Skip to main content
Log in

Velocity measurements in the near field of a diesel fuel injector by ultrafast imagery

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the velocity profile of fuel issuing from a high-pressure single-orifice diesel injector. Velocities of liquid structures were determined from time-resolved ultrafast shadow images, formed by an amplified two-pulse laser source coupled to a double-frame camera. A statistical analysis of the data over many injection events was undertaken to map velocities related to spray formation near the nozzle outlet as a function of time after start of injection. These results reveal a strong asymmetry in the liquid profile of the test injector, with distinct fast and slow regions on opposite sides of the orifice. Differences of ∼100 m/s can be observed between the ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ sides of the jet, resulting in different atomization conditions across the spray. On average, droplets are dispersed at a greater distance from the nozzle on the ‘fast’ side of the flow, and distinct macrostructure can be observed under the asymmetric velocity conditions. The changes in structural velocity and atomization behavior resemble flow structures which are often observed in the presence of string cavitation produced under controlled conditions in scaled, transparent test nozzles. These observations suggest that widely used common-rail supply configurations and modern injectors can potentially generate asymmetric interior flows which strongly influence diesel spray morphology. The velocimetry measurements presented in this work represent an effective and relatively straightforward approach to identify deviant flow behavior in real diesel sprays, providing new spatially resolved information on fluid structure and flow characteristics within the shear layers on the jet periphery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachalo WD (1994) Experimental methods in multiphase flows. Int J Multiph Flow 20(0):261–295

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bradski G, Kaehler A (2008) Learning openCV: computer vision with the OpenCV library. O’Reilly Media, 1 edn, ISBN 978-0-596-51613-0

  • Chaves H, Kirmse C, Obermeier F (2004) Velocity measurements of dense diesel fuel sprays in dense air. Atom Sprays 14(6):589–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabiri S, Sirignano WA, Joseph DD (2007) Cavitation in an orifice flow. Phys Fluids 19(7):072112.1–072112.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabiri S, Sirignano WA, Joseph DD (2010) A numerical study on the effects of cavitation on orifice flow. Phys Fluids 22(4):042102–042102–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danckert B, Affolter PK (2001) Ways of nozzle geometry optimisation for new injection systems, fulfilling future emission limits. In: Proceedings of the 23rd world congress on combustion engine technology for ship propulsion, power generation, rail traction, volume 2 of proceedings of CIMAC. CIMAC, Hamburg, Germany (2001)

  • Fielding J, Long MB, Fielding G, Komiyama M (2001) Systematic errors in optical-flow velocimetry for turbulent flows and flames. Appl Optics 40(6):757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannadakis E, Gavaises M, Arcoumanis C (2008) Modelling of cavitation in diesel injector nozzles. J Fluid Mech 616:153–193

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hespel C, Blaisot J-B, Gazon M, Godard G (2012) Laser correlation velocimetry performance in diesel applications: spatial selectivity and velocity sensitivity. Exp Fluids 53(1):245–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idlahcen S, Rozé C, Girasole T, Blaisot J-B (2012) Sub-picosecond ballistic imaging of a liquid jet. Exp Fluids 52(2):289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König G, Blessing M (2000) Database of cavitation effects in nozzles for model verification: geometry and pressure effects on cavitating nozzle flow. DaimlerChrysler AG

  • Kristensson E, Richter M, Aldén M (2010) Nanosecond structured laser illumination planar imaging for single-shot imaging of dense sprays. Atom Sprays 20(4):337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger S, Grünefeld G (1999) Stereoscopic flow-tagging velocimetry. Appl Phys B Lasers Optics 69(5):509–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebas R, Ménard T, Beau PA, Berlemont A, Demoulin FX (2009) Numerical simulation of primary break-up and atomization: DNS and modelling study. Int J Multiph Flow 35(3):247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linne MA, Paciaroni ME, Berrocal E, Sedarsky D (2009) Ballistic imaging of liquid breakup processes in dense sprays. In: Proceedings of the combustion institute vol 32, pp 2147–2161

  • Luo Y, Duraiswami R (2008) Canny edge detection on nvidia cuda. In: Computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. Proceedings of CVPRW, pp 1–8. IEEE

  • Marks TK, Hershey JR, Movellan JR (2010) Tracking motion, deformation, and texture using conditionally gaussian processes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(2):348–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauger C (2012) Cavitation dans un micro-canal modèle d'injecteur diesel: méthodes de visualisation et influence de l'état de surface. PhD thesis, University of Lyon

  • Ménard T, Tanguy S, Berlemont A (2007) Coupling level set/vof/ghost fluid methods: validation and application to 3d simulation of the primary break-up of a liquid jet. Int J Multiph Flow 33(5):510–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newberry MV (1991) Signal-to-noise considerations for sky-subtracted ccd data. Publ Astron Soc Pac 103(659):122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell CF, Kastengren A, Liu Z, Fezzaa K (2011) The effects of diesel injector needle motion on spray structure. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 133(1):012802.1–012802.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffel M, Willert CE, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J (2007) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer, New York, 2 edn, ISBN 9783540723073

  • Ramírez A, Som S, Aggarwal S, Kastengren A, El-Hannouny E, Longman D, Powell C (2009) Quantitative x-ray measurements of high-pressure fuel sprays from a production heavy duty diesel injector. Exp Fluids 47(1):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedarsky D, Berrocal E, Linne MA (2011) Quantitative image contrast enhancement in time-gated transillumination of scattering media. Opt Express 19(3):1866–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedarsky D, Gord JR, Carter C, Meyer TR, Linne MA (2009) Fast-framing ballistic imaging of velocity in an aerated spray. Opt Lett 34(18):2748–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedarsky D, Idlahcen S, Blaisot J-B, Rozé C (2012) Planar velocity analysis of diesel spray shadow images. In: Proceedings of multiphase flow and transport phenomena, MFTP, Apr. 2012

  • Sedarsky D, Paciaroni ME, Linne MA, Gord JR, Meyer TR (2006) Velocity imaging for the liquid-gas interface in the near field of an atomizing spray: proof of concept. Opt Lett 31(7):906–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavit U, Chigier N (1995) Fractal dimensions of liquid jet interface under breakup. Atom Sprays 5(6):525–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokumaru PT, Dimotakis PE (1995) Image correlation velocimetry. Exp Fluids 19:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NADIA-Bio program, with funding from the French Government and the Haute-Normandie region, in the framework of the Moveo cluster (“private cars and public transport for man and his environment").

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Sedarsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sedarsky, D., Idlahcen, S., Rozé, C. et al. Velocity measurements in the near field of a diesel fuel injector by ultrafast imagery. Exp Fluids 54, 1451 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1451-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1451-9

Keywords

Navigation