Abstract
A theoretical analysis of the spatial resolution in terms of modulation transfer function of the Stereo PIV technique with and without the correction of the misalignment error is performed, and the results show that some wavelengths of the flow field can be significantly dephased and modulated. A performance assessment has been conducted with both synthetic and real images and shows a good agreement with the theoretical analysis. The reconstruction of the three-dimensional displacement field is achieved using both the methods proposed by Soloff et al. (Meas Sci Technol 8:1441–1454, 1997) and by Willert (Meas Sci Technol 8:1465–1479, 1997).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This happens because the stereoscopic setup used here is same side symmetric. For an opposite side symmetric setup, both the local viewing angles and the MTF2C relative to the two cameras are equal in the same physical point, but they change inside the image and then, also in this case, the MTF of the 3C vector is not uniform on the object plane.
Abbreviations
- 2C:
-
Two components (u, v)
- 2D:
-
Bidimensional
- 3C:
-
Three components (u, v, w)
- 3D:
-
Tridimensional
- CS:
-
3C reconstruction proposed by Soloff et al. (1997) with correction of misalignment error
- CW:
-
3C reconstruction proposed by Willert (1997) with correction of misalignment error
- IDM:
-
Image deformation method
- MTF:
-
Modulation transfer function
- MTF2C :
-
Modulation transfer function associated to the PIV process
- MTFΔz :
-
Modulation transfer function associated to the misalignment
- MTFLT :
-
Modulation transfer function associated to the laser thickness for the 3C displacement
- MTFLTc :
-
Modulation transfer function associated to the laser thickness for the camera c
- NCS:
-
3C reconstruction proposed by Soloff et al. (1997) without correction of misalignment error
- NCW:
-
3C reconstruction proposed by Willert (1997) without correction of misalignment error
- PIV:
-
Particle image velocimetry
- THMA:
-
Top hat moving average
- c :
-
camera (1, 2), dimensionless
- dx = [dx, dy, dz]:
-
infinitesimal displacement vector in object space, mm
- dx, dy, dz :
-
3C infinitesimal displacement in object space, mm
- dX c = [dX c , dY c ]:
-
infinitesimal displacement vector in the image plane relative to camera c, pixels
- dX c , dY c :
-
2C infinitesimal displacement in the image plane relative to camera c, pixels
- D u :
-
disparity vector, mm
- E 21 :
-
power spectra of the v component evaluated along the x direction, mm2
- F (c) = [X (c), Y (c)]:
-
vectorial mapping function relative to camera c, pixels/mm
- \( \underline{k} = \left[ {k_{x} ,\;k_{y} ,\;k_{z} } \right] = \left[ {\frac{2\pi }{{\lambda_{x} }},\;\frac{2\pi }{{\lambda_{y} }},\;\frac{2\pi }{{\lambda_{z} }}} \right] \) :
-
wavenumber, rad/mm or rad/pixels
- LT:
-
laser thickness, pixels or mm
- P:
-
point in the measurement plane, dimensionless
- R cl (R cr):
-
resolution measured in the left (right) side of the image recorded by the camera c, pixels/mm
- RR max :
-
maximum ratio between the resolutions measured in the same measurement point of the images recorded by the two cameras, dimensionless
- t c :
-
phase of the sinusoidal component relative to camera c used in 3C reconstruction without correction of the misalignment errors, mm
- u, v, w :
-
3C displacement in object space, mm
- u c , v c :
-
2C displacement relative to camera c, mm
- W :
-
interrogation windows linear dimension, pixels or mm
- x, y, z :
-
coordinates in object space, mm
- X c , Y c :
-
coordinates relative to camera c in the image plane, pixels
- X (c) :
-
mapping function of the image coordinates X c , pixels/mm
- Y (c) :
-
mapping function of the image coordinates Y c , pixels/mm
- α c :
-
angle between the viewing ray and the plane yz measured in the xz plane, rad
- β c :
-
angle between the viewing ray and the plane xz measured in the yz plane, rad
- Δα = |α 2| − |α 1|:
-
difference in the same measurement point between the absolute values of the viewing angles of the two cameras, rad
- Δz :
-
local misalignment between calibration and measurement planes, mm
- φ :
-
phase in measured sinusoidal component caused by misalignment, rad
- λ :
-
wavelength, mm or pixels
- ξ c :
-
vector obtained by intersecting the optical axis of camera c and the laser sheet, mm
References
Astarita T (2006) Analysis of interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV: effect of noise on the accuracy and spatial resolution. Exp Fluids 40:977–987
Coudert S, Schon JP (2001) Back-projection algorithm with misalignment corrections for 2D3C stereoscopic PIV. Meas Sci Technol 12:1371–1381
Coudert S, Westerweel J (2000) Comparison between warping and mapping methods on a Stereoscopic 2D3C DPIV system with Scheimpflug conditions. In: EuroMech 411 colloquium, Rouen, 29–31 May 2000
Fei R, Merzkirch W (2004) Investigation of the measurement accuracy of stereo particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 37:559–565
Foucaut JM, Carlier J, Stanislas M (2004) PIV optimization for the study of turbulent flow using spectral analysis. Meas Sci Technol 15:1046–1058
Lawson N, Wu J (1997) Three-dimensional particle image velocimetry: experimental error analysis of digital angular stereoscopic system. Meas Sci Technol 8:1455–1464
Lecordier B, Westerweel J (2004) The EUROPIV synthetic image generator. In: Stanislas M, Westerweel J, Kompenhans J (eds) Particle image velocimetry: recent improvements. Springer, Heidelberg
Prasad A (2000) Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 29:103–116
Prasad A, Jensen K (1995) Scheimpflug stereocamera for particle image velocimetry in liquid flows. Appl Opt 34:7092–7099
Raffel M, Willert C, Wereley S, Kompenhans J (2007) Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–214. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72308-0
Scarano F, David L, Bsibsi M, Calluaud D (2005) S-PIV comparative assessment: image dewarping + misalignment correction and pinhole + geometric projection. Exp Fluids 39:257–266
Soloff S, Adrian R, Liu Z (1997) Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 8:1441–1454
Stanislas M, Okamoto K, Kähler CJ, Westerweel J, Scarano F (2008) Main results of the third international PIV challenge. Exp Fluids 45:27–71
Tsai RY (1987) A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses. IEEE J Rob Autom 4:RA-3
Westerweel J, van Oord J (2000) Stereoscopic PIV measurement in a turbulent boundary layer. In: Stanislas M et al (eds) Particle image velocimetry: progress towards industrial application. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 459–478
Wieneke B (2005) Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Exp Fluids 39:267–280
Willert C (1997) Stereoscopic digital particle image velocimetry for application in wind tunnel flows. Meas Sci Technol 8:1465–1479
Willert C (2006) Assessment of camera models for use in planar velocimetry calibration. Exp Fluids 41:135–143
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giordano, R., Astarita, T. Spatial resolution of the Stereo PIV technique. Exp Fluids 46, 643–658 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0589-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0589-y