Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of unsteady pressure fields on turrets with different surface features using pressure-sensitive paint

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatially temporally resolved unsteady pressure fields on a surface of a hemisphere-on-cylinder turret with either a flat or a conformal window with realistic features such as gaps and “smile” cutouts were characterized using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint at M = 0.33 for several window viewing angles. Various statistical properties of pressure fields were computed, and geometry effects on the unsteady pressure fields were analyzed and discussed. Proper orthogonal decomposition was also used to extract dominant pressure modes and corresponding temporal coefficients and to analyze and compare instantaneous pressure structures for different turret geometric features and the window viewing angles. An unsteady separation off the turret and a recirculation region downstream of the turret were identified as dominant sources of the unsteady pressure. It was found that while all geometric features affected the unsteady pressure field, the “smiles,” positioned spanwise-symmetrically on both sides of the turret, were the leading cause of these changes, followed by the looking forward flat window. The gaps, the side- and the back-looking flat window introduced only small local changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian RJ (1977) On the role of conditional averages in turbulence theory. In: Zakin J, Patterson G (eds) Proceedings of the fourth biennial symposium on turbulence in liquids. Science Press, Princeton, pp 323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley J (1993) The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25(1):539–575

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet JP, Cole DR, Delville J, Glauser MN, Ukeiley LS (1994) Stochastic estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition: complementary techniques for identifying structure. Exp Fluids 17:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns R, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ, Gogineni S, Paul M, Wittich DJ (2014) Estimation of aero-optical wavefronts using optical and non-optical measurements. AIAA paper 2014-0319

  • Carlbom I, Paciorek J (1978) Planar geometric projections and viewing transformations. ACM Comput Surv 10(4):465–502

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen K, Siegel S, Wetlesen D, Camero J, Sick A (2004) Effective sensor placements for the estimation of proper orthogonal decomposition mode coefficients in von Karman vortex street. J Vib Control 10(12):1857–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2012) The study of aero-optical and mechanical jitter for flat window turrets. AIAA paper 2012-0623

  • De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2013a) In-flight aero-optics of turrets. J Opt Eng 52(7):071405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ, Hird K, Juliano TJ, Gregory JW, Thordahl J, Wittich DJ (2013b) The estimation of the unsteady force applied to a turret in flight. AIAA paper 2013-3136

  • Everson RM, Sirovich L (1995) The Karhunen–Loeve transform for incomplete data. J Opt Soc Am A 12(8):1657–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Disotell KJ, Long SR, Gregory JW, Semmelmayer FC, Guyton RW (2011) Application of fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint to a hemispherical dome in unsteady transonic flow. Exp Fluids 50(6):1495–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Long SR, Disotell KJ, Gregory JW, Semmelmayer FC, Guyton RW (2012) Comparison of unsteady pressure-sensitive paint measurement techniques. AIAA J 50(1):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2010) Fluid dynamics and aero-optics of turrets. Prog Aerosp Sci 46:388–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordeyev S, Post M, MacLaughlin T, Ceniceros J, Jumper EJ (2007) Aero-optical environment around a conformal-window turret. AIAA J 45(7):1514–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordeyev S, Cress J, Smith A, Jumper EJ (2010) Improvement in optical environment over turrets with flat window using passive flow control. AIAA paper 2010-4492

  • Gordeyev S, Burns R, Jumper EJ, Gogineni S, Paul M, Wittich DJ (2013) Aero-optical mitigation of shocks around turrets at transonic speeds using passive flow control. AIAA paper 2013-0717

  • Gregory JW, Asai K, Kameda M, Liu T, Sullivan JP (2008) A review of pressure-sensitive paint for high-speed and unsteady aerodynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 222(2):249–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JW, Sakaue H, Liu T, Sullivan JP (2014) Fast pressure-sensitive paints for flow and acoustic diagnostics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:303–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralick RM (1980) Using perspective transformations in scene analysis. Comput Graph Image Process 13:191–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hird K, Juliano TJ, Gregory JW, De Lucca N, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ, Thordahl J, Wittich DJ (2013) Study of unsteady surface pressure on a turret via pressure-sensitive paint. AIAA paper 2013-3135

  • Jelic R, Sherer S, Greendyke R (2013) Simulation of various turrets at subsonic and transonic flight conditions using overflow. J Aircr 50:398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jumper EJ, Zenk M, Gordeyev S, Cavalieri D, Whiteley MR (2013) Airborne aero-optics laboratory. J Opt Eng 52(7):071408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Sullivan JP (2005) Pressure and temperature sensitive paints. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan PE, Visbal MR (2012a) Numerical simulation of flow over a submerged hemispherical flat-window turret. AIAA paper 2012-3042

  • Morgan PE, Visbal MR (2012b) Hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/Large–Eddy simulation investigating control of flow over a turret. J Aircr 49(6):1700–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan PE, White MD, Visbal MR (2011) Simulation of aero-optics for flow over a flat-window hemispherical turret. AIAA paper 2011-3264

  • Porter C, Gordeyev S, Zenk M, Jumper EJ (2013) Flight measurements of the aero-optical environment around a flat-windowed turret. AIAA J 51(6):1394–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan TN, Sullivan GD, Baker KD (1993) On computing the perspective transformation matrix and camera parameters. In: Proceedings of the 4th British machine vision conference, Surrey, England, pp 125–134

  • Vukasinovic B, Glezer A, Gordeyev S, Jumper EJ (2013) Flow control for aero-optics application. Exp Fluids 54:1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Air Force Research Laboratory, Directed Energy Directorate and the High Energy Laser Division of the Joint Technology Office (HEL JTO) and supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research through Grant Number FA9550-07-1-0574. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The authors also wish to thank Dr. Jim Crafton of Innovative Scientific Solutions, Inc., for his many useful suggestions about the PSP technique.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislav Gordeyev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordeyev, S., De Lucca, N., Jumper, E.J. et al. Comparison of unsteady pressure fields on turrets with different surface features using pressure-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids 55, 1661 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1661-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1661-9

Keywords

Navigation