Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risikofaktoren und Prophylaxe der rhegmatogenen Netzhautablösung bei Erwachsenen

S1-Leitlinie der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft (DOG), der Retinologischen Gesellschaft (RG) und des Berufsverbands der Augenärzte Deutschlands e. V. (BVA). Version: 05.05.2022

Risk factors and prophylaxis of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in adults

S1 guidelines of the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG), the Retinological Society (RG) and the German Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA). Version: 5 May 2022

  • Leitlinien, Stellungnahmen und Empfehlungen
  • Published:
Die Ophthalmologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AWMF:

Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.

BVA:

Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands

DOG:

Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft

RG:

Retinologische Gesellschaft

Literatur

  1. Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST et al (2020) Posterior vitreous detachment, retinal breaks, and lattice degeneration preferred practice pattern\circledR. Ophthalmology 127:P146–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzales CR, Gupta A, Schwartz SD, Kreiger AE (2004) The fellow eye of patients with phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment from atrophic holes of lattice degeneration without posterior vitreous detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1400–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta OP, Benson WE (2005) The risk of fellow eyes in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:175–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Leeuwen R, Haarman AEG, van de Put MAJ, Klaver CCW, Los LI (2021) Association of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment incidence with myopia prevalence in the Netherlands. JAMA Ophthalmol 139:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Achour H, Thomseth VM, Kvaløy JT, Krohn J, Paaske Utheim T, Forsaa VA (2022) Substantial increase in the incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Western Norway over 20 years. Acta Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laatikainen L, Harju H (1985) Bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 63:541–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van de Put MAJ, Hooymans JMM, Los LI, Dutch Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group (2013) The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in The Netherlands. Ophthalmology 120:616–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Falconio G, Gallenga PE (1999) Treatment of retinal tears and lattice degenerations in fellow eyes in high risk patients suffering retinal detachment: a prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1046–1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis MD (1974) Natural history of retinal breaks without detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 92:183–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shea M, Davis MD, Kamel I (1974) Retinal breaks without detachment, treated and untreated. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 12:97–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilkinson CP (2014) Interventions for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration for preventing retinal detachment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD3170

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson DM, Norton EW (1973) Long-term follow-up of treated retinal breaks. Am J Ophthalmol 75:395–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benson WE, Morse PH, Nantawan P (1977) Late complications following cryotherapy of lattice degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 84:514–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Snead MP, Snead DRJ, James S, Richards AJ (2008) Clinicopathological changes at the vitreoretinal junction: posterior vitreous detachment. Eye (Lond) 22:1257–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Byer NE (1994) Natural history of posterior vitreous detachment with early management as the premier line of defense against retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 101:1503–1513 (discussion 1513–4)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coffee RE, Westfall AC, Davis GH, Mieler WF, Holz ER (2007) Symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment and the incidence of delayed retinal breaks: case series and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 144:409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dayan MR, Jayamanne DG, Andrews RM, Griffiths PG (1996) Flashes and floaters as predictors of vitreoretinal pathology: is follow-up necessary for posterior vitreous detachment? Eye (Lond) 10(4):456–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Overdam KA, Bettink-Remeijer MW, Mulder PG, van Meurs JC (2001) Symptoms predictive for the later development of retinal breaks. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1483–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Byer NE (2000) Can rhegmatogenous retinal detachment be prevented? Reflections on the history of „prophylactic“ treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmologe 97:696–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Smiddy WE, Flynn HW, Nicholson DH et al (1991) Results and complications in treated retinal breaks. Am J Ophthalmol 112:623–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer-Schwickerath G, Fried M (1980) Prophylaxis of retinal detachment. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 100:56–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma MC, Regillo CD, Shuler MF, Borrillo JL, Benson WE (2004) Determination of the incidence and clinical characteristics of subsequent retinal tears following treatment of the acute posterior vitreous detachment-related initial retinal tears. Am J Ophthalmol 138:280–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Byer NE (1998) What happens to untreated asymptomatic retinal breaks, and are they affected by posterior vitreous detachment? Ophthalmology 105:1045–1049 (discussion 1049–50)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ang GS, Townend J, Lois N (2012) Interventions for prevention of giant retinal tear in the fellow eye. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD6909

    Google Scholar 

  25. Folk JC, Bennett SR, Klugman MR, Arrindell EL, Boldt HC (1990) Prophylactic treatment to the fellow eye of patients with phakic lattice retinal detachment: analysis of failures and risks of treatment. Retina 10:165–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Byer NE (1989) Long-term natural history of lattice degeneration of the retina. Ophthalmology 96:1396–1401 (discussion 1401–2)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Benson WE, Morse PH (1978) The prognosis of retinal detachment due to lattice degeneration. Ann Ophthalmol 10:1197–1200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Parma ES, Körkkö J, Hagler WS, Ala-Kokko L (2002) Radial perivascular retinal degeneration: a key to the clinical diagnosis of an ocular variant of Stickler syndrome with minimal or no systemic manifestations. Am J Ophthalmol 134:728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fincham GS, Pasea L, Carroll C et al (2014) Prevention of retinal detachment in Stickler syndrome: the Cambridge prophylactic cryotherapy protocol. Ophthalmology 121:1588–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Snead MP, Richards AJ, McNinch AM et al (2021) Stickler syndrome—lessons from a national cohort. Eye (Lond). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01776-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Neumann E, Hyams S (1972) Conservative management of retinal breaks. A follow-up study of subsequent retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 56:482–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Verhoekx JSN, van Etten PG, Wubbels RJ, van Meurs JC, van Overdam KA (2020) Prophylactic laser treatment to decrease the incidence of retinal detachment in fellow eyes of idiopathic giant retinal tears. Retina 40:1094–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ripandelli G, Rossi T, Cacciamani A, Scarinci F, Piaggi P, Stirpe M (2016) LASER PROPHYLACTIC treatment of the fellow eye in giant retinal tears: long-term follow-up. Retina 36:962–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Redaktionskomitee

Prof. Dr. Bernd Bertram; Prof. Dr. Nicolas Feltgen; Prof. Dr. Lars-Olof Hattenbach; Prof. Dr. Horst Helbig; Prof. Dr. Hans Hoerauf; Dr. Thomas Kreutzer; Prof. Dr. Albrecht Lommatzsch; Angelika Ostrowski; Prof. Dr. Siegfried G. Priglinger; Prof. Dr. Armin Wolf

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

    Consortia

    Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft (DOG)

    • Bernd Bertram
    • , Nicolas Feltgen
    • , Lars-Olof Hattenbach
    • , Horst Helbig
    • , Hans Hoerauf
    • , Thomas Kreutzer
    • , Albrecht Lommatzsch
    • , Angelika Ostrowski
    • , Siegfried G. Priglinger
    •  & Armin Wolf

    Retinologische Gesellschaft e. V. (RG)

    Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands e. V. (BVA)

    Ethics declarations

    Interessenkonflikt

    Tab. 2

    Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

    The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

    Additional information

    AWMF-Register Nr. 045-025 nnn/mmm Klasse: S1

    Versionsnummer: 1.0

    Erstveröffentlichung: Mai 2022

    Nächste Überprüfung geplant: März 2027

    Das Redaktionskomitee dieser Stellungnahme wird am Beitragsende gelistet.

    figure qr

    QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft (DOG)., Retinologische Gesellschaft e. V. (RG). & Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands e. V. (BVA). Risikofaktoren und Prophylaxe der rhegmatogenen Netzhautablösung bei Erwachsenen. Ophthalmologie 120 (Suppl 1), 38–43 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-022-01775-4

    Download citation

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-022-01775-4

    Search

    Navigation