Skip to main content
Log in

The density near-field of a non-uniformly heated supersonic jet

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents analyses of high-speed schlieren images that depict the spatio-temporal structure of near-field sound in uniformly and non-uniformly heated supersonic round jets. The non-uniformly heated jet has a concentrated region of locally lower total temperature flow around the centerline of an ideally expanded jet. Compared to the uniform jet, the non-uniform jet is shown to reduce jet noise by up to 2 ± 0.5 dB in the peak narrowband sound pressure level at polar angles upstream of the peak directivity. Space-time correlations are performed on frequency-filtered time series of fluctuating schlieren image intensities, an analog for the fluctuating near-field density gradients. The effect of path integration is evaluated using synthetic schlieren of the dominant azimuthal jet modes, which are simulated using the azimuthal basis function of the Fourier transform. Hydrodynamic structures are identified at low frequencies and are shown to be modified by the thermal non-uniformity at axial locations in the near- and far-nozzle regions. The mid-frequency range is dominated by convecting Mach waves that are decorrelated in the thermally non-uniform jet in the near- and far-nozzle regions. Correlations of the high frequency content capture the emission of an acoustic beam. Results indicate the perturbations induced by the thermal non-uniformity can persist far into the developing flow field and reduce the length scale of coherent structures in regions far from the nozzle exhaust. This suggests centerline base flow changes can be optimized to reduce the acoustic efficiency of unsteady flow structures present near strong noise-producing areas such as the potential core collapse region.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors may provide data upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

A :

Schlieren intensity, counts

a :

Upper limit of the radial basis function (m)

c :

Speed of sound (m/s)

D :

Nozzle diameter (m)

F :

Static thrust (N)

f :

Frequency (Hz)

\(f_\mathrm{s}\) :

Sampling frequency (Hz)

\(G_{11}\) :

Auto-spectral density, counts\(^2\)/Hz

\(G_{12}\) :

Cross-spectral density, counts\(^2\)/Hz

\(J_m\) :

mth order Bessel function

k :

Wave number (1/m)

M :

Mach number

\({\dot{m}}\) :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

N :

Record length

\(N_{\mathrm{rec}}\) :

Number of records

\(N_\mathrm{n}\) :

Normalization factor

NPR:

Nozzle pressure ratio, \(p_0/p_{\infty }\)

n :

Refractive index

p :

Static pressure (pa)

\(p_0\) :

Total pressure (pa)

\(R_{11}\) :

Auto-correlation, counts\(^2\)

\(R_{12}\) :

Cross-correlation, counts\(^2\)

\(R_{nm}\) :

Radial part of the basis function

\(\mathrm{Re}\) :

Reynolds number, \(\rho U D/\mu\)

r :

Radius coordinate from jet centerline (m)

SPL:

Sound pressure level

T :

Static temperature (K)

\(T_0\) :

Total temperature, K

TTR:

Total temperature radio, \(T_0/T_{\infty }\)

t :

Time (s)

U :

Mean axial velocity (m/s)

x :

Jet axial coordinate relative to exhaust (m)

y :

Jet vertical coordinate relative to centerline (m)

z :

Jet horizontal coordinate relative to centerline (m)

\(\gamma\) :

Specific heat ratio

\(\gamma _{12}^2\) :

Coherence

\(\varDelta\) :

Difference between the normalized synthetic schlieren and the pressure gradient along the radius.

\(\epsilon\) :

Light ray deflection on the xy image plane

\(\zeta\) :

Separation in y (m)

\(\theta _0\) :

Polar angle (°)

\(\kappa\) :

Gladstone dale constant (m)\(^3\)/kg

\(\xi\) :

Separation in x (m)

\(\rho\) :

Density (kg/m)\(^3\)

\(\rho _{12}\) :

Normalized cross correlation coefficient

\(\tau\) :

Separation in t (s)

\(\tau ^*\) :

Non-dimensional time lag, \(\tau U/D\)

\(\varPhi _{nm}\) :

Angular component of the basis function

\(\phi\) :

