Skip to main content
Log in

Transition mechanisms in laminar separation bubbles with and without incoming wakes and synthetic jet effects

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laminar separation and transition processes of the boundary layer developing under a strong adverse pressure gradient, typical of Ultra-High-Lift turbine profiles, have been experimentally investigated for a low Reynolds number case. The boundary layer development has been surveyed for different conditions: with steady inflow, with incoming wakes and with the synchronized forcing effects due to both incoming wakes and synthetic jet (zero net mass flow rate jet). In this latter case, the jet Strouhal number has been set equal to half the wake-reduced frequency to synchronize the unsteady forcing effects on the boundary layer. Measurements have been taken by means of a single-sensor hot-wire anemometer. For the steady inflow case, particle image velocimetry has been employed to visualize the large-scale vortical structures shed as a consequence of the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability mechanism. For the unsteady inflow cases, a phase-locked ensemble averaging technique, synchronized with the wake and the synthetic jet frequencies, has been adopted to reconstruct the boundary layer space-time evolution. Results have been represented as color plots, for several time instants of the forcing effect period, in order to provide an overall view of the time-dependent transition and separation processes in terms of ensemble-averaged velocity and unresolved unsteadiness distributions. The phase-locked distributions of the unresolved unsteadiness allowed the identification of the instability mechanisms driving transition as well as the Kelvin–Helmholtz structures that grow within the separated shear layer during the incoming wake interval and the synthetic jet operating period. Incoming wakes and synthetic jet effects in reducing and/or suppressing flow separation are investigated in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C μ :

Jet momentum coefficient \(=\frac{\overline{I}_{j}}{0.5\rho_{0}U_{{\rm ref}}^{2}S}\)

f :

Frequency

f + :

Incoming wake reduced frequency \(=\frac{f_{{\rm wake}}L}{U_{0}}\)

H 1,2 :

Boundary layer shape factor

\(\overline{I_{j}}\) :

Mean jet momentum \(=\frac{1}{T_{j}/2}\rho_{j}S_{j}\int\limits_{0}^{T_{j}/2}u_{j}^{2}(t)\hbox{d}t\)

L :

Plate length

r :

Jet to main flow velocity ratio \(r=\frac{{u}_{{\rm M,j}}}{U_{{\rm ref}}}\)

Re :

Inlet Reynolds number = U 0 L

S :

Main flow passage section

S j :

Synthetic jet passage section

St :

Synthetic jet Strouhal number \(=\frac{f_{j}L}{U_{0}}\)

t :

Time

T :

Wake passage period

T j :

Synthetic jet period

u :

Streamwise velocity

\(\overline{u}\) :

Mean velocity within the separated shear layer

u j :

Velocity induced by synthetic jet actuation

U 0 :

Inlet free-stream velocity

U e :

Local free-stream velocity

u infl :

Streamwise velocity at the inflection point

u M,j :

Maximum jet velocity

urms :

Velocity fluctuation root mean square

U ref :

Time-averaged free-stream velocity at x/L = 0.3

U wake :

Incoming wake peripheral velocity

x :

Axial coordinate

y :

Coordinate normal to the wall

δ w :

Vorticity thickness \(=\Updelta u/(\partial u/\partial y)_{{\rm max}}\)

\(\varphi\) :

Flow coefficient \(=\frac{U_{0}}{U_{{\rm wake}}}\)

λ2 :

Imaginary part of the velocity gradient tensor eigenvalue

ν:

Kinematic viscosity

ρ0 :

Main flow density

ρ j :

Synthetic jet density

ω*:

Dimensionless vortex shedding frequency = \(0.25\delta_{w}(2\pi f)/\overline{u}\)

′:

Fluctuating component

\( \left\langle {} \right\rangle \) :

Ensemble-averaged quantity

References

  • Alam M, Sandham N (2000) Direct numerical simulation of ‘short’ laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. J Fluid Mech 410:1–28

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Amitay M, Pitt D, Glazer A (2002) Separation control in duct flows. J Aircr 39:616–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avdis A, Lardeau S, Leschziner M (2009) Large eddy simulation of separated flow over a two-dimensional hump with and without control by means of a synthetic slot-jet. Flow Turbul Combust 83:343–370

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham M, Reinmann D, Crapo K, Pluim J, Bons JP (2008) Synchronizing separation flow control with unsteady wakes in a low-pressure turbine cascade. ASME J Turbomach 131:021,019.1–021,019.9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bons JL, Pluim J, Gompertz K, Bloxham M, Clark J (2008) The application of flow control to an aft-loaded low pressure turbine cascade with unsteady wakes. ASME paper GT2008-50864

  • Burgmann S, Schröder W (2008) Investigation of the vortex induced unsteadiness of a separation bubble via time-resolved and scanning piv measurements. Exp Fluids 45:675–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar S (1961) Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dovgal A, Kozlov V, Michalke A (1994) Laminar boundary layer separation: instability and associated phenomena. Prog Aerosp Sci 30:61–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gad-el-Hak M, Bushnell D (1991) Separation control: review. ASME J Fluids Eng 113:5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilarranz JL, Rediniotis OK (2001) High-power synthetic jet actuators for flow separation control. AIAA paper 2001-0737

