Abstract
A new image process for quantifying both convection velocities (U C) and scales (λ d) of turbulent structures captured in a fast-framing schlieren movie is presented. We obtained 90 time-series schlieren images of a transverse jet into a Mach 2 supersonic flow with 1-MHz sampling. The schlieren images captured not only the shock and expansion waves but also the turbulent structures within the jet and the boundary layer. The image intensities were extracted along the outer edges of the jet and the boundary layer and were remapped as a time–space intensity map. The time–space map exhibited swept stripe patterns, indicating that stable turbulent structures were periodically generated and convected downstream. The angle and interval of the stripe patterns were efficiently extracted using the two-dimensional Fourier transform, which corresponded to U C and λ d of the dominant structures. The zero-padding fast Fourier transform and the sub-pixel estimation of the spectral peak positions in the Fourier domain improved the accuracy for evaluating the angle and interval of the stripes, which resulted in the accurate evaluation of U C and λ d. The proposed method was validated by comparing U C obtained using the proposed method to those obtained via schlieren image velocimetry for both the transverse jet and the supersonic boundary layer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- D :
-
Injector diameter, mm
- f :
-
Frequency, Hz
- f d :
-
Formation frequency of dominant structure, Hz
- f s :
-
Frame rate of camera, fps
- I :
-
Original image
- \(\hat{I}\) :
-
Spatial-averaged intensity
- \(I\text{n}\) :
-
Normalized image
- \(\overline{{I\text{n}}}\) :
-
Time-averaged image
- \(I\text{n}^{\prime }\) :
-
Fluctuating image
- J :
-
Jet-to-freestream momentum flux ratio
- k :
-
Wave number, m−1 (=1/λ)
- k d :
-
Wave number of dominant structure, m−1
- N :
-
Total number of frames
- N S :
-
Data length in space
- N T :
-
Data length in time
- px, py :
-
Total number of pixels in streamwise and heightwise directions
- r k :
-
Distance from center to high-amplitude point in frequency-wave-number domain
- s :
-
Distance along relevant trajectory of motion
- U C :
-
Convection speed of turbulent structure, m/s
- U ∞ :
-
Freestream velocity (=507 m/s)
- V j :
-
Jet exit velocity (=874 m/s)
- x, y, z :
-
Streamwise, heightwise, and spanwise directions, mm
- δ 99 :
-
Boundary-layer thickness, determined by 99% of freestream velocity
- Δx :
-
Spatial resolution of charge-coupled device sensor (=0.28 mm/pixel)
- Δs :
-
Spatial resolution of time–space map, mm/pixel
- λ :
-
Wavelength of turbulent structure, mm
- \(\hat{\sigma }\) :
-
Spatial-standard-deviation intensity
- \(\overline{{\sigma \text{n}}}\) :
-
Standard-deviation image
- θ :
-
Angle of stripe pattern on time–space map, °
- θ k :
-
Angle to high-amplitude point in two-dimensional power spectrum, °
- n :
-
Frame number
- i, j :
-
Streamwise and heightwise pixel numbers of schlieren image
References
Ben-Yakar A, Hanson RK (2002) Ultra-fast-framing schlieren system for studies of the time evolution of jets in supersonic crossflows. Exp Fluids 32:652–666. doi:10.1007/s00348-002-0405-z
Ben-Yakar A, Mungal MG, Hanson RK (2006) Time evolution and mixing characteristics of hydrogen and ethylene transverse jets in supersonic crossflow. Phys Fluid 18(2):026101-1–026101-16. doi:10.1063/1.2139684
Biswas S, Qiao L (2017) A comprehensive statistical investigation of schlieren image velocimetry using high-velocity helium jet. Exp Fluids. doi:10.1007/s00348-017-2305-2
Brown GL, Roshko A (1974) On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J Fluids Mech 64(4):775–816. doi:10.1017/S002211207400190X
Bueno PC, Ganapathisubramani B, Clemens NT, Dolling DS (2005) Cinematographic planar imaging of a Mach 2 shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. AIAA 2005-0441. doi:10.2514/6.2005-441
Comte-Bellot G, Sarma GR (2001) Constant voltage anemometer practice in supersonic flows. AIAA J 39(2):261–270. doi:10.2514/2.1321
Ganapathisubramani B, Clemens NT, Dolling DS (2006) Large-scale motions in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 556:271–282. doi:10.1017/S0022112006009244
Ganapathisubramani B, Clemens NT, Dolling DS (2007) Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock-induced separation. J Fluid Mech 585:369–394. doi:10.1017/S0022112007006799
Gruber MR, Nejad AS, Chen TH, Dutton JC (1997) Large structure convection velocity measurements in compressible transverse injection flowfields. Exp Fluids 22(5):397–407. doi:10.1007/s003480050066
Hargather MJ, Lawson MJ, Settles GS (2011) Seedless velocimetry measurements by schlieren image velocimetry. AIAA J 49(3):611–620
Jonassen D, Settles GS, Tronosky MD (2006) Schlieren PIV for turbulent flows. Opt Lasers Eng 44(3–4):190–207. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.04.004
Kim KC, Adrian RJ (1999) Very large-scale motion in the outer layer. Phys Fluids 11(2):417–423. doi:10.1063/1.869889
Kondo A, Hayase H, Sakaue S, Arai T (2009) Effect of expansion ramp angle on supersonic mixing using streamwise vortices. AIAA2009-7314. doi:10.2514/6.2009-7314
Kondo A, Sakaue S, Arai T (2010) Measurement method of mass flux and concentration in supersonic mixing by hot-wire anemometry. Int J Emerg Multidiscip Fluid Sci 2(1):15–26. doi:10.1260/1756-8315.2.1.15
Lourenco L, Krothapalli A (1995) On the accuracy of velocity and vorticity measurements with PIV. Exp Fluids 18:421–428
Poggie J, Leger T (2015) Large-scale unsteadiness in a compressible. Turbulent reattaching shear layer. Exp Fluids 56:205. doi:10.1007/s00348-015-2064-x
Poggie J, Erbland PJ, Smits AJ, Miles RB (2004) Quantitative visualization of compressible turbulent shear flows using condensate-enhanced Rayleigh scattering. Exp Fluids 37:438–454. doi:10.1007/s00348-004-0828-9
Smith MW, Smits AJ (1995) Visualization of the structure of supersonic turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 18:288–302. doi:10.1007/bf00195099
Spina EF, Donovan JF, Smits AJ (1991) On the structure of high-Reynolds-number supersonic turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 222:293–327. doi:10.1017/S0022112091001118
Suzuki H, Nagata K, Sakai Y, Hasegawa Y (2012) Improved PIV analysis using an interpolation technique. Trans JSME (Series B) 78:1248–1259. doi:10.1299/kikaib.78.1248 (in Japanese)
Thurow B, Jiang N, Lempert W (2013) Review of ultra-high repetition rate laser diagnostics for fluid dynamic measurements. Meas Sci Technol 24:012002. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/24/1/012002
Uramoto S, Kouchi T, Masuya G (2016) Effects of upstream disturbances on supersonic flowfield with transverse injection. J Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 64(4):244–252. doi:10.2322/jjsass.64.244
Willert C, Gharib M (1991) Digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 10(4):182–193. doi:10.1007/BF00190388
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist (B), 20760105 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 15H04199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kouchi, T., Masuya, G. & Yanase, S. Extracting dominant turbulent structures in supersonic flow using two-dimensional Fourier transform. Exp Fluids 58, 98 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2377-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2377-z