Skip to main content
Log in

Direct measurements of controlled aerodynamic forces on a wire-suspended axisymmetric body

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel in-line miniature force transducer is developed for direct measurements of the net aerodynamic forces and moments on a bluff body. The force transducers are integrated into each of the eight mounting wires that are utilized for suspension of an axisymmetric model in a wind tunnel having minimal wake interference. The aerodynamic forces and moments on the model are altered by induced active local attachment of the separated base flow. Fluidic control is effected by an array of four integrated aft-facing synthetic jet actuators that emanate from narrow, azimuthally segmented slots, equally distributed around the perimeter of the circular tail end. The jet orifices are embedded within a small backward-facing step that extends into a Coanda surface. The altered flow dynamics associated with both quasi-steady and transitory asymmetric activation of the flow control effect is characterized by direct force and PIV measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A j :

Actuator orifice cross-sectional area

C μ :

Jet momentum coefficient

ΔC N :

Difference in normal-force coefficient

D :

Axisymmetric body diameter

R :

Axisymmetric body radius

k :

Turbulent kinetic energy

U :

Mean axial velocity component

V :

Mean radial velocity component

U 0 :

Free stream velocity

U j :

Average jet velocity

T :

Jet period

Re D :

Reynolds number

Re j :

Jet Reynolds number

St D :

Strouhal number

E s :

Strain gage readout

f :

Actuation frequency

t :

Time

ζ :

Mean vorticity component

θ :

Temperature

References

  • Allen D, Smith BL (2009) Axisymmetric Coanda-assisted vectoring. Exp Fluids 46:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett RM, Farmer MG, Mohr RL, Hall WE (1978) Wind-tunnel technique for determining stability derivatives from cable-mounted models. J Aircraft 15(5):304–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Corke T, Tillotson D, Patel M, Su W, Toldeo W (2008) Radius flow vectoring for plasma drag and steering control using plasma actuators. AIAA-2008-3769

  • Englar RJ (2000) Circulation control pneumatic aerodynamics: Blown force and moment augmentation and modification - past, present & future. AIAA-2000-2541

  • Englar RJ (2001) Advanced aerodynamic devices to improve the performance, economics, and handling and safety of heavy vehicles. SAE Technical Paper Series 2001-01-2072

  • Freund J, Mungal M (1994) Drag and wake modification of axisymmetric bluff bodies using Coanda blowing. J Aircraft 31(3):572–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geropp D, Odenthal H-J (2000) Drag reduction of motor vehicles by active flow control using the Coanda effect. Exp Fluids 28:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond D, Redekopp L (1997) Global dynamics and aerodynamic flow vectoring of wakes. J Fluid Mech 338:231–248

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi H, Van Langen P, Sawada H, Tinney CE (2006) Axial flow over a blunt circular cylinder with and without shear layer reattachment. J Fluids Struct 22:949–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho CM, Huerre P (1984) Perturbed free shear layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 16:365–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiya M, Mochizuki O, Tamura H, Nozawa T, Ishikawa R, Kushioka K (1990) Turbulence properties of an axisymmetric separation-and-reattaching flow. AIAA J 29(6):936–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig K, Roshko A (1985) An experimental study of geometrical effects on the drag and flow field of two bluff bodies separated by a gap. J Fluid Mech 156:167–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornilov V (2005) Skin-friction reduction on body of revolution using boundary-layer alteration devices. AIAA J 43(10):2125–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurn A (1968) Drag measurements on a series of afterbodies at transonic speeds showing the effects of sting interference. Aeronautical research council current papers 984

  • Lim D, Redekopp L (2002) Aerodynamic flow-vectoring of a planar jet in a co-flowing stream. J Fluid Mech 450:343–375

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Magill JC, Wehe SD (2002) Initial test of a wire suspension mount for missile virtual flight testing. AIAA-2002-0169

  • Magill JC, Cataldi P, Morency JR, Burgess R, Daugherty C, Jeter E (2004) Demonstration of a wire suspension for dynamic wind tunnel testing. AIAA-2004-1296

  • McMichael J, Lovas A, Plostins P, Sahu J, Brown G, Glezer A (2004) Microadaptive flow control applied to a spinning projectile. AIAA-2004-2512

  • Newman BG (1961) The deflexion of plane jets by adjacent boundaries-Coanda effect. In: Lachmann GV (ed) Boundary layer and flow control principles and applications, vol 1, Pergamon Press Inc., New York, pp 232–264

  • Parsons JS, Goodson RE, Goldschmied FR (1974) Shaping of axisymmetric bodies for minimum drag in incompressible flow. J Hydronautics 8(3):100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao SS (1990) Mechanical vibrations, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart C, McMichael JM, Glezer A (2003) Transitory flow and force development on a body of revolution using synthetic jet actuation. AIAA-2003-0618

  • Sigurdson LW (1995) The structure and control of a turbulent reattaching flow. J Fluid Mech 298:139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BL, Glezer A (1998) The formation and evolution of synthetic jets. Phys Fluids 10(9):2281–2297

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BL, Glezer A (2002) Jet vectoring using synthetic jets. J Fluid Mech 458:1–34

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vukasinovic B, Glezer A (2006) Transitory fluidic control of turbulent shear flows. AIAA-2006-3227

  • Weickgenannt A, Monkewitz P (2000) Control of vortex shedding in an axisymmetric bluff body wake. Euro J Mech-B/Fluids 19(5):789–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Wille R, Fernholz H (1965) Report on the first European mechanics colloquium on the Coanda effect. J Fluid Mech 23:801–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Army Research Office.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bojan Vukasinovic.

