Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of pitching phase angle and amplitude on a two-dimensional flapping wing in hovering mode

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a fundamental investigation of the effects of pitching phase angle (ϕ) and pitching amplitude (α A) on the aerodynamics of a two-dimensional (2D) flapping wing executing simple harmonic motion in hovering mode. A force sensor and digital particle image velocimetry were employed to obtain the time-dependent aerodynamic forces acting on the wing and the associated flow structures, respectively. Pitching phase angle ranging from 0° to 360° at three different pitching amplitudes, that is, 30°, 45° and 60°, was studied. Our experimental results revealed that the largest lift and lift/drag ratio were achieved under the condition of advanced pitching (ϕ > 90°). However, further increasing ϕ beyond a certain value would not enhance the average lift any more. In contrast, the delayed pitching (ϕ < 90°) would cause the average lift to decrease and generally the averaged drag to increase, compared to the normal pitching (ϕ = 90°), overall reducing the lift/drag ratio greatly. Our experimental results also supported the findings of Lua et al. (J Exp Fluids 51:177–195, 2011) that there are two kinds of wing–wake interactions, and they can either enhance or reduce lift on the wing depending on the wing motion and the timing of the reverse stroke. Our results show that wing–wake interaction of the first kind normally has an adverse effect on lift generation when the wing is undergoing delayed pitching but has a positive effect on the lift when the wing is undergoing advanced pitching motion. When the ϕ became larger, the second kind of wing–wake interaction, that is, sliding of the leading edge vortex under the wing, will cause the concurrent fall in lift and drag.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c :

Chord length

C L :

Lift coefficient

C D :

Drag coefficient

f :

Flapping frequency

F A :

Instantaneous force parallel to the chord

F D :

Drag

F L :

Lift

F N :

Instantaneous force normal to the chord

Re :

Reynolds number = U rms c/v

S :

Wing platform area

t :

Current time

t* :

Non-dimensional time = t/T

T :

Flapping period

U max :

Maximum heaving velocity

U rms :

Root mean square of the heaving velocity

α :

Instantaneous pitch angle relative to the heaving motion

ϕ :

Phase angle difference between pitching and heaving motion

v :

Kinematic viscosity of the fluid

ρ :

Density of the fluid

References

  • Birch JM, Dickinson MH (2003) The influence of wing–wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. J Exp Biol 206:2257–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos FM, Lentink D, van Oudheusden BW, Bijl H (2008) Influence of wing kinematics on aerodynamic performance in hovering insect flight. J Fluid Mech 594:341–368

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgoyne DA, Hamel JM, Ceccio SL, Dowling DR (2003) Time-averaged flow over a hydrofoil at high Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 496:365–404

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson M (1994) The effects of wing rotation on unsteady aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds numbers. J Exp Biol 192:179–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson MH, Lehmann F-O, Sane SP (1999) Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284:1954–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellington CP (1984) The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. 4. aerodynamic mechanisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 305:79–113. doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellington CP, Van Den Berg C, Willmott AP, Thomas AL (1996) Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384:626–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freymuth P (1990) Thrust generation by an airfoil in hover modes. Exp Fluids 9:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lua KB, Lim TT, Yeo K, Oo G (2007) Wake-structure formation of a heaving two-dimensional elliptic airfoil. AIAA J 45:1571–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lua KB, Lim TT, Yeo KS (2008) Aerodynamic forces and flow fields of a two-dimensional hovering wing. Exp Fluids 45:1047–1065. doi:10.1007/s00348-008-0527-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lua KB, Lim TT, Yeo KS (2011) Effect of wing–wake interaction on aerodynamic force generation on a 2D flapping wing. Exp Fluids 51:177–195. doi:10.1007/s00348-010-1032-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luff J, Drouillard T, Rompage A, Linne M, Hertzberg J (1999) Experimental uncertainties associated with particle image velocimetry (PIV) based vorticity algorithms. Exp Fluids 26:36–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sane SP, Dickinson MH (2001) The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag. J Exp Biol 204:2607–2626

    Google Scholar 

  • Sane SP, Dickinson MH (2002) The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. J Exp Biol 205:1087–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Tang J (2002) Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J Exp Biol 205:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang J, Viieru D, Shyy W (2008) Effects of Reynolds number and flapping kinematics on hovering aerodynamics. AIAA J 46:967–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZJ (2000) Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering. Phys Rev Lett 85:2216–2219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZJ (2004) The role of drag in insect hovering. J Exp Biol 207:4147–4155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JC (1981) Theory for aerodynamic force and moment in viscous flows. AIAA J 19(4):432–441

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. B. Lua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lua, K.B., Zhang, X.H., Lim, T.T. et al. Effects of pitching phase angle and amplitude on a two-dimensional flapping wing in hovering mode. Exp Fluids 56, 35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1907-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1907-9

Keywords

Navigation