Skip to main content
Log in

Fence probe measurement of flow reversal in separating turbulent boundary layers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A small fence probe was evaluated for measurements in the time-dependent flow reversal region of the transition from boundary layer to separated flow. For moderate and high Reynolds numbers, the fence probe is demonstrated to be a usable tool for the measurement of the reverse flow associated with separation. Although the present probe pressure transducer system was limited to approximately 200 Hz, pulses of positive and negative shear stress were readily detected. At or near the location of zero surface shear stress, the measurements were limited by the signal-to-noise ratio. For the separated flow investigated, a marked reduction in the pressure gradient occurred when the fence probe indicated approximately 20 % reversal for the higher Reynolds numbers. The reversal increased to 24 % for the lower Reynolds numbers. The measurements indicate that flow reversal alone may not be adequate to identify the degree of separation. Upstream of turbulent boundary layer (intermittent) separation, the duration of the reversed shear stress was found to be very short (0.002–0.007 s), suggesting a local, small-scale, impulse-type separation. At and beyond the location of intermittent separation, the shear stress reversal duration was an order of magnitude longer. Estimates of the maximum and minimum surface shear stress in the separation region were also obtained with the fence probe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c f :

Skin friction coefficient \(\frac{\tau_w}{\frac{1}{2}\rho U^2_ e}\)

c p,o :

Pressure coefficient \(\frac{p-p_o}{\frac{1}{2}\rho U_{\rm {ref}}^2}\)

d :

Test section height

G :

Clauser’s integral shape parameter \(\frac{1}{\Updelta} \int_0^\infty \left(\frac{U_e-U}{U_\tau}\right)^2{\rm d}y\)

h :

Fence height

h * :

Non-dimensional fence height \(\frac{h U_\tau}{\nu}\)

H :

Velocity profile shape factor δ*

n :

Coordinate across the boundary layer

p :

Static pressure

p o :

Static pressure at minimum cross-section

\(\Updelta p\) :

Pressure difference across the fence

\(\Updelta p^+\) :

Non-dimensional pressure difference \(\frac{\Updelta p h^2}{\rho\nu^2}\)

Re/m :

Reference Reynolds number per meter at tunnel inlet

R θ :

Momentum thickness Reynolds number

S :

Mean zero surface shear stress correlation, Eq. 2

s :

Coordinate along the test wall

U :

Mean velocity

U e :

Mean velocity at the edge of the boundary layer

U τ :

Shear stress velocity \(\sqrt{\frac{\tau_w}{\rho}}\)

U * :

Wall similarity velocity \(\frac{U}{U_\tau}\)

y * :

Wall similarity coordinate \(\frac{y U_\tau}{\nu}\)

δ* :

Displacement thickness \(\int_0^\infty \left(1-\frac{U}{U_e}\right){\rm d}y\)

\(\Updelta\) :

Clauser’s integral parameter \(\int_0^\infty \frac{U_e-U}{U_\tau}{\rm d}y\)

ρ:

Mass density

θ:

Momentum thickness \(\int_0^\infty \frac{U}{U_e}\left(1-\frac{U}{U_e}\right){\rm d}y\)

τ w :

Surface shear stress

τ + w :

Non-dimensional surface shear stress \(\frac{\tau_w h^2}{\rho\nu^2}\)

ν:

Kinematic viscosity

References

  • Cassel KW (2000) A comparison of Navier-Stokes solutions with the theoretical description of unsteady separation. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond A 358:3207–3227

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clauser FH (1954) Turbulent bounder layers in adverse pressure gradients. J Aeronaut Sci 21(2):91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernholz HH, Janke G, Schober M, Wagner PM, Warnock D (1996) New developments and applications of skin-friction measuring techniques. Meas Sci Tech 7:1396–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller G (2004) Exact theory of unsteady separation for two-dimensional flow. J Fluid Mech 512:257–311

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwieg H, Tillman W (1950) Investigation of the wall shearing stress in turbulent boundary layers. NACA TM 1285

  • McLaughlin DK, Tiederman W (1973) Biasing correction for individual realization of laser anemometer measurements in turbulent flow. Phys Fluids 16(12):2082–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandborn VA (2003) Reynolds number correlations for separated turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J 41(4):744–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandborn VA (2008) Near surface velocity distributions for intermittent separation of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Eng 130(4):041203-1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandborn VA, Kline SJ (1961) Flow models in boundary layer stall inception. J Basic Eng 83(3):317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandborn VA, Liu CY (1968) On turbulent boundary layer separation. J Fluid Mech 23(2):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober RI, Obermeier E, Pirskawetz S, Fernholz HH (2004) A MEMS skin friction sensor for time resolved measurements in separated flow. Exp Fluids 36:593–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RL (1989) Turbulent boundary layer separation. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 21:205–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RL, Strickland JH, Barr KPW (1974) Laser and hot film anemometer measurements in a separating boundary layer. Report No. WT-3, NTIS AD-Ao0115. Thermal and Fluid Science Center. Southern Methodist University

  • Simpson RL, Chew XT, Shivaprasad BG (1980) Measurements of a separating boundary layer. Project SQUID, Report No. SMU-4-PU, NTIS AD-Ao09525213

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung H. Seong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandborn, V.A., Seong, S.H. Fence probe measurement of flow reversal in separating turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids 53, 391–399 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1295-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1295-3

Keywords

Navigation