Abstract
Recent improvements in three techniques for measuring skin friction in two- and three-dimensional turbulent wall-bounded shear flows are presented. The techniques are: oil-film interferometry, hot wires mounted near the wall, and surface hot-film sensors based on MEMS technology. First, we demonstrate that the oil-film interferometry technique can be used to measure the skin-friction magnitude and its direction in two- and three-dimensional wall-bounded shear flows. Second, a simple method is outlined to measure the skin friction with a wall wire located outside of the viscous sublayer. Finally, a systematic study of the parameters influencing wall-friction measurements with MEMS sensors is presented. The results demonstrate that accurate measurements of the mean skin friction with MEMS sensors are possible in two- and three-dimensional wall flows. Measurements by the three techniques are compared to each other and to past measurements in the same facility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruns JM, Fernholz HH, Monkewitz PA (1999) An experimental investigation of a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer in an S-shaped duct. J Fluid Mech 393:175–213
Bruns JM (1998) Experimental investigation of a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer in an S-shaped duct. Verlag Dr. Köster, Berlin
Fernholz HH, Janke G, Schober M, Wagner PM, Warnack D (1996) New developments and applications of skin-friction measuring techniques. Meas Sci Technol 7:1396–1409
Fernholz HH, Warnack D (1998) The effects of a favourable pressure gradient and of the Reynolds number on an incompressible axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer. 1. The turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 359:329–356
Hanratty TJ, Campbell J A (1983) Measurement of wall shear stress. In: Fluid mechanics measurements. Hemisphere, New York, pp 559–615
Haritonidis JH (1989) Measurement of wall shear stress. In: Advances in fluid mechanics measurements. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 229–261
Ho CM, Tai YC (1998) Micro-electro-mechanical-systems (MEMS) and fluid flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 30:579–612
Janke G (1994) Über die Grundlagen und einige Anwendungen der ölfilm-interferometrie zur Messung von Wandreibungsfeldern in Luftstromungen. Technische Universitat Berlin
Jiang F, Tai YC, Gupta B, Goodman R, Tung S, Huang JB, Ho CM (1996) Surface-micromachined shear stress imager. In: Micro electro mechanical systems workshop (MEMS96). IEEE, New York, pp 110–115
Jiang F, Tai YC, Walsh K, Tsao T, Lee GB, Ho CH (1997) A flexible MEMS technology and its first application to shear stress sensors. In: Micro electro mechanical systems workshop (MEMS97). IEEE, New York, pp 465–470
Nishizawa N, Marusic I, Perry AE, Hornung HG (1998) Measurement of wall shear stress in turbulent boundary layers using an optical interferometry method. In: 13th Australian fluid mechanics conference, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Österlund J (1999) Experimental studies of zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow. KTH, Stockholm
Seto J, Hornung HG (1993) Two-directional skin friction measurement utilizing a compact internally-mounted thin-liquid-film skin friction meter. AIAA paper 93–0180
Tanner LH, Blows LG (1976) A study of the motion of oil films on surfaces in air flow, with application to the measurement of skin friction. J Phys E 9:194–202
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Education and Science (OFES) under contract BBWN2.97.0294. The present study was also part of the European project AEROMEMS, contract BRPR-CT97–0573, which investigates the feasibility of using MEMS technology for boundary layer control on aircraft. The contributions of the second author were supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, USAF, under grant number F49620–01–1-0445, and ERCOFTAC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruedi, J.D., Nagib, H., Österlund, J. et al. Evaluation of three techniques for wall-shear measurements in three-dimensional flows. Exp Fluids 35, 389–396 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0650-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0650-9