Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Velocity profiles and interface instability in a two-phase fluid: investigations using ultrasonic velocity profiler

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study the velocity profiles and the instability at the interface of a two phase water-oil fluid were investigated. The main aim of the research project was to investigate the instability mechanisms that can cause the failure of an oil spill barrier. Such mechanisms have been studied before for a vast variety of conditions (Wicks in Fluid dynamics of floating oil containment by mechanical barriers in the presence of water currents. In: Conference on prevention and control of oil spills, pp 55–106, 1969; Fannelop in Appl Ocean Res 5(2):80–92, 1983; Lee and Kang in Spill Sci Technol Bull 4(4):257–266, 1997; Fang and Johnston in J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng ASCE 127(4):234–239, 2001; among others). Although the velocity field in the region behind the barrier can influence the failure significantly, it had not been measured and analyzed precisely. In the present study the velocity profiles in the vicinity of different barriers were studied. To undertake the experiments, an oil layer was contained over the surface of flowing water by means of a barrier in a laboratory flume. The ultrasonic velocity profiler method was used to measure velocity profiles in each phase and to detect the oil–water interface. The effect of the barrier geometry on velocity profiles was studied. It was determined that the contained oil slick, although similar to a gravity current, can not be considered as a gravity current. The oil–water interface, derived from ultrasonic echo, was used to find the velocity profile in each fluid. Finally it was shown that the fluctuations at the rearward side of the oil slick head are due to Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amini A (2007) Contractile floating barriers for confinement and recuperation of oil slicks. PhD thesis, No. 3941, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

  • Amini A, De Cesare G, Schleiss AJ (2006) Interface tracking and velocity profile in an oil–water two-phase flow. In: Fifth international symposium on ultrasonic Doppler methods for fluid mechanics and fluid engineering, ISUD 5, Switzerland, pp 125–128

  • Amini A, Kantoush SA, Schleiss AJ (2008) Velocity field measurements in the vicinity of an oil spill barrier using LSPIV method. In: International conference on fluvial hydraulics, River Flow, Turkey (accepted)

  • Benjamin TB (1968) Gravity currents and related phenomena. J Fluid Mech 31:209–248

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Britter RE, Simpson JE (1978) Experiments on dynamics of a gravity current head. J Fluid Mech 88(2):223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers JJH (2007) Dissipation equals production in the log layer of wall-induced turbulence. Phys Fluids 19(10)

  • Chandrasekhar S (1961) Hydrodynamics and hydromagnetic stability. Oxford

  • De Cesare G, Schleiss A (1999) Turbidity current monitoring in a physical model flume using ultrasonic doppler method. In: Second international symposium on ultrasonic Doppler methods for fluid mechanics and fluid engineering, Switzerland, pp 61–64

  • Delvigne GAL (1991) On scale modeling of oil droplet formation from spilled oil. In: 12th international oil spill conference

  • Drazin PG, Reid WH (2004) Hydrodynamic stability, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Fang F, Johnston AJ (2001) Oil containment by boom in waves and wind. III: Containment failure. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng ASCE 127(4):234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fannelop TK (1983) Loss rates and operational limits for booms used as oil barriers. Appl Ocean Res 5(2):80–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CM, Kang KH (1997) Prediction of oil boom performance in currents and waves. Spill Sci Technol Bull 4(4):257–266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LT, Langevin D, Farnoux B (1991) Neutron reflectivity of an oil–water interface. Phys Rev Lett 67(19):2678–2681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibovich S (1976) Oil slick instability and entrainment failure of oil containment booms. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 98(1):98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons RG (2004) Understanding digital signal processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Halle PTR, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Met-Flow (2002) UVP-DUO User’s guide, Release 5, Met-Flow SA, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Milgram JH, Van Houten RJ (1978) Mechanics of a restrained layer of floating oil above a water current. J Hydronautics 12(3):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura H, Kondo M, Kukita Y (1996) Simultaneous measurement of liquid velocity and interface profiles of horizontal duct wavy flow by ultrasonic velocity profile meter. In: First international symposium on ultrasonic Doppler methods for fluid mechanics and fluid engineering, Villigen, Switzerland, pp 29–32

  • Nakamura H, Kondo M, Kukita Y (1998) Simultaneous measurement of liquid velocity and interface profiles of horizontal duct wavy flow by ultrasonic velocity profile meter. Nuclear Eng Des 184:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting H, Gersten K (1999) Boundary layer theory. Springer, Heidelberg

  • Shin JO, Dalziel SB, Linden PF (2004) Gravity currents produced by lock exchange. J Fluid Mech 521:1–34

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson JE (1972) Effects of the lower boundary on the head of a gravity current. J Fluid Mech 53(4):759–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson JE (1997) Gravity Currents: in the Environment and the Laboratory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Simpson JE, Britter RE (1979) The dynamics of the head of a gravity current advancing over a horizontal surface. J Fluid Mech 94(3):477–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda Y (1995) Velocity profile measurement by ultrasonic doppler method. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 10(4):444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trallero JL, Sarica C, Brill JP (1996) A study of oil–water flow patterns in horizontal pipes. In: SPE annual technical conference, Denver, USA, pp 363–375

  • Von Karman T (1940) The engineer grapples with nonlinear problems. Bull Am Math Soc 46:615–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks M (1969) Fluid dynamics of floating oil containment by mechanical barriers in the presence of water currents. In: Conference on prevention and control of oil spills, pp 55–106

  • Willemetz JC (1996) Influences of fixed and moving interfaces in the measurement of velocity profiles. In: First international symposium on ultrasonic Doppler methods for fluid mechanics and fluid engineering, Villigen, Switzerland, pp 63–66

  • Xu Q (1992) Density currents in shear flow- a two-fluid model. J Atmos Sci 49(6):511–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Moncrieff MW (1994) density current circulation in shear flows. J Atmos Sci 51(3):434–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha GC (2004) Boundary-layer loss mechanism and assessment of wall function for turbulence modeling. AIAA J 42(11):2387–2390

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research project is financed by the Swiss Petroleum Union under grant No. 4’09’02. The authors express their appreciation to Prof. Dr. Y. Takeda for his helpful comments on the measurements and data analysis, and to Met-Flow for providing technical support. The two anonymous reviewers are also greatly acknowledged for their detailed and useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Amini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amini, A., De Cesare, G. & Schleiss, A.J. Velocity profiles and interface instability in a two-phase fluid: investigations using ultrasonic velocity profiler. Exp Fluids 46, 683–692 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0594-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0594-1

Keywords

Navigation