Azimuthal angle, deg

\(\varPsi _{nm}\) :

Basis function

\(\bar{\omega ^2}\) :

Root mean square of the window function

i :

Incident angle

j :

Uniform flow condition

m :

Azimuthal mode number

n :

Eigenvalue

p :

Primary heated flow

s :

Secondary un-heated flow

t :

Transmitted angle

\(\infty\) :

Ambient condition

\(E{[\cdot ]}\) :

Ensemble average

\({[\cdot ]}^{*}\) :

Complex conjugate

\({[\cdot ]}'\) :

Fluctuating component

\({<\cdot >}\) :

Temporal average

\({\mathcal{F}}{[\cdot ]}\) :

Discrete Fourier transform

References

  • Akamine M, Tsutsumi S, Okamoto K, Teramoto S, Nonaka S (2021) Interpretation of multilobe wavepackets in spectral proper orthogonal decomposition of supersonic jet. AIAA J 60(1):56–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JD (2003) Modern compressible flow. Tata McGraw-Hill Education

  • Arndt RE, Long D, Glauser MN (1997) The proper orthogonal decomposition of pressure fluctuations surrounding a turbulent jet. J Fluid Mech 340:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert A, McKinley R (2011) Measurements of jet noise aboard us navy aircraft carriers. In: AIAA centennial of naval aviation forum “100 years of achievement and progress”, pp AIAA 2011–6947

  • Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1988) Random data. Analysis and Measurement Pro

  • Berry M, Magstadt A, Glauser MN (2017) Application of pod on time-resolved schlieren in supersonic multi-stream rectangular jets. Phys Fluids 29(2):020706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brès GA, Towne A, Lele SK (2019) Investigating the effects of temperature non-uniformity on supersonic jet noise with large-eddy simulation. In: 25th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2019–2730

  • Cavalieri A, Jordan P, Colonius T, Gervais Y (2011) Axisymmetric superdirectivity in subsonic jets. In: 17th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (32nd AIAA aeroacoustics conference), p 2743

  • Crighton D, Gaster M (1976) Stability of slowly diverging jet flow. J Fluid Mech 77(2):397–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112076002176

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel K, Mayo DE Jr, Lowe KT, Ng WF (2019) Space-time description of the density near-field in a non-uniformly heated jet. In: 25th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2019–2474

  • Daniel KA, Mayo DE Jr, Lowe KT, Ng WF (2019) Use of thermal non-uniformity to reduce supersonic jet noise. AIAA J 57(10):4467–4475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker T, Lowe KT, Ng WF (2017) On the distribution and scaling of convective wavespeeds in the shear layers of heated supersonic jets. Flow, Turbul Combust 98(2):355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ffowcs Williams J (1963) The noise from turbulence convected at high speed. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Seri A, Math Phys Sci 255(1061):469–503

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler H (1988) Coherent structures in turbulent flows. Prog Aerosp Sci 25(3):231–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher M, Harper-Bourne M, Glegg S (1977) Jet engine noise source location: the polar correlation technique. J Sound Vib 51(1):23–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnaud X, Lesshafft L, Schmid P, Huerre P (2013) The preferred mode of incompressible jets: linear frequency response analysis. J Fluid Mech 716:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.540

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glegg S, Devenport W (2017) Aeroacoustics of low Mach number flows: fundamentals, analysis, and measurement. Academic Press

  • Hay TA, Valdez J, Tinney CE, Hamilton M, Schram C (2019) Sampling artifacts in quantitative schlieren. In: 25th AIAA/ceas aeroacoustics conference, p 2635

  • Henderson BS, Huff DL (2016) The aeroacoustics of offset three-stream jets for future commercial supersonic aircraft. In: 22nd AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2016–2992

  • Henderson BS, Leib SJ (2015) Measurements and predictions of the noise from three-stream jets. In: 21st AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2015–3120

  • Huff DL, Henderson BS, Berton JJ, Seidel JA (2016) Perceived noise analysis for offset jets applied to commercial supersonic aircraft. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, pp AIAA 2016–1635