Appendix: model’s natural frequencies

Appendix: model’s natural frequencies

The axisymmetric body suspended in the hoop frame, as described in Sect. 2, can be modeled as a spring-mass system, having a single central mass supported by eight springs, when only a longitudinal vibration component of the support wires is considered. Consequently, such a simplified model does not incorporate support-wire tension as a parameter, since only transverse component of vibration depends on tension. Each of the mounting wires has a longitudinal and a transverse vibration component. If the transverse mode is secondary due to the dominant central mass, the longitudinal vibration is utilized to model each wire as a spring, and that vibration frequency is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the wire and inversely proportional to the attached mass and the wire length (Rao 1990)

$$ f \approx \sqrt {{\frac{A \times E}{m \times l}}} = \sqrt {\frac{k}{m}} , $$
(1)

where m is the mass, k is the equivalent spring constant, A is the cross-sectional wire area, l is the wire length, and E is Young Modulus of wire. In the present system, each wire is braided bronze that has a cross-sectional area of 1.11 × 10−6 m2, a Young Modulus of 110 Gpa, and a length of 0.33 m. Therefore, the equivalent spring constant is 3.7 × 105 N/m.

The suspended model has a configuration of

$$ \left( {X + x,Y + y,Z + z} \right), $$
(2)

under assumption x, y, z ≪ X, Y, Z, where X, Y, Z are the coordinates of the model about the cg, and x, y, z are perturbations in the three axial directions. The end points of the wires, connected to the hoop frame, are assumed to be rigid. During the small motions of suspended model, each of the springs (mounting wires) provides a restoring force (Rao 1990)

$$ \sum\limits_{1}^{8} {\bar{F}_{i} = m\bar{a}} = \sum\limits_{1}^{8} {k\delta_{i} } , $$
(3)

where \( \bar{a} = \ddot{x}\,\bar{i} + \ddot{y}\,\bar{j} + \ddot{z}\,\bar{k}, \) and \( \delta_{i} = \delta_{i} \left( {x,y,z,X,Y,Z,l} \right), \) \( \bar{F} \) is the restoring force, \( \bar{a} \) is the model acceleration, m is the mass of the body, and δ is the wire displacement. All the wires are identical (k 1 = k 2 = k i = k) and symmetrical around the central body, having the same angle with respect to the three coordinate axes. Decomposing the forces into the three coordinate axes using geometry yields the following equations,

$$ \begin{aligned} m\ddot{x} & = & 4k \times u_{1} \times \bar{i} \times \left[ {\left( {\sqrt {\left( {Y + y} \right)^{2} + \left( {X + x} \right)^{2} + \left( {Z + z} \right)^{2} } - l} \right) - \left( {\sqrt {\left( {Y - y} \right)^{2} + \left( {X - x} \right)^{2} + \left( {Z - z} \right)^{2} } - l} \right)} \right] \\ m\left( {\ddot{y} + \bar{g}} \right) & = & 4k \times u_{2} \times \bar{j} \times \left[ {\left( {\sqrt {\left( {Y + y} \right)^{2} + \left( {X + x} \right)^{2} + \left( {Z + z} \right)^{2} } - l} \right) - \left( {\sqrt {\left( {Y - y} \right)^{2} + \left( {X - x} \right)^{2} + \left( {Z - z} \right)^{2} } - l} \right)} \right], \\ m\ddot{z} & = & 4k \times u_{3} \times \bar{k} \times \left[ {\left( {\sqrt {\left( {Y + y} \right)^{2} + \left( {X + x} \right)^{2} + \left( {Z + z} \right)^{2} } - l} \right) - \left( {\sqrt {\left( {Y - y} \right)^{2} + \left( {X - x} \right)^{2} + \left( {Z - z} \right)^{2} } - l} \right)} \right] \\ \end{aligned} $$
(4)

where \( l = \sqrt {X^{2} + Y^{2} + Z^{2} } \) and u 1, u 2, u 3 are the components of the unit vector, u, along the length of each wire.

Applying a first-order Taylor expansion about (x 0, y 0, z 0),

$$ f(x,y,z) \cong f(x_{0} ,y_{0} ,z_{0} ) + f_{x} (x_{0} ,y_{0} ,z_{0} ) \cdot (x - x_{0} ) + f_{y} (x_{0} ,y_{0} ,z_{0} ) \cdot (y - y_{0} ) + f_{z} (x_{0} ,y_{0} ,z_{0} ) \cdot (z - z_{0} ) $$

where \( (x_{0} ,y_{0} ,z_{0} ) = (0,0,0) \), yields the following three equations:

$$ \begin{gathered} \ddot{x} = {\frac{{8 \times k \times u{}_{1}}}{m}}\left( {xu_{1} + yu_{2} + zu_{3} } \right)\bar{i} \hfill \\ \ddot{y} = {\frac{{8 \times k \times u_{2} }}{m}}\left( {xu_{1} + yu_{2} + zu_{3} } \right)\bar{j} - \bar{g}. \hfill \\ \ddot{z} = {\frac{{8 \times k \times u_{3} }}{m}}\left( {xu_{1} + yu_{2} + zu_{3} } \right)\bar{k} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(5)

The wires in the assembly of the model (Fig. 1) each have a unit vector of \(\overline{u} = \pm 0.712\overline{i} + \pm 0.496\overline{j} + \pm 0.496\overline{k} \). Using Matlab, the above equations are solved numerically. The natural frequencies in the (x, y, z) directions for the model are (295, 205, and 205 Hz).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abramson, P., Vukasinovic, B. & Glezer, A. Direct measurements of controlled aerodynamic forces on a wire-suspended axisymmetric body. Exp Fluids 50, 1711–1725 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-1023-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-1023-9

Keywords

Navigation