  • Greenblatt D, Paschal KB, Yao CS, Harris J (2006) Experimental investigation of separation control part 2: zero mass-efflux oscillatory blowing. AIAA J 44:2831–2845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hain R, Kähler C, Radespiel R (2009) Dynamics of laminar separation bubbles at low-reynolds- number aerofoils. J Fluid Mech 630:129–153

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead DE, Wisler DC, Okiishi T, Walker GJ, Hodson HP, Shin HW (1997) Boundary layer development in axial compressors and turbines: part 1 of 4- composite picture. ASME J Turbomach 119:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson HP, Howell RJ (2005) The role of transition in high-lift low-pressure turbines for aeroengines. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:419–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Sandberg R, Sandham N (2008) Direct numerical simulations of forced and unforced separation bubbles on an airfoil at incidence. J Fluid Mech 602:175–207

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kubacki S, Lodefier K, Zarzycki R, Elsner W, Dick E (2009) Further development of a dynamic intermittency model for wake-induced transition. Flow Turbul Combust 83:539–568

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lang M, Rist U, Wagner S (2004) Investigations on controlled transition development in a laminar separation bubble by means of lda and piv. Exp Fluids 36:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazaro BJ, Gonzalez E, Vazquez R (2009) Unsteady loss production mechanisms in low Reynolds number, high lift, low pressure turbine profiles. ASME paper GT2007-28142

  • Lengani D, Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Bertini F (2011) Application of a synthetic jet to control boundary layer separation under ultra-high-lift turbine pressure distribution. Flow Turbul Combust 87:597–616

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lou W, Hourmouziadis J (2000) Separation bubbles under steady and periodic-unsteady main flow conditions. ASME J Turbomach 122:634–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marxen O, Lang M, Rist U, Wagner S (2003) A combined experimental/numerical study of unsteady phenomena in a laminar separation bubble. Flow Turbul Combust 71:133–146

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mayle RE (1991) The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines. ASME J Turbomach 113:509–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe B, Yaras M (2010) Transition mechanisms in separation bubbles under low- and elevated-freestream turbulence. ASME J Turbomach 132:011,004–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal R, Rampunggoon P, Udaykumar HS (2001) Interaction of a synthetic jet with a flat plate boundary layer. AIAA paper 2001-2773

  • Monkewitz PA, Huerre P (1982) The influence of the velocity ratio on the spatial instability of mixing layers. Phys Fluids 25:1137–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauley LL, Moin P, Reynolds WC (1990) The structure of two-dimensional separation. J Fluid Mech 220:397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rist U, Maucher U (1994) Direct numerical simulation of 2-d and 3-d instability waves in a laminar separation bubble. In: Proceedings of the AGARD symposium on application of direct and large eddy simulation to transition and turbulence, AGARD-CP-551, Chania, Crete

  • Satta F, Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Bertini F (2010) Experimental investigation of separation and transition processes on a high-lift low-pressure turbine profile under steady and unsteady inflow at low reynolds number. J Therm Sci 19:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satta F, Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Bertini F (2010) Synthetic jet design criteria and application for boundary layer separation control. WSEAS Trans Fluid Mech 5:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Satta F, Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Bertini F (2011) Separated-flow transition process on a low-pressure turbine blade under steady and unsteady inflows. In: Proceedings of 9th European turbomachinery conference, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Schmid PJ, Henningson DS (2001) Stability and transition in shear flows. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Lengani D, Bertini F (2012) An experimental investigation of the separated-flow transition under high-lift turbine blade pressure gradients. Flow Turbul Combust 88(1–2):45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourabh SD, Ramesh O (2009) On the origin of the inflectional instability of a laminar separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 629:263–298

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spalart P, Strelets M (2000) Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 403:329–349

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Watmuff JH (1999) Evolution of a wave packet into vortex loops in a laminar separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 397:119–169

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Voke PR (2001) Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. J Fluid Mech 439:305–333

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang PF, Wang JJ, Feng LH (2008) Review of zero-net-mass-flux jet and its application in separation flow control. Sci China Ser E-Tech Sci 51(9):1315–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S (1996) Autogeneration of nearwall vortical structures in channel flow. Phys Fluids 8:288–290

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the European Commission as part of the research project TATMo, ‘Turbulence and Transition Modeling for Special Turbomachinery Applications’. The authors thank Ph.D. Andrea Ghiglione for the precious support in the design and manufacturing of the facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Simoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simoni, D., Ubaldi, M., Zunino, P. et al. Transition mechanisms in laminar separation bubbles with and without incoming wakes and synthetic jet effects. Exp Fluids 53, 173–186 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1281-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1281-9

Keywords

Navigation