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Willert CE, Gharib M (1991) Digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 10(1):181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. de Brederode V (2014) Aerodinamica Incompressivel: Fundamentos. IST Press, LisboaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro C. Ormonde
    • 1
  • André V. G. Cavalieri
    • 1
  • Roberto G. A. da Silva
    • 1
  • Ana C. Avelar
    • 2
  1. 1.Divisão de Engenharia AeronáuticaInstituto Tecnológico de AeronáuticaSão José dos CamposBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Aeronáutica e EspaçoSão José dos CamposBrazil

Personalised recommendations