  • Jordan P, Colonius T (2013) Wave packets and turbulent jet noise. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 45:173–195

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Juvé D, Sunyach M, Comte-Bellot G (1980) Intermittency of the noise emission in subsonic cold jets. J Sound Vib 71(3):319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo CW, Buisson Q, McLaughlin DK, Morris PJ (2013) Experimental investigation of near-field pressure fluctuations generated by supersonic jets. In: 19th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2013–2033

  • Kuo CW, McLaughlin DK, Morris PJ, Viswanathan K (2014) Effects of jet temperature on broadband shock-associated noise. AIAA J 53(6):1515–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill MJ (1954) On sound generated aerodynamically ii. Turbulence as a source of sound. Proc Royal Soc London Ser A. Math Phys Sci 222(1148):1–32

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo DE Jr, Daniel KA, Lowe KT, Ng WF (2019) Mean flow and turbulence of a heated supersonic jet with temperature nonuniformity. AIAA J 57(8):3493–3500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison G, McLaughlin D (1979) Noise generation by instabilities in low reynolds number supersonic jets. J Sound Vib 65(2):177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray NE, Lyons GW (2016) On the convection velocity of source events related to supersonic jet crackle. J Fluid Mech 793:477–503

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Papamoschou D (2018) Modelling of noise reduction in complex multistream jets. J Fluid Mech 834:555–599

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Papamoschou D, Phong VC (2017) The very near pressure field of single-and multi-stream jets. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, pp AIAA 2017–0230

  • Papamoschou D, Xiong J, Liu F (2014) Reduction of radiation efficiency in high-speed jets. In: 20th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2014–2619

  • Pickering E, Rigas G, Nogueira PAS, Cavalieri AVG, Schmidt OT, Colonius T (2020) Lift-up, Kelvin–Helmholtz and ORR mechanisms in turbulent jets. J Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.301

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Powers RW, Kuo CW, McLaughlin DK (2013) Experimental comparison of supersonic jets exhausting from military style nozzles with interior corrugations and fluidic inserts. In: 19th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2013–2186

  • Quinn AM, Daniel K, Lowe KTL, Ng WF (2019) Outdoor acoustic measurements of the virginia tech heated supersonic jet rig using ground microphones. In: AIAA sciTech 2019 forum, pp AIAA 2019–1581

  • Saltzman AJ, Lowe KT, Ng WF (2021) Finite control volume and scalability effects in velocimetry for application to aeroacoustics. Exp Fluids 62(2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt OT, Schmid PJ (2019) A conditional space–time pod formalism for intermittent and rare events: example of acoustic bursts in turbulent jets. J Fluid Mech 867

  • Schmidt OT, Towne A, Rigas G, Colonius T, Brès GA (2018) Spectral analysis of jet turbulence. J Fluid Mech 855:953–982

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Settles GS (2001) Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques: visualizing phenomena in transparent media. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Stuber M, Lowe KT, Ng WF (2019) Synthesis of convection velocity and turbulence measurements in three-stream jets. Exp Fluids 60(5):83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam CK, Chen P (1994) Turbulent mixing noise from supersonic jets. AIAA J 32(9):1774–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanna H (1980) Coannular jets: are they really quiet and why? J Sound Vib 72(1):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinney C, Jordan P (2008) The near pressure field of co-axial subsonic jets. J Fluid Mech 611:175–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinney CE, Schram CF (2019) Acoustic modes from a mach 3 jet. In: 25th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, pp AIAA 2019–2598

  • Wang Q, Ronneberger O, Burkhardt H (2008) Fourier analysis in polar and spherical coordinates. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Institut für Informatik

Download references

Funding

This work was sponsored by Navy Grants N00014-16-1-2444 and N00014-14-1-2836, which are funded by the Office of Naval Research and managed by Steven Martens.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle A. Daniel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in the creation of this content.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daniel, K.A., Mayo, D.E., Lowe, K.T. et al. The density near-field of a non-uniformly heated supersonic jet. Exp Fluids 63, 67 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03413-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03413-w

Navigation